Abstract
Wildfire is increasing in frequency, extent, and severity in many parts of the USA. Considering the unequal burden of natural hazards on socially vulnerable populations, we ask here, how are characteristics of social vulnerability associated with wildfire occurrence nationwide, at different scales and across differing levels of wildland–urban interface development? To answer this question, we first identify all non-urban census tracts in the USA that have experienced a wildfire since 1984. Using 26 different measures of social vulnerability, we compare these tracts to non-urban census tracts that have not experienced a wildfire. In doing so, we identify notable social vulnerabilities in areas that have experienced wildfire, including higher unemployment, higher employment in extractive industries, higher percentage of people living in mobile homes, higher percentages of Native Americans, higher percentage of people with less than 12th grade education, and higher populations of people with special needs. Breaking our data into eight regions and comparing tracts with a high proportion of wildland–urban interface (WUI) to those with a low proportion of WUI, we find that these characteristics are generally consistent across regions of the USA and vary slightly between high WUI and low WUI tracts. Overall, we find a robust pattern of higher social vulnerability in areas with wildfire occurrence. Whereas previous studies about social vulnerability to wildfire focus on relationships with wildfire hazard potential or concentrate on a single region, this study fills a knowledge gap by examining the relationship between social vulnerability and wildfire occurrence nationwide.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abatzoglou JT, Balch JK, Bradley BA, Kolden CA (2018) Human-related ignitions concurrent with high winds promote large wildfires across the USA. Int J Wildland Fire 27:377. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17149
Afrin S, Garcia-Menendez F (2021) Potential impacts of prescribed fire smoke on public health and socially vulnerable populations in a Southeastern U.S. state. Sci Total Environ 794:148712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148712
Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA (2011) Integrating fire behavior models and geospatial analysis for wildland fire risk assessment and fuel management planning. J Combust 2011:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/572452
Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA, Preisler HK (2012) Analyzing wildfire exposure and source–sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape. For Ecol Manag 267:271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.021
Andersen LM, Sugg MM (2019) Geographic multi-criteria evaluation and validation: a case study of wildfire vulnerability in Western North Carolina, USA following the 2016 wildfires. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 39:101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101123
Anderson SE, Plantinga AJ, Wibbenmeyer M (2023) Inequality in agency response: evidence from salient wildfire events. J Polit 85:625–639. https://doi.org/10.1086/722044
Backer H, Duncan D, Christensen K et al (2023) Medical support for california wildfire response. Disaster Med and Public Health Prep 17:e77. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.347
Balch JK, Bradley BA, D’Antonio CM, Gómez-Dans J (2013) Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980–2009). Glob Chang Biol 19:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12046
Balch JK, Bradley BA, Abatzoglou JT et al (2017) Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States. Proc of the Natl Acad of Sci 114:2946–2951. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617394114
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2014) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
Bowman DMJS, Balch J, Artaxo P et al (2011) The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. J Biogeogr 38:2223–2236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02595.x
Brenkert-Smith H (2010) Building bridges to fight fire: the role of informal social interactions in six Colorado wildland–urban interface communities. Int J Wildland Fire 19:689–697. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09063
Bright AD, Burtz RT (2006) Creating defensible space in the wildland-urban interface: the influence of values on perceptions and behavior. Environ Manag 37:170–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0342-0
Caggiano MD, Hawbaker TJ, Gannon BM, Hoffman CM (2020) Building loss in WUI disasters: evaluating the core components of the wildland-urban interface definition. Fire 3:73. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3040073
Champ PA, Brenkert-Smith H, Riley JP et al (2022) Actionable social science can guide community level wildfire solutions. An illustration from North Central Washington, US. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 82:103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103388
Chase J, Hansen P (2021) Displacement after the camp fire: where are the most vulnerable? Soc Nat Resour 34:1566–1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1977879
Collins TW (2005) Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community. Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 6:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.12.003
Collins D, Kearns R (2008) Uninterrupted views: real-estate advertising and changing perspectives on coastal property in New Zealand. Environ Plan A 40:2914–2932. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4085
Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000407
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Cutter SL, Ash KD, Emrich CT (2016) Urban-rural differences in disaster resilience. Ann Am as Geogr 106:1236–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
Davies IP, Haugo RD, Robertson JC, Levin PS (2018) The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire. PLoS ONE 13:e0205825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205825
Dillon, GK, Gilbertson-Day, JW (2020) Wildfire hazard potential for the United States (270-m). 3rd Edition. Forest service research data archive. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2015-0047-3
Duprey T, Jones C, Symmers C, Vallée G (2021) Household financial vulnerabilities and physical climate risks. Bank of Canada. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2021/08/staff-analytical-note-2021-19/
Dyer JF, Bailey C (2008) A place to call home: cultural understandings of heir property among rural African Americans. Rural Soc 73:317–338. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601108785766598
Edgeley CM, Paveglio TB (2017) Community recovery and assistance following large wildfires: the case of the Carlton Complex Fire. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 25:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.009
Emrich CT (2005) Social vulnerability in US metropolitan areas: improvements in hazard vulnerability assessment. Ph.D dissertation. University of South Carolina
Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2011) Social vulnerability to climate-sensitive hazards in the southern United States. Weather Clim Soc 3:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011WCAS1092.1
Emrich CT, Aksha SK, Zhou Y (2022) Assessing distributive inequities in FEMA’s disaster recovery assistance fund allocation. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 74:102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102855
Enarson E, Morrow B (1998) The gendered terrain of disaster: through women’s eyes. Praeger, Connecticut
Eriksen C, Simon G (2017) The affluence-vulnerability interface: intersecting scales of risk, privilege and disaster. Environ Plan A 49:293–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16669511
ESRI (2018) USA urban areas - overview. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=432bb9246fdd467c88136e6ffeac2762
FEMA (2019) Building cultures of preparedness: report for the emergency management higher education community. US Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Fischer AP, Spies TA, Steelman TA et al (2016) Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology. Front Ecol Environ 14:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1283
Fu R, Abrahamson K, Campbell T (2022) Occupational mobility and chronic health conditions in middle and later life: a systematic review. Int J Behav Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10135-0
Gabbe CJ, Pierce G, Oxlaj E (2020) Subsidized households and wildfire hazards in California. Environ Manag 66:873–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01340-2
Gaither CJ, Poudyal NC, Goodrick S et al (2011) Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the Southeastern United States: an exploratory spatial data analysis approach. For Policy Econ 13:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.009
Gares CE, Montz BE (2014) Disaster vulnerability of migrant and seasonal farmworkers: a comparison of Texas and North Carolina. Southeast Geogr 54:36–54
U.S. Geological Survey (2019) Monitoring trends in burn severity. U.S. Geological Survey. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/monitoring-trends-burn-severity
Grala K, Grala RK, Hussain A et al (2017) Impact of human factors on wildfire occurrence in Mississippi, United States. For Policy Econ 81:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.011
Grant E, Runkle JD (2022) Long-term health effects of wildfire exposure: a scoping review. J Clim Change Health 6:100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100110
Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (2015) SoVI® Evolution. Accessed 14 March 2023 from https://www.sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/centers_and_institutes/hvri/data_and_resources/sovi/evolution/index.php
Highfield WE, Peacock WG, Van Zandt S (2014) Mitigation planning: why hazard exposure, structural vulnerability, and social vulnerability matter. J Plan Educ Res 34:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14531828
Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H (2001) Mobility difficulties are not only a problem of old age. J Gen Intern Med 16:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004235.x
James X, Hawkins A, Rowel R (2007) An assessment of the cultural appropriateness of emergency preparedness communication for low income minorities. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 4(3):13. https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1266
Johnston LM, Wang X, Erni S et al (2020) Wildland fire risk research in Canada. Environ Rev 28:164–186. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0046
Keeley JE, Syphard AD (2016) Climate change and future fire regimes: examples from California. Geosci 6:37. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences6030037
Keeley JE, Syphard AD (2018) Historical patterns of wildfire ignition sources in California ecosystems. Int J Wildland Fire 27:781799
Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM et al (2018) Where wildfires destroy buildings in the US relative to the wildland–urban interface and national fire outreach programs. Int J Wildland Fire 27:329–341. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17135
Lambrou N, Kolden C, Loukaitou-Sideris A et al (2023) Social drivers of vulnerability to wildfire disasters: a review of the literature. Landsc and Urban Plan 237:104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104797
Lee JY, Van Zandt S (2019) Housing tenure and social vulnerability to disasters: a review of the evidence. J Plan Lit 34:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412218812080
Lee JY, Ma F, Li Y (2022) Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks. Nat Hazards 114:1525–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05436-2
Lee, JY, Li, Y (2021) A first step towards longitudinal study on homeowners’ proactive actions for managing wildfire risks. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://hazards.colorado.edu/quick-response-report/a-first-step-towards-longitudinal-study-on-homeowners-proactive-actions-for-managing-wildfire-risks
Littell JS, Peterson DL, Riley KL et al (2016) A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States. Glob Change Biol 22:2353–2369. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13275
Liu JC, Pereira G, Uhl SA et al (2015) A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke. Environ Res 136:120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015
Long JW, Lake FK (2018) Escaping social-ecological traps through tribal stewardship on national forest lands in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America. Ecol Soc 23(2):10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10041-230210
Masri S, Scaduto E, Jin Y, Wu J (2021) Disproportionate impacts of wildfires among elderly and low-income communities in California from 2000–2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083921
McWethy DB, Schoennagel T, Higuera PE et al (2019) Rethinking resilience to wildfire. Nat Sustain 2:797–804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0353-8
Méndez M, Flores-Haro G, Zucker L (2020) The (in)visible victims of disaster: understanding the vulnerability of undocumented Latino/a and indigenous immigrants. Geoforum 116:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.007
Montz BE, Allen TR, Monitz GI (2011) Systemic trends in disaster vulnerability: migrant and seasonal farm workers in North Carolina. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2:1–17. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-4079.1070
Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA et al (2014) Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13946
Nagy RC, Fusco E, Bradley B et al (2018) Human-related ignitions increase the number of large wildfires across U.S. ecoregions. Fire 1:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire1010004
National Research Council (2007) Using the American community survey: benefits and challenges. The National Academies Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/11901
Nummi J, Henderson K (2017) Women’s leadership in Texas forest fires and recovery: how gender roles and assumptions empower and constrain women and men postdisaster in a rural southern town. In: Companion M, Chaikem M (eds) Responses to disasters and climate change: understanding vulnerability and fostering resilience. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 173–182
Ojerio R, Moseley C, Lynn K, Bania N (2011) Limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona. Nat Hazards Rev 12:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000027
Oswalt SN, Smith WB, Miles PD, Pugh SA (2019) Forest resources of the United States, 2017: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen Tech Rep WO-97 Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-97
Palaiologou P, Ager AA, Nielsen-Pincus M et al (2019) Social vulnerability to large wildfires in the western USA. Landsc Urban Plan 189:99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.006
Parkinson D (2019) Investigating the increase in domestic violence post disaster: an Australian case study. J Interpers Violence 34:2333–2362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696876
Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Stasiewicz AM, Edgeley CM (2019) Social fragmentation and wildfire management: exploring the scale of adaptive action. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 33:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.09.016
Poudyal N, Gaither CJ, Goodrick S et al (2012) Locating spatial variation in the association between wildland fire risk and social vulnerability across six southern states. Environ Manag 49(3):623–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9796-z
Pulido L (2000) Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in Southern California. Ann Am as Geogr 90:12–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00182
Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI et al (2005) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1413
Radeloff VC, Helmers DP, Kramer HA et al (2018) Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:3314–3319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718850115
Radeloff VC, Helmers DP (2018) Wildland-urban interface (WUI) change 1990–2010. In: SILVIS LAB. Accessed 9 Nov 2022 from http://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/data/wui-change/
Radeloff VC, Mockrin MH, Helmers DP, Carlson AR, Hawbaker TJ, Martinuzzi S, Schug F, Alexandre PM, Kramer HA, Pidgeon AM (2023) Rising wildfire risk to houses in the United States, especially in western grasslands and shrublands. Science 382:702–707. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade9223
Rappold AG, Reyes J, Pouliot G et al (2017) Community vulnerability to health impacts of wildland fire smoke exposure. Environ Sci Technol 51:6674–6682. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06200
Rizza A, Kaplan V, Senn O et al (2012) Age- and gender-related prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care: the swiss fire project. BMC Fam Pract 13:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-113
Rufat S, Tate E, Burton CG, Maroof AS (2015) Social vulnerability to floods: review of case studies and implications for measurement. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:470–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013
Rufat S, Tate E, Emrich CT, Antolini F (2019) How valid are social vulnerability models? Ann Am as Geogr 109:1131–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887
Rumbach A, Sullivan E, Makarewicz C (2020) Mobile home parks and disasters: understanding risk to the third housing type in the United States. Nat Hazards Rev 21:05020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000357
Saito Y (2014) Progress or repetition? Gender perspectives in disaster management in Japan. Disaster Prev Manag 23:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-08-2013-0134
Schumann RL, Mockrin M, Syphard AD et al (2020) Wildfire recovery as a “hot moment” for creating fire-adapted communities. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 42:101354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101354
Simon GL, Dooling S (2013) Flame and fortune in California: the material and political dimensions of vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 23:1410–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.008
Spielman SE, Folch D, Nagle N (2014) Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey. Appl Geogr 46:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.002
Spies T, White E, Kline J et al (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecol and Soc 19(3):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06584-190309
State of California (2019) California is not adequately prepared to protect its most vulnerable residents from natural disasters. California State Auditor. Accessed 7 Mar 2023 from https://www.auditor.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2019-103.pdf.
Steelman T (2016) U.S. wildfire governance as social-ecological problem. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08681-2104030
Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Pfaff AH, Ferschweiler K (2017) Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:13750–13755. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713885114
Syphard AD, Rustigian-Romsos H, Mann M et al (2019) The relative influence of climate and housing development on current and projected future fire patterns and structure loss across three California landscapes. Glob Environ Change 56:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.007
Thomas AS, Escobedo FJ, Sloggy MR, Sánchez JJ (2022) A burning issue: Reviewing the socio-demographic and environmental justice aspects of the wildfire literature. PLoS ONE 17:e0271019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271019
Toledo T, Marom I, Grimberg E, Bekhor S (2018) Analysis of evacuation behavior in a wildfire event. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 31:1366–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2022) Secretary's memorandum 1077–004 June 23, 2022 climate resilience and carbon stewardship of America’s National Forests and Grasslands. Accessed 21 Sep 2023 from https://www.usda.gov/directives/sm-1077-004.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2023) Community wildfire defense program. USDA Forest Service. Accessed 17 Aug 2023 from https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire/grants
Wibbenmeyer M, Robertson M (2022) The distributional incidence of wildfire hazard in the western United States. Environ Res Lett 17:064031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac60d7
Wigtil G, Hammer RB, Kline JD et al (2016) Places where wildfire potential and social vulnerability coincide in the coterminous United States. Int J Wildland Fire 25:896–908. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15109
Williams AP, Abatzoglou JT, Gershunov A et al (2019) Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth’s Future 7:892–910. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001210
Wu A, Yan X, Kuligowski E et al (2022) Wildfire evacuation decision modeling using GPS data. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 83:103373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103373
Yu C-Y, Woo A, Emrich CT, Wang B (2020) Social vulnerability index and obesity: an empirical study in the US. Cities 97:102531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102531
Zybach B, Dubrasich M, Brenner G, Marker J (2009) US wildfire cost-plus-loss economics project: the ‘One-pager’ checklist. In: ‘Advances in Fire Practices’, Fall. (Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center). Assessed 7 March 2023 from https://www.wildfirelessons.net/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=9f94b4ed-d5f2-45b8-b198-5677d430e3ae
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the National Science Foundation DBI-1639145. The authors also thank the two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the quality of the article.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the National Science Foundation DBI-1639145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Schumann, R.L., Emrich, C.T., Butsic, V. et al. The geography of social vulnerability and wildfire occurrence (1984–2018) in the conterminous USA. Nat Hazards 120, 4297–4327 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06367-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06367-2