Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Model order reduction of multibody system dynamics based on stiffness evaluation in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although various studies on reduced-order modeling (ROM) of flexible multibody dynamics have been conducted, the issue of efficiency still exists. Significant computational resources are required in order to handle rigid body motions and inertia forces along with the flexibility of each body. The absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) uses only the absolute values in global coordinates to describe the flexible motions of multibody dynamics. While the other conventional formulations have nonlinearities in mass matrices and inertia forces, the nonlinearities are concentrated in the internal forces in the ANCF formulation, which is analogous to the equations of nonlinear structural dynamics. This enables ANCF approaches to embrace the various ROM techniques that have been developed for nonlinear structural analysis. This paper adopts stiffness evaluation methods, which represent nonlinear internal forces as the sums of third-order polynomial displacements, in order to enhance the efficiency of the ANCF approach. A stiffness evaluation method based on element connectivity is proposed to improve the low efficiency of the conventional method and is combined effectively with an ROM technique without loss of accuracy. The proposed reduction method, which is referred to as SEECROM, is utilized smoothly with ANCF beam elements. A number of examples including a four-bar mechanism are demonstrated to verify the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muravyov, A.A., Rizzi, S.A.: Determination of nonlinear stiffness with application to random vibration of geometrically nonlinear structures. Comput. Struct. 81, 1513–1523 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00145-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shabana, A.A.: Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1, 189–222 (1997). doi:10.1023/A:1009773505418

  3. Escalona, J.L., Hussien, H.A., Shabana, A.A.: Application of the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation to multibody system dynamics. J. Sound Vib. 214, 833–851 (1998). doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.1563

  4. Yakoub, R.Y., Shabana, A.A.: Use of Cholesky coordinates and the absolute nodal coordinate formulation in the computer simulation of flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 20, 267–282 (1999). doi:10.1023/A:1008323106689

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Berzeri, M., Shabana, A.A.: Development of simple models for the elastic forces in the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. J. Sound Vib. 235(4), 539–565 (2000). doi:10.1006/jsvi.1999.2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerstmayr, J., Ambrósio, J.A.C.: Component mode synthesis with constant mass and stiffness matrices applied to flexible multibody systems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 73, 1518–1546 (2008). doi:10.1002/nme.2133

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwai, R., Kobayashi, N.: A new flexible multibody beam element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation using the global shape function and the analytical mode shape function. Nonlinear Dyn. 34, 207–232 (2003). doi:10.1023/B:NODY.0000014560.78333.76

  9. Kobayashi, N., Wago, T., Sugawara, Y.: Reduction of system matrices of planar beam in ANCF by component mode synthesis method. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26(3), 265–281 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11044-011-9259-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, D., Chen, G., Sun, R.: Model reduction of a multibody system including a very flexible beam element. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 28(8), 2963–2969 (2014). doi:10.1007/s12206-014-0703-4

  11. Sun, D., Chen, G., Shi, Y., Wang, T., Sun, R.: Model reduction of a flexible multibody system with clearance. Mech. Mach. Theory. 85, 106–115 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.10.013

  12. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sirovich, L.: Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I—coherent structures. II—symmetries and transformations. III—dynamics and scaling. Q. Appl. Math. (ISSN 0033-569X), 45(July), 561 (1987)

  14. Breuer, K.S.: The use of the Karhunen–Loève procedure for the calculation of linear eigenfunctions. J. Comput. Phys. 96(2), 277–296 (1991). doi:10.1016/0021-9991(91)90237-F

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, Y.C., Lee, H.P., Lim, S.P., Lin, W.Z., Lee, K.H., Wu, C.G.: Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications–part I: theory. J. Sound Vib. 252(3), 527–544 (2002). doi:10.1006/jsvi.2001.4041

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J.: Proper orthogonal decomposition-based parametric reduced order models for structural analysis and design optimization. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University (2015)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2012R1A3A2048841).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maenghyo Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, E., Kim, H. & Cho, M. Model order reduction of multibody system dynamics based on stiffness evaluation in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn 87, 1901–1915 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3161-y

Keywords

Navigation