Abstract
In this paper, we discuss a diffusive predator–prey system with mutually interfering predator and nonlinear harvesting in predator with Crowley–Martin functional response. The mathematical analysis of the system starts with the existence and uniqueness of solution of the system using \(C_0\) semigroup. The analysis reflects that the upper bound of rate of predator harvesting for the coexistence of the species can be guaranteed. In addition, we establish the existence and nonexistence of non-constant positive steady state. Explicit conditions on predator harvesting are obtained for local and global stability of interior equilibrium and also for the existence and nonexistence of non-constant steady-state solution. We also investigate conditions for Turing instabilities of the diffusive system analytically. Our results show that the effort of harvesting (g) provides a threshold value for existence of non-constant positive stationary solution. Furthermore, we illustrate the spatial patterns via numerical simulations, which show that the system exhibits interesting patterns. Some biological implications of obtained theoretical results have also been discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, C.W.: Mathematical Bioeconomics, the Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Wiley, New York (1976)
Berryman, A.A.: The origin and evolution of predator–prey theory. Ecology 73(5), 1530–1535 (1992)
Smith, J.: Models in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1974)
Lotka, A.: Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover, New York (1956)
Holling, C.S.: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398 (1959)
Ruan, S., Xiao, D.: Global analysis in a predator–prey system with non-monotonic functional response. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 61(4), 1445–1472 (2001)
Sun, G.-Q., Wu, Z.-Y., Jin, Z., Wang, Z.: Influence of isolation degree of spatial patterns on persistence of populations. Nonlinear Dyn. 83, 811–819 (2016)
Hassell, M.P.: Mutual interference between searching insect parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 40, 473–486 (1971)
Jana, D., Tripathi, J.P.: Impact of generalist type sexually reproductive top predator interference on the dynamics of a food chain model. In. J. Dyn. Control 5, 999–1009 (2017)
Crowley, P.H., Martin, E.K.: Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8, 211–221 (1989)
Dubey, B., Chandra, P., Sinha, P.: A model for fishery resource with reserve area. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 4, 625–637 (2003)
Chattopadhyay, J., Bairagi, N., Sarkar, R.R.: A prey–predator model with some cower on prey species. Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst. 3(4), 407–420 (2004)
Tripathi, J.P., Abbas, S., Thakur, M.: Dynamical analysis of a prey–predator model with Beddington–DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge. Nonlinear Dyn. 80, 177–196 (2015)
Verma, M., Mishra, A.K.: Modeling the effect of prey refuge on a ratio dependent predator–prey system with the Allee effect. Bull. Math. Biol. 80, 626–656 (2018)
Gupta, R.P., Chandra, P.: Bifurcation analysis of modified Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Michaelis–Menten type prey harvesting. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398, 278–295 (2013)
Dai, G., Tang, M.: Coexistence region and Global dynamics of a harvested predator–prey system. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58(1), 193–210 (1998)
Annik, M., Ruan, S.: Predator–prey models with delay and prey harvesting. J. Math. Biol. 43(3), 247–267 (2001)
Kar, T.K., Ghorai, A.: Dynamic behaviour of a delayed predator–prey model with harvesting. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 9085–9104 (2011)
Brauer, F., Soudack, A.C.: Stabiiity regions in predator–prey systems with constant-rate prey hiuvesthg. J. Math. Biol. 8, 55–71 (1979)
Xiao, D., Jennings, L.S.: Bifurcations of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with constant rate harvesting. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 65(3), 737–753 (2005)
Song, X.Y., Chen, L.S.: Optimal harvesting and stability with stage-structure for a two species competitive system. Math. Biosci. 170, 173–186 (2001)
Clark, C.W.: Mathematical models in the economics of renewable resources. SIAM Rev. 21, 81–89 (1979)
Krishna, S.V., Srinivasu, P.D.N., Kaymakcalan, B.: Conservation of an ecosystem through optimal taxation. Bull. Math. Biol. 60(3), 569–584 (1998)
Hirsch, H.W., Smale, S., Devaney, R.L.: Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos. Academic Press, London (2012)
Brauer, F., Castilo-Chavez, C.: Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology. Springer, New York (2012)
Kar, T.K., Pahari, U.K.: Modelling and analysis of a prey–predator system with stage-structure and harvesting. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 8, 601–609 (2007)
Liu, X., Meng, J.: The positive almost periodic solution for Nicholson-type delay systems with linear harvesting terms. Appl. Math. Model. 36, 3289–3298 (2012)
Clark, C.W., Mangel, M.: Aggregation and fishery dynamics: atheoretical study of schooling and the purseseine tuna fisheries. Fish. Bull. 77, 317–337 (1979)
Liu, W., Jiang, Y.: Bifurcation of a delayed Gause predator–prey model with Michaelis–Menten type harvesting. J. Theor. Biol 438, 116–132 (2018)
Das, T., Mukherjee, R.N., Chaudhari, K.S.: Bioeconomic harvesting of a prey–predator fishery. J. Biol. Dyn. 3, 447–462 (2009)
Hu, D., Cao, H.: Stability and bifurcation analysis in a predator–prey system with Michaelis–Menten type predator harvesting. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 33, 58–82 (2017)
Yang, R., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y.: A delayed diffusive predator–prey system with Michaelis–Menten type predator harvesting. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 28, 1850099 (2018)
Arditi, R., Ginzburg, L.R.: Coupling in predator–prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 311–326 (1989)
Banerjee, M., Banerjee, S.: Turing instabilities and spatio-temporal chaos in ratio-dependent Holling–Tanner model. Math. Biosci. 236, 64–76 (2012)
Banerjee, M., Abbas, S.: Existence and non-existence of spatial patterns in a ratio-dependent predator–prey model. Ecol. Complex. 21, 199–214 (2015)
Beddington, J.R.: Mutual interference between parasites or predators and it’s effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 44(1), 331–340 (1975)
DeAngelis, D.L., Goldstein, R.A., O’Neill, R.V.: A model for tropic interaction. Ecol. Soc. Am. 56(4), 881–892 (1975)
Tripathi, J.P., Abbas, S., Thakur, M.: A density dependent delayed predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 22, 427–450 (2015)
Sklaski, G.T., Gilliam, J.F.: Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternative to Holling type II model. Ecology 82(11), 3083–3092 (2001)
Tripathi, J.P., Tyagi, S., Abbas, S.: Global analysis of a delayed density dependent predator–prey model with Crowley–Martin functional response. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 30, 45–69 (2016)
Parshad, R.D., Basheer, A., Jana, D., Tripathi, J.P.: Do prey handling predators really matter: subtle effects of a Crowley–Martin functional response. Chaos Solitons Fract. 103, 410–421 (2017)
Upadhyay, R.K., Raw, S.N., Rai, V.: Dynamic complexities in a tri-trophic food chain model with Holling type II and Crowley–Martin functional response. Nonlin. Anal. Model. Control 15(3), 361–375 (2010)
Tripathi, J.P.: Almost periodic solution and global attractivity for a density dependent predator–prey system with mutual interference and Crowley–Martin response function. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-016-0298-6
Neuhauser, C.: Mathematical challenges in spatial ecology. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 48, 1304–1314 (2001)
Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C.: Spatial Ecology Via Reaction–Diffusion Equations. Wiley, West Sussex (2003)
Guan, X., Wang, W., Cai, Y.: Spatiotemporal dynamics of a Leslie–Gower predator–prey model incorporating a prey refuge. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 12, 2385–2395 (2011)
Du, Y.-H., Shi, J.-P.: A diffusive predator–prey model with a protection jone. J. Differ. Equ. 229(1), 63–91 (2006)
Ni, W., Wang, M.: Dynamics and patterns of a diffusive Leslie–Gower prey–predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. J. Differ. Equ. 261(7), 4244–4274 (2016)
Yin, H., Xiao, X., Wen, X., Liu, K.: Pattern analysis of a modified Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Crowley–Martin functional response and diffusion. Comput. Math. Appl. 67, 1607–1621 (2014)
Lou, Y., Zhou, P.: Evolution of dispersal in advective homogeneous environment: the effect of boundary conditions. J. Differ. Equ. 259, 141–171 (2015)
Banarjee, M., Petrovskii, S.: Self-organized spatial pattern and chaos in a ratio dependent predator–prey system. Theor. Ecol. 4, 37–53 (2011)
Sun, G.-Q., Chakraborty, A., Liu, Q.X., Jin, Z., Anderson, K.E., Li, B.L.: Influence of time delay and nonlinear diffusion on herbivore outbreak. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19(5), 1507–1518 (2014)
Tripathi, J.P., Abbas, S., Sun, G.-Q., Jana, D., Wang, C.-H.: Interaction between prey and mutually interfering predator in prey reserve habitat: pattern formation and the Turing–Hopf bifurcation. J. Frankl. Inst. 355(15), 7466–7489 (2018)
Li, L., Jin, Z., Li, J.: Periodic solutions in a herbivore-plant system with time delay and spatial diffusion. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 4765–4777 (2016)
Ni, W., Wang, M.: Dynamics and patterns of a diffusive Leslie–Gower prey–predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. J. Differ. Equ. 261, 4244–4274 (2016)
Sun, G.-Q., Wang, C.-H., Wu, Z.-Y.: Pattern dynamics of a Gierer–Meinhardt model with spatial effects. Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 1385–1396 (2017)
Chen, S., Yu, J.: Dynamics of a diffusive predator–prey system with a nonlinear growth rate for the predator. J. Differ. Equ. 260, 7923–7939 (2016)
Zhang, X.C., Sun, G.-Q., Jin, Z.: Spatial dynamics in a predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. Phys. Rev. E 85(2), 021924 (2012)
Sun, G.-Q.: Mathematical modeling of population dynamics with Allee effect. Nonlinear Dyn. 85, 1–12 (2016)
Du, Y., Peng, R., Wang, M.: Effect of a protection zone in the diffusive Leslie predator–prey model. J. Differ. Equ. 246, 3932–3956 (2009)
Rodrigues, L.A.D., Mistro, D.C., Petrovskii, S.: Pattern formation, long-term transients, and the Turing–Hopf bifurcation in a space-and time-discrete predator–prey system. Bull. Math. Biol. 73(8), 1812–1840 (2011)
Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., Lou, Y.: Approximating the ideal free distribution via reaction–diffusion–advection equations. J. Differ. Equ. 245, 3687–3703 (2008)
Sun, G.-Q., Wang, C.-H., Chang, L.-L., Wu, Y.-P., Li, L., Jin, Z.: Effects of feedback regulation on vegetation patterns in semi-arid environments. Appl. Math. Model. 61, 200–215 (2018)
Turing, A.M.: The chemical basis of mokphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 237, 37–72 (1952)
Zhou, J., Shi, J.: The existence, bifurcation and stability of positive stationary solutions of a diffusive Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Holling-type II functional responses. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 405(2), 618–630 (2013)
Leslie, P.H.: A stochastic model for studying the properties of certain biological systems by numerical methods. Biometrika 45, 16–31 (1958)
Leslie, P.H.: Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika 35, 213–245 (1948)
Tripathi, J.P., Meghwani, S.S., Thakur, M., Abbas, S.: A modified Leslie–Gower predator–prey interaction model and parameter identifiability. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 54, 331–346 (2018)
Pazy, A.: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Wang, M.: Stationary patterns for a prey–predator model with prey-dependent and ratio-dependent functional responses and diffusion. Phys. D 196, 172–192 (2004)
Pang, P.Y.H., Wang, M.: Strategy and stationary pattern in a three-species predator–prey model. J. Differ. Equ. 200, 245–273 (2004)
Peng, R.: Qualitative analysis of steady states to the Selkov model. J. Differ. Equ. 241, 386–398 (2007)
Tian, C., Ruan, S.: A free boundary problem for Aedes aegypti mosquito invasion. Appl. Math. Model. 46, 203–217 (2017)
Tian, C., Lin, L., Zhang, L.: Additive noise driven phase transitions in a predator–prey system. Appl. Math. Model. 46, 423–432 (2017)
Liu, Q.-X., et al.: Pattern formation at multiple spatial scales drives the resilience of mussel bed ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 5, 5234 (2014)
Liu, Q.-X., Doelman, A., Rottschafer, V., de Jager, M., Herman, P.M.J., Rietkerk, M., van de Koppel, J.: Phase separation explains a new class of self-organized spatial patterns in ecological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11905–11910 (2013)
Sun, G.-Q., Jusup, M., Jin, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, Z.: Pattern transitions in spatial epidemics: mechanisms and emergent properties. Phys. Life Rev. 19, 43–73 (2016)
Reichenbach, T., Mobilia, M., Frey, E.: Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games. Nature 448, 1046 (2007)
Acknowledgements
The project is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11671241 and 11331009, Outstanding Young Talents Support Plan of Shanxi province, and Selective Financial Support for Scientific and Technological Activities of Overseas Students in Shanxi Province. The research work of Jai Prakash Tripathi is supported by SERB, DST project [grant: ECR/2017/002786].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tiwari, V., Tripathi, J.P., Abbas, S. et al. Qualitative analysis of a diffusive Crowley–Martin predator–prey model: the role of nonlinear predator harvesting. Nonlinear Dyn 98, 1169–1189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05255-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05255-4