Skip to main content
Log in

Overconfident agents and evolving financial networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of agent personality on the complex dynamics taking place in financial markets. Leveraging recent findings, we model the artificial financial market as a complex evolving network: we consider discrete dynamics for the node state variables, which are updated at each trading session, while the edge state variables, which define a network of mutual influence, evolve continuously with time. This evolution depends on the way the agents rank their trading abilities in the network. By means of extensive numerical simulations in selected scenarios, we shed light on the role of overconfident agents in shaping the emerging network topology, thus impacting on the overall market dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brunnermeier, M.K.: Banking Crises, pp. 28–36. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garber, P.M.: Famous first bubbles. J. Econ. Perspect. 4(2), 35 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Temin, P., Voth, H.J.: Riding the south sea bubble. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(5), 1654 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barberis, N., Thaler, R.: A survey of behavioral finance. Handb. Econ. Finance 1, 1053 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiller, R.J.: From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. J. Econ. Perspect. 17(1), 83 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farmer, J.D., Foley, D.: The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460(7256), 685 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farmer, J.D., Gallegati, M., Hommes, C., Kirman, A., Ormerod, P., Cincotti, S., Sanchez, A., Helbing, D.: A complex systems approach to constructing better models for managing financial markets and the economy. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214(1), 295 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barmish, B.R., Primbs, J.A.: On a new paradigm for stock trading via a model-free feedback controller. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 61(3), 662 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, J., Li, D., Cui, X., Wang, S.: Time cardinality constrained mean-variance dynamic portfolio selection and market timing: a stochastic control approach. Automatica 54(4), 91 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. He, J., Wang, Q.G., Cheng, P., Chen, J., Sun, Y.: Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with high-order coupled asset dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 60(5), 1320 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, H., Zhang, Q.: Trading a mean-reverting asset: buy low and sell high. Automatica 44(6), 1511 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiller, R.J.: Tools for financial innovation: neoclassical versus behavioral finance. Financ. Rev. 41(1), 1 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westerhoff, F.H., Dieci, R.: The effectiveness of Keynes–Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: a behavioral finance approach. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 30(2), 293 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fromlet, H.: Behavioral finance-theory and practical application: systematic analysis of departures from the homo oeconomicus paradigm are essential for realistic financial research and analysis. Bus. Econ. 36(3), 63–69 (2001)

  15. Pool, V.K., Stoffman, N., Yonker, S.E.: The people in your neighborhood: social interactions and mutual fund portfolios. The J. Finance 70(6), 2679 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeh, C.H., Yang, C.Y.: Social networks and asset price dynamics. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(3), 387 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Lellis, P., Garofalo, F., Iudice, F.L., Napolentano, E.: Wealth distribution across communities of adaptive financial agents. New J. Phys. 17(8), 083003 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Lellis, P., Di Meglio, A., Garofalo, F., Iudice, F.L.: The evolving cobweb of relations among partially rational investors. PloS ONE 12(2), e0171891 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garofalo, F., Iudice, F.L., Napoletano, E.: Herding as a consensus problem. Submitted to Nonlinear dynamics, (2016)

  20. Schweitzer, F., Fagiolo, G., Sornette, D., Vega-Redondo, F., Vespignani, A., White, D.: Economic networks: the new challenges. Science 325(5939), 422 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Blumm, N., Ghoshal, G., Forró, Z., Schich, M., Bianconi, G., Bouchaud, J.P., Barábasi, A.L.: Dynamics of ranking processes in complex systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(12), 128701 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Markines, B., Vespignani, A.: Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists. Phys. Rev. E 80(056103), 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, S.H., Yeh, C.H.: On the emergent properties of artificial stock markets: the efficient market hypothesis and the rational expectations hypothesis. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 49(2), 217 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D.: Overconfident investors, predictable returns, and excessive trading. J. Econ. Perspect. 29(4), 61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Odean, T. Available at SSRN 94143 (1998)

  26. Kahneman, D., Riepe, M.W.: Aspects of investor psychology. J. Portfolio Manag. 24(4), 52 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho, J.H., Swami, A. In: 2014 IEEE Military Communications Conference (IEEE, 2014), pp. 1627–1632

  28. Rivera, M.T., Soderstrom, S.B., Uzzi, B.: Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 36, 91 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Lellis, P., di Bernardo, M., Garofalo, F., Porfiri, M.: Evolution of complex networks via edge snapping. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regular Papers 57(8), 2132 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Scafuti, F., Aoki, T., di Bernardo, M.: Heterogeneity induces emergent functional networks for synchronization. Phys. Rev. E 91(062913), 1 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Glaser, M., Nöth, M.: Weber. In: Koehler, D.J., Harvey, N. (eds.) Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making, pp. 527–546. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Erdös, P., Rènyi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci 5, 17 (1960)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Chinazzi, M., Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J.A., Schiavo, S.: Post-mortem examination of the international financial network. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 37(8), 1692 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Fagiolo, G.: Clustering in complex directed networks. Phys. Rev. E 76(026107), 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Prof. Franco Garofalo for the fruitful discussion and insightful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Di Meglio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Lellis, P., Di Meglio, A. & Lo Iudice, F. Overconfident agents and evolving financial networks. Nonlinear Dyn 92, 33–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3780-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3780-y

Keywords

Navigation