Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of wing inertial forces on flight stability of hovering insects with varying stroke plane

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the effects of wing inertial forces on flight stability and required lift for hovering of insects with a varying stroke plane. In this paper, the stroke plane of a flying insect is called varying if the angle between the stroke plane and insect’s body remains constant during flight. Using a quasi-steady aerodynamic model and averaging techniques, while including the wing inertial forces in flight dynamics, the analytical results show that for an insect with a varying stroke plane the wing inertial forces have destabilizing effects on the insect’s translational motion during hover. Besides, the results suggest that an insect with a varying stroke plane requires less aerodynamic lift than its weight and a nonzero-mean drag for a stable hovering flight. Numerical simulations support the analytical results. To realize the mechanics behind the destabilizing effects of the wing inertial forces of an insect with a varying stroke plane and explain the properties of the lift and drag required for a stable hover, first, the vibrational control of a three degree of freedom force-input pendulum with a varying force direction is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of the hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 305(1122), 41–78 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deng, X., Schenato, L., Sastry, S.S.: Flapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects, part 2: flight control design. IEEE Trans. Robot. 22(4), 789–803 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doman, D.B., Oppenheimer, M.W., Sigthorsson, D.O.: Wingbeat shape modulation for flapping-wing micro-air-vehicle control during hover. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 33(3), 724–739 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tahmasian, S., Woolsey, C.A.: Flight control of biomimetic air vehicles using vibrational control and averaging. J. Nonlinear Sci. 27(4), 1193–1214 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, R.J.: The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24(2), 341–347 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerdes, J.W., Gupta, S.K., Wilkerson, S.A.: A review of bird-inspired flapping wing miniature air vehicle designs. J. Mech. Robot. 4(2), 021003 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, C., Rossi, C.: A review of compliant transmission mechanisms for bio-inspired flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Bioinspir. Biomim. 12, 025005 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, S., Hu, K., Huang, B., Deng, H., Ding, X.: A review on the mechanical design of hoverable flapping wing micro-air vehicles. J. Bionic Eng. 18, 1235–1254 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Phan, H.V., Park, H.C.: Generation of control moments in an insect-like tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle by changing the stroke-plane angle. J. Bionic Eng. 13, 449–457 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, Q., Chan, W.L.: Development and flight performance of a biologically-inspired tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle with wing stroke plane modulation. Bioinspir. Biomim. 14, 016015 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, G.K., Thomas, A.L.R.: Animal flight dynamics II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. J. Theor. Biol. 214(3), 351–370 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faruque, I., Sean Humbert, J.: Dipteran insect flight dynamics. Part 1: longitudinal motion about hover. J. Theor. Biol. 264(2), 538–552 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng, B., Deng, X.: Translational and rotational damping of flapping flight and its dynamics and stability at hovering. IEEE Trans. Robot. 27(5), 849–864 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, B., Deng, X., Hedrick, T.L.: The mechanics and control of pitching maneuvers in a freely flying hawkmoth (Manduca sexta). J. Exp. Biol. 214, 4092–4106 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karasek, M., Preumont, A.: Flapping flight stability in hover: a comparison of various aerodynamic models. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 4(3), 203–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ristroph, L., Ristroph, G., Morozova, S., Bergou, A.J., Chang, S., Guckenheimer, J., Jane Wang, Z., Cohen, I.: Active and passive stabilization of body pitch in insect flight. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130237 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elzinga, M.J., van Breugel, F., Dickinson, M.H.: Strategies for the stabilization of longitudinal forward flapping flight revealed using a dynamically-scaled robotic fly. Bioinspir. Biomim. 9(2), 025001 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taha, H.E., Hajj, M.R., Nayfeh, A.H.: Longitudinal flight dynamics of hovering MAVs/insects. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 37(3), 970–978 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taha, H.E., Nayfeh, A.H., Hajj, M.R.: Effects of the aerodynamic-induced parametric excitation on the longitudinal stability of hovering MAVs/insects. Nonlinear Dyn. 78, 2399–2408 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taha, H.E., Tahmasian, S., Woolsey, C.A., Nayfeh, A.H., Hajj, M.R.: The need for higher-order averaging in the stability analysis of hovering, flapping-wing flight. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 016002 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, J., Yeo, K.S.: A simplified dynamic model for controlled insect hovering flight and control stability analysis. Bioinspir. Biomim. 14, 056005 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taha, H.E., Kiani, M., Hedrick, T.L., Greeter, J.S.M.: Vibrational control: a hidden stabilization mechanism in insect flight. Sci. Robot. 5, eabb1502 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, J.H., Zhang, Y.L., Sun, M.: Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier–Stokes equations. J. Exp. Biol. 212(20), 3313–3329 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Orlowski, C.T., Girard, A.R.: Longitudinal flight dynamics of flapping-wing micro air vehicles. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 35(4), 1115–1131 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, J.H., Sun, M.: Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 2033–2046 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, M.: Insect flight dynamics: stability and control. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 615–646 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, J.-K., Han, J.-S., Lee, J.-S., Han, J.-H.: Hovering and forward flight of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: trim search and 6-DOF dynamic stability characterization. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 056012 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taha, H.E., Woolsey, C.A., Hajj, M.R.: Geometric control approach to longitudinal stability of flapping flight. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 39(2), 214–226 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bluman, J., Kang, C.-K.: Wing-wake interaction destabilizes hover equilibrium of a flapping insect-scale wing. Bioinspir. Biomim. 12, 046004 (2017)

  30. Xu, R., Zhang, X., Liu, H.: Effects of wing-to-body mass ratio on insect flapping flight. Phys. Fluids 33(3), 021902 (2021)

  31. Lyu, Y.Z., Sun, M.: Power requirements for the hovering flight of insects with different sizes. J. Insect Physiol. 134, 104293 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tahmasian, S., Kotulak-Smith, B.C.: The effects of wing inertial forces and mean stroke angle on the pitch stability of hovering insects. arXiv:2306.15592 (2023)

  33. Orlowski,Christopher T.: Flapping wing micro air vehicles: an analysis of the importance of the mass of the wings to flight dynamics, stability, and control. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2011)

  34. Orlowski, C.T., Girard, A.R.: Dynamics, stability, and control analyses of flapping wing micro-air vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 51, 18–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ellington, C.P.: The aerodynamics of the hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 305(1984), 145–181 (1122)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Farrell Helbling, E., Wood, R.J.: A review of propulsion, power, and control architectures for insect-scale flapping-wing vehicles. Appl. Mech. Rev. 70(1), 010801 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bogoliubov, N.N., Mitropolsky, Y.A.: Asymtotic Methods in the Theory of Non-linear Oscillations. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sanders, J.A., Verhulst, F.: Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P.: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bullo, F.: Averaging and vibrational control of mechanical systems. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 41(2), 542–562 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Bullo, F., Lewis, A.D.: Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tahmasian, S., Woolsey, C.A.: On closed-loop vibrational control of underactuated mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 108, 329–347 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Meerkov, S.M.: Vibrational control theory. J. Frankl. Inst. 303(2), 117–128 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Meerkov, S.M.: Principle of vibrational control: theory and applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 25(4), 755–762 (1980)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Meirovitch, L.: Methods of Analytical Dynamics. Dover Publications, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vela, P.A., Burdick, J.W.: A general averaging theory via series expansions. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, CO, June, pp. 1530–1535 (2003)

  47. Vela, P.A., Morgansen, K.A., Burdick, J.W.: Second order averaging methods for oscillatory control of underactuated mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, May, pp. 4672–4677 (2002)

  48. Sarychev, A.: Stability criteria for time-periodic systems via high-order averaging techniques. In: Thoma, M., Allgower, F., Morari, M. (eds.) Nonlinear Control in the Year 2000, pp. 365–377. Springer, Berlin (2001)

  49. Mou, X.L., Liu, Y.P., Sun, M.: Wing motion measurement and aerodynamics of hovering true hoverflies. J. Exp. Biol. 214(17), 2832–2844 (2011)

  50. Liu, Y., Sun, M.: Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies. J. Exp. Biol. 211(13), 2014–2025 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dudley, R., Ellington, C.P.: Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees I. Kinematics and morphology. J. Exp. Biol. 148(1), 19–52 (1990)

Download references

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevak Tahmasian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahmasian, S. The effects of wing inertial forces on flight stability of hovering insects with varying stroke plane. Nonlinear Dyn 112, 317–330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09053-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09053-x

Keywords

Navigation