Inequality and Unemployment Patterns in Europe: Does Integration Lead to (Real) Convergence?

Research Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The economic convergence criteria adopted in the Maastricht Treaty and the fiscal discipline of the Stability and Growth Pact enforced nominal convergence, leaving aside real convergence indicators. In this paper, we use cluster analysis to examine the convergence patterns of income inequality, absolute redistribution (a measure of governments’ effectiveness in correcting for inequality) and unemployment. The expected outcome after years of economic integration was, ex-ante, convergence to a single cluster. Our results, however, uncover a variety of groups, implying that economic integration has not led to real economic convergence. Moreover, the existence of different patterns suggests: (i) that traditional classifications (Anglo-Saxon, Continental European, European Periphery, and Nordic models) remain broadly valid; (ii) that there is no unemployment-inequality trade-off to be exploited in terms of economic policy; and (iii) that the redistributive capacity of governments plays a pivotal role in coping with inequality without negative effects in terms of unemployment.

Keywords

Europe Convergence Clusters Unemployment Inequality Redistribution 

JEL classification

C33 D63 F15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge constructive comments received from an anonymous referee. Javier Ordóñez is member of the INTECO research Group and gratefully acknowledges the support from the Generalitat Valenciana Project PROMETEOII/201/053 and AICO/2016/38, Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness project ECO2017-83255-C3-3-P and the UJI project UJI-B2017-33. Hector Sala is grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for financial support through grant ECO2016-75623-R.

References

  1. Agell J (2002) On the determinants of labour market institutions: rent seeking vs. social insurance. Ger Econ Rev 4:29–48Google Scholar
  2. Avram S, Levy H, Sutherland H (2014) Income distribution in the European Union. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 3:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry F, Begg I (2003) EMU and cohesion: introduction. J Common Mark Stud 41:781–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard AB, Durlauf SN (1995) Convergence in international outputs. J Appl Econ 10:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertola G (2010) Inequality, integration, and policy: issues and evidence from EMU. J Econ Inequal 8:345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouvet F (2010) EMU and the dynamics of regional per capita income inequality in Europe. J Econ Inequal 8:323–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brülhart M, Tortensson J (1996) Regional integration, scale economies, and industry location in the European Union. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 1435Google Scholar
  8. Bumann S, Lensink R (2016) Capital account liberalization and income inequality. J Int Money Financ 61:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camacho M, Pérez-Quirós G, Saiz L (2008) Do european business cycles look like one? J Econ Dyn Control 29:3177–3185Google Scholar
  10. Dabla-Norris E, Kochhar K, Ricka F, Suphaphiphat N, Tsounta E (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective, IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/13Google Scholar
  11. Darvas Z, Rose AK, Szapáry G (2005) Fiscal divergence and Business cycle synchronization: irresponsibility is idiosyncratic. In: Frankel J, Pissarides C (eds) NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. De Haan J, Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R (2008) Will business cycles in the euro area converge? a critical survey of empirical research. J Econ Surv 22:234–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollar D, Kraay A (2002) Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs 81:120–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2014) An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe? Rising inequalities in the EU and their social, economic and political impacts, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and InnovationGoogle Scholar
  15. Firebaugh G (2003) The new geography of global income inequality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Peñalosa C (2010) Income distribution, economic growth and European integration. Journal of Income Inequality 8:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goedemé T, Collado D. (2016) The EU Convergence Machine at Work: To the Benefit of the EU’s Poorest Citizens? Journal of Common Market Studies, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  18. Katz LF, Murphy KM (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: supply and demand factors. Q J Econ 107:35–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krugman P (1991a) Geography and Trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Krugman P (1991b) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 9:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Midelfart HK, Overman HG, Venables AJ (2003) Monetary union and the economic geography of Europe. J Common Mark Stud 41:847–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monfort M, Cuestas JC, Ordóñez J (2013) Real Convergence in Europe: A Cluster Analysis. Econ Model 33:689–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (2008) Growing unequal? income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD (2011) Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD (2012) OECD employment outlook. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD (2015) In it together: why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Ordóñez J, Sala H, Silva JI (2015) Real unit labour costs in Eurozone countries: drivers and clusters. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 4:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips P, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75:1771–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips P, Sul D (2009) Economic transition and growth. J Appl Econ 24:1153–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solt F (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database. Soc Sci Q 90(2):231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Solt F. (2014) The standardized world income inequality database. Working Paper SWIID Version 5.0, October 2014Google Scholar
  32. Wade RH (2004) Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Dev 32:567–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mercedes Monfort
    • 1
    • 2
  • Javier Ordóñez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hector Sala
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto de Economía InternacionalCastellón de la PlanaSpain
  2. 2.Universitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain
  3. 3.Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  4. 4.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations