Open Economies Review

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 731–785 | Cite as

Fiscal Devaluation Scenarios: A Quantitative Assessment for the Italian Economy

  • Barbara Annicchiarico
  • Fabio Di Dio
  • Francesco Felici
Research Article

Abstract

We study the potential impact of fiscal devaluation poon the Italian economy using IGEM, a dynamic general equilibrium model for the Italian economy developed at the Italian Department of the Treasury. The simulations show that fiscal devaluation policies are likely to produce short-run slight improvements on the external position of the economy, while the output gains seem to persist in the long run. Non-negligible distributional effects across households are also observed, since taxation on consumption tends to be regressive.

Keywords

Fiscal Devaluation DGE Fiscal Reforms Italy 

JEL Classification

E10 C50 E60 

References

  1. Adjemian S, Bastani H, Juillard M, Mihoubi F, Perendia G, Ratto M, Villemot S (2011) Dynare: Reference Manual, Version 4, Dynare Working Papers no. 1, CREPEMAQGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen T (1997) Fiscal Policy in the Emu and Outside. Swedish Economic Policy Review 4:235–275Google Scholar
  3. Annicchiarico B, Di Dio F, Felici F, Monteforte L (2013a) IGEM: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model for Italy, Working Paper no. 4, Department of the Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and of FinanceGoogle Scholar
  4. Annicchiarico B, Di Dio F, Felici F (2013b) Structural reforms and the potential effects on the italian economy. J Policy Model 35(1):88–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayoumi T (2004) GEM - A New International Macroeconomic Model, IMF Occasional Paper no. 239Google Scholar
  6. Calmfors L (1998) Macroeconomic policy, wage setting, and employment - what difference does the EMU make?. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 14:125–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christiano L J, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. J Polit Econ 113(1):1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christoffel K, Coenen G, Warne A (2008) The New Area-Wide Model of the Euro Area- A Micro-Founded Open-Economy Model for Forecasting and Policy Analysis, Working Paper Series 944, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarida R H, Galí J, Gertler M (1999) The science of monetary policy: a new keynesian perspective. J Econ Lit 37:1661–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Mooij R, Keen M (2012) Fiscal Devaluation and Fiscal Consolidation: The VAT in Troubled Times. NBER Working Paper no. 17913Google Scholar
  11. ECB (2012) Competitiveness and external imbalances within the euro area (by a team of the Working Group on Econometric Modelling of the European System of Central Banks), Occasional Paper Series 139, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission (2013) Study on the Impacts of Fiscal Devaluation. Taxation Papers, Working Paper no. 36 – 2013Google Scholar
  13. Evers MP (2012) Federal fiscal transfer rules in monetary unions. Eur Econ Rev 56:507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farhi E, Gopinath G, Itskhoki O (2011) Fiscal Devaluations. NBER Working Paper no. 17662Google Scholar
  15. Feldstein M S, Krugman PR (1990) International Trade Effects of Value-Added Taxation. In: Razin A., Slemrod J. (eds) Taxation in the Global Economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 263–282Google Scholar
  16. Forni L, Gerali A, Pisani M (2010) Macroeconomic effects Of greater competition in the service sector: The Case Of Italy. Macroecon Dyn 14:677–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franco F (2011) Improving Competitiveness through Fiscal Devaluation, The Case of Portugal. FEUNL Working Paper Series No. 556Google Scholar
  18. Galí J, López-Salido J D, Vallés J. (2007) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. J Eur Econ Assoc 5:227–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomes S, Jacquinot P, Pisani M (2012) The EAGLE. A nodel for policy analysis of macroeconomic interdependence in the euro area. Econ Model 29:1686–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hohberger S, Vogel L, Herz B (2014) Budgetary-neutral fiscal policy rules and external adjustment. Open Econ Rev 25(5):909–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IMF (2012) International Monetary Fund Country Report N. 12/168, 2012Google Scholar
  22. IMF (2013a) International Monetary Fund Country Report N. 13/298 - Italy 2013 Article IV Consultation, 2013Google Scholar
  23. IMF (2013b) International Monetary Fund Country Report N. 13/244 - Spain 2013 Article IV Consultation, 2013Google Scholar
  24. IMF (2013c) International Monetary Fund Country Report N. 13/19 - Portugal 2013, 2013Google Scholar
  25. IMF (2013d) International Monetary Fund Country Report N. 13/154 - Greece 2013 Article IV Consultation, 2013Google Scholar
  26. Keynes JM (1931) Addendum I to: Great Britain. Committee on Finance and Industry Report London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, pp. 190–209Google Scholar
  27. Koske I (2013) Fiscal Devaluation – Can it Help to Boost Competitiveness? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1089, Paris: OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumhof M, Laxton D (2013) Simple fiscal policy rules for small open economies. J Int Econ 91:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laker J F (1981) Fiscal Proxies for Devaluation: A General Review. Staff Papers. Int. Monet. Fund 28:118–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusinyan L, Muir D (2013) Assessing the Macroeconomic Impact of Structural Reforms The Case of Italy. IMF Working Paper No. 13/22Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2013) OECD Economic Outlook 2013, Paris: OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (2014) Tax Wages 2014, Paris: OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  33. Smets F, Wouters R (2003) An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(5):1123–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. Am Econ Rev 97(3):586–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roeger W, In’t Veld J (1999) The Sensitivity of Solutions to Terminal Conditions: Simulating Permanent Shocks with QUEST II. In: Hughes Hallet J, Mc Adam P (eds) Analysis in Macroeconomic Modelling. Kluver Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Roeger W, Varga J, In’t Veld J (2008) Structural Reforms in the EU: A Simulation-Based Analysis Using the QUEST Model with Endogenous Growth, European Economy – Economic Paper no. 351Google Scholar
  37. Roeger W, Varga J, In’t Veld J (2009) Modelling the lisbon strategy: analysing policies to promote knowledge investment with an endogenous growth model. Comp Econ Stud 51(4):520–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor J B (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 39:195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogel L (2013) The impact of structural policies on external accounts in infinite-horizon and finite-horizon models. Rev Int Econ 21:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vogel L, Roeger W, Herz B (2013) The performance of simple fiscal policy rules in monetary union. Open Econ Rev 24:165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Annicchiarico
    • 1
  • Fabio Di Dio
    • 2
  • Francesco Felici
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLaw and Institutions, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomaItaly
  2. 2.IT Economia - Modelli di Previsione ed Analisi Statistiche, Sogei S.p.a.RomaItaly
  3. 3.Department of the TreasuryEconomic and Financial Analysis and Planning Directorate, Italian Ministry of Economy and FinanceRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations