Optimization and Engineering

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 407–442 | Cite as

Enhanced indexing for risk averse investors using relaxed second order stochastic dominance

Article

Abstract

The less efficient markets offer scope for enhanced indexing (EI), an investment strategy of portfolio selection which seeks to earn more return than the benchmark index. In this context, we examine the use of relaxed second order stochastic dominance (RSSD) by introducing underachievement and overachievement variables in the second order stochastic dominance (SSD), for EI. We propose a linear optimization model that maximizes the mean return subject to the constraints formed using RSSD. We impose bounds on the ratio of the total underachievement to the sum of total underachievement and total overachievement variables depicting the risk-return tradeoff in the model. The proposed model for EI is inspired from many applications of SSD and almost SSD (ASSD). We examine the performance of the proposed model with the SSD model, EI model of maximizing mean return and minimizing the underperformance (MM) from the benchmark index, \(\epsilon \)-almost second order stochastic dominance (\(\epsilon \)-ASSD) model, and the naïve 1/N portfolio, on two Indian stock indices, CNX 100 and CNX 200, through a rolling window strategy. To widen the empirical analysis, we also compare all models on the eight publicly available real financial data sets from Beasley OR library through a single window strategy. The portfolios from the proposed model are shown to produce statistically significant mean excess return and excess Sharpe ratio (both from the benchmark indices) more often than the MM and \(\epsilon \)-ASSD models. Also, the portfolios from the proposed model always have smaller violation area in SSD constraints from benchmark indices than the MM and \(\epsilon \)-ASSD models.

Keywords

Enhanced indexing Stochastic dominance \( \epsilon \)-Almost stochastic dominance Second order stochastic dominance Relaxed stochastic dominance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author is thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for financial support. The authors are indebted to the referees and editors for their valuable suggestions.

References

  1. Alexander C, Dimitriu A (2005) Indexing and statistical arbitrage: tracking error or cointegration? J Portf Manag 31(2):50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruni R, Cesarone F, Scozzari A, Tardella F (2012) A new stochastic dominance approach to enhanced index tracking problems. Econ Bull 32(4):3460–3470Google Scholar
  3. Bruni R, Cesarone F, Scozzari A, Tardella F (2015) A linear risk-return model for enhanced indexation. OR Spectr 37(3):735–759CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Beasley JE, Meade N, Chang T-J (2003) An evolutionary heuristic for the index tracking problem. Eur J Oper Res 148(3):621–643MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley IRC, Korn R (1998) Optimal index tracking under transaction costs and impulse control. Int J Theor Appl Finance 1(3):315–330CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheong M-P, Sheble GB, Berleant D, Teoh CC, Argaud J-P, Dancre M, Andrieu L, Barjon F (2007) Second order stochastic dominance portfolio optimization for an electric energy company. IEEE, Lausanne, pp 819–824. doi: 10.1109/PCT.2007.4538421 MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Canakgoz NA, Beasley JE (2009) Mixed-integer programming approaches for index tracking and enhanced indexation. Eur J Oper Res 196(1):384–399MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman TF, Li Y, Henniger J (2006) Minimizing tracking error while restricting the number of assets. J Risk 8:33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Consiglio A, Zenios SA (2001) Integrated simulation and optimization models for tracking international fixed income indices. Math Program 89:311–339MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2010) Inverse cutting plane methods for optimization problems with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Optimization 59(3):323–338MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. DiBartolomeo D (2000) The enhanced index fund as an alternative to indexed equity management. http://www.northinfo.com/documents/70.pdf
  12. Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2003) Optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 14(2):548–566MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2006) Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. J Bank Finance 30(2):433–451CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Dembo RS (1991) Scenario optimization. Ann Oper Res 30:63–80MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Dupacova J, Kopa M (2014) Robustness of optimal portfolios under risk and stochastic dominance constraints. Eur J Oper Res 234(2):434–441MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R (2009) Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev Financ Stud 22(5):1915–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blasdell S, Zingone R (2010) Enhanced indexing targeting the return/risk ‘sweet spot’. https://careers.jpmorganchase.com/jpmpdf/1158630201479.pdf
  18. Fábián CI, Mitra G, Roman D (2011) Processing second-order stochastic dominance models using cutting-plane representations. Math Progr 130:33–57MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Filippi C, Guastaroba G, Speranza MG (2016) A heuristic framework for the bi-objective enhanced index tracking problem. Omega. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.004 Google Scholar
  20. Guastaroba G, Mansini R, Ogryczak W, Speranza MG (2015) Linear programming models based on omega ratio for the enhanced index tracking problem. Eur J Oper Res. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.037
  21. Guastaroba G, Speranza MG (2012) Kernel search: an application to the index tracking problem. Eur J Oper Res 217(1):54–68MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Haugen RA, Baker NL (1990) Dedicated stock portfolios. J Portf Manag 16(4):17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hadar J, Russell W (1969) Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Am Econ Rev 59(1):25–34Google Scholar
  24. Hu J, Homem-de-Mello T, Mehrotra S (2011) Risk-adjusted budget allocation models with application in homeland security. IIIE Trans 43(12):819–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jansen R, Dijk RV (2002) Optimal benchmark tracking with small portfolios. J Portf Manag 28(2):33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jobst N, Zenios SA (2003) Tracking corporate bond indices in an integrated market and credit risk environment. Quant Finance 3:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koshizuka T, Konno H, Yamamoto R (2009) Index-plus-alpha tracking subject to correlation constraint. Int J Optim 1(2):215–224MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy M (2012) Almost stochastic dominance and efficient investment sets. Am J Oper Res 2(3):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leshno M, Levy H (2002) Preferred by all and preferred by most decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manag Sci 48(8):1074–1085CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Q, Sun L, Bao L (2011) Enhanced index tracking based on multi-objective immune algorithm. Exp Syst Appl 38(5):6101–6106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lizyayev A, Ruszczynski A (2012) Tractable almost stochastic sominance. Eur J Oper Res 218(2):448–455CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Lozano S, Gutiérrez E (2008) Data envelopment analysis of mutual funds based on second-order stochastic dominance. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):230–244MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Lejeune M, Samatli-Pac G (2013) Construction of risk-averse enhanced index funds. INFORMS J Comput 25(4):701–719MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lejeune MA (2012) Game theoretical approach for reliable enhanced indexation. Decis Anal 9(2):146–155MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall AW, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press, San DiegoMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  37. Meade N, Salkin GR (1989) Index funds construction and performance measurement. J Oper Res Soc 40(10):871–879Google Scholar
  38. Mezali H, Beasley JE (2013) Quantile regression for index tracking and enhanced indexation. J Oper Res Soc 64(11):1676–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nie Y, Wu X, Homem-de-Mello T (2012) Optimal path problems with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Netw Spatial Econ 12:561–587MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogryczak W, Ruszczynski A (1999) From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures. Eur J Oper Res 116:33–50CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Quirk JP, Saposnik R (1962) Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Rev Econ Stud 29:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roman D, Darby-Dowman K, Mitra G (2006) Portfolio construction based on stochastic dominance and target return distributions. Math Program 108:541–569MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Roman D, Mitra G (2008) Portfolio selection models: a review and new directions. Wilmott J 1(2):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roman D, Mitra G, Zverovich V (2013) Enhanced indexation based on second-order stochastic dominance. Eur J Oper Res 228(1):273–281MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Riepe MW, Werner MD (1998) Are enhanced index mutual funds worthy of their name? J Invest 7(2):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roll R (1992) A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. J Portf Manag 18(4):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rudolf M, Wolter H-J, Zimmermann H (1999) A linear model for tracking error minimization. J Bank Finance 23:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudolf G, Ruszczynski A (2008) Optimization problems with second order stochastic constraints: duality, compact formulations, and cut generation methods. SIAM J Optim 19(3):1326–1343MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruiz-Torrubiano R, Suárez A (2009) A hybrid optimization approach to index tracking. Ann Oper Res 166:57–71MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Rudd A (1980) Optimal selection of passive portfolios. Fin Manag 9(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharpe WF (1994) The Sharpe ratio. J Portf Manag 21(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treynor JL, Black F (1973) How to use security analysis to improve portfolio selection. J Bus 46(1):66–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsetlin I, Winkler RL, Huang RJ, Tzeng LY (2015) Generalized almost stochastic dominance. Oper Res 63(2):363–377MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Quirk JP, Saposnik R (1962) Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Rev Econ Stud 29(2):140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Varsei M, Shams N, Fahimnia B, Yazdanpanah A (2013) A heuristic approach to the index tracking problem: a case study of the Tehran exxhange price index. Asian Acad Manag J 18(1):19–34Google Scholar
  56. Wilmott P (1998) Derivatives: the theory and practice of financial engineering. Wiley, New York. ISBN 13: 978-0471983897Google Scholar
  57. Whitmore GA (1970) Third-degree stochastic dominance. Am Econ Rev 60(3):457–459Google Scholar
  58. Wu LC, Chou SC, Yang CC, Ong CS (2007) Enhanced index investing based on goal programming. J Portf Manag 33(3):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valle CA, Meade N, Beasley JE (2014) Absolute return portfolios. Omega 45:20–41CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Young MR (1998) A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution. Manag Sci 44(5):673–683CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Zenios SA (2007) Practical financial optimization. Blackwell, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsIndian Institute of Technology Delhi New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations