Advertisement

Policy Sciences

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 289–303 | Cite as

Policy and regulatory design for developing countries: a mechanism design and transaction cost approach

  • Eduardo Araral
Article

Abstract

The first-generation literature on policy design has made considerable contributions over the last 30 years to our understanding of the process, politics and implications of policy design and instrument choice. This literature, however, has generally treated institutions as a black box and has not developed a coherent set of frameworks, theories and models of how institutions matter to policy design. In this paper, I unpack the black box of institutions using transaction cost and mechanism design to show how regulations can be better designed in developing countries when institutions are weak, unaccountable, corrupted or not credible. Under these conditions, I show that efficient regulatory design has to minimize transaction costs, particularly agency problems, by having incentive compatible (self-enforcing) mechanisms. I conclude with a second-generation research agenda on regulatory design with implications for environmental, food and drug safety, healthcare and financial regulation in developing countries.

Keywords

Transaction cost Mechanism design Infrastructure Institutions Policy/regulatory design Developing countries 

References

  1. Aghion, M., Dewatripont, P., & Rey, P. (1994). Renegotiation design with unverifiable information. Econometrica, 62(2), 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. M. (2006). Regulation, competition, and liberalization. Journal of Economic Literature, 10, 325–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. (1980) The collected works of James M. Buchanan (Vol. 9) (The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution).Google Scholar
  5. Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danau, D., & Vinella, A. (2013). Public-private contracting under limited commitment. Journal of Public Economic Theory (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  7. Dixit, A. (1996). The making of economic policy: A transaction cost politics perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dixit, A. (2001). Some lessons from transaction-cost politics for less-developed countries. Working Paper: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Estache, A., & Martimort, D. (1999). Politics, transaction costs, and the design of regulatory institutions. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2073. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Estache, A., & Martimort, D. (2002). Politics, transaction costs, and the design of regulatory institutions. Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Estache, A., & Wren-Lewis, L. (2009). Towards a theory of regulation for developing countries: Following Jean-Jacques Laffont’s lead. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), 729–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia, A., Reitzes, J., & Benavides, J. (2005). Incentive contracts for infrastructure, litigation and weak institutions. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 27(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomez-Ibanez, J. (2003). Regulating infrastructure: Monopoly, contracts and discretion. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Guasch, J., Laffont, J. J. & Straub, S. (2004). Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America. ESE discussion papers 103, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, D., & Lobina, E. (2005). Public resistance to privatisation in water and energy. Development in Practice, 15(3–4).Google Scholar
  17. Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkpatrick, C. H., & Parker, D. (2004). Infrastructure regulation: Models for developing Asia. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Laffont, J. (2005). Regulation and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laffont, J., & Martimort, D. (1999). Separation of regulators against collusive behavior. The Rand Journal of Economics, 30(2), 232–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laffont, J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory on incentives in procurement and regulation. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lejano, R. (2006). Frameworks for policy analysis: Merging text and context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Levy, B., & Spiller, P. (1996). A framework for resolving the regulatory problem. In B. Levy & P. T. Spiller (Eds.), Regulations, institutions, and commitment: Comparative studies in telecommunications (pp. 1–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowi, T. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  26. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1999). Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (2004). The politician and the judge: Accountability in government. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 1034–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nobel Prize Committee for Economic Sciences. (2007). Nobel minds 2007. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2007/maskin-interview.html.
  29. North, D. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Paul Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 21–65). Bellevue, TN: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pelztman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (2009). Health policy reform in China: Lessons from Asia. Social Science & Medicine, 68(12), 2256–2262.Google Scholar
  35. Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition framework. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1993). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  38. Stavins, R. (1995). Transaction costs and tradable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, J. (1997). What makes an independent regulator independent? Business Strategy Review, 8(2), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell journal of economics and management science, 2, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.Google Scholar
  42. Weimer, D. L. (1992). Claiming races, broiler contracts, heresthetics, and habits: Ten concepts for policy design. Policy Sciences, 25, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weimer, David L. (1993). The current state of design craft: Borrowing, tinkering, and problem solving. Public Administration Review, 53(2), 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weimer, D. L. (1994). Institutional design. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Weimer, D., & Vining, A. (2004). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, O. (1981). The economics of organization: A transaction cost approach. American Sociological Review, 87(3), 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williamson, O. (1985). The legal foundations of capitalism. Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
  48. Williamson, O. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, J. (1986). American government: Institutions and policies. Heath: Lexington.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. (2013). Doing business 2013: Smarter regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9615-5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations