Skip to main content
Log in

A study using Monte Carlo Simulation for failure probability calculation in Reliability-Based Optimization

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a Reliability-Based Optimization (RBO) methodology that uses Monte Carlo Simulation techniques, is presented. Typically, the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) is used in RBO for failure probability calculation and this is accurate enough for most practical cases. However, for highly nonlinear problems it can provide extremely inaccurate results and may lead to unreliable designs. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is usually more accurate than FORM but very computationally intensive. In the RBO methodology presented in this paper, limit state approximations are used in conjunction with MCS techniques in an approximate MCS-based RBO that facilitates the efficient calculation of the probabilities of failure. A FORM-based RBO is first performed to obtain the initial limit state approximations. A Symmetric Rank-1 (SR1) variable metric algorithm is used to construct and update the quadratic limit state approximations. The approximate MCS-based RBO uses a conditional-expectation-based MCS, that was chosen over indicator-based MCS because of the smoothness of the probability of failure estimates and the availability of analytic sensitivities. The RBO methodology was implemented for an analytic test problem and a higher-dimensional, control-augmented-structure test problem. The results indicate that the SR1 algorithm provides accurate limit state approximations (and therefore accurate estimates of the probabilities of failure) for these test problems. It was also observed that the RBO methodology required two orders of magnitude fewer analysis calls than an approach that used exact limit state evaluations for both test problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjerager P (1989) Methods for structural reliability computations. Technical report, University of California, Berkeley. Lecture Notes for the course structural reliability: methods and applications

  • Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO (1996) Structural reliability methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

  • Enevoldsen I, Sørensen JD (1993) Reliability-Based Optimization of series systems of parallel systems. J Structural Eng 119(4):1069–1084

  • Enevoldsen I, Sørensen JD (1994) Reliability-Based Optimization in structural engineering. Structural Safety 15(3):169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelund S, Rackwitz R (1993) A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Structural Safety 12:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandhi RV, Wang L (1998) Reliability-based structural optimization using improved two-point adaptive nonlinear approximations. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 29

  • Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

  • Kirjner-Neto C, Polak E, Der Kiureghian A (1998) An outer approximations approach to reliability-based optimal design of structures. J Optimiz Theor Appl 98(1):1–16

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuschel N, Rackwitz R (1997) Two basic problems in reliability-based structural optimization. Math Meth Operations Res 46(3):309–333

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P-L, Der Kiureghian A (1991) Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Structural Safety 9:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P-L, Der Kiureghian A (1986) Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Prob Eng Mech 1(2):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes MA, Breitung K, Dupuis DJ (1993) Asymptotic importance sampling. Structural Safety 12:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical optimization, springer series in operations research. Springer

  • Oakley DR, Sues RH, Rhodes GS (1998) Performance optimization of multidisciplinary mechanical systems subject to uncertainties. Prob Eng Mech 13(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberkampf WL, DeLand SM, Rutherford BM, Diegert KV, Alvin KF (2000) Estimation of total uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Technical Report SAND2000-0824, Sandia National Laboratories

  • Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. The Annals Math Stat 23(3):470–472

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Bloebaum CL, Hajela P (1990) Sensitivity of control-augmented structure obtained by a system decomposition method. AIAA J 29(2):264–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen JD, Enevoldsen I (1993) Sensitivity weaknesses in application of some statistical distributions in first order reliability methods. Structural Safety 12:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Design, Trans ASME 121:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanesh Padmanabhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padmanabhan, D., Agarwal, H., Renaud, J.E. et al. A study using Monte Carlo Simulation for failure probability calculation in Reliability-Based Optimization. Optim Eng 7, 297–316 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-006-9973-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-006-9973-8

Keywords

Navigation