Aalbers, R., Shestalova, V., & Kocis, V. (2013). Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector. Energy Policy, 63, 1240–1250.
Baekkeskov, E. (2016). Explaining science-led policy-making: Pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories. Policy Sciences, 49, 395–419.
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2015). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.
Bovens, M., & ‘t Hart, P. (1996). Understanding policy fiascos. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Braathen, N. A. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy: How many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1, 185–235.
Braathen, N. A., & Croci, E. (2005). Environmental agreements used in combination with other policy instruments. In E. Croci (Ed.), The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements (Vol. 43, pp. 335–364). Dodrecht: Springer.
Capano, G. (2009). Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11, 7–31.
Capano, G. (2018). Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: The dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 75, 675–694.
Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50, 399–426.
Case, D. O. (2012). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. Bingley: Emerald Group.
Case, O. D., Andrews, J. E., Johnsaon, J. D., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 353–362.
Cretí, A., & Joëts, M. (2017). Multiple bubbles in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Energy Policy, 107, 119–130.
Daviter, F. (2015). The political use of knowledge in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 48, 491–505.
Daviter, F. (2017). Coping, taming or solving: Alternative approaches to the governance of wicked problems. Policy Studies, 38, 571–588.
Daviter, F. (2019). Policy analysis in the face of complexity: What kind of knowledge to tackle wicked problems? Public Policy and Administration, 34, 62–82.
De Francesco, F., & Maggetti, M. (2018). Assessing disproportionality: Indexes of policy responses to the 2007–2008 banking crisis. Policy Sciences, 51, 17–38.
de Leon, P. (1999). The missing link revisited: Contemporary implementation research. Policy Studies Review, 16, 311–338.
Dryzek, J. S. (1983). Donʼt toss coins in garbage cans: A prologue to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 3, 345–368.
Dunn, W. N. (1997). Probing the boundaries of ignorance in policy analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 277–298.
Edmunds, A., & Morris, A. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 17–28.
Elmore, R. F. (1980). Backward mapping. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601–616.
Elmore, R. F. (1987). Instruments and strategies in public policy. Policy Studies Review, 7, 174–186.
English, L. P. (2001). Information quality management: The next frontier. In Quality congress. ASQ’s annual quality congress proceedings (pp. 529–533).
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (2017). Crime in the United States. Available online at: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/arrest-table.
Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2019). Should renewable energy policy be ‘renewable’? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35, 218–243.
Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50, 367–382.
Giest, S., & Samuels, A. (2020). ʻFor good measureʼ: Data gaps in a big data world. Policy Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09384-1.
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilad, S., Maor, M., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 451–478.
Gustavsson, M., & Wänström, C. (2009). Assessing information quality in manufacturing planning and control processes. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26, 325–340.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.
Hargrove, E. L. (1975). The missing link: The study of the implementation of social policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rosenberg, D. E., Medellın-Azuara, J., Lund, J. R., & Howitt, R. E. (2009). Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology, 375, 627–643.
Haynes, K. E., & Li, Q. (1993). Policy analysis and uncertainty: Lessons from the IVHS transportation development process. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 17, 1–14.
Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38, 180–197.
Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Gerlak, A. K. (2020). When does science persuade (or not persuade) in high-conflict policy contexts? Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12655.
Helm, D. (2010). Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: The design of climate change policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26, 182–196.
Helm, D. (2014). The European framework for energy and climate policies. Energy Policy, 64, 29–35.
Helm, D. (2017). Agriculture after Brexit. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, S124–S133.
Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new ‘policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47, 187–207.
Howlett, M. (2018). The criteria for effective policy design: Character and context in policy instrument choice. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11, 245–266.
Howlett, M. (2019a). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Howlett, M. (2019b). The policy design primer: Choosing the right tools for the job. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Howlett, M., & Kemmerling, A. (2016). Calibrating climate change policy: The causes and consequences of sustained policy under-design. In Paper prepared for presentation at the HKU-USC-IPPA conference on public policy, June 10–11, Hong Kong, China.
Howlett, M., & Kemmerling, A. (2017). Calibrating climate change policies: The causes and consequences of sustained under-reaction. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19, 625–637.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2014). Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2, 57–71.
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015). From tools and toolkits in policy design studies: The new policy design orientation toward policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43, 291–311.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26, 1–18.
Huia, R., Hermana, J., Lunda, J., & Madan, K. (2018). Adaptive water infrastructure planning for nonstationary hydrology. Advances in Water Resources, 118, 83–94.
James, T. E., & Jorgensen, P. D. (2009). Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change: Revisiting a fundamental question. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 141–162.
Jansen, E. P. (2008). NPM: Perspectives on performance and the use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 24, 169–191.
Jasanoff, S. S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230.
Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the architecture of choice: Bounded rationality and governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. D., Thomas, H. F., III, & Wolfe, M. (2014). Policy bubbles. Policy Studies Journal, 42, 146–171.
Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–16). Wiley Online Library.
Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & Marchau, V. A. W. J. (2010). Classifying and communicating uncertainties in model-based policy analysis. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 10(4), 299–315.
Lehmann, P., & Söderholm, P. (2018). Can technology-specific deployment policies be cost-effective? The case of renewable energy support schemes. Environmental & Resource Economics, 71, 475–505.
Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, J. M., McGunn, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Politics & Policy, 48, 111–130.
Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990a). Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 303–311.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990b). Research perspectives on the design of public policy: Implementation, formulation and design. In D. J. Palumbo & D. J. Calista (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box. New York: Greenwood Press.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1991). The logic of public policy design: Linking policy actors and plausible instruments. Knowledge and Policy, 4, 121–151.
Mai, J.-E. (2013). The quality and qualities of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 675–688.
Majone, G. (1975). On the notion of political feasibility. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 259–274.
Majone, G. (1980). Policies as theories. Omega, 8, 151–162.
Mathijssen, J., Petersen, A., Besseling, P., Rahman, A., & Don, H. (eds.) (2007). Dealing with uncertainty in policy making. CBP/PBL/Rand Europe, Final Report of the Conference Dealing with Uncertainty in Policy Making, The Hague, Netherlands, 16–17 May 2006.
May, P. J. (1991). Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics. Journal of Public Policy, 11, 187–206.
May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12, 331–354.
May, P. (2003). Policy design and implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 223–233). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Maor, M. (2012). Policy overreaction. Journal of Public Policy, 32, 231–259.
Maor, M. (2014a). Policy bubbles: Policy overreaction and positive feedback. Governance, 27, 469–487.
Maor, M. (2014b). Policy persistence, risk estimation and policy underreaction. Policy Sciences, 47, 425–443.
Maor, M. (2016). Emotion-driven negative policy bubbles. Policy Sciences, 49, 191–210.
Maor, M. (2017a). Policy entrepreneurs in policy valuation processes: The case of the coalition for environmentally responsible economies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 1401–1417.
Maor, M. (2017b). Disproportionate policy response. In Politics: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford University Press.
Maor, M. (2017c). The implications of the emerging disproportionate policy perspective for the new policy design studies. Policy Sciences, 50, 383–398.
Maor, M. (2019a). Overreaction and bubbles in politics and policy. In A. Mintz & L. Terris (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Behavioral Political Science, Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press.
Maor, M. (2019b). Deliberate disproportionate policy response: Towards a conceptual turn. Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000278.
Maor, M. (2019c). Strategic policy overreaction as a risky policy investment. International Review of Public Policy, 1, 46–64.
Maor, M. (2020). A Social Network Perspective on the Interaction between Policy Bubbles. International Review of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.774.
Maor, M., Tosun, J., & Jordan, A. (2017). Proportionate and disproportionate policy responses to Climate Change: Core Concepts and Empirical Applications. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19, 599–611.
Miller, J. (1960). Information input overload and psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 695–704.
Moffitt, S. L. (2014). Making policy public. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2016). Meaning and power in the design and development of policy experiments. Futures, 76, 67–74.
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2017). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy & Politics, 45, 103–118.
Najjar, L., & Schniederjans, M. J. (2006). A quality information benchmarking methodology: A US banking industry empirical study. Quality & Quantity, 40, 419–433.
Pathak, P., Kalra, A., & Ahmad, S. (2017). Temperature and precipitation changes in the Midwestern United States: Implications for water management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33, 1003–1019.
Persson, P. (2018). Attention manipulation and information overload. Behavioral Public Policy, 2, 78–106.
Peters, B. G. (2005). The problem of policy problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 7, 349–370.
Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Peters, G. B., & Hoornbeek, J. A. (2017). Understanding policy problems: A refinement of past work. Policy and Society, 36, 365–384.
Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2, 159–183.
Rice, D. P., & Fineman, N. (2004). Economic implications of increased longevity in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 457–473.
Rittel, H. W., & Weber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Salamon, L. M. (1989). The tools approach: Basic analytics. In L. S. Salamon & M. S. Lund (Eds.), Beyond privatization: The tools of government action (pp. 23–50). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). Economic regulation. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 117–155). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403.
Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W. (2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20, 488–495.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1988). Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 8, 61–80.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics, 52, 510–529.
Schneider, A., & Sidneu, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 103–119.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.
Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W. W. Norton.
Strong, D. M. (2009). Information quality: Managing information as a product. In L. Liu & M. T. Özsu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of database system. Berlin: Springer.
VanderWeele, T. J. (2009). Commentary on the relative nature of overadjustment and unnecessary adjustment. Epidemiology, 20, 496–499.
Walgrave, S., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2017). Surviving information overload: How elite politicians select information. Governance, 30, 229–244.
Walker, W. E., Rahman, S. A., & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy making. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 282–289.
Walker, W. E., Vincent, A. W. J. M., & Swanson, D. (2010). Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive Policies: Introduction to section 2. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 917–923.
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 5–33.
Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystem: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 615–635.
Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (2016). Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing: Comparing coalition politics in North America and Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.