This paper examines the relationship between importing and firm-level productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using a recent firm-level survey for 19 Sub-Saharan African countries, the paper shows that there is a positive and significant relationship between importing and productivity for both manufacturing and services firms. Using a series of robustness tests, the paper finds that the importer-productivity relationship is robust in the case of manufacturing firms, but the results for services appear sensitive to the presence of extreme values. Finally, the paper shows that manufacturing firms with the highest levels of human capital show the strongest relationship between importing and productivity, a result consistent with a role for absorptive capacity in maximising the benefits of importing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
A non-linear relationship between firm size and productivity has been reported e.g. by the International Study Group on Exports and Productivity (ISGEP) (ISGEP) (2008).
White-collar workers include technical workers, supervisory and managerial staff, and clerical, administrative and sales staff. Blue-collar workers include production staff in the case of manufacturing firms, and manual staff in the case of services firms.
A firm is defined as foreign-owned if a direct investor that is resident of another economy has 10 % or more of the ordinary shares or voting power or the equivalent, an approach consistent with much of the existing literature.
In a production function context, the possibility of endogeneity of inputs arises. While this issue is difficult to deal with in a cross-section setting, recent developments with firm-level panel data allow one to control for endogeneity of inputs by assuming a monotonic relationship between some firm-level decision variable (for example investment) and the unobserved firm-level state variable productivity (see Olley and Pakes 1996).
For example, it would have been useful to be able to estimate three structural equations, (i) a production function, (ii) an import equation for the firm decision to import, and (iii) a skilled labor share equation. This would have allowed to control the endogeneity of both the import and the skilled labor share variables and to provide a better mechanism through which imported capital and skilled labor impact productivity.
For a brief introduction to matching techniques see Todd (2010). In the results reported below, we use single nearest neighbor matching.
The data used in this paper are confidential, but not exclusive. In order to gain access to the data, a confidentiality agreement with UNIDO will need to be signed.
Initially, also Cote d’Ivoire was part of the survey as the 20th country. During the data collection, however, the work in Cote d’Ivoire got stopped and the collected data did not get verified by the national supervisor. Given the incomplete execution of the sampling plan and the lack of quality assurance, we did not include Cote d’Ivoire in this study.
In Nigeria, this structure was doubled due to country size, creating a southern survey zone coordinated in Lagos, and a northern survey zone coordinated in Abuja.
Exceptions were Cape Verde, Lesotho and Burundi, where firms with 5 to 10 employees were also included.
We also estimated the basic model for each country separately. A lack of degrees of freedom for many countries resulted in many insignificant coefficients, but the coefficients tend to be positive. These results are available upon request. For all firms, we observe a negative and significant coefficient in only one of 19 countries (Niger), while we find significant and positive coefficients in those countries with the largest sample sizes (Cameroon, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania).
Results from the OLS single threshold model for manufacturing firms only are available upon request. The coefficients on the importer variable are positive and significant in both regimes, but are larger in the high regime.
Results from the OLS and Qreg single threshold models for services firms only are available upon request. The coefficients on the importer variable are positive and significant only in the low regime, while close to zero and insignificant in the high regime.
Aitken BJ, Harrison AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Rev 89(3):605–618
Altomonte C, Bekes G (2011) Trade complexity and productivity. MICRO-DYN Working Paper no. 08/11
Amiti M, Konings J (2007) Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. Am Econ Rev 97(5):1611–1638
Amiti M, Wei SJ (2009) Service offshoring, productivity and employment: evidence from the US. World Econ 32(2):203–220
Andersson M, Lööf H, Johansson S (2008) Productivity and international trade – firm-level evidence from a small open economy. Rev World Econ 144(4):774–801
Antras P, Helpman E (2004) Global sourcing. J Polit Econ 112(3):552–580
Augier P, Cadot O, Dovis M (2013) Imports and TFP at the firm level: the role of absorptive capacity. Can Rev Econ 46(3):956–981
Bai J (1997) Estimating multiple breaks one at a time. Econ Theory 13:315–352
Bartelsman EJ, Doms M (2000) Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal micro data. J Econ Lit 38(3):569–594
Bas MA, Strauss-Kahn V (2014) Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm level evidence from France. Rev World Econ 150(2):241–275
Bekes G, Harasztosi P, Murakozy B (2011) Firms and products in international trade: evidence from Hungary. Econ Syst 35(1):4–24
Benhabib J, Spiegel M (1994) The role of human capital in economic development: evidence from aggregate cross-country data. J Monet Econ 34:143–173
Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2007) Firms in international trade. J Econ Perspect 21(3):105–130
Buchinsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression methods: a practical guideline for empirical research. J Hum Resour 33(1):88–126
Caner M (2002) A note on least absolute deviation estimation of a threshold model. Econ Theory 18(3):800–814
Castellani D, Serti F, Tomasi C (2010) Firms in international trade: importers’ and exporters’ heterogeneity in the Italian manufacturing industry. World Econ 33(3):424–457
Chan K (1993) Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. Ann Stat 21(1):520–533
Coe DT, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39(5):859–887
Coe DT, Helpman E, Hoffmaister AW (1997) North–south R&D spillovers. Econ J 107(440):134–149
Coe DT, Helpman E, Hoffmaister AW (2009) International R&D spillovers and institutions. Eur Econ Rev 53:723–741
Crespo-Cuaresma J, Foster N, Scharler J (2008) Barriers to technology adoption, international R&D spillovers and growth. Econ Bull 15(3):1–7
Damijan J, Kostevc C (2015) Learning from trade through innovation. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 77(3):408–436
Dovis M, Milgram-Baleix J (2009) Trade, tariffs and total factor productivity: the case of Spanish firms. World Econ 32(4):575–605
Eaton J, Kortum S (2001) Trade in capital goods. Eur Econ Rev 45:1195–1235
Eriksson T, Smeets V, Warzynski F (2009) Small open economy firms in international trade: evidence from Danish transactions-level data. Econ J Dan Econ J 147(2):175–194
Falvey RE, Foster N, Greenaway D (2007) Relative backwardness, absorptive capacity and knowledge spillovers. Econ Lett 97:230–234
Farinas JC, Martin-Marcos A (2010) Foreign sourcing and productivity: evidence at the firm level. World Econ 33(3):482–506
Feder G (1983) On exports and economic growth. J Dev Econ 12:59–73
Forlani E (2012) Irish firms’ productivity and imported inputs. DEM Working Papers Series 009, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management
Foster-McGregor N, Isaksson A, Kaulich F (2013) Foreign ownership and labour markets in Sub-Saharan African firms. Wiiw Working Papers 99, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw (forthcoming in African Development Review)
Foster-McGregor N, Isaksson A, Kaulich F (2014) Importing, exporting and performance in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Rev World Econ (Weltwirtschaftliches Arch) 150(2):309–336
Foster-McGregor N, Isaksson A, Kaulich F (2015) Importing, exporting and the productivity of services firms in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Int Trade Econ Dev 24(4):499–522
Galvao AF, Montes-Rojas G, Olmo J (2010) Threshold quantile autoregressive models. J Time Ser Anal 32(3):253–267
Girma S, Görg H (2004) Outsourcing, foreign ownership and productivity: evidence from UK establishment-level data. Rev Int Econ 12(5):817–832
Görzig B, Stephan A (2002) Outsourcing and firm-level performance. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 309, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research
Hagemejer J, Kolassa M (2011) Internationalization and economic performance of enterprises: evidence from polish firm-level data. World Econ 34(1):74–100
Haller SA (2012) Intra-firm trade, exporting, importing, and firm performance. Can J Econ 45(4):1397–1430
Halpern L, Koren M, Szeidl A (2011) Imported inputs and productivity. CeFiG Working Papers 8, Center for Firms in the Global Economy
Hansen BE (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64(2):413–430
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368
Hansen BE (2000) Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica 68(3):575–603
Huber P (1964) Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat 35(1):73–101
International Study Group on Exports and Productivity (ISGEP) (2008) Understanding cross-country differences in exporter Premia: comparable evidence for 14 countries. Rev World Econ (Weltwirtschaftliches Arch) 144(4):596–635
Jabbour L (2010) Offshoring and firm performance: evidence from French manufacturing industry. World Econ 33(3):507–524
Kasahara H, Lapham B (2013) Productivity and the decision to import and export: theory and evidence. J Int Econ 89(2):297–316
Kasahara H, Rodrigue J (2008) Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence. J Dev Econ 87(1):106–118
Koenker R, Hallock K (2001) Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect 15(4):143–156
Kuan C-M, Michalopoulos C, Xiao Z (2010) Quantile regression on quantile ranges. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1869369 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1869369. Accessed 13 May 2015
Lee G (2005) International R&D Spillovers revisited. Open Econ Rev 16(3):249–262
Lööf H, Andersson M (2010) Imports, productivity and the origin of markets: the role of knowledge-intensive economies. World Econ 33(3):458–481
Lüthje T (2003) Intra-industry trade in intermediate goods and final goods in a general equilibrium setting. Open Econ Rev 14(2):191–209
Melitz M (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725
Michaely M (1977) Exports and growth: an empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 4:49–54
Muuls M, Pisu M (2009) Imports and exports at the level of the firm: evidence from Belgium. World Econ 32(5):692–734
Olley GS, Pakes S (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297
Olsen KB (2006) Productivity impacts of offshoring and outsourcing: a review. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 200601, OECD Publishing
Peluffo A, Zaclicever D (2013) Imported intermediates and productivity: does absorptive capacity matter? A firm-level analysis for Uruguay. Documento de Trabajo 06/13 - Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República
Rousseeuw PJ, Yohai V (1987) Robust regression by means of s-estimators. In: Franke J, Härdle W, Martin D (eds) Robust and nonlinear time series analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 256–272
Serti F, Tomasi C (2008) Firm heterogeneity: do destinations of exports and origins matter? In: Piscitello L, Santangelo G (eds) Multinationals and local competitiveness. FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp 167–195
Silva A, Afonso O, Africano AP (2013) Economic performance and international trade engagement: the case of Portuguese manufacturing firms. Int Econ Econ Policy 10(4):521–547
Sjöholm F (1999) Exports, imports and productivity: results from Indonesian establishment data. World Dev 27(4):705–715
Smeets V, Warzynski F (2013) Estimating productivity with multi-product firms, pricing heterogeneity and the role of international trade. J Int Econ 90(2):237–244
Todd PE (2010) matching estimators. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp 108–121
Tucci A (2005) Trade, foreign networks and performance: a firm-level analysis for India. Development Working Papers 199, Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano, University of Milano
UNIDO (2012) Africa investor report 2011: towards evidence-based investment promotion strategies. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna
Verardi V, Croux C (2009) Robust regression in Stata. Stat J 9(3):439–453
Verardi V, Wagner J (2012) Productivity premia for German manufacturing firms exporting to the euro-area and beyond: first evidence from robust fixed effects estimations. World Econ 35:694–712
Vogel A, Wagner J (2010) Higher productivity in importing German manufacturing firms: self-selection, learning from exporting, or both? Rev World Econ 145(4):641–665
Vogel A, Wagner J (2011) Robust estimates of exporter productivity premia in German business services enterprises. Econ Bus Rev 13(1–2):7–26
Wagner J (2007) Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. World Econ 30(1):60–82
Wagner J (2012a) International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Rev World Econ 148(2):235–267
Wagner J (2012b) Exports, imports and profitability: first evidence for manufacturing enterprises. Open Econ Rev 23(5):747–765
Wagner J, Temouri Y (2013) Do outliers and unobserved heterogeneity explain the exporter productivity premium? Evidence from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Econ Bull 33(3):1931–1940
Xu B, Wang J (1999) Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD. Can J Econ 32:1258–1274
Yasar M (2013) Imported capital input, absorptive capacity, and firm performance: evidence from firm level data. Econ Inq 51(1):88–100
Yasar M, Morrison Paul CJ (2007) International linkages and productivity at the plant level: foreign direct investment, exports, imports and licensing. J Int Econ 72:373–388
Yohai V (1987) High breakdown-point and high efficiency estimates for regression. Ann Stat 15(2):642–665
The dataset used in this paper is an output of the project EERAF08043 “Survey of Enterprises in Selected ACP Countries”, funded by the European Commission. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The authors are thankful for comments from the editor and three anonymous referees.
Appendix 1: Regression results when removing foreign-owned firms
Appendix 1: Regression results when removing foreign-owned firms
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster-McGregor, N., Isaksson, A. & Kaulich, F. Importing, Productivity and Absorptive Capacity in Sub-Saharan African Manufacturing and Services Firms. Open Econ Rev 27, 87–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9367-7
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Absorptive capacity
- Human capital