Abstract
The dynamic behaviour of the railway vehicles dependents on the interaction that is developed between the wheels of the rolling stock and the rails. Furthermore, one of the most sensible issues in the railway industry is the damage on vehicles caused by the track conditions and the infrastructure deterioration due to the trainsets’ operation. The study of such phenomena requires the accurate definition of the track geometry that involves, not only the representation of the design track layout, but also the description of its irregularities. In this work, a methodology that includes the track imperfections, measured experimentally by the railroad companies, in the definition of the track model is developed. The purpose is to obtain realistic representations of the track, which are essential to study the dynamics of railway vehicles. The methodology described in this work is applied to study the influence of the track irregularities on the dynamic behaviour of the railway vehicle ML95, which is operated by the Lisbon metro company. For this purpose, a multibody formulation is used to build the vehicle model and a generic wheel-rail contact formulation is applied in order to determine, online during the dynamic analysis, the contact points location and the respective normal and tangential forces. The studies are performed in real operation conditions when travelling between two of the metro stations. The accuracy and suitability of the methodology presented here is demonstrated through the comparison of the dynamic analysis results against those obtained by experimental testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, E., Berg, M., Stichel, S.: Rail Vehicle Dynamics, Fundamentals and Guidelines. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm (1998)
Dukkipati, R.V., Amyot, J.R.: Computer-Aided Simulation in Railway Dynamics. Dekker, New York (1988)
Garg, V.K., Dukkipati, R.V.: Dynamics of Railway Vehicle Systems. Academic Press, New York (1984)
Kalker, J.J.: Survey of wheel-rail rolling contact theory. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 8(4), 317–358 (1979)
Kalker, J.J.: Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1990)
Shabana, A.A., Berzeri, M., Sany, J.R.: Numerical procedure for the simulation of wheel/rail contact dynamics. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 123(2), 168–178 (2001)
Shabana, A.A., Zaazaa, K.E., Escalona, J.L., Sany, J.R.: Modeling two-point wheel/rail contacts using constraint and elastic-force approaches. In: Proceedings of the IMECE’02: 2002 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 17–22 November (2002)
MDI, Mechanical and Dynamics: ADAMS/Rail 9.1.1 ADtranz Milestone I—Release Notes. Ann Arbor, Michigan (1999)
AEA Technology plc: VAMPIRE User Manual—V 4.32. Derby, UK (2004)
DeltaRail Group Ltd: VAMPIRE Pro User Manual—V 5.02. Derby, UK (2006)
Hippmann, G., Duke, M.: Advances in track modelling. SIMPACK News (2003)
MDI, Mechanical and Dynamics: ADAMS/Rail 9.1—Technical Manual. Ann Arbor, Michigan (1995)
MDI, Mechanical and Dynamics: Using ADAMS/Rail 9.1. Ann Arbor, Michigan (1998)
Pombo, J.: A multibody methodology for railway dynamics applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal (2004)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J.: General spatial curve joint for rail guided vehicles: kinematics and dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 9(3), 237–264 (2003)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J.: Modelling tracks for roller coaster dynamics. Int. J. Veh. Des. 45(4), 470–500 (2007)
Mortenson, M.E.: Geometric Modeling. Wiley, New York (1985)
Haug, E.: Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1989)
Nikravesh, P.E.: Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)
Pereira, M., Ambrósio, J.: Computational Dynamics in Multibody Systems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1995)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J.: Dynamic analysis of a railway vehicle in real operation conditions using a new wheel-rail contact detection model. Int. J. Veh. Syst. Model. Test. 1(1/2/3), 79–105 (2005)
Roberson, R.E., Schwertassek, R.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Schiehlen, W.: Advanced Multibody System Dynamics—Simulation and Software Tools. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1993)
Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J.: A computational efficient general wheel-rail contact detection method. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 19(1), 411–421 (2005). Special edn.
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J.: Application of a wheel-rail contact model to railway dynamics in small radius curved tracks. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 19(1–2), 91–114 (2008)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Silva, M.: A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 45(2), 165–189 (2007)
Asadi, A., Brown, M.: Rail vehicle wheel wear prediction: a comparison between analytical and experimental approaches. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 46(6), 541–549 (2008)
Chamorro, R., Escalona, J., González, M.: An approach for modeling long flexible bodies with application to railroad dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26(2), 135–152 (2011)
Jin, X., Wen, Z., Xiao, X., Zhou, Z.: A numerical method for prediction of curved rail wear. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18, 531–557 (2007)
Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R., Olofsson, U., Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Pereira, M., Ariaudo, C., Kuka, N.: Mapping railway wheel material wear mechanisms and transitions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit 224(3), 125–137 (2010)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Pereira, M., Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R., Ariaudo, C., Kuka, N.: A railway wheel wear prediction tool based on a multibody software. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 48(3), 751–770 (2010)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Pereira, M., Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R., Ariaudo, C., Kuka, N.: A study on wear evaluation of railway wheels based on multibody dynamics and wear computation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 24(3), 347–366 (2010)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Pereira, M., Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R., Ariaudo, C., Kuka, N.: Development of a wear prediction tool for steel railway wheels using three alternative wear functions. Wear 271, 238–245 (2011)
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Pereira, M., Verardi, R., Ariaudo, C., Kuka, N.: Influence of track conditions and wheel wear state on the loads imposed on the infrastructure by railway vehicles. Comput. Struct. 89, 1882–1894 (2011)
CP: Descrição Geral do Veículo de Análise Geométrica EM-120 (General Description of the Geometric Analysis Vehicle EM-120). Document from the Library of Portuguese Railway Operator, Lisbon, Portugal (1994) (in Portuguese)
Geismar: Engin de Controle de la Geometrie de la Voie—ECG 7 (Track Geometry Control Unit—ECG 7). Document from the Library of Lisbon Subway Company (1993) (in French)
De Boor, C.: A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer, New York (1978)
Akima, H.: A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 17(4), 589–602 (1970)
Irvine, L.D., Marin, S.P., Smith, P.W.: Constrained interpolation and smoothing. Constr. Approx. 2, 129–151 (1986)
Micchelli, C.A., Smith, P.W., Swetits, J., Ward, J.D.: Constrained Lp approximation. Constr. Approx. 1, 93–102 (1985)
Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J. Mech. Des. 112, 369–376 (1990)
Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 5, 193–207 (1994)
Shen, Z.Y., Hedrick, J.K., Elkins, J.A.: A comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis. In: Hedrick, J.K. (ed.) 8th IAVSD Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Road and Tracks, pp. 591–605. Swets and Zeitlinger, Cambridge (1983)
Polach, O.: A fast wheel-rail forces calculation computer code. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 33(Supplement), 728–739 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J. An alternative method to include track irregularities in railway vehicle dynamic analyses. Nonlinear Dyn 68, 161–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0212-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0212-2