Skip to main content
Log in

What Do Central Banks Know about Inflation Factors?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We offer a novel methodology for assessing the quality of central bank monetary policy reports. We evaluate their economic content by comparing verbally reported inflation factors with factors identified from a simple new Keynesian model. Positive correlations indicate that the reported inflation factors were similar to the model-identified ones, marking high-quality inflation reports. Although sample bank reports on average identified inflation factors correctly, the degree of forward-looking reporting varied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The sample central banks are flexible inflation-targeting central banks, attempting to bring inflation back to the target without undue implications for the real economy. The monetary policy reports provide information about how they are managing the short-run output-inflation tradeoff (Freedman and Laxton 2009).

  2. Wren-Lewis (2015) wrote: “Why do central banks like using the New Keynesian (NK) model? The answer is very simple: the model helps these banks do their job […].”

  3. Förster and Tillmann (2014) showed that the national rates of inflation have been driven primarily by idiosyncratic determinants as opposed to one common global factor.

  4. Our coding for the ECB is highly correlated with the KOF Monetary Policy Communicator and the Rosa and Verga (2007). Anyway, if we misinterpret some of the factors, so would the public (Fracasso et al. 2003).

  5. For example, a sample bank published the first-quarter report of 2009 in mid-February 2009, with information available as of January 23, 2009. The corresponding model-identified factors are based on end-March data.

  6. All model codes, including calibrations, initial and steady-state conditions, and so on are available at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qzqg7935hnln04k/BHS%20files%20for%20posting.zip?dl=0.

  7. Frequent value added tax (VAT) changes – in particular in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland – affected headline CPI. While headline inflation missed the target, a measure adjusted for the impact of indirect taxes may have remained closer to the target. Unfortunately, consistent series for adjusted inflation are not available.

  8. Szilágyi et al. (2013) attributed the identification failure to the exchange rate band that remained in place until 2008, mismeasurement of the real-time cyclical position, and poor judgment about the disinflationary forces.

  9. See Minford et al. (2015) for a review.

  10. Candid internal reviews are certainly possible; see, for example, Czech National Bank (2009).

References

  • Beck GW, Wieland V (2010) Money in monetary policy design: monetary cross-checking in the new-Keynesian model. In: Wieland V (ed) The science and practice of monetary policy today. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A, Karam P, Laxton D (2006) A practical model-based approach to monetary policy analysis–overview. IMF working paper 06/81, Washington: International Monetary Fund. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp0681.pdf

  • Bernanke BS, Woodford M (1997) Inflation forecasts and monetary policy. J Money, Credit, Bank 29(4):653–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS, Ehrmann M, Fratzscher M, de Haan J, Jansen D-J (2008) Central bank communication and monetary policy: a survey of theory and evidence. J Econ Lit 46(4):910–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulíř A, Čihák M, Šmídková K (2012) Writing clearly: the ECB’s monetary policy communication. Ger Econ Rev 14(1):50–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulíř A, Čihák M, Jansen D-J (2013) What drives clarity of central Bank communication about inflation? Open Econ Rev 24(1):125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulíř, A, Hurník J Šmídková K (2014) Inflation Reports and Models: How Well Do Central Banks Really Write? IMF Working Paper No. 14/91, Washington: International Monetary Fund. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1491.pdf

  • Conrad C, Lamla MJ (2010) The high-frequency response of the EUR-USD exchange rate to ECB communication. J Money, Credit, Bank 42(7):1391–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech National Bank (2009) In: Šmídková K (ed) Evaluation of the fulfillment of the CNB’s inflation targets 1998–2007. Czech National Bank, Prague

  • Dale, S, Orphanides A, Österholm P (2008) Imperfect Central Bank Communication–Information Versus Distraction. IMF Working Paper No. 08/60, Washington: International Monetary Fund. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp0860.pdf

  • Doucouliagos, H (2011) How Large is Large? Preliminary and Relative Guidelines for Interpreting Partial Correlations in Economics, Deakin University Working Paper, SWP 2011/5. Available at: http://www.deakin.edu.au/buslaw/aef/workingpapers/2011_5.pdf

  • Ehrmann M, Fratzscher M (2007) Communication by central bank committee members: different strategies, same effectiveness? J Money, Credit, Bank 39(2–3):509–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison M, Sargent TJ (2012) A defense of the FOMC. Int Econ Rev 53(November):1047–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster M, Tillmann P (2014) Reconsidering the international comovement of inflation. Open Econ Rev 25(5):841–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fracasso, A, Genberg H, Wyplosz C (2003) How Do Central Banks Write? Geneva Reports on the World Economy, Special Report 2, The Center for Economic Policy Research. Available at: http://hei.unige.ch/~wyplosz/IR_fgw.pdf

  • Freedman, C, Laxton D (2009) Why Inflation Targeting? IMF Working Paper 09/86. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp0986.pdf

  • Geraats, PM (2009) Trends in monetary policy transparency. CESifo Working Paper No 2584. Available at: http://www.cesifo.de/~DocCIDL/cesifo1_wp2584.pdf

  • Guthrie G, Wright J (2000) Open mouth operations. J Monet Econ 46(2):489–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1989) Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayo B, Mazhar U (2014) Monetary policy committee transparency: measurement, determinants, and economic effects. Open Econ Rev 25(4):739–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland PN (2007) Changes in the federal reserve’s inflation target: causes and consequences. J Money Credit Bank 39(8):1851–1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issing O (2005) Communication, transparency, accountability: monetary policy in the twenty-first century. Fed Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 87(2):65–83 Available at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/05/03/part1/Issing.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen D-J (2011) Does the clarity of central bank communication affect volatility in financial markets? Evidence from humphrey-Hawkins testimonies. Contemp Econ Policy 29(4):494–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A (2014) Establishing and maintaining a firm nominal anchor. Int J Cent Banking 10(2):405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford P, Zhirong O, Wickens M (2015) Revisiting the great moderation: policy or luck? Open Econ Rev 26(2):197–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides A (2001) Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. Am Econ Rev 91(4):964–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides A, Wilcox DW (2002) The opportunistic approach to disinflation. Int Financ 5(Spring):47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer CD, Romer DH (2008) The FOMC versus the staff: where can monetary policymakers add value? Am Econ Rev 98(May):230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa C, Verga G (2007) On the consistency and effectiveness of central bank communication: evidence from the ECB. Eur J Polit Econ 23(1):146–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozkrut M, Rybiński K, Sztaba L, Szwaja R (2007) Quest for central bank communication: does it pay to be ‘talkative’? Eur J Polit Econ 23:176–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: a Bayesian DSGE approach. Am Econ Rev 97(June):586–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L (2009) Evaluating monetary policy. Speech at Uppsala University. Available at: http://www.riksbank.se/en/Press-and-published/Speeches/2009/Svensson-Evaluating-monetary-policy/

  • Szilágyi, K, Baksa D, Benes J, Horváth Á, Köber C, Soós GD (2013) The Hungarian Monetary Policy Model. MNB Working Paper, WP 2013/01. Available at: http://english.mnb.hu/Root/Dokumentumtar/ENMNB/Kiadvanyok/mnben_mnbfuzetek/WP_2013-01.pdf

  • Woodford M (2003) Interest and prices: foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren-Lewis, S (2015) Why do central banks use New Keynesian models? mainly macro blog. Available at: http://mainlymacro.blogspot.com/2015/03/why-do-central-banks-use-new-keynesian.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support from the CNB and the Czech Science Foundation – Research Grant No. 402/11/1487 – is gratefully acknowledged. We are thankful for comments from an anonymous referee, Ray Brooks, Michael Ehrmann, Paul Jenkins, David-Jan Jansen, Gábor Pellényi, Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé, and Pierre Siklos and from participants at the 13th Annual VERC Conference at Waterloo, and IMF and CNB seminars. Keith Miao, Radu Păun, Rungporn Roengpitya, and Caroline Silverman provided excellent research assistance. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleš Bulíř.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Coding the Monetary Policy Reports

We extracted forward-looking verbal assessments and coded the presumed direction thereof on inflation. Each entry was reviewed and checked by two co-authors to ensure consistency and limit subjectivity, with less than one-tenth of the initial entries being reassessed. The ternary coding of inflation factors, −1, 0, +1, proceeded in two steps. First, each comment was catalogued into a major category and a subcategory: demand (fiscal, domestic cycle pressure, wages, external demand, domestic asset price bubbles, other), supply (weather and similar shocks, oil/gas prices, agricultural prices, labor supply, regulated prices, structural changes, retail competition, indirect taxes, other), or external (exchange rates, global financial shocks, other). Second, factors putting upward/downward pressure on inflation were denoted as +1/−1 and neutral/unclear factors were denoted as 0.

Below are typical examples of our coding. The March 2003 ECB Monthly Bulletin contained the following sentence: “the moderate pace of economic growth should reduce inflationary pressures” and was coded as −1 in the demand category. The January 2003 issue noted “increases in administered prices,” and was coded as +1 in the supply category.

Table 5 Sample country characteristics

Appendix 2: Inflation Accounting

For each country we build a country-specific NK model, see Bulíř et al. (2014) for the model structure and calibration details, and then solve it for its reduced form, substituting non-predetermined forward-looking variables with a linear combination of past shocks. The reduced-form of the model serves as a starting point for the estimation of economic shocks using the multivariate (Kalman) filter and the filter extends the model’s reduced form to measurement equations that map observed variables to the unobserved ones:

$$ {y}_t=Z{x}_t+{\varepsilon}_t $$
(1)
$$ {x}_t=T{x}_{t-1}+{\nu}_t, $$
(2)

where x denotes the vector of unobserved state variables, y is the vector of observed (measurement) variables, ε is the process noise, and ν is the measurement noise. Conditional on the state form of the model and the observed variables, the Kalman filter identifies all unobserved variables and shocks. For linear systems the Kalman filter represents an optimum estimate in terms of the least squares criterion (Hamilton 1994). As some variables are nonstationary, without finite value variances, we employ the diffuse Kalman filter. Finally, we employ the smoothing step of the filter using the complete information (Harvey 1989).

The estimated realizations of various shocks are used for historical simulations of the model, quantifying their exact time-varying effects on inflation as in Smets and Wouters (2007). Deviations of inflation from its target are due to six unobserved components, each defined as a deviation from its steady-state value: aggregate demand, aggregate supply, the exchange rate, foreign variables, trends, and monetary policy. To this end, we recursively simulate the model using the estimated state variables, while adding only one particular sequence of estimated shocks. Inflation deviations from the target caused in the model simulation by one sequence of shocks are what we call model-identified inflation factors, capturing the interaction of each shock and the transmission mechanism. The recursive simulations are repeated for all sequences of shocks, providing us with estimates of the impact of demand, supply, exchange rate, and other shocks on the deviation of inflation from its target. By summing up all the inflation factors we recover the actual inflation rate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulíř, A., Hurník, J. & Šmídková, K. What Do Central Banks Know about Inflation Factors?. Open Econ Rev 27, 795–810 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-016-9396-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-016-9396-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation