Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of social capital as a key player in disaster risk comprehension and dissemination: lived experience of rural communities in Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of the community response to flood hazards is closely intertwined with its social capital. Communities with high social capital (robust social networks and cohesive community bonds) are likely to have greater abilities in preparing for and dealing with flood hazards. Numerous studies have continuously emphasized the fundamental significance of social capital throughout all stages of disaster risk management. It is still not fully understood how social capital effectively conveys risks. The present study sought to look at the experiences of rural communities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, with the specific objective of exploring the role of social capital in facilitating the comprehension and dissemination of risk alerts about flood hazards. This study used a comprehensive qualitative methodology, specifically semi-structured interviews, to investigate the local communities' perspectives and use of social capital or networks in the context of risk communication. A total of 48 participants, encompassing a range of backgrounds, including social workers, community leaders, and elders, were engaged in face-to-face interviews. The data that was gathered were then grouped according to specific themes. The researchers utilized the interpretive analysis approach to understand better how the participants interpreted and comprehended the situation within the larger social and institutional framework. The research findings revealed four primary themes: the interpretation and dissemination of risk messages through social networks, the role of community social service connections in accessing social capital and risk information, the negative consequences of social capital maldistribution, and the limitations of social connectedness. The study's results revealed that many individuals impacted by flood hazard's lack access to strong social networks, which may hinder their capacity to obtain and understand information regarding potential risks. The efficient use of hazard alerts, customized to accommodate varied groups' unique interactive and cultural requirements, requires a collaborative and inclusive approach involving several stakeholders, including community people. Implementing this method is paramount in addressing and reducing socioeconomic inequalities within the natural hazards and disaster preparedness framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdeen FN, Fernando T, Kulatunga U et al (2021) Challenges in multi-agency collaboration in disaster management: a Sri Lankan perspective. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 62:102399

    Google Scholar 

  • Abunyewah M, Gajendran T, Maund K, Okyere SA (2020) Strengthening the information deficit model for disaster preparedness: mediating and moderating effects of community participation. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 46:101492

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C et al (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Rana IA, Ali A, Najam FA (2022) Flood risk perception and communication: the role of hazard proximity. J Environ Manage 316:115309

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayeb-Karlsson S, Kniveton D, Cannon T et al (2019) I will not go, I cannot go: cultural and social limitations of disaster preparedness in Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Disasters 43:752–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Azad MAK, Haque CE, Choudhury M-U-I (2022) Social learning-based disaster resilience: collective action in flash flood-prone Sunamganj communities in Bangladesh. Environ Hazards 21:309–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P (1999) Understanding responses to risk: some basic findings. Risk communication and public health 3–32

  • Waseem H Bin, Rana IA (2023) Floods in Pakistan: A State-of-the-art Review. Nat Hazards Res 3(3):359–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Soc Sci Inf 24:195–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2022) Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol 9:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadwell P (2021) Translation and interpreting in disaster situations. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Health pp 253–268

  • Carminati L (2018) Generalizability in qualitative research: a tale of two traditions. Qual Health Res 28:2094–2101

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge T (2018) Functions of social capital–bonding, bridging, linking. Soc Capital Res 20:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford T, Villeneuve M, Yen I et al (2021) Disability inclusive disaster risk reduction with culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in the Hawkesbury-Nepean region: a co-production approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 63:102430

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromby J, Nightingale DJ (1999) What’s wrong with social constructionism. Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice 1–19

  • David Benavides A (2013) Four major disaster occurrences and the Spanish language media: a lack of risk communication. Disaster Prev Manag 22:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes RR (2002) The importance of social capital in disaster response

  • Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S et al (2007) Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 97:S109–S115

    Google Scholar 

  • Field J (2005) Social capital and lifelong learning. Policy Press Bristol

  • Fothergill A, Peek LA (2004) Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazards 32:89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer LJ, Scholderer J, Bredahl L (2003) Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust. Risk Anal 23:1117–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Rivas V, Kilmer RP (2016) Building community capacity and fostering disaster resilience. J Clin Psychol 72:1318–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin H (1997) Warning and evacuation: A night for hard houses. Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters, Routledge, London, Hurricane Andrew, pp 52–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel J (2006) Different concepts of risk–A challenge for risk communication. Int J Med Microbiol 296:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson-Easey S, Every D, Hansen A, Bi P (2018) Risk communication for new and emerging communities: the contingent role of social capital. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 28:620–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson S, Orru K, Siibak A et al (2020) Communication-related vulnerability to disasters: a heuristic framework. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 51:101931

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard A, Agllias K, Bevis M, Blakemore T (2017) “They’ll tell us when to evacuate”: the experiences and expectations of disaster-related communication in vulnerable groups. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 22:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson P, Hagedoorn L, Bubeck P (2020) Potential linkages between social capital, flood risk perceptions, and self-efficacy. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 11:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia X, Chowdhury M, Prayag G, Chowdhury MMH (2020) The role of social capital on proactive and reactive resilience of organizations post-disaster. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 48:101614

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston KA, Taylor M, Ryan B (2020) Emergency management communication: the paradox of the positive in public communication for preparedness. Public Relat Rev 46:101903

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovita HD, Nashir H, Mutiarin D et al (2019) Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines? J Hum Behav Soc Environ 29:519–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE, Golding D, Tuler S (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. J Soc Issues 48:161–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz SB, Miller CR (1996) The low-level radioactive waste siting controversy in North Carolina: Toward a rhetorical model of risk communication. Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America pp 111–140

  • Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2001) Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health 78:458–467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020) Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach 42:846–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Van Zandt S (2019) Housing tenure and social vulnerability to disasters: a review of the evidence. J Plan Lit 34:156–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Lin Y (2023) How can community-based organizations improve flood risk communication? A case study of china based on grounded theory. Systems 11:53

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Hwang SN (2008) Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal 28:539–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochmiller CR (2021) Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. Qualitative Report 26:

  • Lucini B (2013) Social capital and sociological resilience in megacities context. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 4:58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill KR, Scholten N, Blevins B, Smith VD (2022) The importance of civic culture: Toward intellectual solidarity and community agency. Educ Citizsh Soc Justice 17461979221130432

  • Majeed MU, Mahmood A, Molnar E, Murtaza SA (2021) Social media analytics lens: a study on consumer perceived risk to share information on social media networks. Humanit Soc Sci Rev 9:258–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MA (2018) Social capital in disaster research. Handbook of disaster research 263–286

  • Miles S, Frewer LJ (2001) Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Qual Prefer 12:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM (1999) Qualitative generalizability. Qual Health Res 9:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal V, Banerjee D, Perry M, Scott D (2012) Disaster preparedness of linguistically isolated populations: Practical issues for planners. Health Promot Pract 13:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Oktari RS, Munadi K, Idroes R, Sofyan H (2020) Knowledge management practices in disaster management: Systematic review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 51:101881

    Google Scholar 

  • Palenchar MJ, Heath RL (2002) Another part of the risk communication model: analysis of communication processes and message content. J Public Relations Res 14:127–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Panday S, Rushton S, Karki J et al (2021) The role of social capital in disaster resilience in remote communities after the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 55:102112

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Johnston D (2017) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C Thomas Publisher

  • Peel KL (2020) A beginner’s guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 25:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera D, Agnihotri J, Seidou O, Djalante R (2020) Identifying societal challenges in flood early warning systems. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 51:101794

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips B, Ephraim M (1992) Living in the aftermath: Blaming processes in the Loma Prieta earthquake. Natural Hazards Research Applications Information Center, Institute of …

  • Popple K (2015) EBOOK: Analysing community work: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster

  • Rana IA, Bhatti SS, Jamshed A, Ahmad S (2021) An approach to understanding the intrinsic complexity of resilience against floods: evidences from three urban communities of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 63:102442

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasool S, Rana IA, Ahmad S (2022) Linking flood risk perceptions and psychological distancing to climate change: a case study of rural communities along Indus and Chenab rivers, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 70:102787

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustinsyah R, Prasetyo RA, Adib M (2021) Social capital for flood disaster management: case study of flooding in a village of Bengawan Solo Riverbank, Tuban, East Java Province. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 52:101963

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri AM, Ukkusuri SV, Lee S et al (2018) The role of social capital, personal networks, and emergency responders in post-disaster recovery and resilience: a study of rural communities in Indiana. Nat Hazards 90:1377–1406

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg G, Lu C, Schimmele C, Hou F (2018) The correlates of self-assessed community belonging in Canada: Social capital, neighbourhood characteristics, and rootedness. Soc Indic Res 140:597–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow TL, Ulmer RR, Seeger MW, Littlefield R (2008) Effective risk communication: A message-centered approach. Springer, Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ye J, Abid M, Ullah R (2017) Determinants of flood risk mitigation strategies at household level: a case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 88:415–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ye J, Abid M et al (2018a) Flood hazards: household vulnerability and resilience in disaster-prone districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 93:147–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ye J, Pan L et al (2018b) Schools’ flood emergency preparedness in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 9:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Gong Z, Ali M et al (2020a) Looking through the Lens of schools: children perception, knowledge, and preparedness of flood disaster risk management in Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 50:101907

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Gong Z, Ali M et al (2020b) Measuring education sector resilience in the face of flood disasters in Pakistan: an index-based approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:44106–44122

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ajiang C, Gong Z et al (2022a) Reconnoitering school children vulnerability and its determinants: evidence from flood disaster-hit rural communities of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 70:102735

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ullah A, Khan NA et al (2022b) Gender perspective of flood early warning systems: people-centered approach. Water (basel) 14:2261

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ullah A, Khan NA et al (2023a) Identifying obstacles encountered at different stages of the disaster management cycle (DMC) and its implications for rural flooding in Pakistan. Front Environ Sci 11:1088126

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AA, Ullah A, Khan NA et al (2023b) Community social barriers to non-technical aspects of flood early warning systems and NGO-led interventions: the case of Pakistan. Front Earth Sci (lausanne) 11:1068721

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Rana IA, Jamshed A et al (2022) Quantifying the role of social capital for enhancing urban resilience against climate crisis: empirical evidence from formal and informal settlements of Pakistan. Cities 130:103851

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims-Schouten W, Riley SCE, Willig C (2007) Critical realism in discourse analysis: a presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example. Theory Psychol 17:101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2016) Understanding perceived risk: 1978–2015. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JH (2000) Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Nat Hazards Rev 1:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence PR, Lachlan KA, Griffin DR (2007) Crisis communication, race, and natural disasters. J Black Stud 37:539–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoel P, Den Hoed RC (2014) Places and people: rhetorical constructions of “community” in a Canadian environmental risk assessment. Environ Commun 8:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Uekusa S, Matthewman S, Lorenz DF (2022) Conceptualising disaster social capital: what it is, why it matters, and how it can be enhanced. Disasters 46:56–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Uekusa S, Matthewman S (2022) Disaster Linguicism as Deprivation of the Victims’ Linguistic Human Rights. The Handbook of Linguistic Human Rights 639–647

  • Vaughan E, Tinker T (2009) Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health 99:S324–S332

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig C (1999) Beyond appearances: A critical realist approach to social constructionism. Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice pp 37–51

  • Wind T, Fordham M, Komproe H (2011) Social capital and post-disaster mental health. Glob Health Action 4:6351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wukich C (2021) Government social media engagement strategies and public roles. Public Perform Manag Rev 44:187–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Yari A, Ardalan A, Ostadtaghizadeh A et al (2019) Underlying factors affecting death due to flood in Iran: a qualitative content analysis. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 40:101258

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yongxi J, Yueqi Y et al (2022) Open Governance and Disaster Risk Reduction. Society 5.0, Digital Transformation and Disasters: Past. Present and Future. Springer, Cham, pp 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Zia A, Rana IA, Arshad HSH et al (2023) Monsoon flood risks in urban areas of Pakistan: a way forward for risk reduction and adaptation planning. J Environ Manage 336:117652

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

"We sincerely thank Dr. George for his exceptional contributions to this article. His assistance with the manuscript's comprehensive proofreading is greatly appreciated; his recommendations helped significantly improve the final manuscript. The authors appreciate the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R443) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

This research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R443), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Humanities and Development Studies (COHD), China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Ashfaq Ahmad Shah

  2. Department of Mathematics, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China

    Abid Khan

  3. School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

    Nasir Abbas Khan

  4. Faculty of Tropical Agri Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic

    Ayat Ullah

  5. Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Bader Alhafi Alotaibi

Authors
  1. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abid Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayat Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nasir Abbas Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bader Alhafi Alotaibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ashfaq Ahmad Shah or Bader Alhafi Alotaibi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This research was conducted with the respondents' consent according to approval guidelines of the ethical review committee, Faculty of Public Administration, Department of Sociology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China (HHU-PS-21–2805).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ashfaq Ahmad Shah is the first author and first corresponding author. Bader Alhafi Alotaibi is the last author and second corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, A.A., Khan, A., Ullah, A. et al. The role of social capital as a key player in disaster risk comprehension and dissemination: lived experience of rural communities in Pakistan. Nat Hazards 120, 4131–4157 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06372-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06372-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation