Skip to main content
Log in

Some aspects of physical and numerical modeling of water hammer in pipelines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a computational method was used for the prediction of water transmission failure. The proposed method allowed for any arbitrary combination of devices in the water pipeline system. The method used was by a scale model and a prototype (real) system for a city main water pipeline where transient flow was caused by the failure of a transmission system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

λ :

Coefficient of combination

I :

Moment of inertia (m4)

w :

Weight (kg)

P :

Fluid power (pa)

z :

Elevation at the centroid (m)

t :

Time (s)

λ 0 :

Unit of length

p :

Pressure (N/m2)

α :

Pipe cross section area (m2)

V :

Velocity (m/s)

s :

Length (m)

f :

Friction factor

τ :

Shear stress (Pa)

H2H1:

Pressure difference (m-H2O)

C :

Surge wave velocity (m/s)

V :

Volume (m3)

F :

Fluid force (N)

W :

Frequency

q :

Flow rate (m3/s)

D :

Diameter of each pipe (m)

μ :

Fluid dynamic viscosity (kg/m s)

R :

Pipe radius (m)

γ :

Specific weight (N/m3)

ν :

Fluid dynamic viscosity (kg/m s)

J :

Junction point (m)

y :

Surge tank and reservoir elevation difference (m)

K :

Volumetric coefficient (GN/m2)

T :

Period of motion

A :

Pipe cross-sectional area (m2)

dp :

Is subjected to a static pressure rise (m)

h p :

Head gain from a pump (m)

h L :

Combined head loss (m)

E ν :

Bulk modulus of elasticity (Pa)

α :

Kinetic energy correction factor

P :

Surge pressure (m)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

C :

Velocity of surge wave (m/s)

g :

Acceleration of gravity (m/s2)

K :

Wave number

T p :

Pipe thickness (m)

E p :

Pipe module of elasticity (kg/m2)

E w :

Module of elasticity of water (kg/m2)

C 1 :

Pipe support coefficient

Y max  :

Max. fluctuation

Min.:

Minimum

Max.:

Maximum

Lab.:

Laboratory

References

  1. Asli, K.H., Nagiyev, F.B., Hagi, A.K.: Computational methods in applied science and engineering. In: Interpenetration of Two Fluids at Parallel Between Plates and Turbulent Moving in Pipe. pp. 115–128. Nova Science, New York (2009). https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=10681. Chapter 7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joukowski, N.: Paper to Polytechnic Soc. Moscow (1898)

  3. Allievi, L.: General Theory of Pressure Variation in Pipes (1902)

  4. Parmakian, J.: Water Hammer Analysis. Dover, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, D.J., Jones, S.E.: Water hammer charts for various types of valves. J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. ASCE 167–178 (January, 1973)

  6. Wylie, E.B., Streeter, V.L.: Fluid Transients. FEB Press, Ann Arbor (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brunone, B., Karney, B.W., Mecarelli, M., Ferrante, M.: Velocity profiles and unsteady pipe friction in transient flow. ASCE J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 126(4), 236–244 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koelle, E., Luvizotto, E. Jr., Andrade, J.P.G.: Complete operational simulation of pumped storage schemes. In: Water Power95—International Conference on Hydropower, vol. 3, pp. 2403–2412 (1995)

  9. Filion, Y.R., Karney, B.W.: Extended period analysis with a transient model. ASCE J. Hydraul. Eng. 128(6), 616–624 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamam, M.A., McCorquodale, A.: Transient conditions in the transition from gravity to surcharged sewer flow. Can. J. Civil Eng. 189–196 (1982)

  11. Savic, D.A., Walters, G.A.: Genetic algorithms techniques for, calibrating network models. Report No. 95/12, Centre for Systems and Control Engineering (1995)

  12. Walski, T.M., Lutes, T.L.: Hydraulic transients cause low-pressure problems. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 75(2), 58–62 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, Z.Y., Simpson, A.R.: A self-adaptive boundary search genetic algorithm and its application to water distribution systems. J. Hydraul. Res. 40, 191–203 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arturo Leon, S.: Improved modeling of unsteady free surface, pressurized and mixed flows in storm-sewer systems. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 57–58 (2007)

  15. Joukowski, N.: Paper to Polytechnic Soc. Moscow, Spring of 1898. English translation by Miss O. Simin. Proc. AWWA (1904)

  16. Asli, K.H., Nagiyev, F.B., Hagi, A.K.: Physical modeling of fluid movement in pipelines. In: Nanomaterials Yearbook—2009. From Nanostructures, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies to Nanoindustry, pp. 210–225. Nova Science, New York (2009). https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=11587. Chapter 17

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wylie, E.B., Streeter, V.L.: Fluid Transients. FEB Press, Ann Arbor (1983). Corrected copy: 166–171 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kodura, A., Weinerowska, K.: Some Aspects of Physical and Numerical Modeling of Water Hammer in Pipelines, pp. 125–133 (2005)

  19. Lee, T.S., Pejovic, S.: Air influence on similarity of hydraulic transients and vibrations. ASME J. Fluid Eng. 118(4), 706–709 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaveh Hariri Asli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asli, K.H., Naghiyev, F.B.O. & Haghi, A.K. Some aspects of physical and numerical modeling of water hammer in pipelines. Nonlinear Dyn 60, 677–701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9624-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9624-7

Navigation