Advertisement

Open Economies Review

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 381–419 | Cite as

Convergence of EMU Equity Portfolios

  • Maela GiofréEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that, after integration, equity portfolios of countries that joined the European Monetary Union have converged at faster rate than those of NON EMU countries. This outcome can be interpreted as a combination of the convergence of inflation rates and the convergence of investment barriers. On the one hand, the common monetary policy might have driven a stronger comovement in inflation rates, leading to increasingly similar hedging strategies among member countries. On the other hand, exposure to the common currency might have homogenized bilateral investment barriers, thus inducing increasingly similar portfolio allocations among member countries. We find that the comovement of inflation rates has not significantly increased after EMU inception, pointing toward an exclusive role for convergence in investment barriers.

Keywords

Financial integration EMU Inflation hedging Investment barriers 

JEL Classification

F21 F30 F36 G11 G15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to the editor (George Tavlas) and to an anonimous referee for valuable suggestions that improved the paper. I am also grateful to participants in the 2nd FIW Research Conference (Vienna), XVI Spring Meeting of Young Economists (Istanbul) and the CEUS Workshop 2009 (Vallendar) for useful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Adam K, Jappelli T, Menichini A, Padula M, Pagano M (2002) Analyze, compare and apply alternative indicators and monitoring methodologies to measure the evolution of capital market integration in the European Union. Report to the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  2. Adjaouté K, Danthine J-P (2000) EMU and portfolio diversification opportunities. FAME Research Paper #31, International Center FAME, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler M, Dumas B (1983) International portfolio choice and corporation finance: a synthesis. J Finance 38:925–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baca SP, Garbe BL, Weiss RA (2000) The rise of sector effects in major equity markets. Financ Anal J 56(5):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baele L, Ferrando A, Hördhal P, Krylova E, Monnet C (2004) Measuring financial integration in the Euro area. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 20(4):509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxter M, Jermann UJ (1997) The international diversification puzzle is worse than you think. Am Econ Rev 87(1):170–180Google Scholar
  7. Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1995) Time-varying conditional world market integration. J Finance 50:403–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappiello L, Kadareja A, Manganelli S (2010) The impact of the Euro on equity markets. J Financ Quant Anal 45:473–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavaglia S, Brightman C, Aked M (2000) The increasing importance of industry factors. Financ Anal J 52(2):31–39Google Scholar
  10. Cooper IA, Kaplanis E (1994) Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging and international capital market equilibrium. Rev Financ Stud 7(1):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croci M (2004) Integration of the Euro equity markets: an empirical analysis. SSRN Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis EP (2001) Portfolio regulations of life insurance companies and pension funds. Discussion Paper PI-0101, The Pensions Institute, Birckbeck College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrmann M, Fratzscher M, Gürkaynak R, Swanson E (2008) Convergence and anchoring of yield curves in the Euro area. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series 2007-24Google Scholar
  14. Epstein LG, Miao J (2003) A two-person dynamic equilibrium under ambiguity. J Econ Dyn Control 27(7):1253–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fidora M, Fratzscher M, Thimann C (2007) Home bias in global bond and equity markets: the role of real exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Financ 26:631–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flavin TJ (2004) The effect of the Euro on country versus industry portfolio diversification. J Int Money Financ 23(7–8):1137–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fratzscher M (2002) Financial market integration in Europe: on the effects of EMU on stock markets. Int J Financ Econ 7:165–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gehrig T (1993) An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. Scand J Econ 95(1):97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giannetti M, Koskinen Y (2010) Investor protection, equity returns and financial globalization. J Financ Quant Anal 45(1):135–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giofré M (2009) The role of information asymmetries and inflation hedging in international equity portfolios. J Multinatl Financ Manag 19:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldberg GG, Lothian JR, Okunev J (2003) Has international financial integration increased? Open Econ Rev 14(3):299–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman S, Stiglitz J (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70(3):393–408Google Scholar
  23. Guiso L, Jappelli T (2005) Awareness and stock market participation. Rev Financ 9(4):537–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haliassos M, Bertaut C (1995) Why do so few hold stocks? Econ J 105:1110–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardouvelis GA, Malliaropoulos D, Priestley R (1999) EMU and European stock market integration. CEPR Discussion Paper #2124Google Scholar
  26. Honohan P, Lane PR (2003) Divergent inflation rates in EMU. Econ Policy 18:357–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Honohan P, Lane PR (2005) Exchange rates and inflation under EMU: an update. IIIS Discussion Paper Series # 31Google Scholar
  28. Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (2002) Are financial assets priced locally or globally? NBER Working Paper Series, #.W8994Google Scholar
  29. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106:1113–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lane P, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2007) The international equity holdings of Euro area investors. In: Anderton R, di Mauro F (eds) The importance of the external dimension for the Euro area: trade, capital flows, and international macroeconomic linkages. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Lane P, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2008) International investment patterns. Rev Econ Stat 90(3):538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Obstfeld M, Rogoff K (2001) The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15:339–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sercu P (1980) A generalization of the international asset pricing model. Rev Assoc Fr Finance 1:91–135Google Scholar
  34. Solnik B (1974) The international pricing of risk: an empirical investigation of the world capital market structure. J Finance 47:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sorensen BE, Wu Y, Yosha O, Zhu Y (2007) Home bias and international risk sharing: twin puzzles separated at birth. J Int Money Financ 26:587–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uppal R, Wang T (2003) Model misspecification and underdiversification. J Finance 58.6:2465–2486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang J, Min I, Li Q (2003) European stock market integration: does EMU matter? J Bus Finance Account 30:1253–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies (CeRP) and Collegio Carlo Alberto (CCA)Moncalieri (Torino)Italy

Personalised recommendations