Empirical papers analysing the transmission of (unconventional) monetary policy typically rely on a vector autoregressive framework. In this paper, I complement these studies and employ a matching approach to examine the impact of the Bank of England’s asset purchase program on macroeconomic quantities in the UK. My sample covers the period March 2001−December 2015 and five small open inflation targeting economies. Using entropy balancing, I create a synthetic control group comprised of credible counterfactuals for the sample of observations subject to quantitative easing (QE). My key results indicate that a 100 bn GBP increase in QE has a significant and positive effect on GDP growth with a peak effect of 0.66−0.69 percentage points (pp) after 30 months. The same increase leads to a reduction in the inflation gap with a peak effect between −0.77 and −0.94 pp after 30 months. An in-depth analysis reveals that the latter finding is not driven by the choice of the empirical methodology. In contrast, I find that the returns on QE in the UK are decreasing (i) over time and (ii) with the volume of QE. Consequently, monetary policymakers should be aware of the fact that the returns on QE might be non-linear and that QE eventually could have detrimental effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Note that the inclusion of further macroeconomic variables is not feasible as this would violate the condition of perfect covariate balancing.
Note that the difference in GDP growth between treated and non-treated units is not statistically significant when focusing on the financial crisis subsample.
Note that applying the same exercises in the case of the treatment effects on GDP growth does neither reveal a clear pattern over time nor a distinct non-linearity. The results are available on request.
Angrist JD, Jorda O, Kuersteiner GM (2018) Semiparametric estimates of monetary policy effects: String theory revisited. J Bus Econ Stat 36(3):371–387
Bauer MD, Rudebusch GD (2014) The signaling channel for federal reserve bond purchases. Int J Cent Bank 10(3):233–289
Baumeister C, Benati L (2013) Unconventional monetary policy and the great recession: Estimating the macroeconomic effects of a spread compression at the zero lower bound. Int J Cent Bank 9(2):165–212
Breedon F, Chadha JS, Waters A (2012) The financial market impact of UK quantitative easing. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 28(4):702–728
Christensen JHE, Rudebusch GD (2012) The response of interest rates to US and UK quantitative easing. Econ J 122(564):F385–F414
Cloyne J, Hürtgen P (2016) The macroeconomic effects of monetary policy: a new measure for the United Kingdom. American Econ J: Macroeconomics 8(4):75–102
Diamond A, Sekhon JS (2013) Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Rev Econ Stat 95(3):932–945
Gambacorta L, Hofmann B, Peersman G (2014) The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross-country analysis. J Money, Credit, Bank 46(4):615–642
Goodhart CAE, Ashworth JP (2012) QE: A successful start may be running into diminishing returns. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 28(4):640–670
Hainmueller J (2012) Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate re-weighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Polit Anal 20(1):25–46
Joyce MAS, Lasaosa A, Stevens I, Tong M (2011a) The financial market impact of quantitative easing in the United Kingdom. Int J Cent Bank 7(3):113–161
Joyce M, Tong M, Woods R (2011b) The United Kingdom’s quantitative easing policy: Design, operation, and impact. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2011Q3, 200–212
Joyce M, Miles D, Scott A, Vayanos D (2012) Quantitative easing and unconventional monetary policy – an introduction. Econ J 122(564):F271–F288
Kapetanios G, Mumtaz H, Stevens I, Theodoridis K (2012) Assessing the economy-wide effects of quantitative easing. Econ J 122(564):F316–F347
Lin S, Ye H (2007) Does inflation targeting really make a difference? evaluating the treatment effect of inflation targeting in seven industrial countries. J Monet Econ 54(8):2521–2533
Meaning J, Zhu F (2011) The impact of recent central bank asset purchase programmes. BIS Quarterly Review December 2011:73–83
Martin C, Milas C (2012) Quantitative easing: A sceptical survey. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 28(4):750–764
Neuenkirch M, Tillmann P (2016) Does a good central banker make a difference? Econ Inq 54(3):1541–1560
Romer CD, Romer DH (2004) A new measure of monetary shocks: Derivation and implications. Am Econ Rev 94(4):1055–1084
Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48(1):1–48
Uhlig H (2005) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? results from an agnostic identification procedure. J Monet Econ 52(2):381–419
Weale M, Wieladek T (2016) What are the macroeconomic effects of asset purchases? J Monet Econ 79:81–93
Williamson SD (2017) Quantitative easing: How well does this tool work? J Regul Econ 2017Q3:8–14
Wu JC, Xia FD (2016) Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound. J Money, Credit, Bank 48(2–3):253–291
I wish to thank Yesmine Arousse for excellent research assistance. I am also indebted to two anonymous referees, Tobias Kranz, Florian Neumeier, Peter Tillmann, Arina Wischnewsky, and participants of the Money, Macro and Finance Group 49th Annual Conference in London for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper. Financial support from the Deutsche Bundesbank, Hauptverwaltung in Rheinland-Pfalz und dem Saarland is gratefully acknowledged.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Neuenkirch, M. An Unconventional Approach to Evaluate the Bank of England’s Asset Purchase Program. Open Econ Rev 31, 79–94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-019-09527-9
- Asset purchases
- Bank of England
- Entropy balancing
- Quantitative easing
- Treatment effects
- Unconventional monetary policy