Inequality and Unemployment Patterns in Europe: Does Integration Lead to (Real) Convergence?
- 82 Downloads
The economic convergence criteria adopted in the Maastricht Treaty and the fiscal discipline of the Stability and Growth Pact enforced nominal convergence, leaving aside real convergence indicators. In this paper, we use cluster analysis to examine the convergence patterns of income inequality, absolute redistribution (a measure of governments’ effectiveness in correcting for inequality) and unemployment. The expected outcome after years of economic integration was, ex-ante, convergence to a single cluster. Our results, however, uncover a variety of groups, implying that economic integration has not led to real economic convergence. Moreover, the existence of different patterns suggests: (i) that traditional classifications (Anglo-Saxon, Continental European, European Periphery, and Nordic models) remain broadly valid; (ii) that there is no unemployment-inequality trade-off to be exploited in terms of economic policy; and (iii) that the redistributive capacity of governments plays a pivotal role in coping with inequality without negative effects in terms of unemployment.
KeywordsEurope Convergence Clusters Unemployment Inequality Redistribution
JEL classificationC33 D63 F15
We acknowledge constructive comments received from an anonymous referee. Javier Ordóñez is member of the INTECO research Group and gratefully acknowledges the support from the Generalitat Valenciana Project PROMETEOII/201/053 and AICO/2016/38, Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness project ECO2017-83255-C3-3-P and the UJI project UJI-B2017-33. Hector Sala is grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for financial support through grant ECO2016-75623-R.
- Agell J (2002) On the determinants of labour market institutions: rent seeking vs. social insurance. Ger Econ Rev 4:29–48Google Scholar
- Brülhart M, Tortensson J (1996) Regional integration, scale economies, and industry location in the European Union. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 1435Google Scholar
- Camacho M, Pérez-Quirós G, Saiz L (2008) Do european business cycles look like one? J Econ Dyn Control 29:3177–3185Google Scholar
- Dabla-Norris E, Kochhar K, Ricka F, Suphaphiphat N, Tsounta E (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective, IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/13Google Scholar
- Darvas Z, Rose AK, Szapáry G (2005) Fiscal divergence and Business cycle synchronization: irresponsibility is idiosyncratic. In: Frankel J, Pissarides C (eds) NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- European Commission (2014) An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe? Rising inequalities in the EU and their social, economic and political impacts, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and InnovationGoogle Scholar
- Goedemé T, Collado D. (2016) The EU Convergence Machine at Work: To the Benefit of the EU’s Poorest Citizens? Journal of Common Market Studies, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Krugman P (1991a) Geography and Trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2008) Growing unequal? income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2011) Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2012) OECD employment outlook. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2015) In it together: why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Solt F. (2014) The standardized world income inequality database. Working Paper SWIID Version 5.0, October 2014Google Scholar