Skip to main content
Log in

Process optimization under uncertainty when there is not enough process data at the operation stage

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main issues in the design and optimization of a chemical process under uncertainty are the feasibility test, flexibility index and the two-step optimization problem. The formulations of these problems are based on the implicit supposition that at the operation stage it is possible to correct all uncertain parameters in the chemical process models. However, in practice, one can improve the accuracy of only some of the uncertain parameters. As a result, we consider two groups of uncertain parameters. We postulate that one can significantly improve the accuracy of the first group of uncertain parameters using process data at the operation stage. This necessitates the formulation of a new feasibility test and the associated two-stage optimization problem. We consider the general case when both groups of uncertain parameters may or may not be statistically dependent. We propose methods of solving the problems based on the supposition that the parametric uncertainty region is small. Under this condition, the process models are well represented by linearized models whose accuracy is asymptotically equal to that of the original process models. This leads to substantial computational savings. Computational tests show that when it is not possible to improve the accuracy of some of the uncertain parameters, using standard flexibility analysis can lead to processes that are not flexible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahri PA, Bandoni JA, Romagnoli JA (1996) Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: steady-state open-loop back off problem. AIChE J 42:983–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo FP, Pistikopoulos EN, Saraiva PM (1999) Integration and computational issues in stochastic design and planning optimization problems. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3056

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan B, Luther HA, Wilkes JO (1969) Applied numerical methods. Wiley, New York

  • Fogler HS (1999) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

  • Grossmann IE, Floudas CA (1987) Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes. Comp Chem Eng 11:675–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halemane KP, Grossmann IE (1983) Optimal process design under uncertainty. AIChE J 29:425–433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hettich R, Kortanek KO (1993) Semi-infinite programming: theory, methods and applications. SIAM Rev 35(3):380–429

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey JCC (1952) Introduction to the theory of games. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky GM, Volin, YuM, Barit EI, Senyavin MM (1994) Flexibility analysis and optimization of chemical plants. Comput Chem Eng 18:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky GM, Volin YuM, Senyavin MM (1997) An approach to solving a two-stage optimization problem under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 21:311–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky GM, Achenie LEK, Karalapakkam AM, Volin YuM (2002) Flexibility analysis of chemical processes: selected global optimization sub-problems. Optim Eng 3:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrovsky G, Achenie LEK, Datskov I, Volin Y (2004) Uncertainty at both design and operation stages. Chem Eng Comm 191:105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Paules GE, Floudas CA (1992) Stochastic programming in process synthesis: a two-stage model with MINLP recourse for multiperiod heat-integrated distillation sequences. Comput Chem Eng 16:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistikopoulos EN, Grossmann IE (1989) Optimal retrofit design for improving process flexibility in nonlinear systems-1. Fixed degree of flexibility. Comput Chem Eng 12:1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistikopoulos EN, Ierapetritou MG (1995) Novel approach for optimal process design under uncertainty. Comp Chem Eng 19:1089–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raspanty CG, Bandoni JA, Biegler LT (2000) New strategy for flexibility analysis and design under uncertainty. Comp Chem Eng 24:2193–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reemtsen R, Gorner S (1998) Numerical methods for semi-infinite programming: a survey. In: Reemtsen R, Ruckman J-J (eds) Semi-infinitive programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 195–275

  • Rooney WC, Biegler LT (2003) Optimal process design with model parameter uncertainty and process variability. AIChE J 49:438–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub DA, Grossmann IE (1993) Design optimization of stochastic flexibility. Comput Chem Eng 17:339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh S, Perkins J (1996) Operability and control in process synthesis and design. In: Anderson JL (ed) Process synthesis. Academic Press, New York, pp 301–341

  • Waltz RA, Nocedal J (2002) Knitro 2.0 user’s. Northwestern University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Ekem Kweku Achenie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Datskov, I., Ostrovsky, G.M., Achenie, L.E.K. et al. Process optimization under uncertainty when there is not enough process data at the operation stage. Optim Eng 7, 249–276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-006-9971-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-006-9971-x

Keywords

Navigation