Skip to main content
Log in

A velocity transformation method for the nonlinear dynamic simulation of railroad vehicle systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The solution of the constrained multibody system equations of motion using the generalized coordinate partitioning method requires the identification of the dependent and independent coordinates. Using this approach, only the independent accelerations are integrated forward in time in order to determine the independent coordinates and velocities. Dependent coordinates are determined by solving the nonlinear constraint equations at the position level. If the constraint equations are highly nonlinear, numerical difficulties can be encountered or more Newton–Raphson iterations may be required in order to achieve convergence for the dependent variables. In this paper, a velocity transformation method is proposed for railroad vehicle systems in order to deal with the nonlinearity of the constraint equations when the vehicles negotiate curved tracks. In this formulation, two different sets of coordinates are simultaneously used. The first set is the absolute Cartesian coordinates which are widely used in general multibody system computer formulations. These coordinates lead to a simple form of the equations of motion which has a sparse matrix structure. The second set is the trajectory coordinates which are widely used in specialized railroad vehicle system formulations. The trajectory coordinates can be used to obtain simple formulations of the specified motion trajectory constraint equations in the case of railroad vehicle systems. While the equations of motion are formulated in terms of the absolute Cartesian coordinates, the trajectory accelerations are the ones which are integrated forward in time. The problems associated with the higher degree of differentiability required when the trajectory coordinates are used are discussed. Numerical examples are presented in order to examine the performance of the hybrid coordinate formulation proposed in this paper in the analysis of multibody railroad vehicle systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbosa, R.: A 3D contact force safety criterion for flange climb derailment of a railway wheel. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 42(5), 289–300 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berzeri, M., Sany, J.R., Shabana, A.A.: Curved track modeling using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Technical Report # MBS00-4-UIC. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jerkovsky, W.: The structure of multibody dynamic equations. J. Guid. Control 1(3), 173–182 (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, S.S., Vanderploeg, M.J.: A general and efficient method for dynamic analysis of mechanical systems using velocity transformation. ASME J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des. 108(2), 176–192 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Netter, H., Schupp, G., Rulka, W., Shroeder, K.: New aspects of contact modeling and validation within multibody system simulation of railway vehicles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 29, 246–269 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pascal, J.P., Sauvage, G.: New method for reducing the multicontact wheel/rail problem to one equivalent rigid contact patch. In: The Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Railway Tracks, 12th IAVSD-Symposium, Lyon, France, pp. 475–489. Swets & Zeitlinger, B.V. Lisse, The Netherlands (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pombo, J., Ambrosio, J.: A computational efficient general wheel—rail contact detection method. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 19(1), 411–421 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathod, C., Shabana, A.A.: Geometry and differentiability requirements in multibody railroad vehicle dynamic formulations. Nonlinear Dyn. 1, 264–268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shabana, A.A., Tobaa, M., Sugiyama, H., Zaazaa, K.: On the computer formulations of the wheel/rail contact. Nonlinear Dyn. 40, 169–193 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shabana, A.A., Zaazaa, K.E., Sugiyama, H.: Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach. CRC, Boca Raton, FL (in press)

  12. Shampine, L.F., Gordon, M.K.: Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: The Initial Value Problem. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, Z.Y., Hedrick, J.K., Elkins, J.A.A.: Comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th IACSD Symposium, Cambridge, MA, pp. 591–605, August (1983)

  14. Shen, Z.Y., Pratt, I.: The development of a railway dynamics modeling and simulation package to cater for current industrial needs. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 215, Part F, pp. 167–178, (2001)

  15. Sugiyama, H., Shabana, A.A.: Trajectory coordinate constraints in multibody railroad vehicle systems. In: Proceedings of the Third Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Tokyo, Japan, (2006)

  16. Wehage, R.A.: Generalized Coordinate Partitioning in Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (1980)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed A. Shabana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinokrot, T., Nakhaeinejad, M. & Shabana, A.A. A velocity transformation method for the nonlinear dynamic simulation of railroad vehicle systems. Nonlinear Dyn 51, 289–307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-007-9211-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-007-9211-8

Keywords

Navigation