Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond the two communities: a reply to Mead’s “why government often ignores research”

  • Discussion and Commentary
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albaek, E. (1995). Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making. Policy Sciences, 28, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G. (2009). Evidence-based policy-making: What is it? How do we get it?. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach, E. (1984). The dissemination of policy research to policymakers. Science Communication, 6, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, G. (2002). Evidence-based analysis and the work of policy shops. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-based policy making: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T. (1990). Researching policy research: Issues of utilization in decision making. Science Communication, 12, 80–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., Morrison, A., & Stambaugh, R. J. (1975). The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: A report to respondents. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, A., Head, B., Povey, J., Ferguson, M., & Boreham, P. (2015). Use of academic social research by public officials: Exploring preferences and constraints that impact on research use. Evidence and Policy, 11, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. N. (1980). The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: An exploratory case survey. Science Communication, 1, 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A., & Carson, W. G. (2010). The limits to evidence-based policy: Evidence, emotion and criminal justice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, R. D. (2012). The professors on public life. The Political Quarterly, 83, 532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, R. D. (2014). Public life as tragedy. The Political Quarterly, 85, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society, 29, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2013). Evidence-based policymaking—speaking truth to power? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72, 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B., Ferguson, M., Cherney, A., & Boreham, P. (2014). Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy and Society, 33, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Newman, J. (2010). Policy analysis and policy work in federal systems: Policy advice and its contribution to evidence-based policy-making in multi-level governance systems. Policy and Society, 29, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Wellstead, A. M. (2011). Policy analysts in the bureaucracy revisited: The nature of professional policy work in contemporary government. Politics & Policy, 49, 613–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, E. T., Jr., & Hall, J. L. (2012). Evidence-based practice and the use of information in state agency decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmuss, D. (1981). Scholars in the courtroom: Two models of applied social science. The American Sociologist, 16, 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C., & Lightowler, C. (2013). Sustaining knowledge exchange and research impact in the social sciences and humanities: Investing in knowledge broker roles in UK universities. Evidence and Policy, 9, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63, 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavis, J. N., Ross, S. E., Hurley, J. E., Hohenadel, J. M., Stoddart, G. L., Woodward, C. A., et al. (2002). Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. The Milbank Quarterly, 80, 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. P. (1993). The utilization of policy analysis by state agency officials. Science Communication, 14, 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C., & Lowe, S. T. (2007). And the question is? Knowledge growth in welfare policy research. Policy Sciences, 40, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, L. M. (2015). Only connect: Why government often ignores research. Policy Sciences, 48, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. E., Roberts, J., Maederer, C. M., Wertheimer, B., & Johnson, B. (1987). The utilization of social science information by policymakers. The American Behavioral Scientist, 30, 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2014a). Measuring policy success: Case studies from Canada and Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73, 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2014b). Revisiting the “two communities” metaphor of research utilisation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27, 614–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J., Perl, A., Wellstead, A., & McNutt, K. (2013). Policy capacity for climate change in Canada’s transportation sector. Review of Policy Research, 30, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neylan, J. (2008). Social policy and the authority of evidence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., & Webb, J. (2000). Evidence and the policy process. In H. T. O. Davies, S. M. Nutley, & P. C. Smith (Eds.), What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (pp. 13–41). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C. (2012). Policy without politicians: Bureaucratic influence in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C., & Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy bureaucracy: Government with a cast of thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up—Evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British government. Public Policy and Administration, 17, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J. (2007). Soft craft, hard choices, altered context: Reflections on 25 years of policy advice in Canada. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, & D. Laycock (Eds.), Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 163–185). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1988). Symposium editors’ introduction. Policy Sciences, 21, 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J. P. (2000). Science, policy and practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Development, 71, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C., & Talbot, C. (2014). Sir Humphrey and the professors: What does Whitehall want from academics?. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafillou, Peter. (2015). The political implications of performance management and evidence-based policymaking. American Review of Public Administration, 45, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill (pp. 163–175). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence and Policy, 5, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L. E. Lynn Jr. (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (p. 23). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. A. (1979). Access to influence: Some effects of policy sector on the use of social science. American Behavioral Scientist, 22, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Science Communication, 1, 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingens, M. (1990). Toward a general utilization theory: A systems theory reformulation of the two-communities metaphor. Science Communication, 12, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social and Policy Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Joshua Newman

  2. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Brian Head

Authors
  1. Joshua Newman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Head
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Newman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Newman, J., Head, B. Beyond the two communities: a reply to Mead’s “why government often ignores research”. Policy Sci 48, 383–393 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9226-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9226-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation