Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial analysis of earthquake-prone rural areas and residents' preparedness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In impoverished rural areas, natural disasters, notably earthquakes, have a substantial impact, necessitating the identification of vulnerable regions and the development of comprehensive disaster mitigation strategies. This study conducted a spatial analysis of earthquake-prone rural areas in Abhar, Iran, to assess their seismic status and the preparedness of residents. The study comprised two segments, the first utilized the VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model within ArcGIS, incorporating 10 factors. The second phase entailed a survey in which 379 questionnaires were gathered from residents and subsequently subjected to analysis using SPSS software. The spatial analysis categorized rural areas into three groups, distinguishing between high, low, and moderate seismic risks, with 39 locations falling into the moderate and high-risk categories. Among the factors analyzed, certain elements, such as access to health centers in rural and nearby urban areas, as well as the availability of emergency centers like fire stations, emerged as neglected areas, necessitating immediate reinforcement or establishment. Moreover, the outcomes regarding local preparedness revealed deficiencies across all domains, encompassing individual, physical, economic, and accessibility aspects. Furthermore, the research findings underscored a pronounced economic fragility, with accessibility factors exerting direct or indirect influence on the overall susceptibility of the situation. This research provides a holistic understanding by integrating natural and man-made factors with the current preparedness status of residents to reveal a pressing need for optimizing the spatial allocation of essential services, such as health and emergency facilities. Additionally, enhancing economic conditions and implementing training initiatives are imperative for bolstering community preparedness. These findings have significant implications for managers, decision-makers, and government authorities committed to enhancing public safety and mitigating earthquake hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahi S, Madadi M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2021) Monitoring and investigating dust phenomenon using remote sensing science, geographical information system, and statistical methods. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01419-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullahi M (2004) Crisis management in urban areas, publications, organizations, municipalities and RMs country, Third Edition, Tehran, p 136

  • Adnan A, Zamri Ramli M, Sk AR, Sk M (2015) Disaster management and mitigation for earthquakes: are we ready? In: Conference: 9th Asia Pacific structural engineering and construction conference (APSEC2015)At: Kuala Lumpur

  • Altindal A, Karimzadeh S, Altug Erberik M, Askan A, Anil O, Kockar K, MustafaMustafa S (2021) A case study for probabilistic seismic risk assessment of earthquake-prone old urban centers. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 61:102376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini HK, Hosseini M, Izadkhah Y, Mansouri B, Shaw T (2014) Main challenges on community-based approaches in earthquake risk reduction: Case study of Tehran, Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8(114–124):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Anabestani A (2008) Doruneh and the establishment of human settlements in the region of Kashmar. Geograph J 40(63):1858

    Google Scholar 

  • Ao Y, Zhang H, Yang L, Wang Y, Martek I, Gang W (2021) Impacts of earthquake knowledge and risk perception on earthquake preparedness of rural residents. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04632-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharizadeh E, Ehsani R, Vali Pour F (2011) 360-degree performance evaluation methods and techniques managers to decide VIKOR (Case Study Agricultural Engineering Research Institute). J Ind Manag Stud IX(23):48–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR, McClure J (2017) The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 22:179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (2014) Earthquakes and coseismic surface faulting on the Iranian Plateau, a historical, social and physical approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) EM-DAT. The international disaster database. https://www.emdat.be/. Accessed 1 April 2020

  • Chen TL, Paris L (2022) Identifying key environmental and building features affecting the outcome of a seismic event: a case study of the “921” earthquake. Nat Hazards 111:2627–2647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05151-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DataGIS (2016) Shapefiles of Abhar County. DataGIS. شیپ فایل های شهرستان ابهر - GIS ابهر 1401 (datagis.ir)

  • Duckstein L, Opricovic S (1980) Multiobjective optimization in river basin development. Water Resour Res 16(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i001p00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake in Iran, world data. Info (2022) Recent earthquakes and their magnitudes in Iran (worlddata.info)

  • Fujita K, Ichimura T, Hori M, Wijerathne MLL, Tanaka S (2014) A quick earthquake disaster estimation system with fast urban earthquake simulation and interactive visualization. Procedia Comput Sci 29(2014):866–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration of Iran (2017) Earthquake shapefiles (GSI). سازمان زمین شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور (gsi.ir)

  • Gholami Y, Hayati S, Ghanbari M, Esmaieli A (2015) predicted an earthquake in Mashhad vulnerable spaces. Urban Plan Geogr Res Q 3(1):67–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Goorabi A (2020) Detection of landslide induced by large earthquake using InSAR coherence techniques—Northwest Zagros, Iran. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 23(2020):195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2019.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gvishiani A, Boris DA, Dzeranov BV, Kedrov EO, Skorkina AA, Nikitina IM (2022) Strong earthquake-prone areas in the eastern sector of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Appl Sci 12:11990. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson K, Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2008) Assessment of a flood management formwork. Int J Public Inf Syst 1:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi M, Alesheikh AA (2011) A GIS-based earthquake damage assessment and settlement methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh R, Nedović-Budić Z, Razavi AA, Norouzzadeh M, Hodhodkian H (2013) Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania hazard model). Comput Geosci 51:324–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrion M, Mokhtari M, Parsizadeh F, Nadim F (2015) Timescape of the earthquake disasters in Iran: the intricacies of earthquake time and earthquake disaster risk reduction. Geogr Ann Ser B 97(1):197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwansyah E, Hartati S (2014) Assessment of building damage hazard caused by earthquake: integration of FNN and GIS. IERI Procedia 10:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.09.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jigyasu R (2002) Reducing disaster vulnerability through local knowledge and capacity the case of earthquake prone rural communities in India and Nepal. Department of Town and Regional Planning, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H, Perez-Fuentes G, Potts HWW, Rossetto T (2016) How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: the fix-it intervention. Nat Hazards 84(3):1943–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliá PB, Ferreira TM, Rodrigues H (2021) Post-earthquake fire risk assessment of historic urban areas: a scenario-based analysis applied to the Historic City Centre of Leiria, Portugal. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 60:102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamranzad F, Memarian H, Zare M (2020) Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran Iran. Int J Geo Inform 9:430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel N, Chungong S, Omaar A, Xing J (2020) Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khankeh HR (2011) Hospital Disaster preparedness program national. University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Khankeh HR, Mohammadi R, Ahmadi F (2004) Facilitating factors and barriers to health services in times of natural disasters. Rehabitation 6:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodag S, Mani SK, Balamurugan G, Bera S (2022) Earthquake and flood resilience through spatial planning in the complex urban system. Progr Disaster Sci 14:100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Manisha L, Preet P, Alisha T, Pratyush S, Purabi, (2022) Analyzing urban damage and surface deformation based hazard-risk in Kathmandu city occurred during Nepal earthquake (2015) using SAR interferometry. Adv Space Res 70:3892–3904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusumastuti RD, Nurmala N, Arviansyah A, Wibowo SS (2022) Indicators of community preparedness for fast-onset disasters: a systematic literature review and case study. Nat Hazards 110:787–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04970-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwazu C, Richards GC, Chang A (2022) A tool to assess livelihood preparedness for disasters: a study of Kaikōura earthquake in New Zealand. Nat Hazards 113:745–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05322-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam CY, Tai K, Cruz AM (2021) Topological network and GIS approach to modeling earthquake risk of infrastructure systems: a case study in Japan. Appl Geogr 127:102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Hu K, Cui P (2002) Morphology of basin of debris flow. J Mt Sci 20:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lian P, Zhuo Z, Qi Y, Xu D, Deng X (2021) The impacts of training on farmers’ preparedness behaviors of earthquake disaster—evidence from earthquake-prone settlements in Rural China. Agriculture 11:726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares-Rivas A (2012) Panama prepares the city of david for earthquakes, project highlights. Panama 9:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann AL (2011) Disaster preparedness in vulnerable communities. Int Law Policy Rev 1:69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Cui X, Yuan D, Wang Z, Jin J, Wang M (2011) Study of Earthquake disaster population risk based on GIS a case study of Wenchuan earthquake region. Procedia Environ Sci 11:1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JG, Mason PJ, Yu E, Wu MC, Tang C, Huang R, Liu H (2012) GIS modelling of earthquake damage zones using satellite remote sensing and DEM data. Geomorphology 139–140:518–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Lin Y, Wang S (2014) Urban design for post-earthquake reconstruction: a case study of Wenchuan County, China. Habitat Int 41:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludovico Di, Donato D, GinoDebora S (2020) Post-earthquake reconstruction as an opportunity for a sustainable reorganisation of transport and urban structure. Cities 96:102447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutman Marjana ŠMB, Weiss P, Klemenc I, Polona MC, Jeraj J, Banovec Primož Z (2014) Aspects of earthquake risk management in Slovenia. In: 4th international conference on building resilience, building resilience 2014, 8–10 September2014, Salford Quays, United kingdom, Procedia Economics and Finance vol 18 ,pp 659–666

  • Ma Z, Guo S, Deng X, Xu D (2021) Community resilience and residents’ disaster preparedness: evidence from China’s earthquake-stricken areas. Nat Hazards 108(3):567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04695-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manafpour, A. R (2004) Bam earthquake, Iran: lessons on the seismic behavior of building structures. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China

  • Masson F, Anvari M, Djamour Y, Walpersdorf A, Tavakoli F, Daigni’eres M, Nankali H, van Gorp S (2007) large-scale velocity field and strain tensor in Iran inferred from GPS measurements: new insight for the present-day deformation pattern within NE Iran. Geophys J Int 170:436–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhaske Y, Sumedh C, Deepankar, (2010) GIS-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. J Appl Geophys 70(3):216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinfar AA, Naderzadeh A (1990). An Immediate and Preliminary Report on the Manjil, Iran. Earthquake of 20 June 1990, Building and Housing Research Center, Iranian Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.

  • Mota-Santiago LR, Lozano A, Ortiz-Valera AE (2023) Determination of disaster scenarios for estimating relief demand to develop an early response to an earthquake disaster in urban areas of developing countries. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ningthoujam MC, Nanda RP (2018) A GIS system integrated with earthquake vulnerability assessment of RC building. Structure 15:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyimbili P, Hopkins T, Erden T (2021) Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best-worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups. Nat Hazards 105:1031–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04348-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Financial management of earthquake risk. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Management of risk substances and sustainable development. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Review of the effects of anthropogenic influence on the wetland environment. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01767-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oven K, Bankoff G (2020) The neglected country(side): earthquake risk perceptions and disaster risk reduction in post-Soviet rural Kazakhstan. J Rural Stud 80:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm R (1998) Urban earthquake hazards. Appl Geogr 18(I):3546

    Google Scholar 

  • Parishan M (2011) Risk management, environmental hazards, earthquake risk in rural areas, thesis Geography. Tarbiat Modarres University, Faculty of Humanities, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton D, Anderson E, Becker J, Petersen J (2015) Developing a comprehensive model of hazard preparedness: lessons from the Christchurch earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour Taheri M, Haji Nejad A, Fatahi A, Nemati R (2014) Assessment of the physical vulnerability of rural settlements against natural hazards (earthquakes) with copperas decision making model (Case study of Rural District There Chalanchulan city). J Spat Plan 1(3):52–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Qadiri M, Nesbi N (2015) Analysis of attitudinal difference in mental preparation households in the city against earthquakes, geography. Urban Plan Res J 3(2):245–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghizadeh H, Saghafi Nia M, Entezari V (2004) Analyzing medical management in disasters: a review of the bam earthquake experiences. J Med 5:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi MS, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2012) A preliminary reconnaissance report on August 11th, 2012, Varzaghan-Ahar twin earthquakes in NW of Iran. Technical report, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior.

  • Russell LA, Goltz JD, Bourque LB (1995a) Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environ Behav 27(6):744–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell LA, Goltz JD, Bourque JB (1995b) Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environ Behav 27:744–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabzghabaie A, Kondori A, Shojaee M, KamraniRad A, Amini A, Hatamabadi HR (2013) Hospital safety in hospitals affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2011–13. Pejouhandeh 18:83–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PJ, Schauer BA (2006) HAZUS—Its development and its future. Nat Hazard Rev 7:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şenik B, Uzun O (2021) An assessment on size and site selection of emergency assembly points and temporary shelter areas in Düzce. Nat Hazards 105:1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04367-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams V, Ahmad G, Changiz T, Talebian M, Shams Vahdati S, Mahmoudieh T (2014) Disaster in South-East of Iran: Saravan Earthquake with Minimum Mortality. The Journal of Academic Emergency Physicians Association of Turkey. www.akademikaciltip.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/jaem.2014.02418

  • Shapefiles of Iran’s tectonic earthquakes (2017) sapla.ir/DownloadContent.aspx

  • Shayannejad M, Ghobadi M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Modeling of surface flow and infiltration during surface irrigation advance based on numerical solution of Saint–Venant equations using Preissmann’s scheme. Pure Appl Geophys 179:1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02962-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen S, Cheng C, Song C, Yang J, Yang S, Su K, Yuan L, Chen X (2018) Spatial distribution patterns of global natural disasters based on biclustering. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3279-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater T, Jeff Birchall S (2022) Growing resilient: the potential of urban agriculture for increasing food security and improving earthquake recovery. Cities 31:103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Pandey R, Dong G, Sharifi A, Subedi PB (2022) Urban-rural disparity in community resilience: a multilevel analysis of the relief progress after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. Sustain Cities Soc. 79:103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran (2016). Statistical census of Iran in 2016. www.amar.org.ir

  • Sutton J, Tierney K (2006) Disaster preparedness: Concepts, guidance, and research. Natural Hazards Center, Institute of Behavioral Science,University of Colorado, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadjer K, Bensaibi M (2017) Earthquake risk assessment of Blida (Algeria) using GIS. Energ Procedia 139:645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan A, Deniz D (2013) Sustainable urban planning and risk assessment of earthquake hazards in Turkey. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 40:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2012) Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES). http://www.iiees.ac.ir/iiees/English/bank/report.html.

  • Villagra P, Rojas C, Ohno R, Xue Ma, Gómez K (2014) A GIS-base exploration of the relationships between open space systems and urban form for the adaptive capacity of cities after an earthquake: the cases of two Chilean cities. Appl Geogr 48:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen CV (2004) Geoinformation science and earth observation for municipal risk management; The SLARIM project. International Instititute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, ITC

  • Wieczorek-Kosmala M (2021) COVID-19 impact on the hospitality industry: exploratory study of financial-slack-driven risk preparedness. Int J Hosp Manag 94(2021):102799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis L (2003) At risk: natural hazardous, peoples vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Wu G (2020) An analysis of rural households’ earthquake-resistant construction behavior: evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:9079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi J (2022) Relationship between the organizational structure in implementing Post-Disaster Housing reconstruction and outcome characteristics: a study on urban Dujiangyan after the Wenchuan Earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 80:103221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong K, Adhikari BR, Stamatopoulos CA, Zhan Y, Wu S, Dong Z, Di B (2020) Comparison of different machine learning methods for debris flow susceptibility mapping: a case study in the Sichuan Province. China Remote Sens 12:295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan P (2022) Research on the selection of path planning algorithm: a case study in leeds. J Phys Conf Ser 2179(2022):012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2179/1/012039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yodmani S (2000) Disaster risk management and vulnerability reduction: Protecting the poor. http://www.adpc.net/infores/adpc-documents/povertypaper.pdf, (2000). Accessed May 15 2013, p 34

  • Zaheri M, Aghayari Hare M, Zakeri Miyabi K (2015) Rural areas of earthquake vulnerability assessment (Case study: the central city of Marand). J Res Rural Plan 4:111–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai C, Zhao Y, Wen W, Qin H, Xie L (2023) A novel urban seismic resilience assessment method considering the weighting of post-earthquake loss and recovery time. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 84:103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103453

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Hajilo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any Conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hajilo, M., Talkhab, A. & Pennington-Gray, L. Spatial analysis of earthquake-prone rural areas and residents' preparedness. Nat Hazards 120, 4101–4130 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06364-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06364-5

Keywords

Navigation