Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of flood conveyance capacity of small- and medium-sized river and flood managements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed great losses caused by floods due to the unknown of rivers’ flood conveyance capacities, which make it difficult for floods management. In particular, flood conveyance capacities of small- and medium-sized rivers are usually designed to meet the flood with a return period of 10 years but these rivers have not been paid enough attention. After years of scouring and siltation, the flood conveyance capacities of small- and medium-sized rivers are unknown, and flood disasters caused by reservoir discharge are unpredictable. The aim of this research is to set a standardized research process to find out the actual flood conveyance capacities of small- and medium-sized rivers. The hydrodynamic model is constructed and calibrated to evaluate the river’s flood conveyance capacity. The design flood data are used to make the simulation, and the flood conveyance capacity of the river channel is evaluated combined with the actual situation of the river. Then with water level observation points settled, the dynamic process of water level of the river channel can be represented and real-time assessment of flood risk of the river can be done. Taking the downstream of Yingna River, a typical small- and medium-sized river flowing into the ocean, as an example, the results showed that this standardized process can provide a reference for the analysis of flood conveyance capacity of small- and medium-sized rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Alaghmand S, Abdullah RB, Abustan I, Eslamian S (2012) Comparison between capabilities of HEC-RAS and MIKE11 hydraulic models in river flood risk modelling (a case study of Sungai Kayu Ara River basin, Malaysia). IJHST 2:270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2012.049187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braimah MM, Abdul-Rahaman I, Sekyere DO- et al (2014) A study into the causes of floods and its socio-economic effects on the people of Sawaba in the Bolgatanga municipality, Upper East, Ghana. 7

  • Cai J, Yin D (2015) Analysis on flood carrying capacity of downstream channel. of Qinghe Sluice Based on Mike

  • Chai J (2016) Study on Characteristic Water Level at Downstream of Jinling Reservoir on Xiaoling River, Liaonin Province. China Flood  Drought Manage 26:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M (2015) Study on flood forecast and flood control forecast regulation of Yingna River Reservoir. Master, Dalian University of technology

  • Chen X (1995) Analysis on flood disasters in China. Marine geology. Quaternary Geol 15:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng X (2020) Flood risk and flood management policies in China. In: annual report on China’s response to climate change (2017). Springer, pp 49–65

  • Dong Z (2016) Research on and application of the flood control dispatching of Yingna River Reservoir. Dalian University of Technology, Master

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng J (2016) Analysis of Flood carrying capacity of Dayang River dandong section with Dyke based on MIKE11 hydrodynamic model. Agricu Sci Technol  Equipment,  30–32

  • Gao Q, Liu Y (2011) Discussion on the Application of API Model in Yingna River Basin. In: discussion on the application of API Model in Yingna River Basin

  • Gao Q, Wang J (2012) Dynamic control plan of Yingna River Reservoir. Northeast Water Resource Hydropower 30:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottardi G, Venutelli M (2004) Central scheme for two-dimensional dam-break flow simulation. Adv Water Resour 27:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan M, Carrivick JL, Wright NG et al (2016) Quantifying the combined effects of multiple extreme floods on river channel geometry and on flood hazards. J Hydrol 538:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersmark CT, Fleenor WE, Schladow SG (2005) Simulation of flood impact and habitat extent for a tidal freshwater marsh restoration. Ecol Eng 25:137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi MR, Abedini MJ, Neill SP, Malekzadeh P (2008) Tidal and surge modelling using differential quadrature: A case study in the Bristol Channel. Coast Eng 55:811–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusre BC, Baruah DC, Bordoloi PK, Patra SC (2010) Assessment of hydropower potential using GIS and hydrological modeling technique in Kopili River basin in Assam (India). Appl Energy 87:298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L (2019) Study on flood loss assessment and disaster reduction strategies in the middle and lower reaches of the yellow River in Henan Province. Henan University of Technology, Master

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Li S (2004) Analysis of Flood Disaster in China in Recent 50 Years. Agrometeorol China 25:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zhao X (2006) Hydraulic calculation manual. In: hydraulic calculation manual, second edition. China water resources and hydropower Press, Beijing,  465

  • Li Y, Wright DB, Byrne PK (2020) The Influence of Tropical Cyclones on the Evolution of River Conveyance Capacity in Puerto Rico. Water Resour Res 56.e2020WR027971.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027971

  • Lian J, Xu H, Xu K, Ma C (2017) Optimal management of the flooding risk caused by the joint occurrence of extreme rainfall and high tide level in a coastal city. Nat Hazards 89:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2958-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian JJ, Xu K, Ma C (2013) Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study of Fuzhou City, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:679–689. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H-L, Chen X, Bao A-M, Wang L (2007) Investigation of groundwater response to overland flow and topography using a coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modeling system for an arid watershed. J Hydrol 347:448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Li W, Zhang C (2008) Numerical simulation on flood protection ability and Flood inundation downstream of biliuhe reservoir.China rural water and Hydropower22–25

  • Luu TNM, Garnier J, Billen G et al (2010) Hydrological regime and water budget of the Red River Delta (Northern Vietnam). J Asian Earth Sci 37:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Rong F, Miao X (2017) Thought on comprehensive improvement of Changjiang River flood control capacity. Yangtze River 48:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma T (2013) The Application of water line calculation in renovation of middle and small rivers. Master, Hebei Agricultural University

  • Makungo R, Odiyo JO, Ndiritu JG, Mwaka B (2010) Rainfall–runoff modelling approach for ungauged catchments: A case study of Nzhelele River sub-quaternary catchment. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 35:596–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltsev K, Yermolaev O (2020) Assessment of soil loss by water erosion in small river basins in Russia. CATENA 195:104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei J, Guan F, Li W (2013) Code for design of embankment engineering. Ministry of water resources of the People’s Republic of China

  • Miao X (2018) Study on rainfall runoff control and impact of tidal backwater in coastal cities. Master, Qingdao Technological University

  • Mishra A, Anand A, Singh R, Raghuwanshi NS (2001) Hydraulic Modeling of Kangsabati Main Canal for Performance Assessment. J Irrig Drain Eng 127:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni S (2005) Probe on reducing flood damage loss by taking non-engineering flood protection measures. J Qinghai Univ 23:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranaee E, Shoushtari MM, Quchani SR (2009) The Combination of HEC-Geo-HMS, HEC-HMS and MIKE11 Software Utilize in a Two Branches River Flood Routing Modeling. In: 2009 second international conference on environmental and computer science. IEEE, Dubai, UAE, pp 317–321

  • Slater LJ, Singer MB, Kirchner JW (2015) Hydrologic versus geomorphic drivers of trends in flood hazard. Geophys Res Lett 42:370–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Harding Blake (2001) An unsteady hydraulic surface water model of the Lower Cosumnes River, California, for the investigation of floodplain dynamics. University of California. Davis 294

  • Su M, Zheng Y, Hao Y et al (2018) The influence of landscape pattern on the risk of urban water-logging and flood disaster. Ecol Ind 92:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun F, Liu Y (2010) Sensitivity Analysis and Automatic Calibration of a Rainfall-Runoff Model Using Multi-objectives. In: Setchi R, Jordanov I, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 90–99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y (2018) Analysis on flood carrying capacity of Daliao River Based on MIKE Model.Jilin Water Conservancy 58–62

  • Tayfur G, Kavvas ML, Govindaraju RS, Storm DE (1993) Applicability of St. Venant Equations for Two-Dimensional Overland Flows over Rough Infiltrating Surfaces. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 119:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:1(51)

  • Thompson JR, Sørenson HR, Gavin H, Refsgaard A (2004) Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. J Hydrol 293:151–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2016) Research and application of rainfall forecast information availability of Yingna River Reservoir. Dalian University of Technology, Master

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Tang J, Duan Y (1998) Calculation Method of Design Rainstorm Flood for Small and Medium-sized Rivers (areas without data) in Liaoning Province. Liaoning Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Shenyang

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JS, Ni HG (2000) Finite-difference tvd scheivie for computation OF DAM-BREAK Problems. 11

  • Wang Q, Xu Y, Cai X et al (2021) Role of underlying surface, rainstorm and antecedent wetness condition on flood responses in small and medium sized watersheds in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. CATENA 206:105489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G (1993) River Mathematical Model. Ocean Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaroslav S (2000) D Z, P W, R M Updating the designed flood profile for the Fraser River gravel reach with the Mike 11 hydrodynamic model. Presentation to the CWRA 53rd annual conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Zhang L, Tan J (2016) The Example Analysis and Computation of DesignStorm Rain Based on“Rain - Flood” Method in Small - medium River Basin Area without Hydrologic Data. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy 22:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Bi D (2014) Design of the downstream Embankment of Yingna River Reservoir. Dalian Water Affairs Bureau

  • Zheng F, Westra S, Leonard M, Sisson SA (2014) Modeling dependence between extreme rainfall and storm surge to estimate coastal flooding risk. Water Resour Res 50:2050–2071. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong H, van Overloop P-J, van Gelder P, Rijcken T (2012) Influence of a storm surge barrier’s operation on the flood frequency in the Rhine Delta Area. Water 4:474–493. https://doi.org/10.3390/w4020474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Wang G (2007) Research on flood control capacity of the lower reaches of the Yingna River reservoir and assessment report on flood damage in key river sections. Dalian University of Technology

  • Zhou X (1995) Computational Hydraulics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X (2018a) Analysis of “804” Rainstorm in Yingna River Basin in 2017.Water Conservancy Planning and Design49–52

  • Zhou X (2018b) Investigation and analysis of 2017 “804” Flood in Yingna River Basin. Water Resour Hydropower Northeast China 36:45–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. DUT20RC(3)019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Ye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, F., Jin, S., Ye, L. et al. Analysis of flood conveyance capacity of small- and medium-sized river and flood managements. Nat Hazards 116, 447–467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05682-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05682-4

Keywords

Navigation