Advertisement

Policy Sciences

, 42:323 | Cite as

What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions

  • James MeadowcroftEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article is concerned with governance of long term socio-technical transitions required to orient development trajectories of advanced industrial counties along more sustainable lines. It discusses the contribution that ‘transition management’ can make to such processes, emphasizes the irreducibly political character of governance for sustainable development, and suggests that the long-term transformation of energy systems will prove to be a messy, conflictual, and highly disjointed process.

Keywords

Sustainable development Sustainable energy Governance Politics Transition management Energy transition Long term policy change 

References

  1. Ashford, N. (2002). Government and environmental innovation in Europe and North America. American Behavioural Scientist, 45, 1417–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy maker and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braybrooke, D. (2004). Utilitarianism: Restorations; repairs; renovations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, M., Marsh, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elzen, B., Geels, F., & Green, K. (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., & O’Connor, M. (1998). Challenges in the use of science for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geels, F. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2007). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Grin, J. (2006). Reflexive modernization as a governance issue, or designing and shaping Restructuration. In J. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 54–81). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Grin, J. (2008). The multi-level perspective and the design of system innovations. In: van den Bergh, J., & Bruinsma, F. (eds. in association with Vreeker, R., & Idenburg, A.), Managing the transition to renewable energy: Theory and macro-regional practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 47–80.Google Scholar
  16. Grin, J., & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of policy learning: agency, structure and change. In F. Fisher, G. Miller, & M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Hendriks, C., & Grin, J. (2008). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. In J. Newig, J. Voß, & J. Monstadt (Eds.), Governance for sustainable development: Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Howlett, M. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Howlett, M., & Bennett, C. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2006). World energy outlook 2006. Paris: OECD/IEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2008). World energy outlook 2008. Paris: OECD/IEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC. (2005). In B. Metz, et al. (Eds.), Special report on carbon capture and storage. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  25. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  26. IPIECA. (2007). Increasing the pace of technology innovation and application: Enabling climate change solutions. London: International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association.Google Scholar
  27. Jordan, A. (2008). Governance for sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2003). Governance for sustainability through transition management. In: Paper for EAEPA conference, November 7, 2003.Google Scholar
  29. Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14, 78–91.Google Scholar
  30. Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2005). The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In M. Weber & J. Hemmelskemp (Eds.), Towards environmental innovation systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Kemp, R., Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2007). Assessing the Dutch energy transition policy: How does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions? Journal of Environment Policy and Planning, 9, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36, 4093–4103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafferty, W. (2004a). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  35. Lafferty, W. (2004b). From environmental protection to sustainable development: The challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Lafferty, W., & Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.). (2000). Implementing sustainable development: Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lenschow, A. (2002). Environmental policy integration: Greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  38. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.Google Scholar
  40. MEA. (2006). Ecosystem and human well-being: General synthesis. Washington: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Google Scholar
  41. Meadowcroft, J. (1997). Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literatures of political science. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 427–454.Google Scholar
  42. Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics? In M. Kenny & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Planning for sustainability (pp. 12–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Meadowcroft, J. (2005). Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10, 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meadowcroft, J. (2007a). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environment Policy and Planning, 9, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meadowcroft, J. (2007b). National sustainable development strategies: a contribution to reflexive governance? European Environment, 17, 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meadowcroft, J. & Bregha F. (2009). ‘Governance for sustainable development: the challenge ahead’, a scoping paper prepared for the Public Research Initiative, January 2009.Google Scholar
  47. Meadowcroft, J., & Hellin, M. (2007). Carbon capture and storage: imagining CCS as a technological transition and/or a magic bullet? In: 10th International conference on technology policy and innovation, Stavanger, June 17–20, 2007.Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell, B., & Van Ham, J. (2006). Canada’s CO 2 capture and storage road map. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.Google Scholar
  49. NEEP4. (2002). Where there’s a will there’s a world. The Netherlands Forth National Environmental Policy Plan, Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment.Google Scholar
  50. Newig, J., Voß, J., & Monstadt, J. (Eds.). (2008). Governance for sustainable development: Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Nilsson, M., & Eckerberg, K. (2007). Environmental policy integration in practice: Shaping institutions for learning. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  52. Pal, L. (2005). Beyond policy analysis. Scarborough: Thomson/Nelson.Google Scholar
  53. Rammel, C., Stagl S. & Wilfing H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems—A coevolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rip, A. (1992). A quasi-evolutionary model of technological development and a cognitive approach to technology policy. RISESST. Rivista di studi epistemologici e sociale sulla scienza e la technologia, 2, 69–102.Google Scholar
  55. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1989). Implementation and public policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  57. Schot, J. (1992). The policy relevance of the quasi-evolutionary model: The case of stimulating clean technologies. In R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, & V. Walsh (Eds.), Technological change and company strategies: Economic and sociological perspectives (pp. 185–200). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schot, J. (1998). ‘The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. History and Technology, 14, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simbeck, D. R. (2004). CO2 capture and storage—the essential bridge to the hydrogen economy. Energy, 29, 1633–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stahel, A. (2005). Value from a complex dynamic system’s perspective. Ecological Economics, 54, 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stirling, A. (2004). Opening up or closing down: Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science, citizenship and globalisation. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  63. Unruh, G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Von Goerne, G., & Lundberg, F. (2008). Last gasp of the coal industry. Goteborg: Air Pollution & Climate Secretariat.Google Scholar
  65. Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  66. WCED. (1987). Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences, 4, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations