Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 785–803 | Cite as

Currency Networks, Bilateral Exchange Rate Volatility and the Role of the US Dollar

  • Michael BleaneyEmail author
  • Mo Tian
Research Article

Abstract

We investigate monthly bilateral exchange rate volatility for a large sample of currency pairs over the period 1999–2006. Pegs (particularly to the US dollar) and managed floats tend to have lower volatility than independent floats. A deeper investigation shows that the peg effect operates almost entirely through currency networks (i.e. where two currencies are pegged to the same anchor currency), and the lower volatility of US dollar pegs reflects the size of the US dollar network. Managed floats show clear evidence of tracking the US dollar, further increasing the effective size of the US dollar network. Inflation undermines the currency-stabilizing effect of peg networks. Currencies in smaller peg networks have higher unweighted but not trade-weighted exchange rate volatility, which is consistent with anchors being chosen to minimize trade-weighted volatility. The size of the effective US dollar network revealed here is a plausible explanation of the rarity of basket pegs. Volatility also reflects a range of structural factors such as country size, level of development, population density, inflation differentials and business cycle asymmetry.

Keywords

Exchange rate volatility Currency peg Inflation 

JEL No.

F3 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on a previous version. Remaining errors are of course the authors’ responsibility.

References

  1. Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1998) Exchange rate volatility and intervention: implications of the theory of optimum currency areas. J Int Econ 45:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleaney MF (2008) Openness and real exchange rate volatility: in search of an explanation. Open Econ Rev 19:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleaney MF, Francisco M (2005) Exchange rate regimes and inflation: only hard pegs make a difference. Canadian Journal of Economics 38:1453–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleaney MF, Francisco M (2007) Classifying exchange rate regimes: a statistical analysis of alternative methods. Econ Bull 6(3):1–6Google Scholar
  5. Bleaney MF, Francisco M (2010) What makes currencies volatile? An empirical investigation. Open Econ Rev 21:731–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleaney MF, Tian M (2011) Currency networks, bilateral exchange rate volatility and the role of the US dollar, University of Nottingham School of Economics Discussion Paper no. 11/06Google Scholar
  7. Bravo-Ortega C, di Giovanni J (2005) Trade costs and real exchange rate volatility: the role of Ricardian comparative advantage, IMF Working Paper no. 05/5Google Scholar
  8. Bravo-Ortega C, di Giovanni J (2006) Remoteness and real exchange rate volatility, IMF Staff Papers 53 (Special Issue), 115–132Google Scholar
  9. Broda C (2004) Terms of trade and exchange rate regimes in developing countries. J Int Econ 63:31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvo G, Reinhart CM (2002) Fear of floating. Q J Econ 117:379–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cashin P, Céspedes LF, Sahay R (2004) Commodity Currencies and the Real Exchange Rate. J Dev Econ 75(1):239–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devereux MB, Lane P (2003) Understanding bilateral exchange rate volatility. J Int Econ 60:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards S, Levy-Yeyati E (2005) Flexible exchange rates as shock absorbers. Eur Econ Rev 49:2079–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flood RP, Rose AK (1995) Fixing exchange rates: a virtual quest for fundamentals. J Monetary Econ 36:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosh AR, Gulde A-M, Wolf HC (2002) Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences, Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hau H (2002) Real exchange rate volatility and openness: theory and evidence. J Money Credit Bank 34:611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein MW, Shambaugh JC (2008) The dynamics of exchange rate regimes: fixes, floats and flips. J Int Econ 75:70–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy-Yeyati E, Sturzenegger F (2005) Classifying exchange rate regimes: deeds versus words. Eur Econ Rev 49:1603–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meissner CM, Oomes N (2009) Why do countries peg the way they peg? The determinants of anchor currency choice. J Int Money Finance 28(3):522–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reinhart CM, Rogoff K (2004) The modern history of exchange rate arrangements: a reinterpretation. Q J Econ 119:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shambaugh J (2004) The effect of fixed exchange rates on monetary policy. Q J Econ 119:301–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tavlas G, Dellas H, Stockman AC (2008) The classification and performance of alternative exchange-rate systems. Eur Econ Rev 52:941–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations