Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of joint probability analysis to predict water yield for Thomson catchment in Victoria, Australia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bushfires in water supply catchments can adversely impact the reliability of water supply and thus threaten the wellbeing and prosperity of a city. Frequent fire events are looming to threaten water supply from the forested catchments of Victoria, Australia. Melbourne, the capital of Victoria, has to meet growing water demand due to population increase and economic development. In recent years, the state has confronted with severe drought conditions, resulting in a considerable reduction of the water supply yield of the catchments. These continued multi-year droughts culminated into the latest major bushfire in 2009 (Black Saturday). Thomson catchment, the largest water supply catchment supplying water in Melbourne is fully forested. This catchment is comprised of different Ash-type forests, Mixed species, Alpine vegetation, and Scrubs. The study noted that there is probability of occurrence of high danger fire events at 1 in 20-year return period for Thomson catchment. The objective of this study was to carry out a joint probability analysis for different percentages of catchment burning, if a 20-year fire event occurs at least once between 2010 and the given year, and determine the percent reductions in water yield from years 2030 to 2090. Based on the analysis carried out in the study, if 5% of the Ash-type forest is burnt once since 2010, the combined reduction of the total water yield would be 6.75% (16,968 ML/year) by 2090.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asadieh B, Krakauer NY (2015) Global trends in extreme precipitation: climate models versus observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:877–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyon R, England J, Eastham J, Polglase P, White D (2007) Tree water use in forestry compared to other dry-land agricultural crops in the Victorian context. In: Report prepared for the Department of Primary Industries Victoria to promote scientific knowledge in this area. Ensis Technical Report number 159

  • Cliamte Council (2017) https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/1b331044fb03fd0997c4a4946705606b.pdf

  • Cornish PM, Vertessy RA (2001) Forest age-induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in eucalypt forest. J Hydrol 242:43–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eWater CRC (2008) Hydrological studies into the impact of timber harvesting on water yield in state forests supplying water to Melbourne—Part 2 of hydrological studies (Climate Change and Bushfire). www.water.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf…/HydrologicalStudyPart1a.pdf, last accessed on 15th March, 2012

  • Khastagir A (2008) Optimal use of rainwater tanks to minimize residential water consumption. Masters by Research, Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Khastagir A (2013) Risk and severity of bushfires and the impact on water supply reliability in Victoria, Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, RMIT University

  • Khastagir A (2018) Fire frequency analysis for different climactic stations in Victoria. Nat Hazards 93:787–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khastagir A, Jayasuriya N (2008) Role of rainwater tanks in managing demand during droughts. In: Cheesman C (ed) Enviro 08 Proceedings, Australia, 05–07 May 2008

  • Khastagir A, Jayasuriya N, Bhuyian M (2017) Use of regionalisation approach to develop fire frequency curves for Victoria, Australia. Theoret Appl Climatol 134:849–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khastagir A, Jayasuriya N, Bhuyian M (2018) Assessment of fire danger vulnerability using McArthur’s forest and grass fire danger indices. Nat Hazards 94:1277–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovner J (1956) Evapotranspiration and water yields following forest cutting and natural regrowth. In: Proceedings, Society of American Foresters. Society of American Foresters, pp 106–110

  • Kuczera G (1985) Prediction of water yield reduction following a bushfire in ash mixed species eucalyptus forest. Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera G (1987) Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest. J Hydrol 94:215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford KJ (1976) Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of Eucalyptus regnans. J Hydrol 29:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur A (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet No. 100. Canberra, Australia

  • McArthur A (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet No. 107. Canberra, Australia

  • Mein R, Jayasuriya LNN, Jayasuriya MDA, O’Shaughnessy PJ (1992) Simulation of water yield to evaluate the impact of timber harvesting strategies for the Thomson catchment. In: Proceedings of hydrology and water resources symposium, Newcastle, June 30–July 2, 1992

  • Melbourne Water (2018) Water storage and use https://www.melbournewater.com.au/water/water-storage-and-use#/. Last Accessed 14th August 2018

  • Melbourne Water (2019) Thomson river https://www.melbournewater.com.au/community-and-education/about-our-water/waterstorage-reservoirs/Thomson. Last Accessed 5th June 2019

  • National Fire Warning System (2009) New warning system explained. http://www.cfaconnect.net.au/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=873. Last Accessed 2nd December 2009

  • Noble I, Bary G, Gill A (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Aust J Ecol 5:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel M, Watson F, Vertessy R, Lau A, Watson I, Sutton M, Rhodes B (2000) Predicting the water yield impacts of forest disturbance in the Maroondah and Thomson reservoirs using the macaque model. In: Technical report 00/04

  • Poff NL, Schmidt J (2016) How dams can go with the flow. Science 353:1099–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read Sturgess and Associates (1994) Phase tow of the study into the economic values of wood and water for the Thomson catchment. Read Sturgess and Associates

  • Roberts S, Vertessy R, Grayson R (2001) Transpiration from Eucalyptus sieberi forests of different age. For Ecol Manag 143:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk AIJM, Keenan RJ (2007) Planted forests and water in perspective. For Ecol Manage 251:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertessy RA, Hatton TJ, O’Shaughnessy PJ, Jayasuriya MDA (1993) Predicting water yield from a mountain ash forest catchment using a terrain analysis based catchment model. J Hydrol 150:665–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertessy R, Watson F, O’Sullivan S, Davis S, Campbell R, Benyon R, Haydon S (1998) Predicting water yield from mountain ash forest catchments. In: Industry report 98/4. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Clayton

  • Vertessy RA, Watson FG, O'Sullivan SK (2001) Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. For Ecol Manag 143:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anirban Khastagir.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khastagir, A., Jayasuriya, N. & Bhuiyan, M.A. The use of joint probability analysis to predict water yield for Thomson catchment in Victoria, Australia. Nat Hazards 104, 2619–2634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04288-y

Keywords

Navigation