Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of aeroelastic response and aerodynamic stiffness effect of an airfoil in the presence of dynamic stall

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response characteristics and aerodynamic stiffness characteristics of the self-excited aeroelastic system under the influence of dynamic stall are investigated adopting CFD (computational fluid dynamics) method. It is found that as velocity increases, the response type changes from asymmetric LCOs (limit cycle oscillations) to symmetric LCOs due to the effect of dynamic stall. Special stable fixed-point responses and low-amplitude LCOs are also found between the asymmetric and symmetric high-amplitude LCO state. The stability of the fixed point is analyzed by combining traditional linearization method and energy map. By observing the flow field variations, it is found that the occurrence of these special responses is related to the separation of the boundary layer of lower surface near the trailing edge, and its mechanism is completely different from the high-amplitude limit-cycle oscillation dominated by dynamic stall. Systems with small equilibrium angular position enter the symmetric limit-cycle state more quickly after the Hopf bifurcation and dynamic stall occur on both upper and lower surfaces of the airfoil, as the velocity increases. While in the case of systems with large equilibrium angular position, the minimum angle of attack of aeroelastic responses decreases slowly before reaching the negative angle that allows dynamic stall to occur on the lower surface, the system remains in the asymmetric limit-cycle state over a wide range of velocities. Thus, aerodynamic stiffness of system with large equilibrium angular position changes non-monotonically due to the varying aerodynamic moment characteristics at the minimum angle of attack of asymmetric LCOs. Furthermore, by increasing the initial angular velocity, we found that the system responses all become symmetric LCOs and therefore the aerodynamic stiffness increases monotonically with the flow velocity. As to the effect of structural stiffness, it is found that the variation of the LCO amplitude with the structural stiffness coefficients will show different trends at different free-stream velocities. Energy maps show that different parametric distributions of the energy transfer at different free-stream velocities contribute to this phenomenon. Aerodynamic stiffness maps based on equivalent linearization method are also established to explain the aerodynamic stiffness variation. Moreover, when entering the symmetric LCO state, the structural stiffness no longer has a significant effect on the aerodynamic stiffness of the system, as the LCO amplitude and the aerodynamic moment characteristics do not vary much, which results in constant dimensionless aerodynamic stiffness coefficient for this stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Corke, T.C., Thomas, F.O.: Dynamic stall in pitching airfoils: aerodynamic damping and compressibility effects. Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 47, 479–505 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-013632

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, B., Price, S., Wong, Y.: Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of airfoils: bifurcation and chaos. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 35(3), 205–334 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-0421(98)00015-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Halfman, R.L., Johnson, H.C., Haley, S.M.: Evaluation of high-angle attack aerodynamic-derivative data and stall-flutter prediction techniques. Techn. Rep. Arch. Image Libr. 36(3), 513–8 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carta, F.O., Niebanck, C.F.: Prediction of rotor instability at high forward speeds. volume 3. stall flutter. Technical report, U.S. Army Aviation Material Lab. , Wright-Patterson AFB (United States), TR-44-177-AMC-332 (1969)

  5. Oates, G.C.: Aircraft Propulsion Systems Technology and Design, pp. 384–523. AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Washington, D.C. (1989)

  6. Bowles, P.O., Corke, T.C., Coleman, D.G., Thomas, F.O., Wasikowski, M.: Improved understanding of aerodynamic damping through the hilbert transform. AIAA J. 52(11), 2384–2394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhat, S.S., Govardhan, R.N.: Stall flutter of naca 0012 airfoil at low reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Struct. 41, 166–174 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Menon, K., Mittal, R.: Flow physics and dynamics of flow-induced pitch oscillations of an airfoil. J. Fluid Mech. 877, 582–613 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilliatt, H.C., Strganac, T.W., Kurdila, A.J.: An investigation of internal resonance in aeroelastic systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 31(1), 1–22 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasconcellos, R.MGd., Pereira, Dd.A., Marques, F.D.: Characterization of nonlinear behavior of an airfoil under stall-induced pitching oscillations. J. Sound Vib. 372, 283–298 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimitriadis, G., Li, J.: Bifurcation behavior of airfoil undergoing stall flutter oscillations in low-speed wind tunnel. AIAA J. 47(11), 2577–2596 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poirel, D., Harris, Y., Benaissa, A.: Self-sustained aeroelastic oscillations of a naca0012 airfoil at low-to-moderate reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Struct. 24(5), 700–719 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu, Z., Wang, F.: Aeroelastic responses of airfoil under dynamic stall forced to oscillate by cyclic pitch input. J. Sound Vib. 115366 (2020)

  14. Qiu, Z., Wang, F.: Aerodynamic stiffness effect and sub-harmonic synchronization of aeroelastic system in the presence of dynamic stall. J. Fluids Struct. 107, 103410 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu, Z., Wang, F.: On aeroelastic response of an airfoil under dynamic stall using time delay neural network. Aerosp. Syst. 1(2), 87–97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-018-0010-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McAlister, K., Pucci, S., McCroskey, W., Carr, L.: An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil section. volume 2: Pressure and force data. Technical report, Ames Research Center (California), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (United States), NACA-TM 84245 (1982)

  17. Dimitriadis, G.: Introduction to Nonlinear Aeroelasticity. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Poirel, D., Métivier, V., Dumas, G.: Computational aeroelastic simulations of self-sustained pitch oscillations of a naca0012 at transitional reynolds numbers. J. Fluids Struct. 27(8), 1262–1277 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the project sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 12172220).

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Agreement No. 12172220

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuxin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, Z., Wang, F. Characterization of aeroelastic response and aerodynamic stiffness effect of an airfoil in the presence of dynamic stall. Nonlinear Dyn 111, 129–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07775-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07775-y

Keywords

Navigation