Policy feedback research faces a potential pivot point owing to recent theoretical and substantive advances. Concerted attention now spans new scientific communities, such as climate focused socio-technical transitions literature, as well as reinvigorated attention to environmental politics or policy. Rather than being interested in abstractly explaining policy stability and change, this latest turn turns feedback theory in order to help find practical answers to long-term policy challenges. This introduction to our special issue of Policy Sciences aims to take stock of recent developments in policy feedback research and highlight some areas that could be addressed to move the field forward. We argue for taking seriously the original dictum of policy feedback as a loop in which policy is treated as both the start and end point of analysis. This requires integrating advances in policy design scholarship through shared conceptualizations of ‘policy,’ ‘actors’ and ‘agency’. Doing so, we posit, will champion more comprehensive understandings of the effectiveness of policy design choices in general, and long-term oriented policy change in particular.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bali, A. S., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Anticipating and Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Policy and Society,38(1), 1–13.
Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering Policy Feedback. Administration & Society,42(5), 568–590.
Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). How Solutions Chase Problems: Instrument Constituencies in the Policy Process. Governance,29(3), 393–409.
Béland, D., Howlett, M., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2020). Designing Policy Resilience: Lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Policy Sciences,1, 1–21.
Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2019). Policy Feedback and the Politics of the Affordable Care Act. Policy Studies Journal,47(2), 395–422.
Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward. Policy Studies Journal,47(2), 184–205.
Bernstein, S., Lebow, R. N., Stein, J. G., & Weber, S. (2000). God gave physics the easy problems: adapting social science to an unpredictable world. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 43–76.
Campbell, A. L. (2003). How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science,15(1), 333–351.
Capano, G., & Galanti, M. T. (2018). Policy Dynamics and Types of Agency: From Individual to Collective Patterns of Action. European Policy Analysis,4(1), 23–47.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open.
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science,51(3), 532–551.
Daugbjerg, C., & Kay, A. (2019). Policy Feedback and Pathways: When Change Leads to Endurance and Continuity to Change. Policy Sciences,1, 1–16.
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Review Article: Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform. British Journal of Political Science,34(4), 693–724.
Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2019). Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,685(1), 8–28.
Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). The Role of Actors in the Policy Design Process: Introducing Design Coalitions to Explain Policy Output. Policy Sciences,1, 1–39.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics,25(3), 275.
Hall, P. A. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance,20(1), 127–144.
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis,11(1), 33–46.
Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales From the Crypt: The Rise and Fall (and Rebirth?) Of Policy Design. Administration & Society,45(3), 357–381.
Jacobs, A. M., & Kent Weaver, R. (2015). When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change. Governance,28(4), 441–457.
Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in Climate Policy: The Politics of Invention, Diffusion, and Evaluation. Environmental Politics,4016, 1–20.
Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing Policies That Intentionally Stick: Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Policy Sciences,47(3), 227–247.
Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2020). Durable by Design? Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2017). Harnessing Theories of the Policy Process for Analysing the Politics of Sustainability Transitions: A Critical Survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.,27, 102–117.
Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: New Approaches and Insights through Bridging Innovation and Policy Studies. Research Policy,48(10), 103832.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.
Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory Policy Outputs and Impacts: Exploring a Complex Relationship. Regulation and Governance,6(4), 427–444.
Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2017). Discursive Agency: (Re-)Conceptualizing Actors and Practices in the Analysis of Discursive Policymaking. Policy Studies Journal,45(3), 510–534.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Constraining Our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change. Policy Sciences,45, 123–152.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions. Policy Sciences,42(4), 323–340.
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the Politics of Sustainability Transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,1(1), 70–75.
Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., & Zysman, J. (2015). Winning Coalitions for Climate Policy. Science,349(6253), 1170–1171.
Meckling, J., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy Sequencing toward Decarbonization. Nature Energy,2, 918–922.
Mettler, S. (2005). Soldiers to Citizens: The GI Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, B., & Jordan, A. J. (2020). Disaggregating the Dependent Variable in Policy Feedback Research: An Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading System. Policy Sciences,1, 1–17.
Mukherjee, I., & Howlett, M. (2015). Who Is a Stream? Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Public Policy-Making. Politics and Governance,3(2), 65.
Pahle, M., et al. (2018). Sequencing to Ratchet up Climate Policy Stringency. Nature Climate Change.,8(10), 861–867.
Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Peters, B. Guy, et al. (2018). Elements in Public Policy Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics,45(4), 595–628.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review,94(2), 251–267.
Pierson, Paul. (2004). Politics in Time : History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pischke, E. C., & Wellstead, A. M. (2020). Reimagining Instrument Constituencies: The Case of Conservation Policy in Mexico. Policy Sciences.
Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Cashore, B. (2019). Stability and Climate Policy? Harnessing Insights on Path Dependence, Policy Feedback, and Transition Pathways. Energy Research and Social Science,50, 168–178.
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance—Odus V Elliott - Google Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2014). The Innovativeness of National Policy Portfolios—Climate Policy Change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics,23(5), 860–883.
Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2015). Toward a Comparative Measure of Climate Policy Output. Policy Studies Journal,43(2), 257–282.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929-1930 Revision of the Tariff. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Schmid, N., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). Explaining Advocacy Coalition Change with Policy Feedback. Policy Studies Journal,2, 1.
Schmid, N., et al. (2020). Governing Complex Societal Problems: The Impact of Private on Public Regulation through Technological Change. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12314.
Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2017). Technology as a Driver of Climate and Energy Politics. Nature Energy,2(6), 17084.
Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2019). Measuring the Temporal Dynamics of Policy Mixes—An Empirical Analysis of Renewable Energy Policy Mixes’ Balance and Design Features in Nine Countries. Research Policy,48(10), 103557.
Schmidt, T. S., Sewerin, S., & Bateson, B. (2018). Does Policy Design Predict a Policy Mix’s Future? A New Empirical Approach to Analysing Path-Dependency.
Skocpol, T. (1992). 22 Contemporary Sociology Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States.
Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy Feedback and Self-Reinforcing and Self-Undermining Processes in EU Biofuels Policy. Journal of European Public Policy,24(1), 21–41.
Skogstad, G. (2020). Mixed Feedback Dynamics and the USA Renewable Fuel Standard: The Roles of Policy Design and Administrative Agency. Policy Sciences,1, 1.
Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review,101(1), 111–127.
Stokes, L. C. (2016). Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy: A Natural Experiment on Retrospective Voting and Local Resistance to Public Policy. American Journal of Political Science,60(4), 958–974.
Stokes, L. C. (2020). Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 208–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voß, J. P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument Constituencies and the Supply Side of Policy Innovation: The Social Life of Emissions Trading. Environmental Politics,23(5), 735–754.
Weaver, R. Kent. (2010). Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders?: Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change. Journal of Public Policy,30(02), 137–162.
Yona, L., Cashore, B., & Schmitz, O. J. (2019). Integrating policy and ecology systems to achieve path dependent climate solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 98, 54–60.
Zito, A. R. (2018). Instrument Constituencies and Epistemic Community Theory. Policy and Society,37(1), 36–58.
Sebastian Sewerin gratefully acknowledges financial support provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project number PYAPP1_166905).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sewerin, S., Béland, D. & Cashore, B. Designing policy for the long term: agency, policy feedback and policy change. Policy Sci 53, 243–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09391-2
- Policy feedback
- Policy change
- Policy design
- Long-term policymaking
- Policy termination
- Policy continuation