Abstract
This paper investigates the synchronization of three identical oscillators, or clocks, suspended from a common rigid support. We consider scenarios where each clock interacts with the other two, achieving synchronization through small impacts exchanged between oscillator pairs. The fundamental outcome of our study reveals that the ultimate synchronized state maintains a phase difference of \(\frac{2\pi }{3}\) between successive clocks, either clockwise or counter-clockwise. Furthermore, these locked states exhibit an attracting set, the closure of which encompasses the entire initial conditions space. Our analytical approach involves constructing a nonlinear discrete dynamical system in dimension two. These findings hold significance for sets of three weakly coupled periodic oscillators engaged in mutual symmetric impact periodic interaction, irrespective of the specific oscillator models employed. Lastly, we explore the amplitude of oscillations at the final locked state in the context of two and three interacting Andronov pendulum clocks. Our analysis reveals a precise small change in the amplitude of the locked-state oscillations, as quantified in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Abraham, R.: Phase Regulation of Coupled Oscillators and Chaos, pp. 49–78. World Scientific, Singapore (1991)
Abraham, R., Garfinkel, A.: The dynamics of synchronization and phase regulation. http://www.ralph-abraham.org/articles/Blurbs/blurb111.shtml (2003)
Adler, R.: A study of locking phenomena in oscillators. Proc. IRE 34(6), 351–357 (1946)
Alligood, K.T., Sauer, T.D., Yorke, J.A.: Chaos. An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Andronov, A.A., Vitt, A.A., Khaikin, S.E.: Theory of Oscillators. Pergammon Press, Oxford, New York (1959/1963/1966)
Arrowsmith, D.K., Place, C.M., Place, C.H., et al.: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Bennett, M., Schatz, M., Rockwood, H., Wiesenfeld, K.: Huygen’s clocks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 458(2019), 563–579 (2002)
Birkhoff, G.D.: Collected Mathematical Papers. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (1950)
Boyland, P.L.: Bifurcations of circle maps: Arnol’d tongues, bistability and rotation intervals. Commun. Math. Phys. 106(3), 353–381 (1986)
Carvalho, P.R., Savi, M.A.: Synchronization and chimera state in a mechanical system. Nonlinear Dyn. 102(2), 907–925 (2020)
Czolczynski, K., Perlikowski, P., Stefanski, A., Kapitaniak, T.: Huygen’s odd sympathy experiment revisited. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 07(21), 2047–2056 (2011)
Fradkov, A., Andrievsky, B.: Synchronization and phase relations in the motion of two-pendulum system. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 6(42), 895–901 (2007)
Gilmore, R., Lefranc, M.: The Topology of Chaos, 2nd edn. Wiley, Weinheim (2011)
Goldsztein, G.H., Nadeau, A.N., Strogatz, S.H.: Synchronization of clocks and metronomes: a perturbation analysis based on multiple timescales. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 31(2), 023109 (2021)
Guckenheimer, J.: Isochrons and phaseless sets. J. Math. Biol. 1(3), 259–273 (1975)
Huygens, C.: Letters to de Sluse, Constantyn Huygens, (letters; no. 1333 of 24 February 1665, no. 1335 of 26 February 1665, no. 1345 of 6 March 1665). Societe Hollandaise Des Sciences, Martinus Nijho, La Haye (1895)
Jovanovic, V., Koshkin, S.: Synchronization of Huygens’ clocks and the Poincare method. J. Sound Vib. 12(331), 2887–2900 (2012)
Kapitaniak, M., Czolczynski, K., Perlikowski, P., Stefanski, A., Kapitaniak, T.: Synchronization of clocks. Phys. Rep. 1(517), 1–69 (2012)
Luo, A.C.J.: Discrete Systems Synchronization, p. pages 197-236. Springer, New York (2013)
Luo, A.C.J.: A theory for synchronization of dynamical systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14(5), 1901–1951 (2009)
Martens, E.A., Thutupalli, S., Fourrièrec, A., Hallatschek, O.: Chimera states in mechanical oscillator networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 26(110), 10563–10567 (2013)
Nakao, H.: Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators. Contemp. Phys. 57(2), 188–214 (2016)
Oliveira, H.M., Melo, L.V.: Huygens synchronization of two clocks. Sci. Rep. 5(11548), 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11548
Oliveira, H.M., Perestrelo, S.: Stability of coupled Huygens oscillators. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 28(10), 1362–1380 (2022)
Oud, W.T., Nijmeijer, H., Pogromsky, A.Y.: A Study of Huijgens’ Synchronization: Experimental Results, Volume 336 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, pp. 191–203. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Peña Ramirez, J., Olvera, L.A., Nijmeijer, H., Alvarez, J.: The sympathy of two pendulum clocks: beyond Huygens’ observations. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 23580 (2016)
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., Kurths, J.: Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Volume 12 of Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series, 1st edn, p. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Senator, M.: Synchronization of two coupled escapement-driven pendulum clocks. J. Sound Vib. 3–5(291), 566–603 (2006)
Strogatz, S.: Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. Penguin UK (2004)
Vassalo-Pereira, J.: A theorem on phase-locking in two interacting clocks (the Huygens effect). In: Avez, A., Blaquiere, A., Marzollo, A. (eds.) Dynamical Systems and Microphysics: Geometry and Mechanics, pp. 343–352. Academic Press, New York (1982)
Funding
The author ED was partially supported by the program Mobilità Docenti Erasmus+, Univ. Vanvitelli. The author HMO was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, UIDB/04459/2020 and UIDP/04459/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 The steps in the construction of the model
Step 1 first impact. Interactions of \(O_{1}\) on \(O_{2}\) and of \(O_{1}\) on \(O_{3}\), at \(t=0\).
When the system in position A attains phase 0 \(({\text {mod}}2\pi )\) it receives a sudden supply of energy, for short “a kick”, from its escape mechanism, this kick propagates in the common support of the three clocks and reaches the other two clocks.
Now, the phase difference between \(O_{3}\) and \(O_{1}\) is corrected by the perturbative value P:
The phase difference between \(O_{1}\) and \(O_{3}\) is
since P must be an odd function of the mutual phase difference.
The phase difference between \(O_{2}\) and \(O_{1}\) is
and the symmetric phase difference between \(O_{1}\) and \(O_{2}\) is
The phase difference between \(O_{3}\) and \(O_{2}\) depends on \(\left( CA\right) _{I}\) and \(\left( BA\right) _{I}\), and it is
Step 2 first natural time shift. The next clock to arrive at \(2\pi ^{-}\), from working hypothesis 3.2 (2), is the clock \(O_{3}\) at vertex C. The situation right before \(O_{3}\) receives its kick of energy is when the phase of this clock is \(2\pi ^{-}\).
At this point we have
Step 3 second impact. Clock \(O_{3}\) receives its internal kick, at the position \(2\pi \).
Now, we have
Step 4 second natural time shift. The next clock to arrive at \(2\pi ^{-}\), from working hypothesis 3.2 (2), is the clock \(O_{2}\) at vertex B. The situation right before \(O_{2}\) receives its kick of energy is when the phase of this clock is \(2\pi ^{-}\).
Then we have
Step 5 third impact. Clock \(O_{2}\) receives its internal energy kick. It reaches the position \(2\pi \).
Then we have
Step 6 (the final) third natural time shift. The next clock to arrive at \(2\pi ^{-}\), from working hypothesis 3.2 (2), is the clock \(O_{1}\) at vertex A. The situation before \(O_{1}\) receives its kick of energy is when the phase of this clock is \(2\pi ^{-}\), i.e., the cycles are complete.
At this point we are able to describe what happens to the phases after a complete cycle of the reference clock.
We have
Now, we compute the phase differences after the first cycle of \(O_{1}\).
We have
and
Hence, if we set \(x=BA\) and \(y=CA\), we obtain the system
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
D’Aniello, E., Oliveira, H.M. Huygens synchronization of three clocks equidistant from each other. Nonlinear Dyn 112, 3303–3317 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09241-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09241-9
Keywords
- Synchronization of oscillators
- Stability
- Andronov pendulum clocks
- Mutual symmetric impact interaction
- Amplitude increase in locked-state oscillations