The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy
Governments are increasingly turning to public sector innovation (PSI) labs to take new approaches to policy and service design. This turn towards PSI labs, which has accelerated in more recent years, has been linked to a number of trends. These include growing interest in evidence-based policymaking and the application of ‘design thinking’ to policymaking, although these trends sit uncomfortably together. According to their proponents, PSI labs are helping to create a new era of experimental government and rapid experimentation in policy design. But what do these PSI labs do? How do they differ from other public sector change agents and policy actors? What approaches do they bring to addressing contemporary policymaking? And how do they relate to other developments in policy design such as the growing interest in evidence-based policy and design experiments? The rise of PSI labs has thus far received little attention from policy scientists. Focusing on the problems associated with conceptualising PSI labs and clearly situating them in the policy process, this paper provides an analysis of some of the most prominent PSI labs. It examines whether labs can be classified into distinct types, their relationship to government and other policy actors and the principal methodological practices and commitments underpinning their approach to policymaking. Throughout, the paper considers how the rise of PSI labs may challenge positivist framings of policymaking as an empirically driven decision process.
KeywordsPolicy design Pubic sector innovation Public sector reform Policy lab Design thinking Evidence-based policymaking
- Acevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: The contribution of public innovation labs. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Bailey, J., & Lloyd, P. (2016). The introduction of design to policymaking: Policy Lab and the UK government. In P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceeceedings of DRS 2016: design + research + society (pp. 3619–3634). Brighton: Design Research Society.Google Scholar
- Bason, C. (2013). Discovering co-production by design. In E. Manzini & E. Staszowski (Eds.), Public and collaborative: Exploring the intersections of design, social innovation and public policy (pp. viii–xvi). New York: DESIS Network.Google Scholar
- Bason, C., & Schneider, A. (2014). Public design in global perspective: Empirical trends. In C. Bason (Ed.), Design for policy (pp. 23–40). Farnham, Surrey: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Burkett, I. (2016). Could prototyping reduce risks and increase the chance of success in policymaking? Presented at the Tacsifest, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help? The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–26.Google Scholar
- Centre for Public Impact. (2016). Briefing bulletin: design for policy and public services. Centre for Public Impact. https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/briefing-bulletin-design-for-policy-and-public-services/. Accessed November 3, 2016.
- Chen, D.-S., Lu-Lin, C., Hummels, C., & Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Christiansen, J. (2016). Embedding design: Towards cultural change in government. In B. Mager (Ed.), Service design impact report: public sector (pp. 48–59). Köln: Service Design Network.Google Scholar
- Fuller, M., & Lochard, A. (2016). Public policy labs in European Union member states. Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
- GovLab. (2016). Who we are? The Gov Lab. http://www.thegovlab.org/about.html. Accessed November 11, 2016
- Gryszkiewicz, L., Lykourentzou, I., & Toivonen, T. (2016). Innovation labs: leveraging openness for radical innovation? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2556692). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2556692. Accessed September 28, 2016.
- Helsinki Design Lab. (2013). HDL closing in 2013. http://www.helsinkidesignlab.org/moimoi. Accessed May 12, 2017.
- Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jenson, J., & Harrisson, D. (2013). Social innovation research in the European Union: Approaches, findings and future directions. Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
- Kieboom, M. (2014). Lab matters: Challenging the practice of social innovation laboratories. Amsterdam: Kennisland.Google Scholar
- Kimbell, L. (2015). Applying design approaches to policy making: Discovering policy lab. Brighton: University of Brighton.Google Scholar
- Kimbell, L. (2016). Design in the time of policy problems. In P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS 2016: Design + research + society (pp. 3605–3618). Brighton: Design Research Society.Google Scholar
- La 27e Région. (2017). Territories in residence. La 27e Région. http://www.la27eregion.fr/en/residence/. Accessed February 22, 2017.
- Lewis, J. M., Lin, V., & Gibson, B. (2003). Evidence-based policy: A technocratic wish in a political world. Evidence-based health policy: Problems and possibilities (pp. 250–259). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mulgan, G. (2014). The radical’s dilemma: An overview of the practice and prospects of Social and Public Labs. Social and public labs. https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/social_and_public_labs_-_and_the_radicals_dilemma.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2017.
- O’Rafferty, S., de Eyto, A., & Lewis, H. J. (2016). Open practices: Lessons from co-design of public services for behaviour change. In P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS 2016: Design + research + society (pp. 3573–3590). Brighton: Design Research Society.Google Scholar
- Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading Mass: Adison Wesley Public Comp.Google Scholar
- Public Policy Forum. (2013). Changes labs and government in Canada. Ottawa: Canada’s Public Policy Forum.Google Scholar
- Puttick, R. (2014). Innovation teams and labs: A practice guide. London: NESTA. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/innovation-teams-and-labs-practice-guide. Accessed October 12, 2016.
- Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). I-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. London: Nesta and Bloomberg Philanthropies.Google Scholar
- Rebolledo, N. (2016). The value of service design in policy making. In B. Mager (Ed.), Service design impact report: Public sector (pp. 40–46). Köln: Service Design Network.Google Scholar
- Roberts, A. (2014). Public sector innovation in the Australian public service. Public Manager, 43(1), 20–23.Google Scholar
- Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist governance in the European Union: Towards a new architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
- Selloni, D., & Staszowski, E. (2013). Gov innovation labs constellation 1.0. New York: PARSONS DESIS LAB. http://nyc.pubcollab.org/files/Gov_Innovation_Labs-Constellation_1.0.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2016.
- Siodmok, A. (2014). Designer policies. RSA Journal, 4, 24–29.Google Scholar
- Slow Research Lab. (2016). http://slowlab.net. Accessed December 22, 2016.
- Tenbensel, T. (2006). Policy knowledge for policy work. In H. K. Colebatch (Ed.), The work of policy: An international survey (pp. 199–215). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- The Studio DCC. (2014). Goodbye for now! https://dccstudio.wordpress.com/2014/04/16/goodbye-for-now/. Accessed May 12, 2017.
- Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2015). Discovering innovation labs in the public sector (No. 61). Norway: The Other Canon Foundation. http://hum.ttu.ee/wp/paper61.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2016.
- Torjman, L. (2012). Labs: Designing the future. Ontario: MaRS Discovery District.Google Scholar
- Williamson, B. (2015b). Testing governance: The laboratory lives and methods of policy innovation labs. Stirling: University of Stirling. https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2015/03/30/testing-government/. Accessed October 12, 2016.
- Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The new ambiguity of ‘open government’ (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2012489). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2012489. Accessed November 18, 2016.