Abstract
Floods are the most frequent natural disaster and pose a very challenging threat to many cities worldwide. Understanding the flood dynamic is essential for developing strategies to reduce its risk and damages, thus ensuring the cities’ protection. This study evaluated the Capibaribe River basin's hydrological response to extreme events and its impact on the city of Recife, in the northeast of Brazil. The CAWM IV and HEC-HMS models were coupled with a high-resolution 2D HEC-RAS model to simulate the flood events of 1975 and 2011 in Recife. CAWM IV is a newly developed hydrological model that presented very promising results for the data-scarce watersheds of the Brazilian semiarid region. For the 2D hydrodynamic modeling, 1-m LiDAR DEM was used. A reservoir operation model was also applied to assess the effect of the basin's main reservoirs on the water system upstream from Recife. Lastly, the 2011 flood event was simulated under the scenario of an absence of this reservoir system. The strategy used to address flooding simulation in an urban area proved to be satisfactory. Of the events simulated with CAWM IV, 60% have at least a satisfactory adjustment with NSEsqrtQ coefficients greater than 0.36 in 95% of cases. With the reservoir operation model, it was possible to calculate the peak flow of the events of 1975 and 2011 as being 2574 and 731 m3/s, respectively. The 2D HEC-RAS model presented a measure of fit of approximately 0.7. The study showed that the reservoir system was responsible for reducing flood extent by 70.3% in the 2011 event, but even with this system, this event still caused a flood covering an area of 6.01 km2. The results indicate that although the reservoirs prevent severe flooding in the lower course of the Capibaribe River, Recife is still vulnerable to flooding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afshari S, Tavakoly AA, Rajib MA, Zheng X, Omranian FML, E, Fekete BM, (2018) Comparison of new generation low-complexity flood inundation mapping tools with a hydrodynamic model. J Hydrol 556:539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.036
Alcoforado RG (2006) Hydro-hydrological flow simulation in complex urban river networks: support for high-resolution spatial information. Doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Pernambuco
Alcoforado RG, Cirilo JA (2001) Decision support system for analysis, forecasting and flood control. Braz J Water Resour 6(4):133–153. https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v6n4.p133-153
Almeida neto JB (2019). Determination of the water accumulation Potential in the soils of the state of Pernambuco. Undergraduate thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco (Caruaru)
Bandini A (1961) Hidráulica, vol 1. EESC/USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Barros MC (1979) Verificação do grau de proteção do plano de controle de enchentes do Governo Federal, Bacia do Rio Capibaribe PE-BR. M.Sc. Dissertation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Bates PD, Marks KJ, Horritt MS (2002) Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrol Process 17:537–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1113
Bonnifait L, Delrieu G, Lay ML, Boudevillain B, Masson A, Belleudy P, Gaume E, Saulnier G (2009) Distributed hydrologic and hydraulic modelling with radar rainfall input: Reconstruction of the 8–9 September 2002 catastrophic flood event in the Gard region, France. Adv Water Resour 32:1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.007
Bruner GW (2016) HEC-RAS river analysis system. 2D Modeling user’s manual version 5.0. Davis, California.
Carisi F, Schöter K, Domeneghetti A, Kreibich H, Castellarin A (2018) Development and assessment of uni- and multivariable flood loss models for Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:2057–2079. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2057-2018
Casulli V, Stelling GS (2011) Semi-implicit subgrid modelling of three-dimensional free-surface flows. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 67:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2361
Cirilo JA (2021) Campus Agreste Watershed Model. Federal University of Pernambuco. https://www.ufpe.br/web/grh/cawm. Acessed 23 Mar 2021.
Cirilo JA, Alves FHB, Silva LAC, Campos JHAL (2014) Support of Georeferenced Information of High Resolution for Implementation of Infrastructure and Territorial Planning. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 07: 755–763. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v7.4.p755-763
Cirilo JA, Verçosa LFM, Gomes MMA, Feitoza MAB, Ferraz GF, Silva BM (2020) Development and application of a rainfall-runoff model for semi-arid regions. Braz J Water Resour 25:15. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.252020190106
Cook A, Merwade V (2009) Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol 377:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.015
Costabile P, Costanzo C, Macchione F, Mercogliano P (2012) Two-dimensional model for overland flow simulations: a case study. European Water 38:13–23
Costabile P, Costanzo C, Lorenzo G, Macchione F (2020) Is local flood hazard assessment in urban areas significantly influenced by the physical complexity of the hydrodynamic inundation model? J Hydrol 580:124231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231
Coulibaly G, Leye B, Tazen F, Mounirou LA, Karambiri H (2020) Urban flood modeling using 2d shallow-water equations in ouagadougou. Burkina Faso Water 12(2120):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082120
CRED (2020) The human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years (2000–2019). Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. https://www.cred.be/publications. Consulted on 6 Mar 2021.
Dang TD, Vu DT, Chowdhury AFMK, Galelli S (2020) A software package for the representation and optimization of water reservoir operations in the VIC hydrologic model. Environmental Modelling and Software 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104673
David A, Schamalz B (2019) Flood hazard analysis in small catchments: Comparison of hydrological and hydrodynamic approaches by the use of direct rainfall. J Flood Risk Management 2020 (13). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12639
Dimitriadis P, Tegos A, Oikonomou A, Pagana V, Koukouvinos A, Mamassis N, Koutsoyiannis E (2016) Comparative evaluation of 1D and quasi-2D hydraulic models based on benchmark and real-world applications for uncertainty assessment in flood mapping. J Hydrol 534:478–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
Edijatno MC (1989) Un modele pluie-débit journalier à trois paramètres. Houille Blanche 2:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/1989007
Falter D, Vorogushyn S, Lhomme J, Apel H, Gouldby B, Merz B (2013) Hydraulic model evaluation for large-scale flood risk assessments. Hydrol Process 27:1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9553
Farriansyah AM, Juwono PT, Suhartanto E, Dermawan V (2018) Water allocation computation model for river and multi-reservoir system with sustainability—efficiency-equity criteria. Water 10:1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111537
Ferraz GF (2019) Hydrological and hydrodynamic simulation of the impact of floods in the sirinhaém river basin and assessment of the proposed control system. Master thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco.
Fewtrell TJ, Bates PD, Horritt M, Hunter NM (2008) Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments. Hydrol Process 22:5107–5118. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7148
Fewtrell TJ, Duncan A, Sampson CC, Neal JC, Bates PD (2011) Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data. Phys Chem Earth 36:281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.011
Fleischmann A, Paiva R, Collischonn W (2019) Can regional to continental river hydrodynamic models be locally relevant? A Cross-Scale Comparison J Hydrol X 3:100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100027
Gain AK, Mojtahed V, Biscaro C, Balbi S, Giupponi C (2015) An integrated approach of flood risk assessment in the eastern part of Dhaka City. Nat Hazards 79:1499–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1911-7
Gallegos HA, Schubert JE, Sanders BF (2009) Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: a case study of Baldwin Hills, California. Adv Water Resour 32:1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.008
Garcia R, Restrepo P, DeWeese M, Ziemer M, Palmer J, Thornburg J, Lacasta A (2015) Advanced GPU Paralellization for Two-Dimensional Operational River Flood Forecasting. In: 36th International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research World Congress. The Hague, Netherlands.
Ghimire S (2013) Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model for assessing flood risk from extreme storm events. Climate 1:148–162. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli1030148
Ghimire U, Agarwal A, Shrestha NK, Daggupati P, Srinivasan G, Than HH (2020) Applicability of Lumped Hydrological Models in a Data-Constrained River Basin of Asia. J. Hydrol. Eng. 25(8). https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001950
Gomes MMA (2019). Integrated approach to hydrological modeling and operation of dams to assess the efficiency of flood control in the Capibaribe River Basin. Master thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco.
Güneralp B, Güneralp I, Liu Y (2015) Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Glob Environ Chang 31:217–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.002
Hariri-Ardebili MA (2018) Risk, Reliability, Resilience (R3) and beyond in dam engineering: a state-of-the-art review. Int J Dis Risk Reduc 31:806–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.024
Hdeib R, Abdallah C, Colin F, Brocca L, Moussa R (2018) Constraining coupled hydrological-hydraulic flood model by past storm events and post-event measurements in data-sparse regions. J Hydrol 565(2018):160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.008
Horritt MS, Baldassarre GDi, Bates PD, Brath A, (2007) Comparing the performance of a 2-D finite element and a 2-D finite volume model of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery. Hydrol Process 21:2745–2759. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6486
Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X
Hsu NS, Wei CC (2007) A multipurpose reservoir real-time operation model for flood control during typhoon invasion. J Hydrol 336:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.001
Huang S, Kumar R, Flörke M, Yang T, Hundecha Y, Kraft P, Gao C, Gelfan A, Liersch S, Lobanova A, Strauch M, Ogtrop F, Reinhardt J, Haberlandt U (2017) Krysanova V (2016) Evaluation of an ensemble of regional hydrological models in 12 large-scale river basins worldwide. Clim Change 141:381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1841-8
Hunter NM, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Wilson MD (2007) Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review. Geomorphology 90:208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
Hunter NM, Bates PD, Neelz S et al (2008) Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flood simulations. Proc Inst Civil Eng Water Manag 161:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2008.161.1.13
Ivkovic M, Todorovic A, Plavsic J (2018) Improved input to distributed hydrologic model in areas with sparse subdaily rainfall data using multivariate daily rainfall disaggregation. J Hydroinf 20(4):784–797. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.053
Jafarzadegan K, Merwade V (2017) A DEM-based approach for large-scale floodplain mapping in ungauged watershed. J Hydrol 550:650–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.053
Kloosterman P (2012) A comparison of the performance of lumped hydrological models in modelling a flash flood in the Hupsel Brook catchment. Master Thesis, Wageningen University
Lane RA, Coxon G, Freer JE, Wagener T, Johnes PJ, Bloomfield JP, Greene S, Macleod CJA, Reaney SM (2019) Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across a large-sample of catchments in Great Britain. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:4011–4032. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-635
Lee S, Kang T, Lee KS (2017) An operational model of a reservoir system simulation for real-time flood control in the Han River Basin. J Flood Risk Manag 10:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12159
Li W, Lin K, Zhao T, Lan T, Chen X, Du H, Chen H (2019) Risk assessment and sensitivity analysis of flash floods in ungauged basins using coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic models. J Hydrol 572(2019):108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.002
Lima MCG, Sá SMF, Souza WM, Santos TEM (2018) Generated impacts and the management of the Capibaribe river basin-PE. J Environ Anal Prog 03:75–85. https://doi.org/10.24221/jeap.3.1.2018.1658.075-085
Liu Z, Merwade V, Jafarzadegan K (2019a) Investigating the role of model structure and surface roughness in generating flood inundation extents using one- and two dimensional hydraulic models. J Flood Risk Manag 12:e12347. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12347
Liu Z, Zhang H, Liang Q (2019b) A coupled hydrological and hydrodynamic model for flood Simulation. Hydrol Res 50(2):589–606. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.090
Manfreda S, Samela C (2019) A digital elevation model based method for a rapid estimation of flood inundation depth. J Flood Risk Manag 12–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12541
Matgen P, Schumann G, Henry JB, Hoffman L, Pfister L (2007) Integration of SAR-derived river inundation areas, high-precision topographic data and a river flow model toward near real-time flood management. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 9(2007):247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.003
Mihu-Pintile A, Cîmpianu CI, Stoleriu CC, Pérez MN, Paveluc LE (2019) Using high-density lidar data and 2d streamflow hydraulic modeling to improve urban flood hazard maps: a hec-ras multi-scenario approach. Water 11(1832):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091832
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Binger RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 50: 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P. (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 58(6):1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715
Morsy MM, Goodall JL, O’Neil GL, Sadler JM, Voce D, Hassan G, Huxley C (2018) A cloud-based flood warning system for forecasting impacts to transportation infrastructure systems. Environ Modell Softw 107:231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.007
Murphy PNC, Ogilvie J, Meng F, Arp P (2008) Stream network modelling using lidar and photogrammetric digital elevation models: a comparison and field verification. Hydrol Process 22:1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6770
Nascimento VF, Ribeiro Neto A (2017) Characterization of reservoirs for water supply in Northeast Brazil using high resolution remote sensing. Braz J Water Resour 22. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.0217170060
Nasonova ON (2011) Application of a land surface model for simulating rainfall streamflow hydrograph: 2. Comparison with hydrological models. Water Resour Res 38:274–283. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807811030080
Neal J, Villanueva I, Wright N, Willis T, Fewtrell T, Bates P (2011) How much physical complexity is needed to model flood inundation? Hydrol Process 26(15):2264–2282. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8339
Noh JS, Lee J, Lee S, Kawaike K, Seo D (2018) Hyper-resolution 1D–2D urban flood modelling using LiDAR data and hybrid parallelization. Environ Modell Softw 103:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.008
Nguyen P, Thorstensen A, Sorooshian S, Hsu K, Aghakouchak A, Sanders B, Koren V, Cui Z, Smith M (2016) A high resolution coupled hydrologic–hydraulic model (HiResFlood-UCI) for flash flood modeling. J Hydrol 541:401–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.047
Ozdemir H, Sampson CC, de Almeida GAM, Bates PD (2013) Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood modelling using terrestrial LIDAR data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:4015–4030
Ongdas N, Akiyanova F, Karakulov Y, Muratbayeva A, Zinadbin N (2020) Application of HEC-RAS (2D) for flood hazard maps generation for Yesil (Ishim) River in Kazakhstan. Water 12(2672):1–20
Pachepsky YA, Martinez G, Pan F, Wagener T, Nicholson T (2016) Evaluating hydrological model performance using information theory-based metrics. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2016. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-46
Papaioannou G, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Aronica GT (2016) Flood inundation mapping sensitivity to riverine spatial resolution and modelling approach. Nat Hazards 83:S117–S132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2382-1
Pappenberger F, Beven K, Horritt M, Blazkova S (2005) Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. J Hydrol 302:46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036
Patel DP, Ramirez JA, Srivastava PK, Bray M, Han D (2017) Assessment of flood inundation mapping of Surat city by coupled 1D/2D hydrodynamic modeling: a case application of the new HEC-RAS 5. Nat Hazards 89:93–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2956-6
Paz AR, Collischonn W, Tucci CEM, Padovani CR (2011) Large-scale modelling of channel flow and floodplain inundation dynamics and its application to the Pantanal (Brazil). Hydrol Process 25:1498–1516. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7926
Pérez-Sánchez J, Senent-Aparicio J, Segura-Méndez F, Pulido-Velazquez D, Srinivasan R (2019) Evaluating hydrological models for deriving water resources in Peninsular Spain. Sustainability 11:2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102872
Perrin C, Michel C, Andréssian V (2003) Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J Hydrol 279:275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7
Pilotti M, Milanesi L, Bacchi V, Tomirotti M, Maranzoni A (2020) Dam-break wave propagation in Alpine Valley with HEC-RAS 2D: experimental cancano test case. J Hydraul Eng 146(6):05020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001779
Pinos J, Timbe L (2019) Performance assessment of two-dimensional hydraulic models for generation of flood inundation maps in mountain river basins. Water Sci Eng 12:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.03.001
Pushpalatha R, Perrin C, Moine NL, Andréassian V (2012) A review of efficiency criteria suitable for evaluating low-flow simulations. J Hydrol 420–421:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.055
Ribeiro AASB, Oliveira GA, Cirilo JA, Alves FHB, Batista LFDR, Melo VB (2020) Floodplain reconstitution based on data collected via smartphones: a methodological approach to hydrological risk mapping 25(41). https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.252020190179
Ribeiro Neto A, Cirilo JA, Dantas CEO, Silva ER (2015) Characterization of flood formation in the Una river basin, Pernambuco: hydrological-hydrodynamic simulation. Braz J Water Resour 20: 394–403. https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v20n2.p394-403
Ribeiro Neto A, Scott CA, Lima EA, Montenegro SMGL, Cirilo JA (2014) Infrastructure sufficiency in meeting water demand under climate-induced sociohydrological transition in the urbanizing Capibaribe River basin-Brazil. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3449–3459. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3449-2014
Roelens J, Rosier I, Dondeyne S, Van Orshoven J, Diels J (2018). Extracting drainage networks and their connectivity using LiDAR data. Hydrol Process 32(8):1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11472.
Sabercherani K, Abghari H, Tabari H (2016) Application of PSO algorithm in short-term optimization of reservoir operation. Environ Monit Assess 188:667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5689-1
Saksena S, Merwade V (2015) Incorporating the Effect of DEM resolution and accuracy for improved flood inundation mapping. J Hydrol 530:180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.069
Saksena S, Merwade V, Singhofen PJ (2019) Flood inundation modeling and mapping by integrating surface and subsurface hydrology with river hydrodynamics. J Hydrol 575(2019):1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.024
Samela C, Troy TJ, Manfreda S (2017) Geomorphic classifiers for flood-prone areas delineation for data-scarce environments. Adv Water Resour 102:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.01.007
Sampson CC, Fewtrell TJ, Duncan A et al (2012) Use of terrestrial laser scanning data to drive decimetric resolution urban inundation models. Adv Water Resour 41:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.010
Savage JTS, Bates P, Freer J, Neal J, Aronica G (2016) When does spatial resolution become spurious in probabilistic flood inundation predictions? Hydrol Process 30:2014–2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10749
Sayama T, Ozawa G, Kawakami T, Nabesaka S, Fukami K (2012) Rainfall–runoff–inundation analysis of the 2010 Pakistan flood in the Kabul River basin. Hydrol Sci J 57:298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.644245
Schaefli B, Gupta HV (2007) Do Nash values have value? Hydrol Process 21:2075–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6825
Schubert JE, Sanders BF (2012) Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency. Adv Water Resour 41:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.012
Seiller G, Anctil F, Perrin C (2012) Multimodel evaluation of twenty lumped hydrological models under contrasted climate conditions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1171-2012
Singh J, Altinakar MS, Ding Y (2015) Numerical modeling of rainfall-generated overland flow using nonlinear shallow-water equations. J Hydrol Eng 20(8):0414089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001124
Shi P, Zhou M, Qu S, Chen X, Qiao X, Zhang Z, Ma X (2013) Testing a conceptual lumped model in Karst Area. Southwest China 2013:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/827980
Shustikova I, Domeneghetti A, Neal JC, Bates P, Castellarin A (2019) Comparing 2D capabilities of HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP on complex topography. Hydrolog Sci J 64(14):1769–1782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1671982
Sibson R (1981) A Brief Description of Natural Neighbor Interpolation. In: Barnett V (ed) Interpreting Multivariate Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 21–36.
Silva BM (2019) Hydrological and hydrodynamic modeling for flood assessment in the urban area of Caruaru, PE. In: Master thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco.
Stephenson DB (2000) Use of the “odds ratio” for diagnosing forecast skill. Weather Forecast 15:221–232
Tan KS, Chiew FHS, Grayson RB (2007) A steepness index unit volume flood hydrograph approach for sub-daily flow disaggregation. Hydrol Process 21:2807–2816. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6501
Tate EC, Maindment DR, Oliveira F, Anderson DJ (2002) Creating a Terrain Model for Floodplain Mapping. J Hydrol Eng 7:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:2(100).
Tayefi V, Lane SN, Hardy RJ, YU DA, (2007) A comparison of one-and two-dimensional approaches to modelling flood inundation over complex upland floodplains. Hydrol Process 21:3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6523
Teng J, Jakeman AJ, Vaze J, Croke BFW, Dutta D, Kim S (2017) Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environ Modell Softw 90:201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006
Tierolf L, Moel H, Vliet J (2021) Modeling urban development and its exposure to river flood risk in Southeast Asia. Comput Environ Urban Syst 87:101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101620
Traore VB, Sambou S, Tamba S, Fall S, Diaw AT, Cisse MT (2014) Calibrating the Rainfall-Runoff Model GR4J and GR2M on the Koulontou River Basin, a Tributary of the Gambia River. Am J Environ Protect 3:36–44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20140301.15
Unduche F, Tolossa H, Senbeta D, Zhu E (2018) Evaluation of four hydrological models for operational flood forecasting in a Canadian Prairie watershed. Hydrol Sci J 63(8):1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1474219
Ureta JC, Zurqani HA, Post CJ, Ureta J, Motallebi M (2021) Application of Nonhydraulic Delineation Method of Flood Hazard Areas Using LiDAR-Based Data. Geosciences 10–9:338. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10090338
Uysal G, Akkol B, Topcu MI, Sensoy A, Schwanenberg D (2016) Comparison of different reservoir models for short term operation of flood management. Procedia Eng 154:1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.506
Vacondio R, Aureli F, Ferrari A, Mignosa P, Palù AD (2016) Simulation of the January 2014 flood on the Secchia River using a fast and high-resolution 2D parallel shallow-water numerical scheme. Nat Hazards 80:103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1959-4
Van Liew MW, Veith TL, Bosch DD, Arnold JG (2007) Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessments project: comparison on USDA agricultural research service watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 12:173–189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(173)
Virães MV, Cirilo JA (2019) Regionalization of hydrological model parameters for the semi-arid region of the northeast Brazil. Brazilian J Water Resour 24(49). https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.241920180114
Wang Y, Chen AS, Fu G, Djordjević S, Zhang C, Savić DA (2018) An integrated framework for high-resolution urban flood modelling considering multiple information sources and urban features. Environ Modell Softw 201885:95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.010
Winsemius HC, Aaerts JCJH, Van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP, Bouwman A, Jongman B, Kwadijk JCJ, Ligtvoet W, Lucas PL, Van Vuuren DP (2015) Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat Clim Chang 6–4:381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893
Wu J, Yen H, Arnold JG, Yang YCE, Cai X, White MJ, Santhi C, Miao C, Srinivasan R (2020) Development of reservoir operation functions in SWAT+ for national environmental assessments. J Hydrol 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124556
Xiao Y, Yi S, Tang Z (2017) Integrated flood hazard assessment based on spatial ordered weighted averaging method considering spatial heterogeneity of risk preference. Sci Total Environ 599–600:1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.218
Yalcin E (2020) Assessing the impact of topography and land cover data resolutions on two-dimensional HEC-RAS hydrodynamic model simulations for urban flood hazard analysis. Natural Haz 101(3):995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03906-z
Yu D, Lane SN (2006) Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment, part 1: mesh resolution effects. Hydrol Process 20:1541–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5935
Zappa M (2002) Multiple-response verification of a distributed hydrological model at different spatial scales. In: PhD Tesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
Zhao J, Cai X, Wang Z (2011) Optimality conditions for a two-stage reservoir operation problem. Water Resour Res 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009971
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Foundation for the Support of Science and Technology of Pernambuco (FACEPE) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for their support in the development of research through Postgraduate scholarships. The English text of this paper has been revised by Sidney Pratt, Canadian, MAT (The Johns Hopkins University), RSAdip—TESL (Cambridge University).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MMAG contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, writing—original draft, data curation. LFMV contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, writing—original draft, data curation. JAC contributed to supervision, project administration, writing—review and editing, conceptualization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Arruda Gomes, M.M., de Melo Verçosa, L.F. & Cirilo, J.A. Hydrologic models coupled with 2D hydrodynamic model for high-resolution urban flood simulation. Nat Hazards 108, 3121–3157 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04817-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04817-3