Abstract
Process-based hydrological models are of great importance to understand hydrological processes and support decision making. The LImburg Soil Erosion Model (LISEM) requires information on soil and land-use-related attributes to represent the transformation of rainfall into runoff for isolated rainfall events. This study aimed at evaluating LISEM for estimation of direct surface runoff (DSR) hydrographs in a watershed in Southern Brazil under the predominance of long-duration rainfall events, dominated by Argisols and with availability of a high-density rain gauge network. In addition, this study sought to: (i) suggest and evaluate a procedure for definition of initial soil moisture from antecedent 5-day rainfall depth; (ii) reduce the degree of subjectivity involved in the determination of some vegetation-related parameters by using remote sensing; and (iii) recommend a validation procedure. The saturated soil hydraulic conductivity and the Manning’s surface roughness coefficient were calibrated considering 11 rainfall–runoff events, whereas the validation was performed for 4 events from the average calibrated parameters. The Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient was used to assess both calibration and validation, resulting in average values of 0.64 and 0.58, respectively. It can be inferred from the results that the use of remote sensing to derive some LISEM parameters, along with the suggested schemes for definition of initial soil moisture and validation, was effective and provided sound results even for long-duration rainfall events. The results of this study and its methodological procedures can serve as a basis for other professionals who intend to use LISEM for both conducting detailed analyses of DSR hydrographs and supporting water resources management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agência Nacional de Águas (ANA) (2014) Conjuntura dos recursos hídricos no Brasil. http://www.snirh.gov.br/portal/snirh/centrais-de-conteudos/conjuntura-dos-recursos-hidricos
Almedeij J, Esen II (2014) Modified green-ampt infiltration model for steady rainfall. J Hydrol Eng 19:04014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000944
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Moraes G, Leonardo J, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1996) Hydrology Handbook. New York, USA.
Aquino L (2014) Hydrological modeling in the Southern of the Rio Grande do Sul state (Brazil) using the SWAT and LASH models. Doctoral thesis, Federal University of Pelotas.
Baartman JEM, Jetten VG, Ritsema CJ, Vente J (2012) Exploring effects of rainfall intensity and duration on soil erosion at the catchment scale using openLISEM: prado catchment, SE Spain. Hydrol Process 26:1034–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8196
Barros CAP, Minella JPG, Dalbianco L, Ramon R (2014) Description of hydrological and erosion processes determined by applying the LISEM model in a rural catchment in southern Brazil. J Soil Sediment 14:1298–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0903-7
Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) Answer: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23:938–944. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34692
Beskow S, Mello CR, Norton LD (2011) Development, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of LASH model. Scientia Agricola 68(3):365–374. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162011000300001
Beskow S, Timm LC, Tavares VEQ, Caldeira TL, Aquino LS (2016) Potential of the LASH model for water resources management in data-scarce basins: a case study of the Fragata River basin, southern Brazil. Hydrolog Sci J 61:2567–2578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1133912
Beskow S, Nunes GS, Mello CR, Caldeira TL, Norton LD, Steinmetz AA, Vargas MM, Ávila LF (2018) Geomorphology-based unit hydrograph models for flood risk management: case study in Brazilian watersheds with contrasting physiographic characteristics. An Acad Bras Cienc 90:1873–1890. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170430
Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically-based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci B 24:43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
Caldeira TL, Oliveira VA, Steinmetz AA, Viola MR, Beskow S (2018) Deterministic rainfall-runoff hydrological modeling in watersheds: an introductory look. Rev Bras Eng Sust 5:22–32. https://doi.org/10.15210/rbes.v5i1.13231
Castro ALC (2003) Manual de desastres: desastres naturais. Ministério da Integração Nacional, Brasília
CEPED/UFSC (2012) Atlas Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais 1991–2012. Volume Brasil. Florianópolis. https://www.ceped.ufsc.br/atlas-brasileiro-de-desastres-naturais-1991-a-2012/
Chow V, Maidment D, Mays L (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company
Chen L, Xiang L, Young MH, Yin J, Yu Z, Van Genuchten MT (2015) Optimal parameters for the green-ampt infiltration model under rainfall conditions. J Hydrol Hydromech 63:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0012
Chu X, Yang J, Chi Y (2012) Quantification of soil random roughness and surface depression storage: methods, applicability, and limitations. Trans ASABE 55:1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42361
Costa CDO, Alves MC, Sousa AP, Silva HR, González AP, Avalos JMM, Beskow S, Marques AP (2015) Estimative loss of soil and sediment deposition in a sub-basin river in process of environmental degradation. Rev Cienc Amb 9:67–85. https://doi.org/10.18316/1981-8858.15.5
Costa CDO, Alves MC, Sousa AP, Silva HR, González AP, Avalos JMM (2016) Production and deposition sediment in a sub-basin river with susceptible soils to erosion. Irriga 21:284–299. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2016v21n2p284-299
Cunha N, Silveira R, Severo C (2006) Solos e Terras do Planalto Sul-Rio-Grandense e Planícies Costeira. Pelotas: EMBRAPA/CPACT 43 p.
De Roo APJ, Jetten VG (1999) Calibrating and validating the LISEM model for two data sets from the Netherlands and South Africa. CATENA 37:477–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00034-X
De Roo APJ, Wesseling CG, Ritsema CJ (1996a) LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. I: theory, input and output. Hydrol Process 10:1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199608)10:8%3C1107::AID-HYP415%3E3.0.CO;2-4
De Roo APJ, Offermans RJE, Cremers NHDT (1996b) LISEM: a single-event physically-based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II: sensitivity analysis, validation and application. Hydrol Process 10:1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199608)10:8%3C1119::AID-HYP416%3E3.0.CO;2-V
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) (2015).
ESRI. Environmental Systems Research Institute (2014).
Flanagan D, Nearing M (1995) USDA – water erosion prediction project (WEPP) hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. National Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette
Gomes NM, Mello CR, Silva AM, Beskow S (2008) Applicability of the LISEM (Limburg soil erosion) model for hydrological simulation in a tropical watershed. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 36:2483–2492. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832008000600025
Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics. J Agric Sci 4:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600001441
Grum B, Woldearegay K, Hessel R, Baartman JEM, Abdulkadir M, Yazew E, Kessler A, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V (2017) Assessing the effect of water harvesting techniques on event-based hydrological responses and sediment yield at a catchment scale in northern Ethiopia using the Limburg Soil Erosion Model (LISEM). CATENA 159:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.07.018
Hasenack H, Weber E (2010) Base cartográfica vetorial contínua do Rio Grande do Sul – escala 1:50.000. UFRGS - Centro de Ecologia. Porto Alegre. https://www.ufrgs.br/labgeo/index.php/dados-espaciais/250-base-cartografica-vetorial-continua-do-rio-grande-do-sul-escala-1-50-000
Hessel R (2005) Effects of grid cell size and time step length on simulation results of the Limburg soil erosion model (LISEM). Hydrol Process 19:3037–3049. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5815
Hessel R, Jetten V, Liu B, Zhang Y, Stolte J (2003) Calibration of the LISEM model for a small Loess Plateau catchment. CATENA 54:235–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00067-5
Hessel R, Van Den Bosch R, Vigiak O (2006) Evaluation of the LISEM soil erosion model in two catchments in the East African Highlands. Earth Surf Proc Land 31:469–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1280
Hu W, She D, Shao M, Chun KP, Si B (2015) Effects of initial soil water content and saturated hydraulic conductivity variability on small watershed runoff simulation using LISEM. Hydrolog Sci J 60:1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.903332
Hutchinson M, Xu T, Stein J (2011) Recent Progress in the ANUDEM Elevation Gridding Procedure. In: Geomorphometry 2011, edited by T. Hengel, I.S. Evans, J.P. Wilson and M. Gould, 19–22. Redlands, California,
IUSS Working Group Wrb (2015) World Reference Base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Update 2015. World Soil Resources Report 106. FAO, Rome: 188 p.
IUSS Working Group Wrb (2015) World Reference Base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Report 106. FAO, Rome: 188 p.
Jetten V (2018) LISEM user manual, version 7.96 x. Utrecht University, Utrecht
Julià MF, Monreal TE, Jiménez ASC, Meléndez EG (2004) Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction. Geoderma 123:257–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.02.011
Jong SM, Jetten VG (2007) Estimating spatial patterns of rainfall interception from remotely sensed vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21:529–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601064884
Kamphorst EC, Jetten V, J (2000) Predicting depressional storage from soil surface roughness. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(5):1749–1758
Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9:384–394. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR009i002p00384
Mello CR, Viola MR, Norton LD, Silva AM, Weimar FA (2008) Development and application of a simple hydrologic model simulation for a Brazilian headwater basin. CATENA 75:235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.07.002
Mello CR, Norton LD, Pinto LC, Beskow S, Curi N (2016) Agricultural watershed modeling: a review for hydrology and soil erosion processes. Ciênc Agrotec 40:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542016000100001
Mishra SK, Tyagi JV, Singh VP (2003) Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrol Process 17:2629–2652. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1257
Moura MM (2018) Influence of different relief data sources and scales on flood estimations from Nash’s Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph. Dissertation, Federal University of Pelotas
Moro M, Minella J, Merten G (2009) Simulação da produção de sedimentos em uma pequena bacia hidrográfica rural utilizando o modelo LISEM (LImburg Soil Erosion Model). In: 8 Simpósio Nacional de Controle de Erosão.
Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. T ASABE 58:1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715
Nash J (1957) E (1957) The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Assemblee Generale de Toronto, 3. Toronto. Anais... Toronto, Iahs, pp 14–121
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Pruski FF, Ferreira PA, Ramos MM, Cecon PR (1997) Model to design level terraces. J Irrig Drain Eng 123:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:1(8)
Rahmati M, Neyshabouri MR, Fakherifard A, Oskouei MM, Ahmadi A, Sheikh JV (2013) Rainfall-runoff prediction using LISEM model in Lighvan watershed, North West of Iran. J Eng Appl Sci 3:1893–1901
Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Soni B (1983) Agricultural management effects on soil water processes part I: Soil water retention and Green and Ampt infiltration parameters. Trans Asae 26:1747–1752. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.33837
SCS (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds, Technical Release No. 55. Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D. C. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044171.pdf
Sartori A, Lombardi Neto F, Genovez AM (2005) Hydrologic classification of brazilian soils to estimate excess rainfall using the soil conservation service method part 1: classification. Rev Bras Rec Híd 10:05–18. https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v10n4.p5-18
SEDEC - Secretaria Nacional da Defesa Civil, Centro Nacional de Gerenciamento de Riscos e Desastres (2013) Ministério da Integração Nacional. Anuário Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais.
SEMA/DRH (2013). Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. Departamento de Recursos Hídricos – DRH.
Sheikh V, Van Loon E, Hessel R, Jetten V (2010) Sensitivity of LISEM predicted catchment discharge to initial soil moisture content of soil profile. J Hydrol 393:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.016
Steinmetz AA, Beskow S, Terra FS, Nunes MCM, Vargas MM, Horn JFC (2019) Influence of spatial discretization on flood modeling from unit hydrograph theory. Rev Bras Rec Híd 24:e16. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.241920180143
Stolte J, Liu V, Ritsema CJ, Van Den Elsen HGM, Hessel R (2003) Modelling water flow and sediment processes in a small gully system on the Loess Plateau in China. CATENA 54:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00060-2
Thiessen AH, Alter C (1911) Precipitation averages for large areas. Mon Weather Rev 39:1082–1089
Tobler W (1987) Measuring spatial resolution. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geographic Information Systems.
Van Deursen W (1995) Geographical information systems and dynamic models.
Van Liew MW, Veith TL, Bosch DD, Arnold JG (2007) Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 12:173–189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(173)
Barros CAP, Minella JPG, Schlesner AA, Ramon R, Copetti A C (2021) Impact of data sources to DEM construction and application to runoff and sediment yield modelling using LISEM model. J. Earth Syst Sci 130(1):1–17.
Xu H., Xu CY, Chen H, Zhang Z, Li L (2013) Assessing the influence of rain gauge density and distribution on hydrological model performance in a humid region of China. J. Hydrol 505, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.004
Zeng Q, Chen H, Xu CY, Jie MX, Chen J, Guo SL, Liu J (2018) The effect of rain gauge density and distribution on runoff simulation using a lumped hydrological modelling approach. J. Hydrol 563:106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.058
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship to the first author, the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) for the scholarships to the fourth author, FAPERGS for the research grants (2082-2551/13-0; 16/2551-0000 247-9), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for scholarships to the second (308645/2017-0) and third (301556/2017-2) authors and for the research grant (485279/2013-4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vargas, M.M., Beskow, S., de Mello, C.R. et al. Capability of LISEM to estimate flood hydrographs in a watershed with predominance of long-duration rainfall events. Nat Hazards 109, 593–614 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04850-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04850-2