Abstract
We propose the so-called chance constrained programming model of stochastic programming theory to analyze limit and shakedown loads of structures under random strength with a lognormal distribution. A dual chance constrained programming algorithm is developed to calculate simultaneously both the upper and lower bounds of the plastic collapse limit and the shakedown limit. The edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) is used with three-node linear triangular elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belytschko T (1972) Plane stress shakedown analysis by finite element. Int J Mech Sci 14(9):619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(72)90061-6
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 6(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1962) Chance-constrained and normal deviates. J Am Statist Assoc 57(279):134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1962.10482155
Cobb B, Rumí R, Salmerón A (2012) Approximating the distribution of a sum of log-normal random variables. In: Proceedings of the sixth european workshop on probabilistic graphical models (PGM’2012), Granada, Spain, pp. 67-74. http://leo.ugr.es/pgm2012/proceedings/eproceedings/cobb_approximating.pdf. Accessed 19–21 Sept 2012
Corradi L, Zavelani A (1974) A linear programming approach to shakedown analysis of structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90041-3
Ellis JH, Zimmerman JJ, Corotis RB (1991) Stochastic programs for identifying critical structural collapse mechanisms. Appl Math Modell 15:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(91)90062-T
Fenton LF (1960) The sum of lognormal probability distributions in scatter transmission systems. IRE Trans Commun Syst 8(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097606
Garcea G, Armentano G, Petrolo S, Casciaro R (2005) Finite element shakedown analysis of two-dimensional structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng 63:1174–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1316
Gaydon FA, McCrum AW (1954) A theoretical investigation of the yield point loading of a square plate with a central circular hole. J Mech Phys Solids 2:156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(54)90022-8
Genna F (1988) A non-linear inequality, finite element approach to the direct computation of the shakedown load safety factor. Int J Mech Sci 30:769–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(88)90041-0
Groß-Weege J (1997) On the numerical assessment of the safety factor of elastic-plastic structures under variable loading. Int J Mech Sci 39(4):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00039-2
Heitzer M, Staat M (2000) Reliability analysis of elasto-plastic structures under variable loads. In: Maier G, Weichert D (eds) Inelastic analysis of structures under variable loads: theory and engineering applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9421-4_17
Heitzer M, Staat M (2002) Limit and shakedown analysis with uncertain data. In: Marti K (ed) Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (LNEMS), stochastic optimization techniques, numerical methods and technical applications, vol 513. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 253–267
Heitzer M, Staat M (2003) Basis reduction technique for limit and shakedown problems. In: Staat M, Heitzer M (eds) Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach, vol 15. Part I. NIC Series. John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich, pp 1–55. http://hdl.handle.net/2128/2926
Heitzer M, Pop G, Staat M (2000) Basis reduction for the shakedown problem for bounded kinematic hardening material. J Global Optim 17(1–4):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008321026063
Kataoka S (1963) Stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31(1–2):181–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910956
Kolbin VV (1977) Stochastic Programming. D. Reidel. Dordrecht, Boston
Li Pu, Arellano-Garcia H, Wozny G (2008) Chance constrained programming approach to process optimization under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 32(1–2):25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.05.009
Liu GR, Nguyen TT (2010) Smoothed finite element methods. CRC, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439820278
Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2002) Lower bound limit analysis using non-linear programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 55:573–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.511
Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (2006) Methods of structural safety. 2nd edn. Dover, Mineola, New York
Makrodimopoulos A, Bisbos C (2003) Shakedown analysis of plane stress problems via SOCP. In: Staat M, Heitzer M (eds) Numerical methods for limit and shakedown analysis. Deterministic and probabilistic approach, vol 15. Part VI. NIC Series. John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich, pp 185–216
Mehta N, Wu J, Molisch A, Zhang J (2007) Approximating a sum of random variables with a lognormal. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 6(7):2690–2699. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2007.051000
Pham PT, Staat M (2014) FEM-based shakedown analysis of hardening structures. Asia Pacific J Comput Eng 1(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1166-1-4
Proske D (2018) Bridge collapse frequencies versus failure probabilities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73833-8
Rao SS (2009) Engineering optimization. Theory and practice, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470549124
Sikorski KA, Borkowski A (1990) Ultimate load analysis by stochastic programming. In: Smith DL (ed) Mathematical Programming Methods in Structural Plasticity. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 299. Springer, Wien, New York, pp 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2618-9_20
Simon JW, Weichert D (2012) Shakedown analysis of engineering structures with limited kinematical hardening. Int J Solids Struct 49:2177–2186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.039
Staat M (2004) Limit and shakedown analysis under uncertainty. Int J Comput Methods 11(2):1343008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876213430081
Staat M, Heitzer M (eds) (2003a) Probabilistic limit and shakedown problems. In: Numerical methods for limit and shakedown analysis. Deterministic and probabilistic approach. Part VII. NIC series vol. 15. John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich, pp 217–268. http://hdl.handle.net/2128/2926
Staat M, Heitzer M (eds) (2003b) Numerical methods for limit and shakedown analysis. deterministic and probabilistic approach. NIC Series vol. 15. John von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich. http://hdl.handle.net/2128/2926
Thoft-Cristensen P, Baker MJ (1982) Structural reliability theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin
Tin-Loi F, Wei Z (1999) Elastoplastic analysis of structures under uncertainty: model and solution methods. Numer Funct Anal Optim 20(3–4):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/01630569908816897
Tin-Loi F, Qi L, Wei Z, Womersley RS (1996) Stochastic ultimate load analysis: models and solution methods. Numer Funct Anal Opt 17(9–10):1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01630569608816740
Tran TN, Staat M (2015) Uncertain multimode failure and shakedown analysis of shells. In: Fuschi P, Pisano AA, Weichert D (eds) Direct methods for limit and shakedown analysis of structures, Chap. 14. Springer, Cham, pp 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12928-0_14
Trần TN, Staat M (2013) An edge-based smoothed finite element method for primal-dual shakedown analysis of structures under uncertainties. In: de Saxcé G, Oueslati A, Charkaluk E, Tritsch JB (eds) Limit states of materials and structures: direct methods, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5425-6_5
Tran TN, Kreißig R, Staat M (2009) Probabilistic limit and shakedown analysis of thin plates and shells. Struct Saf 31(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.10.003
Tran TN, Liu GR, Nguyen-Xuan H, Nguyen-Thoi T (2010) An edge-based smoothed finite element method for primal–dual shakedown analysis of structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng 82(7):917–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2804
Trần TN, Phạm PT, Vũ ĐK, Staat M (2009) Reliability analysis of inelastic shell structures under variable loads. In: Weichert D, Ponter ARS (eds) Limit states of materials and structures: direct methods. Springer, Netherlands, pp 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9634-1_7
Trần NT, Trần TN, Matthies HG, Stavroulakis GE, Staat M (2016a) FEM shakedown analysis of uncertain structures by chance constrained programming. PAMM Proc Appl Math Mech 16(1):715–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201610346
Trần NT, Trần TN, Matthies HG, Stavroulakis GE, Staat M (2016) FEM shakedown analysis of plate bending under stochastic uncertainty by chance constrained programming. In: Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V, Stefanou G, Plevris V(eds) VII European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS congress 2016. Crete Island, Greece, 5–10 June 2016, vol 2, pp 3007–3019. https://doi.org/10.7712/100016.2012.11106
Trần NT, Trần TN, Matthies HG, Stavroulakis GE, Staat M (2017) In: Barrera O, Cocks A, Ponter A (eds) Advances in direct methods for materials and structures, Chap 6. Springer, Cham, pp 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59810-9_6
Vu DK (2002) Dual limit and shakedown analysis of structures. PhD Thesis. Université de Liège, Belgique
Vu DK, Yan AM, Nguyen DH (2004) A primal-dual algorithm for shakedown analysis of structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:4663–4674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.03.011
Vu DK, Staat M, Tran IT (2007) Analysis of pressure equipment by application of the primal-dual theory of shakedown. Commun Numer Methods Eng 23(3):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.891
Zouain N (2017) Shakedown and safety assessment. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics. Part 2: Solids and structures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119176817.ecm2031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trần, N.T., Staat, M. Direct plastic structural design under lognormally distributed strength by chance constrained programming. Optim Eng 21, 131–157 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-019-09437-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-019-09437-2