Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental observation of destabilization in a DC bus system and its stabilization with delayed feedback control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct-current (DC) bus systems are expected to play a significant role in next-generation power technology because of the rapid development of power electronics. However, it is well known that the bus line voltage can become unstable when electric power through the bus line is constantly consumed by loads. Bifurcation analysis of this instability has been previously performed. It has been reported that in theory, delayed feedback control, which was developed to stabilize chaotic systems, can suppress this instability. For practical applications, it is necessary to confirm these analytical results with circuit experiments. In this study, the dynamics of a DC bus system without control and with delayed feedback control are experimentally investigated. The following three main results are obtained. First, bifurcation phenomena are experimentally found to occur with an increase in power consumption in the DC bus system without control. Second, it is experimentally found that delayed feedback control stabilizes the operating point. These results provide experimental evidence that delayed feedback control can be utilized as a stabilization method for DC bus systems. Third, it is experimentally demonstrated that the delayed feedback controller can track the operating point when the power consumption changes slowly, but not when it changes rapidly. A frequency-domain analysis is conducted to analytically estimate the upper limit of the acceptable power consumption rate of change. The estimated upper limit is useful for designing the controller and restricting the change rate of power consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In “Appendix A,” delayed feedback control is compared to the adaptive techniques.

  2. We replace the capacitor for filtering, which had been implemented in a regulator (LM2675-5.0EVAL, Texas Instruments), by five \(1\,\upmu \hbox {F}\) capacitors and one \({0.1}\,{\upmu \hbox {F}}\) capacitor. They are included in C.

  3. A diode with a Zener voltage of \({20}\,\hbox {V}\) is used in the bus line to avoid high voltages being applied to devices connected to the bus line.

References

  1. Rohden, M., Sorge, A., Timme, M., Witthaut, D.: Self-organized synchronization in decentralized power grids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 064101 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kojima, C., Susuki, Y., Tsumura, K., Hara, S.: Decomposition of energy function and hierarchical diagnosis of power grid swing instabilities. Nonlinear Theory Appl. IEICE 7, 523–547 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Witthaut, D., Timme, M.: Nonlocal failures in complex supply networks by single link additions. Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 377 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Menck, P.J., Heitzig, J., Kurths, J., Joachim Schellnhuber, H.: How dead ends undermine power grid stability. Nat. Commun. 5, 3969 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Timme, M., Kocarev, L., Witthaut, D.: Focus on networks, energy and the economy. New J. Phys. 17, 110201 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Justo, J.J., Mwasilu, F., Lee, J., Jung, J.W.: AC-microgrids versus DC-microgrids with distributed energy resources: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24, 387–405 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Planas, E., Andreu, J., Gárate, J.I., Martínez de Alegría, I., Ibarra, E.: AC and DC technology in microgrids: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 43, 726–749 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elsayed, A.T., Mohamed, A.A., Mohammed, O.A.: DC microgrids and distribution systems: an overview. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 119, 407–417 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Torreglosa, J.P., García-Triviño, P., Fernández-Ramirez, L.M., Jurado, F.: Control strategies for DC networks: a systematic literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 319–330 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dragicevic, T., Lu, X., Vasquez, J.C., Guerrero, J.M.: DC microgrids—part II: a review of power architectures, applications, and standardization issues. IEEE Trans. Power Electr. 31, 3528–3549 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griffo, A., Wang, J., Howe, D.: Large signal stability analysis of DC power systems with constant power loads. Proceedings of IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, pp. 1–6 (2008)

  12. Cespedes, M., Xing, L., Sun, J.: Constant-power load system stabilization by passive damping. IEEE Trans. Power Electr. 26, 1832–1836 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, S., Gautam, A.R., Fulwani, D.: Constant power loads and their effects in DC distributed power systems: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 72, 407–421 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. AL-Nussairi, M.K., Bayindir, R., Padmanaban, S., Mihet-Popa, L., Siano, P.: Constant power loads (CPL) with microgrids: problem definition, stability analysis and compensation techniques. Energies 10, 1656 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dragicevic, T., Lu, X., Vasquez, J., Guerrero, J.: DC microgrids—part I: a review of control strategies and stabilization techniques. IEEE Trans. Power Electr. 31, 4876–4891 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riccobono, A., Santi, E.: Comprehensive review of stability criteria for DC power distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 50, 3525–3535 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Middlebrook, R.D.: Input filter consideration in design and application of switching regulators. Proceedings of IEEE Industrial Applications Society Annual Meeting, pp. 366–382 (1976)

  18. Wildrick, C., Lee, F., Cho, B., Choi, B.: A method of defining the load impedance specification for a stable distributed power system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 10, 280–285 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kwasinski, A., Onwuchekwa, C.N.: Dynamic behavior and stabilization of DC microgrids with instantaneous constant-power loads. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 26, 822–834 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gomes, C.C., Cupertino, A.F., Pereira, H.A.: Damping techniques for grid-connected voltage source converters based on LCL filter: an overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 116–135 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rahimi, A., Emadi, A.: Active damping in DC/DC power electronic converters: a novel method to overcome the problems of constant power loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 1428–1439 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lu, X., Sun, K., Guerrero, J.M., Vasquez, J.C., Huang, L., Wang, J.: Stability enhancement based on virtual impedance for DC microgrids with constant power loads. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6, 2770–2783 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chang, X., Li, Y., Li, X., Chen, X.: An active damping method based on a supercapacitor energy storage system to overcome the destabilizing effect of instantaneous constant power loads in DC microgrids. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 32, 36–47 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, S., Su, P., Zhang, L.: A nonlinear disturbance observer based virtual negative inductor stabilizing strategy for DC microgrid with constant power loads. Energies 11, 3174 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rahimi, A., Williamson, G., Emadi, A.: Loop-cancellation technique: a novel nonlinear feedback to overcome the destabilizing effect of constant-power loads. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59, 650–661 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Solsona, J., Gomez Jorge, S., Busada, C.: Nonlinear control of a buck converter feeding a constant power load. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 12, 899–903 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arora, S., Balsara, P., Bhatia, D.: Input–output linearization of a boost converter with mixed load (constant voltage load and constant power load). IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 34, 815–825 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao, Y., Qiao, W., Ha, D.: A sliding-mode duty-ratio controller for DC/DC buck converters with constant power loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 50, 1448–1458 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chincholkar, S.H., Jiang, W., Chan, C.Y.: A modified hysteresis-modulation-based sliding mode control for improved performance in hybrid DC–DC boost converter. IEEE Tran. Circuits Syst. II 65, 1683–1687 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, J., Lu, Y.: Adaptive backstepping sliding mode control for boost converter with constant power load. IEEE Access 7, 50797–50807 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huddy, S.R., Skufca, J.D.: Amplitude death solutions for stabilization of DC microgrids with instantaneous constant-power loads. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 28, 247–253 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hu, H., Wang, X., Peng, Y., Xia, Y., Yu, M., Wei, W.: Stability analysis and stability enhancement based on virtual harmonic resistance for meshed DC distributed power systems with constant power loads. Energies 10, 69 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gao, F., Bozhko, S., Costabeber, A., Asher, G., Wheeler, P.: Control design and voltage stability analysis of a droop-controlled electrical power system for more electric aircraft. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64, 9271–9281 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Su, M., Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Han, H., Hou, X.: Stability analysis and stabilization methods of DC microgrid with multiple parallel-connected DC–DC converters loaded by CPLs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9, 132–142 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bielawski, S., Bouazaoui, M., Derozier, D., Glorieux, P.: Stabilization and characterization of unstable steady states in a laser. Phys. Rev. A 47, 3276–3279 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Parmananda, P., Rhode, M.A., Johnson, G.A., Rollins, R.W., Dewald, H.D., Markworth, A.J.: Stabilization of unstable steady states in an electrochemical system using derivative control. Phys. Rev. E 49, 5007–5011 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rulkov, N.F., Tsimring, L.S., Abarbanel, H.D.I.: Tracking unstable orbits in chaos using dissipative feedback control. Phys. Rev. E 50, 314–324 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Namajūnas, A., Pyragas, K., Tamaševičius, A.: Stabilization of an unstable steady state in a Mackey–Glass system. Phys. Lett. A 204, 255–262 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ciofini, M., Labate, A., Meucci, R., Galanti, M.: Stabilization of unstable fixed points in the dynamics of a laser with feedback. Phys. Rev. E 60, 398–402 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schenck zu Schweinsberg, A., Dressler, U.: Characterization and stabilization of the unstable fixed points of a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser. Phys. Rev. E 63, 056210 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pyragas, K., Pyragas, V., Kiss, I.Z., Hudson, J.L.: Adaptive control of unknown unstable steady states of dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. E 70, 026215 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huijberts, H.: Linear controllers for the stabilization of unknown steady states of chaotic systems. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 53, 2246–2254 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Pyragas, K.: Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Phys. Lett. A 170, 421–428 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pyragas, K.: Delayed feedback control of chaos. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 2309–2334 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Schöll, E., Schuster, H.G.: Handbook of Chaos Control. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Hövel, P.: Control of Complex Nonlinear Systems with Delay. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Konishi, K., Sugitani, Y., Hara, N.: Analysis of a DC bus system with a nonlinear constant power load and its delayed feedback control. Phys. Rev. E 89, 022906 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Konishi, K., Sugitani, Y., Hara, N.: Dynamics of DC bus networks and their stabilization by decentralized delayed feedback. Phys. Rev. E 91, 012911 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Yoshida, K., Konishi, K., Hara, N.: Tracking of operating point in DC bus system with delayed feedback control for time-varying loads. Proceedings of International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and Its Applications, pp. 663–666 (2016)

  50. Sudhoff, S.D., Corzine, K.A., Glover, S.F., Hegner, H.J., Robey, H.N.: DC link stabilized field oriented control of electric propulsion systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 13, 27–33 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kokame, H., Hirata, K., Konishi, K., Mori, T.: State difference feedback for stabilizing uncertain steady states of non-linear systems. Int. J. Control 74, 537–546 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, H., Liserre, M., Blaabjerg, F.: Toward reliable power electronics: challenges, design tools, and opportunities. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 7, 17–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, H., Blaabjerg, F.: Reliability of capacitors for DC-link applications in power electronic converters—an overview. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 50, 3569–3578 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kokame, H., Hirata, K., Konishi, K., Mori, T.: Difference feedback can stabilize uncertain steady states. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 46, 1908–1913 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (JP26289131, JP18H03306).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiji Konishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Comparison to adaptive techniques

Fig. 17
figure 17

Circuit diagram of amplifier connected to \(R_{L}\) in CPL circuit

Fig. 18
figure 18

Bipolar power supply connected to DC bus line to set initial voltages

Fig. 19
figure 19

Circuit implementation of delay unit

Derivative control and low-/high-pass first-order RC filter techniques can also track the operating point. However, derivative control is sensitive to high-frequency noise in practical situations, because its control law requires differentiation. Moreover, low-/high-pass first-order RC filter techniques require an additional large capacitor (e.g., an electrolytic capacitor) to stabilize the system. In general, capacitors have a high maintenance cost and reduce the lifetime of power electronic equipment [52, 53]. In contrast, delayed feedback control requires neither differentiation [54] nor capacitors.

Appendix B: Amplifier in CPL

A circuit diagram of an amplifier connected to load resistance \(R_{L}\) in the CPL circuit (see Fig. 3) is shown in Fig. 17, where the main device is an audio power amplifier (LM3886, Texas Instruments).

Appendix C: Experimental procedure for setting initial points

This appendix describes the experimental procedure used for setting the initial points \(v_{P}(0)\)\((\Leftrightarrow x(0))\) and \(i_{L}(0)\)\((\Leftrightarrow y(0))\). To set these points to the desired voltage and current, a bipolar power supply, which consists of a standard DC power supply (PW18-2, KENWOOD) and a constant voltage load (CVL) (PLZ164W, KIKUSUI), is connected to the bus line as illustrated in Fig. 18. When the switch is closed, the initial bus voltage is fixed at \(v_P(0) = v_{P0}\), where \(v_{P0}\) can be set to the desired value. The initial bus line current depends on \(v_{P0}\), \(i_L(0) = (E-v_{P0}) / r\); thus, these initial points are on the nullcline \(\dot{y} = 0\). When the switch is opened, the DC bus system starts from the initial voltage and current.

Appendix D: Digital implementation of delay unit

The circuit of the delay unit is shown in Fig. 19. In this unit, a peripheral interface controller (PIC; PIC18F2550-I/SP, Microchip Technology) is used as a digital computer. Voltage \(v_{p}(t)\) is applied to the level-shift circuit, which shifts the voltage range of \(v_{p}(t)\) to the range 0–5 V, since the PIC can deal with this range. The shifted voltage is sent to the input terminal RA0 of an analog-to-digital converter built into the PIC and transformed into a digital data. The received data are delayed using the first-in-first-out rule program on the PIC. The delayed voltage signal is sent to the output terminals RB0, RB1,\(\ldots \), RB7 and transformed into an analog voltage by a digital-to-analog converter (R-2R ladder). The delayed analog voltage is transformed into a voltage in the original voltage range by a differential amplifier. The delayed voltage \(v_{p}(t-\mathrm {\Gamma })\) is applied to feedback resistance \(r_{k}\). The control current \(i_{u}(t)\) in Eq. (9) is injected into the bus line.

The PIC has an analog-to-digital converter with 8-bit resolution and a sampling period of \({25}\,\upmu \hbox {s}\). The voltage resolution (0.043 V) is just \(0.24 \%\) of the source voltage E; the sampling period (\({25}\,\upmu \hbox {s}\)) is about \(1 \%\) of the natural period of the operating point. This resolution and this period are small and short enough for the digital controller to be used as an ideal analog controller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, K., Konishi, K. & Hara, N. Experimental observation of destabilization in a DC bus system and its stabilization with delayed feedback control. Nonlinear Dyn 98, 1645–1657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05273-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05273-2

Keywords

Navigation