Abstract
We study the long-run connection between atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and the probability of hydrometeorological disasters using a panel of 193 countries over the period 1970–2016 providing annual disaster projections to the year 2040 for each of these countries. Generating accurate predictions on where hydrometeorological disasters have greater chances to occur, may facilitate preparedness and adaption to such disasters, thus helping to reduce their high human and economic costs. We estimate the probabilities of hydrometeorological disasters at country levels using Bayesian sampling techniques. We decompose the probability of country disaster into the effects of country-specific factors, such as climatological and socio-demographic factors, and factors associated with world climate, which we denote global probability of disaster (GPOD). Finally, we subject these GPOD time paths to a cointegration analysis with CO2 concentration and provide projections to the year 2040 of the GPOD conditional on nine Shared Socioeconomic Pathways scenarios. We detect a stable long-term relation between CO2 accumulation and the GPOD that allows us to determine projections of the latter process conditional on the former. We conclude that readily available statistical data on global atmospheric concentrations of CO2 can be used as a conceptually meaningful, statistically valid and policy useful predictor of the probability of occurrence of hydrometeorological disasters.



Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data files can be found at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/t2nelg9epd6jvga/data.rar?dl=0. A guide for replicating results is available at: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/577iz845crmlwufcnasxn/guide_for_replicating_results.docx?dl=0&rlkey=uyfvatkdv02odu3fa85mba672. A preprint version of this manuscript is available at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-528668/v1.
Notes
Climatological models typically build upon physical principles and laws, fluid mechanics and/or chemistry relations, used for running computer simulations of the earth climate system.
This definition was also adopted by López et al. (2020) and accords with the one by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: “Process or phenomenon of atmospheric, hydrological or oceanographic nature that may cause loss of life, injury or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social and economic disruption, or environmental damage” (UNISDR, 2009).
Iso-region or iso-subregion are used depending on the selected model and refer to a geographical classification of countries. Iso-region corresponds to continent (5 categories total) and iso-subregion to a within continent subdivision (21 categories). For aggregating observations over time, we allow for random year and decade effects.
The Metropolis–Hastings (also known as MCMC) algorithm is a recursive method to simulate multivariate distributions. It can be shown that the simulated distribution converges to the target distribution, a detailed description of the algorithm can be found in Chib and Greenberg (1995). BayesX software utilizes a generalized version of the algorithm with distribution specific iteratively weighted least squares proposal densities.
To put the effect estimates into perspective, consider the descriptive statistics in Table 1 using two country examples. Vietnam had a precipitation deviation of 46.74 mm/month in 1990 and -78.13 mm/month in 2010; Zambia -81.82 mm/month in 1990 and 37.64 mm/month in 2010. These changes account for -0.67 (Vietnam) and 0.65 (Zambia) standard deviations. Hence, other things equal, this precipitation changes account for a reduction of the probability of at least one disaster by 3.78% for Vietnam, and an increase of 3.62% for Zambia.
As our model selection process favored growth rates instead of log levels for these controls, a direct interpretation of the correlation results in the sense of the ones in Wu et al. (2018), Mora et al. (2018), or López et al (2020) cannot be made here. Taking GDP per capita as an example, we have that on the one hand neoclassical theory suggests conditional higher growth rates for lower income (more vulnerable) countries, while on the other hand growth has been shown to be sensitive to disasters (Loayza et al. 2012, Cavallo et al. 2013 and others). Hence, we refrain from making any causal interpretation.
See Kremers et al. (1992) for a discussion of single equation cointegration and error-correction models.
Under the null hypothesis of no cointegration, testing the significance of \({\alpha }_{2}\) requires non-standard critical values (Kremers et al. 1992). Appendix AB.1 provides the results with these values.
We have also applied these exercises to two other related trending variables as placebo, namely Global Temperature and World GDP per capita. Both variables appear to be also correlated in the long term with the GPOD, but both trending variables fail to be weakly exogenous (see Appendix B.2). Hence, for the conditioning of GPOD projections Global Temperature and World GDP per capita lack an essential qualification.
These scenarios include the five high-priority scenarios for the Sixth Assessment report by the IPCC (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP5-8.5 and SSP1-1.9), the three scenarios that complete the Tier 2 list suggested by O’Neill et al. (2016) (SSP4-6.0, SSP4-3.4, SSP5-3.4-OS) and a variation of the SSP3-7.0 scenario (Meinshausen et al., 2020). For a comprehensive description of the SSPs we refer the reader to the work of Riahi et al. (2016).
References
AON (2019) Weather, climate, and catastrophe insight: 2018 annual report. AON Empower Results. http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20190122-ab-if-annual-weather-climate-report-2018.pdf.
Appendini CM, Meza-Padilla R, Abud-Russell S et al (2019) Effect of climate change over landfalling hurricanes at the Yucatan Peninsula. Clim Change 157:469–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02569-5
Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2016) The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Clim Change 134(3):387–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5
Baker H, Millar R, Karoly D, Beyerle U, Guillod B, Mitchell D, Shiogama H, Sparrow S, Woolings T, Allen M (2018) Higher CO2 concentrations increase extreme event risk in a 1.5 °C world. Nature Clim Change 8:604–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0190-1
Banholzer S, Kossin J, Donner S (2014) The impact of climate change on natural disasters. In: Singh A, Zommers Z (eds) Reducting Disasters: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change. Springer, pp 21–49
Belitz C, Brezger A, Kneib T, Lang S, Umlauf N (2012) BayesX. Software for Bayesian inference in structured additive regression models. Version 2.1. Available from http://www.bayesx.org.
Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J (2013) Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat 95(5):1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00413
Chib S, Greenberg E (1995) Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Am Stat 49(4):327–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684568
Cook LM, McGinnis S, Samaras C (2020) The effect of modeling choices on updating intensity-duration-frequency curves and stormwater infrastructure designs for climate change. Clim Change 159:289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02649-6
CRED (2020) Human Costs of Disasters: An overview of the last 20 years. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). https://geographyandyou.com/human-cost-of-disasters-2000-2019/
Davlasheridze M, Fisher-Vanden K, Klaiber AH (2017) The effects of adaptation measures on hurricane induced property losses: Which FEMA investments have the highest returns? J Environ Econ Manag 81:93–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.005
Diffenbaugh NS, Swain DL, Touma D (2015) Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. PNAS 112(13):3931–3936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422385112
Dore MHI (2003) Forecasting the conditional probabilities of natural disasters in Canada as a guide for disaster preparedness. Nat Hazards 28(2):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022978024522
Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289(5487):2068–2074. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5487.2068
Engle R, Granger C (1987) Co-Integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Fang J, Lau CK, Lu Z, Wu W, Zhu L (2019) Natural disasters, climate change and their impact on inclusive wealth in G20 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(2):1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3634-2
FEMA (2019) The national flood insurance program. Federal Emergency Management Agency, US Department of Home Security, USA. https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance
Hallegatte S, Rozenberg J (2017) Climate change through a poverty lens. Nat Clim Change 7:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3253
Hauer ME, Evansand JM, Mishra DR (2016) Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States. Nat Clim Change 6:691–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2961
Herring SC, Hoerling MP, Peterson TC, Stott PA (2014) Explaining extreme events of 2013 from a climate perspective. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(9):S1–S104. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-95.9.S1.1
Herrmann-Lunecke MG, Villagra P (2020) Community resilience and urban planning in tsunami prone settlements: the case of Mehuin, Queule, Toltén and Puerto Saavedra. Chile Disasters 44(1):103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12369
Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S, Konoshima L, Yamazaki D, Watanabe S, Kim H, Kanae S (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Change 3:816–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911
Hoerling M, Eischeid J, Perlwitz Q, Zhang JXT, Pegion P (2012) On the increased frequency of Mediterranean drought. J Clim 25(6):2146–2161. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00296.1
IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A.Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
IPCC (2019) IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/3/2019/12/SROCC_ FullReport_FINAL.pdf
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf
Jayawardena AW (2015) Hydro-meteorological disasters: causes, effects and mitigation measures with special reference to early warning with data driven approaches of forecasting. Procedia IUTAM 17:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2015.06.003
Khan K, Zaman K, Shoukry A, Sharkawy A, Gani S, Sasmoko S, Ahmad J, Khan A, Sanil H (2019) Natural disasters and economic losses: controlling external migration, energy and environmental resources, water demand, and financial development for global prosperity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:14287–14299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04755-5
Klein N, Kneib T, Lang S (2015) Bayesian generalized additive models for location, scale and shape zero-inflated and overdispersed count data. J Am Stat Assoc 110(509):405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2014.912955
Kremers JJM, Ericsson N, Dolado JJ (1992) The power of cointegration tests. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 54(3):325–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00005.x
Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI, Handmer J, Nicholls N, Peduzzi P, Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Arnell N, Mach K, Muir-Wood R, Brakenridge GR, Kron W, Benito G, Honda Y, Takahashi K, Sherstyukov B (2014) Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 59(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
Lee WS, Lee MI (2016) Interannual variability of heat waves in South Korea and their connection with large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns. Int J Climatol 36(15):4815–4830. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4671
Li J, Wang B (2018) Predictability of summer extreme precipitation days over eastern China. Clim Dyn 51:4543–4554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3848-x
Loayza N, Olaberría E, Rigolini J, Christiansen L (2012) Natural disasters and growth: going beyond the averages. World Dev 40(7):1317–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.002
Loebach P (2019) Livelihoods, precarity, and disaster vulnerability: Nicaragua and Hurricane Mitch. Disasters 43(4):727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12402
López R, Thomas V, Troncoso P (2020) Impacts of carbon dioxide emissions on global hydro meteorological disasters. Clim Dis Dev J. 4(1):30–50. https://doi.org/10.18783/cddj.v004.i01.a03
López R, Thomas V, Troncoso P (2016) Economic growth, natural disasters, and climate change: New empirical estimates. Series Documentos de Trabajo No. 434, pp. 1 - 38. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/143427
Marvin HJP, Kleter GA, Van der Fels-Klerx HJ, Noordam MY, Franz E, Willems DJM, Boxall B (2013) Proactive systems for early warning of potential impacts of natural disasters on food safety: climate-change-induced extreme events as case in point. Food Control 34(2):444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.04.037
Meinshausen M, Nicholls ZRJ, Lewis J, Gidden MJ, Vogel E, Freund M, Beyerle U, Gessner C, Nauels A, Bauer N, Canadell JG, Daniel JS, John A, Krummel PB, Luderer G, Meinshausen N, Montzka SA, Rayner PJ, Reimann S, Smith SJ, van den Berg M, Velders GJM, Vollmer MK, Wang RHJ (2020) The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci Model Dev 13(8):3571–3605. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
Min SK, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09763
Mora C, Spirandelli D, Franklin EC et al (2018) Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nat Clim Change 8:1062–1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0315-6
Morice CP, Kennedy JJ, Rayner NA, Jones PD (2012) Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 dataset. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017187
NG (2011) Floods 101. National Geographic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PXj7bOD7IY
NIDM (2019) Hydro-Meteorological Disasters. National Institute of Disaster Management, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. https://nidm.gov.in/PDF/Disaster hymet.pdf
NOAA (2019a) Carbon dioxide levels hit record peak in May. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://research.noaa.gov/article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2461/Carbon-dioxide-levels-hit-record-peak-in-May
NOAA (2019b) Global carbon dioxide growth in 2018 reached 4th highest on record. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.noaa.gov/news/global-carbon-dioxide-growth-in-2018-reached-4th-highest-on-record
NOAA (2021) Carbon dioxide peaks near 420 parts per million at Mauna Loa observatory. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://research.noaa.gov/article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2764/Coronavirus-response-barely-slows-rising-carbon-dioxide
Nuccitelli D (2014) California just had its worst drought in over 1200 years, as temperatures and risks rise. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/dec/08/california-just-had-its-worst-drought-in-over-1200-years Accessed 05 May 2021
O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren DP, Eyring V, Friedlingstein P, Hurtt G, Knutti R, Kriegler E, Lamarque J-F, Lowe J, Meehl GA, Moss R, Riahi K, Sanderson BM (2016) The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci Model Dev 9:3461–3482. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
Otto FE, Massey N, Van Oldenborgh GJ, Jones RG, Allen MR (2012) Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave. Geophys Res Lett 39(4):L04702. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050422
Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA, Nozawa T, Hilberts AGJ, Lohmann D, Allen MR (2000) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470:382–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09762
Pei L, Xia J, Yan Z, Yang H (2016) Assessment of the Pacific decadal oscillation’s contribution to the occurrence of local torrential rainfall in north China. Clim Change 144:391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1610-8
Pretis F (2020) Econometric modelling of climate systems: The equivalence of energy balance models and cointegrated vector autoregressions. J Econom 214(1):256–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.05.013
Rahmstorf S, Coumou D (2011) Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(44):17905–17909. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101766108
Ramírez F (2011) Resettlement as a preventive measure in a comprehensive risk reduction framework. In: Correa E, Ramírez F, Sanahuja A (eds) Populations at Risk of Disaster. World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, Washington, pp 15–27
Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Crespo Cuaresma J, S KC, Leimbach M, Jiang L, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Ebi K, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, Aleluia Da Silva L, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Baumstark L, Doelman J, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Tavoni M (2016) The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an Overview. Glob Environ Change. 42:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
Schneider U, Becker A, Finger P, Meyer Christoffer A, Ziese M (2018) GPCC Full Data Monthly Product Version 2018 at 1.0: Monthly Land Surface Precipitation from Rain-Gauges built on GTS-based and Historical Data. Global Precipitation Climatology Centre. https://doi.org/10.5676/DWDGPCC/FDMV2018100
Schreider SY, Smith DI, Jakeman AJ (2000) Climate change impacts on urban flooding. Clim Change 47(1):91–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005621523177
Seung-Soo H (2018) Water and disasters. In TOPICS Geo Natural Catastrophes 2017: Analyses, Assessments, Positions. Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Königinstrasse 107, 80802 München, Germany: Munich Re. p 36–37.
Siverd C, Hagen S, Bilskie M, Braud D, Twilley R (2020) Quantifying storm surge and risk reduction costs: a case study for Lafitte, Louisiana. Clim Change 161:201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02636-x
Smith A, Bates PD, Wing O, Sampson C, Quinn N, Neal J (2019) New estimates of flood exposure in developing countries using high-resolution population data. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09282-y
Sperling F, Szekely F (2005) Disaster risk management in a changing climate, vulnerability and adaptation. Discussion paper prepared for the world conference on disaster reduction - reprint with addendum on conference outcomes. Vulnerability and Adaptation Resource Group, Washington
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde V (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc B 64(4):583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
Stott P, Stone DA, Allen M (2004) Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature 432:610–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03089
Stott P, Allen M, Christidis N, Dole R, Hoerling M, Huntingford C, Pall P, Perlwitz J, Stone D (2012) Attribution of weather and climate-related events. Climate Science for Serving Society. Springer, Netherlands, pp 307–337
Tan K, Huang P, Liu F, Murakami H, Hsu P (2019) Simulated ENSO’s impact on tropical cyclone genesis over the western North Pacific in CMIP5 models and its changes under global warming. Int J Climatol 39:3668–3678. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6031
Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockstrom J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
Thomas V, Albert J, Hepburn C (2014) Contributors to the frequency of intense climate disasters in Asia-Pacific countries. Clim Change 126(3–4):381–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1232-y
Tyler S, Moench M (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim Dev 4(4):311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
UNISDR (2009) United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Terminology on disaster risk reduction.
UNISDR (2019) United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Press release: EMBARGO 11.00 CET, JANUARY 24.
Wei W, Yan Y, Jones PD (2017) Potential predictability of seasonal extreme precipitation accumulation in China. J Hydrometeorol 18(4):1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0141.1
Wei W, Yan Y, Jones PD (2019) A decision-tree approach to seasonal prediction of extreme precipitation in eastern China. Int J Climatol 40(1):255–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6207
Wu J, Han G, Zhou H, Li N (2018) Economic development and declining vulnerability toclimate-related disasters in China. Environ Res Lett 13:034013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaabd7
Funding
This research has been partially financed by the authors’ academics institutions, particularly for the research stays of Helmut Herwartz at the Department of Economics of the University of Chile in 2018 and 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Andrés Fortunato involved in data acquisition, software programming, tables and figures, literature review, model description and manuscript co-editing. Helmut Herwartz participated in econometric model designing and result interpretation, model description, text review. Ramón López involved in Initial conception, manuscript editing, text review, result interpretation, and supervision. Eugenio Figueroa B. participated in Research coordination, literature review, and manuscript writing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
We declare that there are no competing interests.
Code availability
Code files for replicating results can be downloaded from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqb7agjvkt5ysd7/hydro_disasters.rar?dl=0.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortunato, A., Herwartz, H., López, R.E. et al. Carbon dioxide atmospheric concentration and hydrometeorological disasters. Nat Hazards 112, 57–74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05172-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05172-z


