Abstract
The classical models of risk assessment and the forecasting tools of business revenue typically contain unknown parameters with a range of empirical values that are insufficient for making intuitive predictions. To improve the modeling and simulation approaches, it is necessary to deal with the associated data-sets, subject to several complex constraints, using smart programming tools. These constraints are responsible for the randomness, noise and perturbation, technically termed as the stochastic effects. Such stochastic processes, when incorporated with seasonality lead to the mean reverting L’evy-based Ornstein–Uhlenbeck approach. The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck modeling approach is used here for the assessment of the revenue. Regression learner models of machine learning are developed to explore impact of the change in temperature on pandemic thresholds and with this, the change in revenue. The current research strategy can prove to support the investors in their future investment planning and decisions and to forecast the risks and the fate of small and individual-based businesses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that the data generated during simulations, is generated based on the optimized parametric values and literature review as acknowledged.
References
Coleman, M., Marks, H.: Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment. Food Control 10(4–5), 289–297 (1999)
Ho, K., Leroi, E., Roberds, B.: Quantitative risk assessment: application, myths and future direction. In: ISRM International Symposium, OnePetro, (2000).
Apostolakis, G.E.: How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk. Anal. Int. J. 24(3), 515–520 (2004)
Van Ryzin, J.: Quantitative risk assessment. J. Occup. Med. 22, 321–326 (1980)
Kaplan, S., Garrick, B.J.: On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1(1), 11–27 (1981)
Mutshinda, C.M., Antai, I., O’Hara, R.B.: A probabilistic approach to exposure risk assessment. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk Assess. 22(4), 441–449 (2008)
Paltrinieri, N., Comfort, L., Reniers, G.: Learning about risk: machine learning for risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 118, 475–486 (2019)
Tuan, B.A., Pho, K.-H., Pan, S.-H., Wong, W.-K.: Applications in sciences in the prevention of covid-19. Adv. Decis. Sci. 26(4), 1–16 (2022)
Coppendale, J.: Manage risk in product and process development and avoid unpleasant surprises. Eng. Manag. J. 5(1), 35–38 (1995)
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Liu, N.: Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(2), 828–838 (2013)
Bartik, A.W., Bertrand, M., Cullen, Z., Glaeser, E.L., Luca, M., Stanton, C.: The impact of covid-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(30), 17656–17666 (2020)
Yu, Z., Abdel-Salam, A.-S.G., Sohail, A., Alam, F.: Forecasting the impact of environmental stresses on the frequent waves of covid19. Nonlinear Dyn. 106(2), 1509–1523 (2021)
Yin, M.-Z., Zhu, Q.-W., Lü, X.: Parameter estimation of the incubation period of covid-19 based on the doubly interval-censored data model. Nonlinear Dyn. 106(2), 1347–1358 (2021)
Tenreiro Machado, J., Ma, J.: “Nonlinear dynamics of covid-19 pandemic: modeling, control, and future perspectives. Nonlinear Dyn. 101(3), 1525–1526 (2020)
Lü, X., Hui, H.-W., Liu, F.-F., Bai, Y.-L.: Stability and optimal control strategies for a novel epidemic model of covid-19. Nonlinear Dyn. 106(2), 1491–1507 (2021)
Song, Z., Giuriato, M., Lillehaugen, T., et al.: Economic and clinical impact of covid-19 on provider practices in Massachusetts. NEJM Catalyst Innov. Care Deliv. 1(5), (2020)
Ferneini, E.M.: The financial impact of covid-19 on our practice. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 78(7), 1047–1048 (2020)
Liang, Z., Yuen, K.C., Guo, J.: Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment in a stock market with Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Insur. Math. Econ. 49(2), 207–215 (2011)
Chaiyapo, N., Phewchean, N.: An application of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process to commodity pricing in Thailand. Adv. Diff. Equ. 2017(1), 1–10 (2017)
Janczura, J., OrzeŃ, S., WyŃomańska, A.: Subordinated α-stable Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process as a tool for financial data description. Physica A 390(23–24), 4379–4387 (2011)
Vasicek, O.: An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Financ. Econ. 5(2), 177–188 (1977)
Moore, P.G., Moore, P.G.: The business of risk. Cambridge University Press (1983)
Rasmussen, N.C.: The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies. Ann. Rev. Energy 6(1), 123–138 (1981)
Nobile, A., Ricciardi, L., Sacerdote, L.: Exponential trends of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck first-passage-time densities. J. Appl. Probab. 22(2), 360–369 (1985)
Rounak, A., Gupta, S.: Stochastic p-bifurcation in a nonlinear impact oscillator with soft barrier under Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Nonlinear Dyn. 99(4), 2657–2674 (2020)
Ricciardi, L.M., Sato, S.: First-passage-time density and moments of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. J. Appl. Probab. 25(1), 43–57 (1988)
Lindner, A., Maller, R.: Lévy integrals and the stationarity of generalised Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes. Stochast. Process. Appl. 115(10), 1701–1722 (2005)
Fricker, T.E., Oakley, J.E., Urban, N.M.: Multivariate gaussian process emulators with nonseparable covariance structures. Technometrics 55(1), 47–56 (2013)
Ikeda, N., Watanabe, S.: Stochastic differential equations and diffusion processes. Elsevier (2014)
Benth, F.E., Šaltytė-Benth, J.: Stochastic modelling of temperature variations with a view towards weather derivatives. Appl. Math. Financ. 12(1), 53–85 (2005)
Lieth, H.: Phenology and seasonality modeling. Springer Science & Business Media (2013)
Li, P.: Pricing weather derivatives with partial differential equations of the ornstein–uhlenbeck process. Comput. Math. Appl. 75(3), 1044–1059 (2018)
Gupta, A.: Risk management and simulation. CRC Press (2013)
Yu, Z., Sohail, A., Nofal, T.A., Tavares, J.M.R.: Explainability of neural network clustering in interpreting the covid-19 emergency data. Fractals 30, 2240122 (2022)
Yu, Z., Arif, R., Fahmy, M.A., Sohail, A.: Self organizing maps for the parametric analysis of covid-19 seirs delayed model. Chaos Solitons Fract. 150, 111202 (2021)
Yu, Z., Sohail, A., Jamil, M., Beg, O., Tavares, J.M.R.: Hybrid algorithm for the classification of fractal designs and images. Fractals (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400030
Sohail, A., Yu, Z., Arif, R., Nutini, A., Nofal, T.A.: Piecewise differentiation of the fractional order car-t cells-sars-2 virus model. Res. Phys. 33, 105046 (2022)
Yu, Z., Gao, H., Cong, X., Naiqi, W., Song, H.H.: A survey on cyber-physical systems security. IEEE Internet Things J. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3289625
Nishtar, S., Boerma, T., Amjad, S., Alam, A.Y., Khalid, F., Haq, I., Mirza, Y.A.: Pakistan’s health system: performance and prospects after the 18th constitutional amendment. Lancet 381(9884), 2193–2206 (2013)
Patil, A.V., Somasundaram, K., Goyal, R.: Current health scenario in rural india. Aust. J. Rural Health 10(2), 129–135 (2002)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the data repositories: CSSEGISandData-COVID-19 and UNEP Environmental Data Explorer.
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Z., Sohail, A. Machine learning to explore the stochastic perturbations in revenue of pandemic-influenced small businesses. Nonlinear Dyn 112, 1549–1558 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09011-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09011-7