Global Trends in the Choice of Exchange Rate Regime

Abstract

The raw data suggest that the global trend towards greater exchange rate flexibility that was evident before 1990 has since stopped. An optimum currency area (OCA) model of exchange rate regime choice is estimated. Four different schemes for classifying exchange rate regime are investigated. Trends in the explanatory variables made little difference to the trend towards greater flexibility before 1990 but have worked against it since, largely because of the reduction in inflation. Underlying preferences are still shifting gradually in the direction of greater flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition, the algorithms used in some classification schemes may mean that pegs with more than one devaluation in a calendar year, as is likely to occur with rapid inflation, are in any case often classified as floats.

  2. 2.

    The descriptions are taken from Bleaney et al. (2015a), pp. 3–4 and Table 1.

  3. 3.

    See Bleaney and Tian (2014) for details. A similar regression approach to regime classification has been suggested by Bénassy-Quéré et al. (2006) and Frankel and Wei (2008), but they focus on the estimated coefficients rather than the goodness of fit.

  4. 4.

    We are grateful to a referee for suggesting this variable.

  5. 5.

    The ranges used were 0 to 10 %, 10 to 20 %, 20 to 50 % and greater than 50 %.

  6. 6.

    Results are similar if we estimate a logit instead of a probit.

References

  1. Alesina A, Wagner AF (2006) Choosing (and reneging on) exchange rate regimes. J Eur Econ Assoc 4:770–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bénassy-Quéré A, Coeuré B, Mignon V (2006) On the identification of de facto currency pegs. J Jpn Int Econ 20:112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berdiev A, Kim Y, Chang CP (2012) The political economy of exchange rate regimes in developed and developing countries. Eur J Polit Econ 28:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleaney MF, Fielding D (2002) Exchange rate regimes, inflation and output volatility in developing countries. J Dev Econ 68:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bleaney MF, Francisco M (2008) Balance sheet effects and the choice of exchange rate regime in developing countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 17:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bleaney M F, Tian M (2014) Classifying exchange rate regimes by regression methods. University of Nottingham School of Economics Discussion Paper no. 14/02

  7. Bleaney M F, Tian M, Yin L (2015) De facto exchange rate regime classifications are better than you think. University of Nottingham School of Economics Discussion Paper no. 15/01

  8. Bleaney M F, Tian M, Yin L (2015) Global trends in the choice of exchange rate regime. University of Nottingham School of Economics Discussion Paper no. 15/03

  9. Breedon F, Pétursson TG, Rose AK (2012) Exchange rate policy in small rich economies. Open Econ Rev 23:421–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carmignani F, Colombo E, Tirelli P (2008) Exploring different views of exchange rate regime choice. J Int Money Financ 27:1177–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chinn MD, Ito H (2006) What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions and interactions. J Dev Econ 81:163–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frankel J, Wei S-J (1995) Emerging currency blocs. In: Genberg H (ed) The international monetary system: its institutions and its future. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frankel J, Wei S-J (2008) Estimation of de facto exchange rate regimes: synthesis of the techniques for inferring flexibility and basket weights. IMF Staff Pap 55:384–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harms P, Hoffmann M (2011) Deciding to peg the exchange rate in developing countries: the role of private-sector debt. Open Econ Rev 22:825–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy-Yeyati E, Sturzenegger F, Reggio I (2010) On the endogeneity of exchange rate regimes. Eur Econ Rev 54:659–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Méon P-G, Rizzo J-M (2002) The viability of fixed exchange rate commitments: does politics matter? A theoretical and empirical investigation. Open Econ Rev 13:111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reinhart CM, Rogoff K (2004) The modern history of exchange rate arrangements: a re-interpretation. Q J Econ 119:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizzo J-M (1998) The economic determinants of the choice of an exchange rate regime: a probit analysis. Econ Lett 59:283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shambaugh J (2004) The effects of fixed exchange rates on monetary policy. Q J Econ 119:301–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tavlas G, Dellas H, Stockman AC (2008) The classification and performance of alternative exchange-rate systems. Eur Econ Rev 52:941–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. von Hagen J, Zhou J (2007) The choice of exchange rate regimes in developing countries: a multinomial panel analysis. J Int Money Financ 26:1072–1094

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bleaney.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Data sources
Table 9 Sample of Countries (182)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bleaney, M., Tian, M. & Yin, L. Global Trends in the Choice of Exchange Rate Regime. Open Econ Rev 27, 71–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9375-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Exchange rate regimes
  • Inflation
  • Openness

JEL Classification

  • F31