Skip to main content
Log in

Developing significant earthquake damage scenarios following the July 2018 earthquake swarm in the Sea of Galilee area near the Dead Sea Fault

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a damage scenario following an earthquake swarm event in high-risk areas, such as the inland Sea of Galilee (SoG) in Israel, is critical for significantly increasing public awareness in preparation for a strong earthquake event. Following the earthquake swarms in 2013 and 2020 that occurred near the Dead Sea Fault (DSF) system in the SoG, the present study adopts a conservative approach to damage scenario development, maintaining that these events should be treated as precursory swarms. Accordingly, different damage and loss scenarios were developed using the 2020 Federal Emergency Management Agency software program Hazus and new in-house spatial analysis and postprocessing tools. The results of the scenario analyses confirm that the most intensive damage is expected to be concentrated around the SoG, especially in the adjacent city, Tiberias, if a moderate earthquake (Mw ∼ 6) occurred soon thereafter along the DSF system. In contrast, if a stronger earthquake (Mw ∼ 7) was to occur, the damage may spread to distant cities, such as Beit She’an and Haifa (distances of more than 50 km). Considering the potentially high number of casualties, intensive damage to buildings and essential facilities, high economic loss, blockages of main roads due to slope failures, and weight of debris expected to accumulate near the SoG, we stress the importance of immediate action on the part of civil protection agencies based on the present scenarios to promote the readiness of the population and significantly reduce the anticipated disaster magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN (2009) Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: a multidisciplinary study of seismicity up to 1900. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1988) An analysis of the Eastern Mediterranean Earthquake of 20 May 1202. In: Lee WHK, Meyers H, Shimazaki K (eds) Historical seismograms and earthquakes of the World. Academic, London, pp 181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit R, Zilberman E, Enzel Y, Porat N (2002) Paleoseismic evidence for time dependency of seismic response on a fault system in the southern Arava valley, Dead Sea rift. Isr Geol Soc Am Bull 114:192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avni R (1999) The 1927 Jericho Earthquake, Comprehensive Macroseismic Analysis based on contemporary sources. (PhD). Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer G, Funning GJ, Shamir G, Wright TJ (2008) The 1995 November 22, mw 7.2 Gulf of Elat earthquake cycle revisited. Geophys J Int 175:1040–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begin BZ (2005) Destructive earthquakes in the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea – their recurrence intervals and the probability of their occurrence. Geological Survey of Israel. Report GSI/12/05

  • Ben-Menahem A, Nur A, Vered M (1976) Tectonics, seismicity and structure of the afro-eurasian junction—the breaking of an incoherent plate. Phys Earth Planet Inter 12:1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogoch R, Sneh A (2008) The geological map of Israel at 1:50,000 scale: Arbel sheet. The Geological Survey of Israel

  • Calvo R, Salamon A (2016) Toward a CO2 sequestration project in the jurassic saline aquifer of southern Israel: seismotectonic characterization. Int J Greenh Gas Control 47:48–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgina Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24:139–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics (2022) www.cbs.gov.il/he/settlements/Pages/default.aspx?mode=Yeshuv

  • Chandriyan H, Reddy R, Roy PNS (2022) Numerical precursory study on strong earthquakes in southern and Baja California. Geosyst Geoenvironment 1(100066):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulagain H, Rodrigues H, Jara J, Spacone E, Varum H (2013) Seismic response of current RC buildings in Nepal: a comparative analysis of different design/construction. Eng Struct 49:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemett N, Wladimir W, Gallo C, O’Reilly GJ, Gabbianelli G, Monteiro R (2022) Optimal seismic retrofitting of existing buildings considering environmental impact. Engineering Structures 250: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113391

  • Coburn AW, Spence RJS (1992) Factors determining human casualty levels in Earthquakes: Mortality Prediction in Building Collapse, Proceedings of the 10 WCEE, Madrid, Spain: 5989–5994

  • Daeron M, Klinger Y, Tapponnier P, Elias A, Jacques E, Sursock A (2005) Sources of the large A. D. 1202 and 1759 Near East earthquakes. Geology 33:529–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumaru R, Rodrigues H, Varum H (2019) Cost-benefit analysis of retrofitted non-engineered and engineered buildings in Nepal using probabilistic approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 122:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenblum R, Marco S, Agnon A, Rockwell T, Boas A (1998) Crusader castle torn apart by earthquake at dawn, 20 May 1202. Geology 26:303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenblum R, Marco S, Kool R, Davidovitch U, Porat R, Agnon A (2015) Archaeological record of earthquake ruptures in Tell Ateret, the Dead Sea. Tectonics 34:2105–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Rashidov T, Safak E, Turdukulov A (2005) Assessment of seismic risk in Tashkent, Uzbekistan and Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evison FF, Rhoades DA (1993) The precursory earthquake swarm in New Zealand: hypothesis tests. NZ J Geol Geophys 36(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1993.9514553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani S, Behnam B, Tahershamsi A (2020) Macrozonation of seismic transient and permanent ground deformation of Iran. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:2889–2903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2020) Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual (Hazus 4.2 SP3), Washington DC, United States, pp 436

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Developed by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC pp XX

  • Felsenstein D, Elbaum E, levi T, Calvo R (2021) Post–processing Hazus earthquake damage and loss assessments for individual buildings. Nat Hazards 105:21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer T, Hainzl S (2021) The growth of earthquake clusters. Front Earth Sci 9:638336. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.638336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund R, Zak I, Garfunkel Z (1968) Age and rate of sinistral movement along the Dead Sea rift. Nature 220:253–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frucht E, Salamon A, Rozelle J, Levi T, Calvo R, Avirav V, Burns JN, Zuzak C, Gal E, Trapper P, Galanti B, Bausch D (2021) Tsunami loss assessment based on Hazus approach – the Bat Galim, Israel, case study. Eng Geol 289(106175):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfunkel Z (1981) Internal structure of the Dead Sea leaky transform (rift) in relation to plate kinematics. Tectonophysics 80:81–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfunkel Z (2014) Lateral Motion and Deformation Along the Dead Sea Transform. In: Z. Garfunkel (eds.), Dead Sea Transform Fault System: Reviews, Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences 6, Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht. Chapter 5 109–150

  • Gasperini L, Lazar M, Mazzini A, Lupi M, Haddad A, Hensen C, Schmidt M, Caracausi A, Ligi M, Polonia A (2020) Neotectonics of the sea of Galilee (northeast Israel): implication for geodynamics and seismicity along the Dead Sea Fault system. Sci Rep 10:11932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67930-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GII (Geophysical Institute of Israel) 2017 Seismological Bulletin earthquakes in and around Israel in 2013. Geophysical Institute of Israel, Report No. 030/880/17

  • Gorstein M, Wetzler N, Kurzon I (2020) Seismological Bulletin earthquakes in the vicinity of Israel during 2018. Geological Survey of Israel, Report No. TR-GSI/06/2020

  • Guidoboni E, Comastri A (2005) Catalogue of earthquakes and tsunamis in the Mediterranean area from the 11th to the 15th century. INGV-SGA? Bologna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidoboni E, Comastri A, Traina G (1994) Catalogue of ancient earthquakes in the Mediterranean area up to the 10th century. ING-SGA, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati B (2006) Earthquake risk assessment of buildings: applicability of Hazus in Dehradun, India. Published Master Degree in International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation ENSCHEDE, The Netherlands, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad A, Alcanie M, Zahradník J, Lazar M, Antunes V, Gasperini L et al (2020) Tectonics of the Dead Sea fault driving the July 2018 seismic swarm in the sea of Galilee (Lake Kinneret), Israel. J Geophys Research: Solid Earth 125:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018963. e2019JB018963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JK, Calvo R (2005) Landforms of Israel: digital shaded relief maps of Israel, 1:500,000 scale. Grayscale and color. In: Hall JK, Krasheninnikov VA, Hirsch F, Benjamini C (eds) Geological Framework of the Levant. and A. Flexer), Plate XI, In

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamiel Y, Piatibratova O (2023) Transient behavior and interplay between seismic and aseismic deformation near the tip of a creeping segment: insights from the northern Jordan Valley segment of the Dead Sea Fault. Geophys Res Lett 50:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamiel Y, Amit R, Begin ZB, Marco S, Katz O, Salamon A, Zilberman E, Porat N (2009) The seismicity along the Dead Sea fault during the last 60,000 years. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2020–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamiel Y, Piatibratova O, Mizrahi Y (2016) Creep along the northern Jordan Valley section of the Dead Sea Fault. Geophys Res Lett 43:2494–2501. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos MC, Silva V (2022) Exploring benefit cost analysis to support earthquake risk mitigation in Central America. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 80:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz S, Garfunkel Z, Ben-Gai Y, Reznikov M, Rotstein Y, Gvirtzman H (2002) The tectonic framework of a complex pull-apart basin: seismic reflection observations in the sea of Galilee, Dead Sea transform. Tectonophysics 359(3–4):289–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00516-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel Standard SI (413) 2013 Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, Amendment No. 5. The Standards Institution of Israel

  • Jayanta G, Saxena V (2002) Extreme losses from natural disasters—earthquakes, tropical cyclones and extratropical cyclones. Applied Insurance Research Inc. 101 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02199, pp 1–14

  • Katz O, Almog A (2006) Map of countrywide danger of slope slides in Israel, northern sheet, scale: 1:200,000. Final Report, Isr. Geol. Surv. Report #GSI/38/2006 (in Hebrew)

  • Katz O, Hecht H, Almog E (2008) Geological database for Hazus: geotechnical and landslides susceptibility maps. Geological Survey of Israel. Report GSI/08/08 (in Hebrew)

  • Klar A, Meirova T, Zaslavsky Y, Shapira A (2011) Spectral acceleration maps for use in SI 413 amendment No. 5. Geophysical Institute of Israel, Report No. 522/599/11. The Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, The National Building Research Institute Report No, pp 2012938–2012931

  • Korkmaz KA (2009) Earthquake disaster risk assessment and evaluation for Turkey. Environ Geol 57:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi T, Bausch D, Katz O, Rozelle J, Salamon A (2015) Insights from Hazus loss estimations in Israel for Dead Sea transform. Earthquakes Nat Hazards 75:365–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi T, Salamon A, Bausch D, Rozelle J, Cutrell A, Hoyland S, Hamiel Y, Katz O, Calvo R, Gvirtzman Z, Ackerman B, Gavrieli I (2018) Earthquake scenario in a national drill, the case of ‘‘Turning Point 6’’, 2012, Israel. Natural Hazards, 92: 113–132

  • Levi T, Calvo R, Avirav V, Hamiel Y (2019) Economic loss scenarios (buildings) for Financial Management of Earthquake Risk in Israel (in Hebrew). Geological Survey of Israel, Report No. GSI/07/2019, 31 p

  • Lohman RB, McGuire JJ 2007 earthquake swarms driven by aseismic creep in the Salton Trough. Calif J Geophys Res 112, B04405: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004596

  • Marco S, Rockwell TK, Heimann A, Frieslander U, Agnon A (2005) Late holocene slip of the Dead Sea transform revealed in 3D palaeoseismic trenches on the Jordan Gorge segment. Earth Planet Sci Lett 234:189–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nastev M (2014) Adapting Hazus for seismic risk assessment in Canada. Can Geotech J 51:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemer T, Meghraoui M (2006) Evidence of coseismic ruptures along the Roum fault (Lebanon): a possible source for the AD 1837 earthquake. J Struct Geol 28:1483–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter N, Ishiwateri M, Nonoguchi A, Tanaka Y, Casagrande D, Durden S, Rees J (2019) Large–scale managed retreat and structural protection following the 2011 Japan tsunami. Nat Hazards 96:1429–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploeger SK, Atkinson GM, Samson C (2010) A 695 pplying the HAZUS-MH software tool to assess seismic risk in downtown Ottawa, Canada. Nat Hazards 53:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploeger SK, Elsabbagh A, Saatcioglu M (2016) Development of the CanRisk earthquake injury model. Nat Hazards 80:1171–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quennell AM (1959) Tectonics of the dead sea rift, in Proceedings of the 20th International Geological Congress, Mexico, pp. 386–405, Mexico City

  • Rein A, Corotis RB (2013) An overview approach to seismic awareness for a ‘‘quiescent’’ region. Nat Hazards 67:335–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remo JWF, Pinter N (2012) Hazus-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA. Nat Hazards 63:1055–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznikov M, Ben-Avraham Z, Garfunkel Z, Gvirtzman H, Rotstein Y (2004) Structural and stratigraphic framework of Lake Kinneret. Israel J Earth Sci 53(3–4):131–149. https://doi.org/10.1560/QY1W-VVRM-FLNK-C9M9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DA, Rastin SJ, Christophersen AA (2022) 20-Year journey of forecasting with the Every Earthquake a Precursor according to Scale. Model Geosci 12:349: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12090349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland E, McGuire JJ (2009) Earthquake swarms on transform faults. Geophys J Int 178(3):1677–1690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04214.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle J (2018) International adaptation of the Hazus earthquake model using global exposure datasets. M.A. thesis, University of Colorado in Denver, 80 p

  • Sagy A, Rosensaft M (2019) Updates Map of ‘Active’ and ‘Potentially Active’ Faults that Rupture the Surface in Israel. For Israel Standard 413. Final Report, Isr. Geol. Surv. Report TR-GSI/04/2019 (in Hebrew)

  • Salamon A, Hofstetter A, Garfunkel Z, Ron H (2003) Seismotectonics of the Sinai subplate –the eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int 155:149–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon A, Katz O, Crouvi O (2010) Zones of required investigation for earthquake-related hazards in Jerusalem. Nat Hazards 53:375–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbeinati MR, Darawcheh R, Mouty M (2005) The historical earthquakes of Syria: an analysis of large and moderate earthquakes from 1365 B.C. to 1900 A.D. Ann Geophys 48:347–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattner U, Segev A, Mikhailov V, Rybakov M, Lyakhovsky V (2019) Magnetic signature of the kinneret–kinarot tectonic basin along the Dead Sea transform, northern Israel. Pure Appl Geophys 176:4383–4399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02211-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson HA, Shoaf KI (2003) Human impacts of earthquakes, chap. 28. In: Chen W-F, Scawthorn CR (eds) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir G, Bartov Y, Sneh A, Fleisher L, Arad V, Rosensaft M 2001 preliminary seismic zonation in Israel. Geological survey of Israel, Report GSI/12/2001 and Geophysical Institute of Israel, Report GII/550/95/01(1)

  • Shanker D, Singh HN, Paudyal H, Kumar A, Panthi A, Singh VP (2010) Searching for an earthquake Precursor—A Case Study of Precursory Swarm as a real seismic pattern before major shocks. Pure Appl Geophys 167:655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira A, Hofstetter R, Abdallah AQF, Dabbeek J, Hays W (2007) Earthquake hazard assessments for building codes, final report. Submitted to the U.S Agency for international development bureau for economic growth agriculture and trade, pp. 88

  • Shapira A, Avni R, Nur A (1993) New estimate of the Jericho earthquake epicenter of July 11, 1927. Israel J Earth Sci 42:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira S, Levi T, Bar-Dayan Y, Aharonson-Daniel L (2018) The impact of behavior on the risk of injury and death during an earthquake: a simulation-based study. Nat Hazards 91:1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3167-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon M, Sagy A, Kurzon I, Marco S, Rosensaft M (2020) Assessment of seismic sources and capable faults through hierarchic tectonic criteria: implications for seismic hazard in the Levant. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneh A (2010) The geological map of Israel at 1:50,000 scale: Teverya sheet. The Geological Survey of Israel

  • Sneh A, Weinberger R (2014) Major Structures of Israel and Environs, scale 1:500,000. Geological Survey of Israel

  • USGS (2020) https://www.usgs.gov/news/earthquake-forecast-westmorland-swarm-beginning-sept-30-2020, web-site visited at January 26th, 2022

  • Wechsler N, Rockwell TK, Klinger Y, Štěpančíková P, Kanari M, Marco S, Agnon A (2014) A paleoseismic record of earthquakes for the Dead Sea transform Fault between the First and Seventh centuries C. E.: nonperiodic behavior of a plate Boundary Fault. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(3):1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler N, Marco S, Hinzen KG, Hinojosa-Prieto H (2018) Historical earthquakes around the sea of Galilee. In: Eisenberg M (ed) Hippos - Sussita of the Decapolis: the First Twelve Seasons of excavations (2000–2011), volume II, vol 2. The Zinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, pp 16–23

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzler N, Shalev E, Göbel T, Amelung F, Kurzon I, Lyakhovsky V, Brodsky EE (2019) Earthquake swarms triggered by groundwater extraction near the Dead Sea Fault. Geophys Res Lett 46:8056–8063. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagoda-Biran G, Hatzor YH, Amit R, Katz O (2010) Constraining regional paleo peak ground acceleration from back analysis of prehistoric landslides: Example from Sea of Galilee, Dead Sea transform. Tectonophysics 490(1–2):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zion C, Katz O, Ben-Avraham Z (2004) Evaluation of earthquake induced landslide hazard in Arbel and Tiberias quadrangles of the topographic map (in Hebrew). Geological Survey of Israel, Report. GSI/26/04

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar M, Salamon A, Rubin R (2016) Reappraised list of historical earthquakes in Israel and its close surroundings. J Seismol 20:971–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar M, Salamon A, Rubin R (2017) Earthquake damage history in Israel and its close surrounding – evaluation of spatial and temporal patterns. Tectonophysics 696–697:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Yariv Hamiel, Nadav Wetzler and Ram Weinberger for their helpful discussions regarding the July 2018 swarm event. The thorough and helpful reviews of two anonymous reviewers and Editor Francesco Comiti are highly appreciated.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Geological Survey of Israel. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Open access funding provided by Geological Survey of Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception, design and methodology. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Tsafrir Levi and Ran Calvo, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Levi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levi, T., Calvo, R., Frucht, E. et al. Developing significant earthquake damage scenarios following the July 2018 earthquake swarm in the Sea of Galilee area near the Dead Sea Fault. Nat Hazards (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06539-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06539-8

Keywords

Navigation