Policy Sciences

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 165–180 | Cite as

Balancing alternatives and avoiding false dichotomies to make informed U.S. electricity policy

Article

Abstract

Recent events highlight the importance of electric energy policy and how to meet growing electricity demand. Price spikes, global climate change and other environmental concerns, national security threats, an aging infrastructure, and a restructured industry with mixed results are challenges that policy makers and the industry must address. Given the capital-intensive nature of the industry, investment decisions will determine in large part how successfully these challenges are met. One paper that favors energy efficiency, renewable energy, and small-scale distributed generation is examined in detail to test the proposition that fossil fuel and nuclear power should be part of the mix of new investments. To determine the future electricity resource mix requires having a complete and informed picture of the relative costs and benefits of various technologies. The levels of energy efficiency, renewable resources, and distributed generation can and should be increased, but coal and nuclear generation investments are also likely to be needed.

Keywords

Renewable energy Energy policy Electric utility industry Energy efficiency Nuclear power Fossil fuels 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the students of the Energy Planning and Policy seminar at Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, for their input, and acknowledge the comments of an anonymous referee.

References

  1. Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ambord, T. (2007). Dangerous drivers among us. In PreferredConsumer.com. Available at http://www.preferredconsumer.com/teen/articles/teen_drivers.html. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  3. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. (2007). Publications available at: http://www.aceee.org/.
  4. American Wind Energy Association. (1991). Top 20 states with wind energy resource potential. Available at http://www.awea.org/newsroom/pdf/Top_20_States_with_Wind_Energy_Potential.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  5. Apt, J., Gresham, L., Morgan, M. G., & Newcomer, A. (2007). Incentives for near-term carbon dioxide geological sequestration. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center.Google Scholar
  6. Awerbuch, S. (Ed.). (1996). Special issue: Valuing the benefits of renewables. Energy Policy 24: 2.Google Scholar
  7. A Literature Search on Hydroelectric Power in South America. (2007). Available at http://lilt.ilstu.edu/psanders/litsearch/hydroelectric.htm. Accessed 10 October, 2007.
  8. Burchell, R. W., & David, L. (Eds). (1982). Introduction: The energy-land use interface. In Energy and land use (pp. 189–213). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research.Google Scholar
  9. Car Accident Statistics (2007). Car-Accidents.com. Retrieved from http://www.car-accidents.com/pages/stats.html. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  10. Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology. (n.d.) Solar power: FAQs. Washington, D.C.: Renewable Energy Policy Project. Available at http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/995469913_2.html_142.htm. Accessed 22 January 2008.
  11. De Leon, K. (2007). The dark side of Kentucky: Krishtine de Leon reports on Tyson chicken houses. RollingStone March 9. Available at http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13751913/the_dark_side_of_kentucky_krishtine_de_leon_reports_on_tyson_chicken_houses/print. Accessed 10 October 2007.
  12. DSS Management Consultants, Inc. and RWDI Air Inc. (2005). Cost benefit analysis: Replacing Ontario’s coal-fired electricity generation. Available at http://www.localpower.org/documents/reporto_ome_costofcoal.pdf. Accessed 27 October 2007.
  13. Electric Power Research Council. (2007). The power to reduce CO2 emissions. Discussion Paper, August.Google Scholar
  14. Hlouskova, J., Kossmeier, S., Obersteiner, M., & Schnabl, A. (2002). Real option models and electricity portfolio management. OSCOGEN Discussion Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
  15. Kaslow, T. W., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Valuing flexibility in utility planning. The Electricity Journal, March: 60–65.Google Scholar
  16. KEMA, Inc. (2004). New Jersey energy efficiency and distributed generation market assessment. Final Report to Rutgers University, Center for Energy, Economic and Environmental Policy. Available at http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/ceeep/images/Kema%20Report.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  17. Lal, R. (1995). The role of residues management in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 5, 51–78. doi:10.1300/J064v05n04_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malthus, T. A. (1809). An essay on the principle of population (Vol 1, 3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Roger Chew Weightman.Google Scholar
  19. Massachusetts Institute for Technology. (2003). The future nuclear power. Boston, MA: MIT. Available at http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  20. Massachusetts Institute for Technology. (2007). The future of coal: Options for a carbon-constrained world. Available at http://web.mit.edu/coal/The_Future_of_Coal.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  21. Merriam-Webster Online. (2007). Dichotomy. Available at: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/dichotomy. Accessed 22 October 2007.
  22. Mr. Solar Energy. (2008). Solar energy panels, solar panel electric system. Available at http://www.mrsolarenergy.com/solar-energy-panels.html. Accessed 21 January 2008.
  23. National Association of State PIRGs. (2005). Energy efficiency: The smart way to reduce global warming pollution in the northeast. Available at http://www.rggi.org/docs/rggi_energy_8_24_05.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  24. National Commission on Energy Policy. (2004). Ending the energy stalemate: A bipartisan strategy to meet America’s energy challenges. Washington, D.C.: NCEP. Available at http://www.energycommission.org/site/page.php?report=13. Accessed 18 September 2007.
  25. National Energy Policy Development Group. (2001). National energy policy. Washington, D.C.: NEPDG. Available at http://www.wtrg.com/EnergyReport/National-Energy-Policy.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  26. National Regulatory Research Institute. (2007). What generation mix suits your state? Tools for comparing fourteen technologies across nine criteria. Available at http://www.nrri.ohio-state.edu/Electric/what-generation-mix-suits-your-state-tools-for-comparing-fourteen-technologies-across-nine-criteria/. Accessed 29 October 2007.
  27. Oster, S. (2007). China dam project to uproot millions more. The Wall Street Journal, 12 October, A3. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB119212305140656176-lMyQjAxMDE3OTEyMTExMjEzWj.html. Accessed 12 October 2007.
  28. Pimentel, D. (2002). Renewable energy: Current and potential issues. Bioscience, 52, 1111–1120. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1111:RECAPI]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. (2007). Model rule & amended memorandum of understanding. Available at http://www.rggi.org/index.htm. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  30. Ritter, J. (2005). Wind turbines taking toll on birds of prey. USA Today 1 March. Available at http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-04-windmills-usat_x.htm. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  31. Roques, F. A., Nuttal, W. J., Newberry, D. M., de Neufville, R., & Connors, S. (2006). Nuclear power: A hedge against uncertain gas and carbon prices?. The Energy Journal, 27, 4.Google Scholar
  32. Sangrillo, M. (2003). Putting wind power’s effect on birds in perspective. American Wind Energy Association. Available at http://www.awea.org/faq/sagrillo/swbirds.html. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  33. Socolow, R. H., Pacala, S. W. (2006). A plan to keep carbon in check. Scientific American September: 50–56 Medline.Google Scholar
  34. Sovacool, B. K. (2007). Coal and nuclear technologies: Creating a false dichotomy for American energy policy. Policy Science, 40, 101–122. doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9038-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Synapse Energy Economics. (2004). A responsible electricity future: An efficient, cleaner and balanced scenario for the US electricity system. Available at http://www.synapse-energy.com/Downloads/SynapseReport.2004-06.Natl-Commission.Responsible-Electricity-Future.03-49.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  36. United States Energy Information Administration. (2002). Impact of a 10-percent renewable portfolio standard. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/rps/pdf/sroiaf(2002)03.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  37. United States Energy Information Administration. (2006). Annual energy review 2006. Washington, D.C.: United States Energy Information Administration. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec2.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2007.
  38. United States Energy Information Agency. (2007). Annual energy outlook 2007: With projections to 2030. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency. No Date. The inside story: A guide to indoor air quality. Washington, D.C.: Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (6609J), Cosponsored with the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Available at http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/insidest.html. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  40. United States Government Accountability Office. (2004). Renewable energy: Wind power’s contribution to electric power generation and impact on farms and rural communities. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office. Available at www.gao.gov/new.items/d04756.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2007.
  41. Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research. (2005). A study of increased use of renewable energy resources in Virginia. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech University, Center for Coal and Energy Research. . The White House. 2006. Advanced Energy Initiative, Washington, D.C.: National Economic Council. Available at http://www.nei.org/filefolder/advanced_energy_initiative_booklet.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2008.
  42. Wikipedia. (2007a). Combined heat and power. Available at, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_heat_and_power. Accessed 26 October 2007.
  43. Wikipedia. (2007b). Renewable energy certificates. Available at, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_Energy_Certificates. Accessed 30 October 2007.
  44. Zerriffi, H., Dowlatabadi, H., & Farrell, A. (2007). Incorporating stress in electric power systems reliability models. Energy Policy, 35, 61–75. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statutes

  1. Energy Policy Act. 2005. Pub. L. No. 109-58, 42 U.S.C. §§ 15801.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations