Open Economies Review

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 319–341 | Cite as

Current Accounts and Coordination of Wage Bargaining

  • Mika NieminenEmail author
  • Kari Heimonen
  • Timo Tohmo
Research Article


This study provides novel evidence on the impact of labor market institutions on current account dynamics. Our results suggest that a high degree of coordination of wage bargaining has a positive effect on the current account balance over the long run. This result is not driven entirely by wage moderation induced by centralized wage setting. We also provide robust evidence that a high degree of coordination of wage bargaining is associated with a slower current account adjustment toward its long-run equilibrium. This result seems theoretically plausible; the aggregate shocks in the exporting sector are largely driven by idiosyncratic shocks and the presence of idiosyncratic shocks increases the importance of labor market flexibility. Overall, our analysis of the impact of labor market institutions on current account dynamics complements the existing empirical current account literature focused on macroeconomic and financial measures.


Current account balance Current account dynamics Coordination of wage bargaining Exchange rate adjustment 

JEL Classification

F21 F32 F41 



We thank two anonymous referees, Ansgar Belke, Stephen G. Hall, Sercan Eraslan, Niku Määttänen, Tomi Kortela and the other participants at the 21st Annual International Conference on Macroeconomic Analysis and International Finance, FDPE Macroeconomics Workshop I/2016, Finnish Economic Association XXXVIII Annual Meeting, BOFIT seminar at the Bank of Finland, as well as Zuzana Fungáčová, Juho Jokinen, Mika Maliranta and Matthias Strifler for useful comments and suggestions. Mika Nieminen acknowledges financial support from the OP Group Research Foundation, the Alfred Kordelin Foundation and Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition. This study is part of the work of the JSBE Research Group on International Macro and Finance (JyIMaF) which acknowledges financial support from the OP Group Research Foundation.

Supplementary material

11079_2018_9511_MOESM1_ESM.docx (173 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 172 kb)


  1. Aidt TS, Tzannatos Z (2008) Trade unions, collective bargaining and macroeconomic performance: a review. Ind Relat J 39:258–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenman J, Chinn MD, Ito H (2010) The emerging global financial architecture: tracing and evaluating the new patterns of the trilemma’s configurations. J Int Money Financ 29:615–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth E, Zweimüller J (1995) Relative wages under decentralized and corporatist bargaining systems. Scand J Econ 97:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2012) The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annu Rev Econ 4:283–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cá Zorzi M, Chudik A, Dieppe A (2012) Thousands of models, one story: current account imbalances in the global economy. J Int Money Financ 31:1319–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahuc P, Carcillo S, Zylberberg A (2014) Labor Economics, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Calmfors L, Driffill J (1988) Centralization of wage bargaining. Econ Policy 3(6):13–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canals C, Gabaix X, Vilarrubia JM, Weinstein D (2007) Trade patterns, trade balances, and idiosyncratic shocks. Banco de España Working Paper No. 0721Google Scholar
  9. Carlin W, Soskice D (2006) Macroeconomics: imperfections, institutions, and policies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Chinn MD (2015) Emerging market economies and the next reserve currencies. Open Econ Rev 26:155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chinn MD, Ito H (2007) Current account balances, financial development and institutions: assaying the world “saving glut”. J Int Money Financ 26:546–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chinn MD, Prasad ES (2003) Medium-term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: an empirical exploration. J Int Econ 59:47–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chinn MD, Wei S-J (2013) A faith-based initiative meets the evidence: does a flexible exchange rate regime really facilitate current account adjustment? Rev Econ Stat 95:168–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuñat A, Melitz MJ (2012) Volatility, labor market flexibility, and the pattern of comparative advantage. J Eur Econ Assoc 10:225–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Del Rosal I (2013) The granular hypothesis in EU country exports. Econ Lett 120:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du Q, Liu Q (2015) Labor market flexibility and the real exchange rate. Econ Lett 136:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer C, Hossfeld O, Radeck K (2018) On the suitability of alternative competitiveness indicators for explaining real exports of advanced economies. Open Econ Rev 29:119–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flanagan RJ (1999) Macroeconomic performance and collective bargaining: an international perspective. J Econ Lit 37:1150–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freund C, Pierola MD (2015) Export superstars. Rev Econ Stat 97:1023–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garloff A, Guertzgen N (2012) Collective wage contracts, opt-out clauses, and firm wage differentials: evidence from linked employer-employee data. Ind Relat 51:731–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghosh A, Qureshi M, Tsangarides C (2013) Is the exchange rate regime really irrelevant for external adjustment? Econ Lett 118:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gourinchas P-O, Rey H (2007) From world banker to world venture capitalist: US external adjustment and the exorbitant privilege. In: Clarida R (ed) G-7 current account imbalances: sustainability and adjustment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 11–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gourinchas P-O, Rey H (2014) External adjustment, global imbalances, valuation effect. In: Gopinath G, Helpman E, Rogoff K (eds.), Handbook of international economics, volume 4. North-Holland, pp. 585–645Google Scholar
  24. Gruber JW, Kamin SB (2007) Explaining the global pattern of current account imbalances. J Int Money Financ 26:500–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guertzgen N (2009) Rent-sharing and collective bargaining coverage: evidence from linked employer-employee data. Scand J Econ 111:323–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ju J, Shi K, Wei S-J (2014) On the connections between intra-temporal and intertemporal trades. J Int Econ 92:S36–S51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prasad ES (2014) The dollar trap. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhee HJ, Song J (2017) Real wage flexibility, economic fluctuations, and exchange rate regimes. Open Econ Rev 28:633–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Syversen C (2011) What determines productivity? J Econ Lit 49:326–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Traxler F, Brandl B (2012) Collective bargaining, inter-sectoral heterogeneity and competitiveness: a cross-national comparison of macroeconomic performance. Brit J Ind Relat 50:73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Visser J (2013) Wage bargaining institutions – from crisis to crisis. European Economy. Economic Papers 488Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jyväskylä University School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations