Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conflicts among \(\varvec{N}\) armed groups: scenarios from a new descriptive model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose and analyze a new descriptive model of armed conflicts among N groups. The model is composed of \(N^2\) ordinary differential equations, with \(3(N^2+N)\) constant parameters that describe military characteristics and recruitment policies, ranging from pure defensivism to pure fanaticism. The results are only preliminary, but point out interesting (though not very surprising) properties: periodic coexistence is possible, and multiple attractors can exist; governmental groups cannot go extinct if they are highly defensivist, and rebels cannot be eradicated if they are highly fanatic. Shocks due to interventions of short duration of an external army can stabilize/destabilize the system and/or eradicate some group, and the same holds true for small structural changes. Other more subtle questions concerning, for example, the existence of chaotic regimes and the systematic evaluation of the role of strategic factors like power, intelligence, and fanaticism, remain open and require further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kress, M.: Modeling armed conflicts. Science 336(6083), 865–869 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MacKay, N.J.: When Lanchester met Richardson, the outcome was stalemate: a parable for mathematical models of insurgency. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(2), 191–201 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanchester, F.W.: Aircraft in warfare: the dawn of the fourth arm. Constable and Company Limited, London (1916)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson, L.F.: Mathematical psychology of war. W. Hunt, Oxford (1919)

  5. Richardson, L.F.: Mathematical psychology of war. Nature 135, 830–831 (1935)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiermeier, Q.: Attempts to predict terrorist attacks hit limits. Nature 517, 419–420 (2015)

  7. Lopes, A.M., Machado, J.T., Mata, M.E.: Analysis of global terrorism dynamics by means of entropy and state space portrait. Nonlinear Dyn. 85(3), 1–14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Gustav Feichtinger and Jonathan Caulkins for their comments and encouragement. The help of three anonymous reviewers has allowed us to significantly improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Della Rossa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rinaldi, S., Della Rossa, F. Conflicts among \(\varvec{N}\) armed groups: scenarios from a new descriptive model. Nonlinear Dyn 92, 3–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3446-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3446-9

Keywords

Navigation