Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Do hazard mitigation plans represent the resilience priorities of residents in vulnerable Texas coastal counties?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hazard mitigation plans (HMP) inform residents and policymakers of the risks a community is vulnerable to, as well as prioritize measures implemented to minimize hazard damage. HMP development emphasizes the importance of creating plans with a strong fact base and analysis of risk exposure, while also facilitating participatory planning with residents. This paper discusses the intersection of citizen perception of extreme heat risk, policy implementation concerning extreme heat risk and actual extreme heat risk exposure in four coastal counties in Texas, Brazoria, Cameron, Galveston and Nueces Counties. Through surveying county residents and analyzing the counties’ HMPs, it was observed that residents perceive extreme heat risk as very high but HMPs have very little information on extreme heat mitigation. By examining three major components of hazard mitigation planning (actual/projected risk exposure, policy implementation and citizen perception), planners can better understand possible disconnects and fallacies that decrease the efficacy of mitigation plans. As HMPs are updated, officials should ensure that resident perceptions, which may change over time and as the result of specific events, are reflected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for toxic substances and disease registry. (2020). CDC social vulnerability index. Retrieved from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html

  • American association for public opinion research (AAPOR). (2015). Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/.../Standard-Definitions2015_8thEd.pdf

  • Babcock M (2013) State hazard mitigation plans and climate change: rating the states. Columbia law school center for climate change law, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia MP, Hoaglin DC, Frankel MR (2013) Practical considerations in raking survey data. Survey practice 2(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR, Cooper J, Salvesen D, Spurlock D, Rausch C (2010) Disaster plans: challenges and choices to build the resiliency of vulnerable populations. Int J Mass Emerg Disast 28(3):368–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR, Smith G, Lyles W (2012) Planning for resiliency: evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act. Nat Hazards Rev 13(2):139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostick TP, Holzer TH, Sarkani S (2017) Enabling stakeholder involvement in coastal disaster resilience planning. Risk Anal 37(6):1181–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD (2003) Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. J Plan Educat Res 23(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burby R (2003) Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action. J Am Plan Associat 69(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ, Deyle RE, Godschalk DR, Olshansky RB (2000) Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Nat Hazards Rev 1(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, K., Monaghan, A., Hayden, M., & Wilhelmi, O. (2016). Potential impacts of future warming and land use changes on intra-urban heat exposure in Houston, Texas. PLoS ONE, 11(3):e0151226. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148890

  • Connell DJ, Daoust-Filiatrault LA (2017) Better than good: three dimensions of plan quality. J Plan Educ Res 38(3):265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental protection agency (EPA), office of water. (2015). Incident action checklist-drought. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency, 8 p. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/drought_0.pdf

  • Fannin, B. (2011). Texas agricultural drought losses reach record $5.2 billion. College station (TX): Texas A&M AgriLife. Retrieved from: http://today.agrilife.org/2011/08/17/texas-agricultural-drought-losses-reach-record-5-2-billion/

  • Federal emergency management agency (FEMA). (2000). Disaster mitigation act of 2000. Retrieved at: http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=1935

  • Federal emergency management agency (FEMA). (2011). Local mitigation plan review guide. Retrieved at: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/fema-local-mitigation-plan-review-guide_09_30_2011.pdf

  • Federal emergency management agency (FEMA). (2012). Multi-hazard mitigation planning. Retrieved at: http://www.fema.gov/multi-hazard-mitigation-planning

  • Frazier TG, Walker MH, Kumari A, Thompson CM (2013) Opportunities and constraints to hazard mitigation planning. Appl Geogr 40:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR, Brody S, Burby R (2003) Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: challenges for comprehensive planning. J Environ Plan Manage 46(5):733–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goidel K (2011) Political polling in the digital age: the challenge of measuring and understanding public opinion. In Media and Public Affairs. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goidel K, Horney JA, Kellstedt P, Sullivan E, Brown S (2019) Perceptions of disaster resilience in four Texas coastal counties. Local Govern Stud 45(3):413–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horney JA, Simon M, Grabich S, Berke P (2015) Measuring participation by socially vulnerable groups in hazard mitigation planning, Bertie County, NC. J Environ Planning Manage 58(5):802–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.892870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang JE, Peacock WG, Husein R (2010) An assessment of coastal zone hazard mitigation plans in Texas. J Disast Res 5(5):520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeter S, Hatley N, Kennedy C, Lau A (2017) What low response rates mean for telephone surveys. Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/2017/05/15/what-low-response-rates-mean-for-telephone-surveys/

  • Kim H, Marcouiller D (2017) Mitigating flood risk and enhancing community resilience to natural disasters: plan quality matters. Environ Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2017.1407743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch KR, Feldt B, Zane DF, Haywood T, Jones R, Horney JA (2016) A longitudinal community assessment of wildfire response and recovery, Bastrop County. Texas Health Security 14(2):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2015.0060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link MW, Lai JW (2011) Cell-Phone-Only households and problems of differential nonresponse using an address-based sampling design. Public Opin Q 75:613–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link MW, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Osborn L, Mokdad A (2008) A comparison of Address-Based Sampling versus Random-Digit Dialing for general population surveys. Public Opin Q 72:6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles W, Berke P, Smith G (2016) Local plan implementation: assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the US Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design 43(2):382–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles W, Berke P, Overstreet KH (2017) Where to begin municipal climate adaptation planning? Evaluating two local choices. J Environ Plan Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1379958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JW (2016) America’s Most Literate Cities, 2016. Retrieved at: http://web.ccsu.edu/americasmostliteratecities/2016/default.asp

  • National weather service (NWS) (2016) 2011 Health Related Fatalities. Retrieved at: www.nws.noaa.gov/os/hazstats/heat11.pdf

  • Nelson M, Ehrenfeucht R, Laska S (2007) Planning, plans and people: professional expertise, local knowledge and governmental action in post-hurricane Katrina New Orleans. Cityscape 9:23–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Gammon JW (2011) The 2011 Texas drought: a briefing packet for the texas legislature. College station (TX): Office of the State Climatologist. Retrieved from: http://climatexas.tamu.edu/files/2011_drought.pdf

  • Office of the state climatologist. (2013). Texas extremes: extreme climate records. College Station (TX): Office of the State Climatologist. Retrieved from: http://climatexas.tamu.edu/index.php/data/texas-extremes

  • Peacock WG, Husein R (2011) The adoption and implementation of hazard mitigation policies and strategies by coastal jurisdictions in Texas. Report submitted to the Texas General Land Office and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Prater CS, Lindell MK (2000) Politics of hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev 1(2):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridenour K, Rissel S, Powell W, Gray R, Fisher M, Sommerfeld J (2012). The bastrop complex wildfire case study. College Station (TX): Texas Forest Service. Joint publication with the Bastrop County Office of Emergency Management. Retrieved from: http://content.austin.ynn.com/auscontent/documents/BastropReport1-42.pdf

  • Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W., & Slosberg, R. (2006). Mitigating New York City’s heat island with urban forestry, living roofs and light surfaces. A report to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.

  • Ross AD (2014) Local disaster resilience : administrative and political perspectives. Routledge Research in Public Administration and Public Policy, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE (2012) Unheavenly chorus: unequal voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Ting M, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Naik N (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316(5828):1181–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solecki WD, Rosenzweig C, Parshall L, Pope G, Clark M, Cox J, Wiencke M (2005) Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey. Global Environ Change Part B: Environ Hazards 6(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MR, Berke PR, Song Y (2010) Public participation in local government review of development proposals in hazardous locations: does it matter and what do local government planners have to do with it? Environ Manage 45(2):320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas State Comptroller. (2012). The impact of the 2011 drought and beyond [Internet]. Austin (TX): Comptroller of Public Accounts, 14 p. Available from: http://comptroller.texas.gov/specialrpt/drought/96-1704-Drought.pdf

  • U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program. (2015). Population Estimates. Washington (DC): U.S Census Bureau. Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html

  • Yoon, D.K., Youngs, G.A., & Abe, D. (2012). Examining factors contributing to the development of FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plans. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(2).

  • Zhang K, Chen TH, Begley CE (2015) Impact of the 2011 heat wave on mortality and emergency department visits in Houston. Texas Environ Health 14(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This publication was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency’s Texas SeaGrant Program (Grant #S161270). The sponsors had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, 3137 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Emily Sullivan

  2. Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, 4234 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Kirby Goidel

  3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4234 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Stephanie E. V. Brown

  4. Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, 4348 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Paul Kellstedt

  5. Epidemiology Program, University of Delaware, 100 Discovery Blvd, Newark, DE, 19713, USA

    Jennifer A. Horney

Authors
  1. Emily Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kirby Goidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephanie E. V. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Kellstedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jennifer A. Horney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Horney.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, E., Goidel, K., Brown, S.E.V. et al. Do hazard mitigation plans represent the resilience priorities of residents in vulnerable Texas coastal counties?. Nat Hazards 106, 2337–2352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04545-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04545-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation