Skip to main content
Log in

Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of monetary arrangements on trade integration and business cycle correlation in late 19th century Europe. We estimate a gravity model and show that tighter monetary integration was associated with substantially higher trade, as in recent studies using contemporary data. For instance, the Austro-Hungarian monetary union improved trade between member states by a factor of 3. To explain this, we build and estimate a simple model where greater monetary integration weakens the current account constraint by fostering business cycle co-movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James E. and Van Wincoop Eric (2003) “Gravity with Gravitas; A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93(1):170–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • A’Hearn, Brian and Ulrich Woitek (2001) “More International Evidence on the Historical Properties of Business Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 47:321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni, I., A. Kashyap and B. Mojon (2003) Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asdrubali, Pierfederico, Bent E. Sorensen and Oved Yosha (1996) “Channels of Interstate Risk Sharing: United States 1963–1990.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1081–1110.

  • Bairoch, P. (1989) “European Trade Policy.” Cambridge Economic History of Europe 1–160.

  • Bordo, Michael and Anna Schwartz (1997) “Monetary Policy Regimes and Economic Performance: The Historical Record.” NBER Working Paper 6201, p. 83.

  • Clark, T.E. and E. van Wincoop (2000) “Borders and Business Cycles.” FRBNY manuscript.

  • De Ménil, G. and M. Maurel (1994) “Breaking Up a Custom Union: The Case of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1919.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 130, Heft 3:553–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry (1992) “Should the Maastricht Treaty Be Saved?.” Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 74, International Finance Section, Princeton University, December.

  • Einaudi, Luca (2001) Money and Politics. Oxford University Press.

  • Engel, C and A. Rose (2002) “Currency Unions and International Integration.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 34(4):1067–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1989) One Money, One Market. Oxford.

  • Fatas, Antonio and Andrew Rose (2001) “Do Monetary Handcuffs Restrain Leviathan? Fiscal Policy in Extreme Exchange Rate Regimes.” CEPR, DP 2692.

  • Flandreau, Marc (2000) “The Economics and Politics of Monetary Unions: A Reassessment of the Latin Monetary Union, 1865–1871.” Financial History Review 7:25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandreau, Marc (2003) “The Bank, the States and the Market, an Austro-Hungarian Tale for Euroland.” In F. Capie et G. Wood (eds.), The History of Monetary Unions. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandreau, Marc (2005) “The Logic of Compromise: An Anti-Optimum Currency Area Manifesto.” CEPR Discussion Paper.

  • Flandreau, Marc and Frédéric Zumer (2004) The Making of Global Finance 1880–1913. Paris: OECD Development center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontagné, Lionel and Michael, Freudenberg (1999) “Endogeneous Symmetry of Shocks in a Monetary Union.” Open Economies Review 10(3):263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A. and A.K. Rose (1998) “The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria.” Economic Journal 108:1009–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey (1997) Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. International Institute Economics.

  • Furstenberg, George M. (2004) “Income Insurance Aspects of Monetary Unions.” In J. Mélitz, V. Alexander and G. von Furstenberg (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and Paul, Krugman (1989) Trade Policy and Market Structure. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (1984) “Exchange Rate Volatility and World Trade.” IMF Occasional Papers, 28/7/84.

  • Kemmerer, Edwin (1944) Gold and the Gold Standard. NY and London: Mac Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. (1969) “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View.” In Mundell and Swoboda (eds.), Monetary Problems of the International Economy. University of Chicago Press.

  • Komlos, John (1983) The Habsburg Monarchy as a Custom Union. Economic Development in Austria-Hungary in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton.

  • Krugman, Paul (1993) “Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU.” In F. Giavazzi and F. Torres (eds.), The Transition to Economic and Monetary Union in Europe, NY, CUP, pp. 241–61.

  • López-Córdova, J. Ernesto and Christopher M. Meissner (2003) “Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era.” American Economic Review 93(1):344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurel, Mathilde (1998) Régionalisme et désintégration en Europe centrale et orientale: Une approche gravitationnelle. Paris, Presses du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurel, Mathilde (2004) “Current Account Constraint as a Barrier to International Trade: The evidence from the European Enlargement Process.” Economic Systems 28(3):301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, John (1995) “National Borders Matter: Canada-US: National Trade Patterns.” American Economic Review 85:615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mélitz, Jacques (2001) “Geography, Trade and Currency Union.” mimeo.

  • Mélitz, Jacques and Frédéric Zumer (1999) “Interregional and International Risk-Sharing and Lessons for EMU.” Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 51:149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1848) Principles of Political Economy. London.

  • Mitchell, B.R. (1992) European Historical Statistics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, Robert (1961) “ A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” American Economic Review 51:509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff (2000) “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macro: Is There a Common Cause?” NBER Working Paper 7777.

  • Pakko, Michael R. and Howard Wall (2001) “Reconsidering the Trade Creating Effects of a Currency Union.” Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis.

  • Persson, Torsten (2001) “Currency Unions and Trade: How Large is the Treatment Effect?” Economic Policy.

  • Rose, Andrew K. (2000) “One Money, One Market, The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade.” Economic Policy 0(30):7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. (2001) “The Effect is Large.” Economic Policy.

  • Savage, I. Richard and Karl W. Deutsch (1960) “A Statistical Model of the Gross Analysis of Transaction Flows.” Econometrica 28(3):551–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelkle, Waltraub (2001) “The Optimum Currency Area Approach to European Monetary Integration: Framework of Debate or Dead End?” Working Paper.

  • Schulze, Max Stefan (2003) “Structural Change and Productivity Growth in the Habsburg Empire.” Mimeo, London School of Economics.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flandreau, M., Maurel, M. Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe. Open Econ Rev 16, 135–152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-005-5872-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-005-5872-4

Key words

Navigation