Think tanks and strategic policy-making: the contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems
Think tanks have proliferated in most Western democracies over the past three decades and are often considered to be increasingly important actors in public policy. Still, their precise contribution to public policy remains contested. This paper takes the existing literature in a new direction by focusing on the capacity of think tanks to contribute to strategic policy-making and assessing their particular role within policy advisory systems. We propose that strategic policy-making capacity requires three critical features: high levels of research capacity, substantial organizational autonomy and a long-term policy horizon. Subsequently, we assess the potential of think tanks to play this particular role in policy-making, using empirical evidence from structured interviews with a set of prominent Australian think tanks.
KeywordsThink tanks Strategic policy-making Policy advisory systems Policy advice Policy capacity
Previous versions of this article were presented at the International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis, 8–10 July 2015; and the Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference, 28–30 September 2015. We would like to thank the participants in those panels for their helpful comments and suggestions. The research presented in this article has been supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Scheme (DP140104097). We would like to thank the interviewees for their time in answering our questions. We would also like to thank Dr. She Hawke for her assistance in conducting these telephone interviews. Last but not least we thank the anonymous referees and the journal editor for their critical yet constructive comments which have improved the article considerably.
- Abelson, D. E. (2002). Do think tanks matter? Assessing the impact of public policy institutes. Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
- Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- della Porta, D. (2013). Can democracy be saved: Participation, deliberation and social movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Fraussen, B., Pattyn, V., & Lawarée, J. (2016). Thinking in splendid isolation? The organization and policy engagement of think tanks in Belgium. In M. Brans & D. Aubin (Eds.), Policy analysis in Belgium. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In G. B. Peters & D. T. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment (pp. 138–172). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
- Halpin, D. (2014). The organization of political interest groups. Designing advocacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Halpin, D. (2015). Interest group policy agendas. In A. Cigler, B. Loomis, & A. Nownes (Eds.), Interest group politics (9th ed.). Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Marsh, I. (1995). Beyond the two party system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marsh, I., & Stone, D. (2004). Australian think tanks. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas (pp. 247–263). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- McConnell, A. (2008). Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- McGann, J. G. (2015). 2014 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report Think tanks and civil societies program. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Prasser, S. (2006). Providing Advice to Government. Papers on Parliament. Canberra: Senate of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/~/link.aspx?_id=11AB0553BB894CD4A00F5E67C6A0B649&_z=z.
- Rich, A. O., & Weaver, R. K. (1998). Advocate and analysist: Think tanks and the politicization of expertise. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics. Washington, CQ: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests. Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. MPifG discussion paper. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln.Google Scholar
- Stone, D., & Denham, A. (2004). Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Weaver, R. K. (1989). The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science & Politics, 22(03), 563–578.Google Scholar
- Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgement. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar