Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flood disaster preparedness: experience and attitude of rural residents in Sichuan, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerns regarding climate change have recently spotlighted the devastating impacts of flooding. In this regard, disaster preparedness is known to mitigate against potential loss suffered as a consequence of flood disasters. Extant research has explored the influence of residents’ experience and attitude on disaster preparedness behavior as separate factors; however, research to date has yet to consider these inter-related factors simultaneously. Accordingly, this study explores this relationship, taking rural residents of the flood-prone regions of Sichuan Province, China, as the research subject. Exploratory factor analysis and ordered logistic regression are used to ascertain the effects of flood experience and attitude on residents’ disaster preparedness behavior. Results show the following. (1) The level of disaster preparedness behavior of rural residents is relatively low. (2) Respondents who are older, more educated, or who have lived locally for longer are more likely to be better prepared for flood disasters. (3) On the other hand, respondents with higher income, either as individuals or households, are less prepared. (4) Previous flood experience and disposition toward disaster also impacts preparedness behavior. On the basis of these findings, the following suggestions are proposed as mitigation policies for flood-prone areas. (1) Structural flood control measures should be organically combined with daily disaster preparedness. (2) Rural areas affected by devastating floods should offer psychological counseling to residents in order to reduce states of fear and helplessness. (3) Government departments should inform residents in real time of flood warnings and of flood control measures. (4) Lastly, relevant local departments should educate local residents in flood preparedness. Taken together, these measures can be expected to improve living conditions, people’s trust in the media, and in the government’s flood control capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Ablah E, Konda K, Kelley CL (2009) Factors predicting individual emergency preparedness: a multi-state analysis of 2006 BRFSS data. Biosecur Bioterror 7(3):317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelekan IO, Asiyanbi AP (2015) Flood risk perception in flood-affected communities in Lagos, Nigeria. Nat Hazards 80(1):445–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1977-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaero ID, Okoro NM, Ajaero CK (2016) Perception of and attitude toward mass media reportage of the 2012 flood in rural Nigeria. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016666887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Atreya A, Czajkowski J, Botzen W, Bustamante G, Campbell K, Collier B, Montgomery M (2017) Adoption of flood preparedness actions: a household level study in rural communities in Tabasco, Mexico. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 24:428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker EJ (2011) Household preparedness for the Aftermath of Hurricanes in Florida. Appl Geogr 31(1):1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Basolo V, Steinberg LJ, Burby RJ, Levine J, Cruz AM, Huang C (2009) The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environ Behav 41(3):338–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkholz S, Muro M, Jeffrey P, Smith HM (2014) Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Sci Total Environ 478(8):12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Box P, Bird D, Haynes K, King D (2016) Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Nat Hazards 81(3):1549–1568

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, López-Vázquez E, Cifuentes LA (2015) Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Nat Hazards 81(1):307–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Yuan L, Wang F (2018) Analysis of current situation and development trend of flood disaster research based on bibliometrics. Water Econ 36(4):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous K, Bruggeman A, Giannakis E, Zoumides C (2018) Improving public participation processes for the Floods directive and flood awareness: evidence from Cyprus. Water 10(7):958

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2007) Risk assessment and management of rainstorm and flood in fujian province. Soil water conserv res 14(4):180–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2019) Investigation on the status quo of disaster preparedness of rural families in D Town. Agric Disaster Res 9(01):94–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Pang Y, Zhang Y (2010) Study on the characteristics of climate change in Sichuan Basin in recent 50 years. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Edition) 32(9):115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniell J, Wenzel F, Schaefer A (2016) The economic costs of natural disasters globally from 1900–2015: historical and normalised floods, storms, earthquakes, volcanoes, bushfires, drought and other disasters. Paper presented at the EGU general assembly conference abstracts

  • Danso SY, Addo IY (2017) Coping strategies of households affected by flooding: a case study of Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis in Ghana. Urban Water J 14(5):539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng G, Ma Z, Sun J (2016) Analysis on the characteristics of rainstorm and flood disaster in Sichuan Province and the circulation background in the main flood season. In: Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Chinese Meteorological Society S2 subtropical meteorology and meteorological disaster risk

  • Du H, Dong T (2016) Risk assessment of rainstorm and flood in main flood season in Sichuan Yunnan region. Soil Water Conserv Bull 36(4):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Du H, Yan J, Yang D, Yang R (2015) Multi time scale analysis of precipitation change and drought and flood in Jialing River Basin. J Nat Resour 30(5):836–845

    Google Scholar 

  • EM-DAT. (2017). Emergency disasters database

  • Ejeta LT, Ardalan A, Paton D, Yaseri M (2018) Emotional and cognitive factors influencing flood preparedness in Dire Dawa town, Ethiopia. Nat Hazards 93(2):715–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Zhixin S, Jun FT (2016) Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of emergency response to natural disaster relief in China from 2011 to 2015. Disaster Sci 31(3):217–221. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2016.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15(3):199–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q (1993) On disaster behavior

  • Guo Y, Cha L (2010) Analysis of flood risk zoning and disaster area change trend in Anhui Province. Agrometeorology, China 31(1):130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann R, Muttarak R (2017) Learn from the past, prepare for the future: impacts of education and experience on disaster preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand. World Dev 96:32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Cao W, Wang H, Wang Z (2020) Affect path to flood protective coping behaviors using SEM based on a survey in Shenzhen, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Jie Z et al (2017) Analysis of the factors influencing the efficacy of the first single drug treatment for newly diagnosed epileptic children. Zhongnan Pharm 11:1637–1642

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YC, Kang J (2010) Communication, neighbourhood belonging and household hurricane preparedness. Disasters 34(2):470–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J, Quade D, Becker J (2014) Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Nat Hazards 74(3):1773–1794

    Google Scholar 

  • Levavasseur F, Bailly J-S, Lagacherie P, Colin F, Rabotin M (2012) Simulating the effects of spatial configurations of agricultural ditch drainage networks on surface runoff from agricultural catchments. Hydrol Process 26(22):3393–3404

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Min T, Xiaofang S (2015) Research progress on measurement methods of farmers’ natural disaster risk attitude at home and abroad. Anhui Agric Sci 43(12):274–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Yang H, Song Y (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns of flood disasters in Asia Pacific region. J Shaanxi Normal Univ (Nat Sci Edn) 41(1):74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie T, Naiding Y (2016) A study on the multi factor influence of personal emotion and behavior decision-making in the context of sudden disaster. Quest 3:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Shaw D, Ho M-C (2008) Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Nat Hazards 44(2):305–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (2015) Research on disaster management at the grassroots level: participation status, experience characteristics and working mechanism: taking Mianyang disaster management research work as a sample. Econ Soc Develop Res 2:73–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Zhuang T (2012) A study on the cognition of disaster prevention and mitigation of farmers in southwest poverty-stricken areas and the impact of their behavior—Based on a survey of 665 farmers in 36 villages. Agric Econ Probl 12:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Liyan J (2010) SPSS statistical analysis standard course. People’s Post and Telecommunications Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokonon BOK (2016) Urban households’ attitude towards flood risk, and waste disposal: evidence from Cotonou. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 19:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q-C, Zhang J, Rahman AS (2017) The interrelationship between travel behavior and life choices in adapting to flood disasters. Nat Hazards 85(2):1005–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q-C, Zhang J, Wu L, Rahman AS (2016) Job and residential location changes responding to floods and cyclones: an analysis based on a cross-nested logit model. Clim Change 138(3–4):453–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner F, Meyer V (2006) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception—challenges for flood damage research. Ufz Discuss Papers 67:149–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli R, Sotgiu I, Settanni M (2008) Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol 28(2):164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers DG, Twenge JM, Hou Y, Le G, Zhang Z (2016). Social psychology. 11th Edition

  • Ning Y, Tao M, Hu J, Li Y, Cheng Y, Zhang GW, Li L, Chai Y, Nan H, Zhao H, Wang J (2013) Emergency preparedness status and influencing factors of urban and rural residents in four districts (counties) of Shaanxi Province [J]. Chin J Prevent Med 4:347–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberghaus D (2015) The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany—Evidence from a nationwide survey. Ecol Econ 110:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Osuret J, Atuyambe LM, Mayega RW, Ssentongo J, Tumuhamye N, Bua GM, Bazeyo W (2016) Coping strategies for landslide and flood disasters: a qualitative study of Mt. Elgon Region, Uganda. PLoS Curr, vol 8

  • Ottmar Edenhofer RP-M, Youba S, Jan Christoph M (2014) Change 2014: mitigation of climate change. In: contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. p 1454

  • Priyanti RP, Hidayah N, Rosmaharani S, Nahariani P, Asri M, Mundakir N (2019) Community preparedness in flood disaster: a qualitative study. Int Q Commun Health Educ 40(1):67–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X19853169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin D, Thomas S (2014) Highlights of the report of the first working group of the fifth IPCC Assessment Report. Progress in climate change research 10(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin S, Zhang Y, Liu J (2020) Research on influencing factors of farmers’ demands for production and living difficulties: an empirical analysis based on binary logistic regression model [J]. Hubei Agric Sci 59(3):175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Qing Q, Chen W, Zhan Z (2013) Characteristics of spatial and temporal distribution of losses caused by flood damage% temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of rainstorm and flood damage in Sichuan Province. Plateau Mountain Meteorol Res 33(1):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikes J, Smith TF, Jacobson C, Baldwin C (2019) Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for floods and droughts: a systematic review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud A, Aubert C, Nguyen M-H (2013) Living with floods: protective behaviours and risk perception of Vietnamese households. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Issues Pract 38(3):547–579. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2013.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan H (2019) Empirical analysis of migrant workers’ employment service satisfaction based on ordered multi classification logistic model [J]. Res World 12:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Chatterjee R, Misra B, Tatano H (2014) Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: reasons or results of flood preparedness intention? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Misra BA, Tatano H (2012) Flood risk awareness and preparedness: the role of trust in information sources. In: Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on systems

  • Saqib SE, Ahmad MM, Panezai S, Rana IA (2016) An empirical assessment of farmers’ risk attitudes in flood-prone areas of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 18:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schad I, Schmitter P, Saint-Macary C, Neef A, Lamers M, Nguyen L, Hoffmann V (2012) Why do people not learn from flood disasters? Evidence from Vietnam’s northwestern mountains. Nat Hazards 62(2):221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolobig A, Marchi BD, Borga M (2012) The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: findings from case studies in an Alpine Region. Nat Hazards 63(2):499–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Sun X, Su Y (2012) Trust in science and technology, trust in management and its impact on public awareness of flood risk: a social survey based on the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Disaster Sci 27(1):487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra GM, Kardash CM, Taasoobshirazi G, Lombardi D (2012) Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instr Sci 40(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Soane E, Schubert I, Challenor P, Lunn R, Narendran S, Pollard S (2010) Flood perception and mitigation: the role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environ Plann A Econ Space 42(12):3023–3038. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soans SJ (2011) Impact of health education in raising community awareness on flood preparedness. Rev Global Med Healthc Res 2(1):29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto R, Mullins A, Achour N (2016b) The perceptions of social responsibility for community resilience to flooding: the impact of past experience, age, gender and ethnicity. Nat Hazards 86(3):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto R, Mullins A, Achour N (2016a) The perceptions of social responsibility for community resilience to flooding: the impact of past experience, age, gender and ethnicity. Nat Hazards 86(3):1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2732-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Zhang M, Gao L, Li N (2008) The impact of flood control project trust on public flood risk perception. J Nat Disasters 23(4):70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Qi W, Deng Y, Wei B (2018) Research on disaster behavior abroad: origin, issues and discoveries. Seismol North China, pp 27–34

  • Taylor S, Peplau L, Sears D (2000) Social psychology, 10th Edition. In: Chinese translation, Peking University Pres

  • Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Anal 31(10):1658–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra T, Gutteling JM (2008) Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int J Water Resour Dev 24(4):555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Müller M, Merz B (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):1016–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Shivakoti GP, Ali G (2015) Factors effecting farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions: the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang H, Huang J, Kang J, Han D (2018) Analysis of the public flood risk perception in a flood-prone city: the case of Jingdezhen city in China. Water 10(11):1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xiuying H (2014) Effects of disaster preparedness education on disaster preparedness awareness, behavior and knowledge of college students. Chin J Pract Nurs 030(3):76–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X (2012) Research on family disaster preparedness strategies in ethnic areas from the perspective of vulnerability analysis. (Master). Lanzhou University, Available from CNKI

  • Wang W (2013) Study on the factors influencing the behavior of individual flood adjustment

  • Xiao Y, Wg Peacock (2017) Can enterprise disaster reduction and preparedness really reduce disaster losses? Analysis of the importance of enterprise disaster management planning. Risk Disaster Crisis Study 3:190–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Peng L, Liu S, Wang X (2018) Influences of risk perception and sense of place on landslide disaster preparedness in southwestern China. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 9(2):167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue W (2013) SPSS statistical analysis method and application

  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: an introductory analysis. Retrieved from

  • Ye H (2010) Community disaster management is the foundation of disaster prevention and mitigation. China Disaster Reduct 7:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong AG, Lemyre L (2019) Getting Canadians prepared for natural disasters: a multi-method analysis of risk perception, behaviors, and the social environment. Nat Hazards 98(1):319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03669-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaalberg R, Midden CJH (2013) Living behind dikes: mimicking flooding experiences. Risk Anal 33(5):866–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01868.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaalberg R, Midden C, Meijnders A, McCalley T (2009) Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Anal 29(12):1759–1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Gu X, Peng Y, Yuan T (2019) Knowledge map analysis of China’s disaster risk cognition research. Saf Environ Eng 115:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Zhang M (2010) The impact of flood control project trust on public flood risk perception: a case study of Kaifeng along the Yellow River and Yueyang Dongting Lake

  • Zhou C, Wan Q (2000) Study on flood risk zoning based on GIS. Acta geogr Sin 55(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Cen S, Li Y, Peng G, Yang S, Peng J (2011) Variation characteristics and influence of precipitation in Sichuan Province in recent 50 years. J Geogr 66(5):619–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L (2018) Overview of current situation of flood disaster research and assessment. Shandong Indus Technol 10:192

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate financial support from Sichuan Province Social Science Planning Project (SC19TJ030), Sichuan Science and Technology Department Soft Science Major Work Support Research Project (20RKX0412/2020JDR0177), Sichuan Rural Community Governance Research Center funding (SQZL2019C01), Ministry of Education Industry-School Cooperative Education Program (201901098002), Funding for Key Teachers of Chengdu University of Technology (10912-KYGG2019-02305), the Natural Science Key Project from the Sichuan Provincial Department of Education (18ZA0048), and the Development Research Center of Oil and Gas, Sichuan (CYQK-SKB17-04), the Research Center for Systems Science and Enterprise Development, Key Research of Social Sciences Base of Sichuan Province (Grant No. Xq17B05), the Electronic Commerce and Modern Logistics Research Center Program, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Science, Sichuan Provincial Education Department (Grant No. DSWL17-13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Ji.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The Office of Humanities of Social Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, reviewed and approved this research proposal under the project title “A Study on Flood Disaster Preparedness in Rural Areas.” All participant-related data have been deidentified, and anonymity preserved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ao, Y., Zhou, X., Ji, F. et al. Flood disaster preparedness: experience and attitude of rural residents in Sichuan, China. Nat Hazards 104, 2591–2618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04286-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04286-0

Keywords

Navigation