Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 499–510 | Cite as

Chaotic predation scheme for age-clustered one predator–one prey Lotka–Volterra

Original Paper


Lotka–Volterra differential equations deal with modeling of predator and prey populations and interrelation of population sizes in a continuous domain. Since all populations, be they predators or prays, are only the estimates in consequence of sampling process, this paper initially concerns with discretization schemes of one predator–prey Lotka–Volterra systems. Second-order Runge–Kutta approximation is used to discretize the original differential equations for flexibility to manipulate the system parameters. Subsequent to discretization, a novel predation scheme is introduced to enhance the rationalization of original model with age cluster-based and detailed rules which are based on reproductivity, predation ability, predation essentiality, food provision and consumption. Aging is also simulated with transitive structure of the algorithms that the alive individuals are getting older and changing clusters after the predation scheme is operated. Experiments revealed that our model exhibits not only fluctuations like the original model but also stable trajectories and fractal structure depending on the model parameters. Therefore, the main novelty of this paper briefly is the discovery of chaotic one predator–one prey system exhibiting chaotic behavior for a narrow interval and revealing a strange attractor which is very unique.


Predator and prey Lotka–Volterra Discretization Runge–Kutta approximation Predation scheme Chaotic 



The work and the contribution were supported by the project “Smart Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing Environments”, Grant Agency of Excellence, University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Informatics and Management, Czech Republic (Grant No. UHK-FIM-GE-2018).


  1. 1.
    Lotka, A.J.: Analytical note on certain rhythmic relations in organic systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 6(7), 410–415 (1920)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Volterra, V.: Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118, 558–560 (1926)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goh, B.S.: Global stability in two species interactions. J. Math. Biol. 3(3–4), 313–318 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kar, T.K., Ghorai, A.: Dynamic behaviour of a delayed predator–prey model with harvesting. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(22), 9085–9104 (2011)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jana, S., Kar, T.K.: Modeling and analysis of a prey–predator system with disease in the prey. Chaos Solitons Fractals 47, 42–53 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, S., Dong, L., Chen, L.: The study of predator–prey system with defensive ability of prey and impulsive perturbations on the predator. Chaos Solitons Fractals 23(2), 631–643 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jana, S., Ghorai, A., Guria, S., Kar, T.K.: Global dynamics of a predator, weaker prey and stronger prey system. Appl. Math. Comput. 250, 235–248 (2015)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kar, T., Batabyal, A.: Persistence and stability of a two prey one predator system. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2(2), 174–190 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutson, V., Vickers, G.: A criterion for permanent coexistence of species with an application to two prey, one predator system. Math. Biosci. 63, 253–269 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kar, T., Chaudhury, K.: Harvesting in a two-prey one-predator fishery. ANZIAM J. 45, 443–456 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elettreby, M.: Two-prey one-predator model. Chaos Solitons Fractals 39, 2018–2027 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, Y., Xiu, Z., Chen, L.: Dynamic complexity of a two-prey one-predator system with impulsive effect. Chaos Solitons Fractals 26, 131–139 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler, G., Waltman, P.: Bifurcation from a limit cycle in a two predator–one prey ecosystem modeled on a chemostat. J. Math. Biol. 12, 295–310 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cushing, J.: Periodic two-predator, one-prey interactions and the time sharing of a resource niche. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 44, 392–410 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farkas, M.: Zip bifurcation in a competition model. Nonlinear Anal. 8, 1295–1309 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muratori, S., Rinaldi, S.: Remarks on competition coexistence, (1989). SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 1462–1472 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, H.: The interaction of steady state and Hopf bifurcations in a two-predator one-prey competition model. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42, 27–43 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    May, R.M., Leonard, W.J.: Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29(2), 243–253 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, R., Xiao, D.: Bifurcations and chaotic dynamics in a 4-dimensional competitive Lotka–Volterra system. Nonlinear Dyn. 59(3), 411–422 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smale, S.: On the differential equations of species in compepetition. J. Math. Biol. 3, 5–7 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vano, J.A., Wildenberg, J.C., Anderson, M.B., Noel, J.K., Sprott, J.C.: Chaos in low-dimensional Lotka–Volterra models of competition. Nonlinearity 19(10), 2391–2404 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sprott, J.C., Wildenberg, J.C., Azizi, Y.: A simple spatiotemporal chaotic Lotka–Volterra model. Chaos Solitons Fractals 26(4), 1035–1043 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geijzendorffer, I.R., Van der Werf, W., Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Schulte, R.P.O.: Sustained dynamic transience in a Lotka–Volterra competition model system for grassland species. Ecol. Model. 222(15), 2817–2824 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thierry, H., Sheeren, D., Marilleau, N., Corson, N., Amalric, M., Monteil, C.: From the Lotka–Volterra model to a spatialised population-driven individual-based model. Ecol. Model. (2014).
  25. 25.
    Llibre, J., Xiao, D.: Global dynamics of a Lotka–Volterra model with two predators competing for one prey. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 74(2), 434–453 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang, D., Ji, C., Li, X., O’Regan, D.: Analysis of autonomous Lotka–Volterra competition systems with random perturbation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 390(2), 582–595 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doust, M.R., Gholizade, S.: An analysis of the modified Lotka–Volterra predator–prey model. Gen 25(2), 1–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    He, Q., Täuber, U.C., Zia, R.K.P.: On the relationship between cyclic and hierarchical three-species predator–prey systems and the two-species Lotka–Volterra model. Eur. Phys. J. B 85(4), 1–13 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muhammadhaji, A., Teng, Z., Rehim, M.: On a two species stochastic Lotka–Volterra competition system. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 21(3), 495–511 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, Q., Jiang, D.: The coexistence of a stochastic Lotka–Volterra model with two predators competing for one prey. Appl. Math. Comput. 269, 288–300 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Droz, M., Pękalski, A.: Coexistence in a predator–prey system. Phys. Rev. E 63(5), 051909/1-6 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trojan, K., Pękalski, A.: Dynamics of a predator–prey model in a habitat with cover. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 330(1), 130–138 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu, C., Yin, G.: On competitive Lotka–Volterra model in random environments. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 357(1), 154–170 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reichenbach, T., Mobilia, M., Frey, E.: Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka–Volterra model. Phys. Rev. E 74(5), 051907 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li, X., Mao, X.: Population dynamical behavior of non-autonomous Lotka–Volterra competitive system with random perturbation. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 24(2), 523–593 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen, F.: Positive periodic solutions of neutral Lotka–Volterra system with feedback control. Appl. Math. Comput. 162(3), 1279–1302 (2005)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molter, A., Rafikov, M.: Nonlinear optimal control of population systems: applications in ecosystems. Nonlinear Dyn. 76(2), 1141–1150 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krivine, H., Lesne, A., Treiner, J.: Discrete-time and continuous-time modelling: some bridges and gaps. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 17(02), 261–276 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Süli, E., Mayers, D.F.: An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Basic and Applied Research, Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations