Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the resilience of informal urban settlements against earthquakes: a case study of Mashhad, Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The expansion of urban areas and increasing marginalization has resulted in the proliferation of inappropriate settlements susceptible to significant hazards like earthquakes. Unsuitable land use, inadequate building construction and design, and deficient urban infrastructure contribute to the vulnerability of human settlements. This study aims to evaluate the resilience of Koi Nah Dareh, a neighborhood situated on the outskirts of Mashhad, and identify the factors rendering it vulnerable to earthquakes using exploratory factor analysis. The study focused on disadvantaged areas with poor physical conditions and numerous inefficiencies, including aging residential units and areas with unfavorable natural conditions for construction. The present study adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess the relative importance of vulnerability factors and indicators and identify the vulnerability zone. The findings revealed five key factors: convenient access to services, physical retrofitting, environmental adaptation, improvement of the road network, and enhancement of public transportation. Convenient access to services held the highest importance coefficient (0.315) as the top priority followed by physical retrofitting with an importance coefficient of 0.184, signifying its significant impact on earthquake vulnerability. The assessment demonstrated that all habitable areas of the neighborhood exhibited high vulnerability indicators, indicating a low level of resilience to earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2001) Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. J Int Dev 13:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainuddin S, Routray JK (2012) Community resilience framework for an earthquake-prone area in Baluchistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arghandeh R, Von Meier A, Mehrmanesh L, Mili L (2016) On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1060–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslani F, Amini-Hosseini K, Fallahi A (2019) Evaluation of physical resilience of Karaj city, Iran, against earthquake. Sci J Rescue Reli 11:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton M (2001) Neighborhood resiliency. J Community Pract 9:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan A, Singh A, Jharkharia S (2018) An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision-making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India. J Air Waste Manag As 68:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee J, Clarke J (2015) On securing the generational challenge of urban resilience. Town Plan Rev 86:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M et al (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (2006) Consistency, understanding and truth in educational research. J Philos Educ 40:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis I, Izadkhah YO (2006) Building resilient urban communities. Open House Int 31:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-01-2006-b0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert A, Kerle N (2008) Urban social vulnerability assessment using object-oriented analysis of remote sensing and GIS data. a case study for Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37:1307–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC (2007) Resilience of traditional societies in facing natural hazards. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 16(4):522–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharakhloo M, Hoseini SH (2007) Indicators of urban sustainable development. J Geogr Reg Dev. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v5i8.4231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR (2003) Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev 4:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khakpour BA, Zomorrodian MJ, Sadeghi S, Moghaddami A (2011) The analysis of physical–structural vulnerability of the ninth district of mashhad from a seismological perspective. Geogr Reg Dev 9:1–34. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v9i16.11025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren D, Kilar V, Rus K (2018) A conceptual framework for the seismic resilience assessment of complex urban systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th european conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, p 18–21

  • Kukihara H, Yamawaki N, Uchiyama K et al (2014) Trauma, depression, and resilience of earthquake/tsunami/nuclear disaster survivors of Hirono, Fukushima, Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 68:524–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantada N, Pujades LG, Barbat AH (2009) Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation. A comparison. Nat Hazards 51:501–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi S, Sasanipor M (2020) Investigating environmental factors in security of urban public spaces using path analysis model (a case study: of Shiraz city). J Stud Hum Settl Plan 15:745–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30:434–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels T, Chang S, Cole D et al (2008) Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Glob Environ Change 18:310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B et al (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Comm Psychol 41:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parizi SM, Taleai M, Sharifi A (2022) A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework to evaluate urban physical resilience against earthquakes. Sustainability 14:5034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Johnston D (2001) Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 10:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: social resilience and natural disaster. London: Earthscan 212

  • Pendal S, Neille S (2007) Parliament house (WA) forecourt and fountains redevelopment

  • Pickett CL, Gardner WL, Knowles M (2004) Getting a cue: the need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 30:1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnama MR, Ahmadian MA, Mohammadian M (2012) Urban management and organization of informal settlements case study Kuye Nohdarreh, a suburb of Mashhad. J Geogr Reg Dev. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v10i18.17372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei MR (2013) Evaluating the economic and institutional resilience of urban communities to natural disasters using promethe technique case study: tehran districts. Emerg Manag 2(3):25–36. https://sid.ir/paper/226051/en

  • Salat S (2017) A systemic approach of urban resilience: power laws and urban growth patterns. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 9:107–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2016) Urban resilience assessment: multiple dimensions, criteria, and indicators. Urban Resil Transform Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadegan MH, Fathi H (2008) Application of seismic risk assessment models in urban planning and design. Soffeh 17(2–1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (2001) Innovation in earthquake resistant concrete structure design philosophies; a century of progress since Hennebique’s patent. Eng Struct 23:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takewaki I (2013) Toward greater building earthquake resilience using the concept of critical excitation: a review. Sustain Cities Soc 9:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Li J, Lei Z et al (2015) Creating social–physical resilience to natural disasters: lessons from the Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards 79:1111–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornbush M, Golubchikov O, Bouzarovski S (2013) Sustainable cities targeted by combined mitigation–adaptation efforts for future-proofing. Sustain Cities Soc 9:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Whiteford LM (2002) Community resilience and volcano hazard: the eruption of Tungurahua and evacuation of the faldas in Ecuador. Disasters 26(1):28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker BE (1994) Trends in urban earthquake hazard and earthquake hazard mitigation in developing and industrialized countries.pdf. In: Disaster management in metropolitan areas for the 21st century: Proceedings of the IDNDR aichi/nagoya international conference 1993 Japan, p 137–145

  • Ujoh F, Igbawua T, Ogidi Paul M (2019) Suitability mapping for rice cultivation in Benue state, Nigeria using satellite data. Geo-Spat Inf Sci 22:332–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN G (2001) Information kit: countering disasters, targeting vulnerability

  • Yong AG, Pearce S (2013) A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 9:79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebardast E (2013) Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Nat Hazards 65:1331–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Fung JF, Johnson KJ, Sattar S (2022) Review of seismic risk mitigation policies in earthquake-prone countries: lessons for earthquake resilience in the United States. J Earthq Eng 26(12):6208–6235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has not been funded by any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

    Mojdeh Bastani & Sajjad Hashemi

  2. Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

    Omid Khairabadi

  3. Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

    Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir

Authors
  1. Mojdeh Bastani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sajjad Hashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omid Khairabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omid Khairabadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest in the publication of this research article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastani, M., Hashemi, S., Khairabadi, O. et al. Assessing the resilience of informal urban settlements against earthquakes: a case study of Mashhad, Iran. Nat Hazards 120, 4507–4526 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06381-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06381-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation