Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of strong ground motion for a potential Mw7.3 earthquake in Kopili fault zone, northeast India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we present the results of strong ground motion simulation carried out for a potential earthquake (Mw7.3) in the Kopili source zone of northeast India using the stochastic finite fault modeling technique. Prior to simulation of the potential event, the technique was validated by simulating a recorded earthquake Mw5.3, which was located close to the Nagaon district of Assam, India. The earthquake records (Mw5.3) of ten stations in the study region were analyzed, and average source parameters, namely corner frequency, seismic moment, stress drop and source radius, estimated to be 0.48 Hz, 1.44E + 24 dyne-cm, 103.4 bar and 2.7 km, respectively. While estimating the source parameters, the path attenuation parameters (Q and ko) also constrained at each seismic station. Using the constrained attenuation parameters, site amplification factors and source parameters, we simulated strong ground motion time histories for Mw5.3 event at individual sites and found them comparable with amplitude and frequency content of the respective observed records satisfactorily. The results, therefore, validated the technique used in the study. Further, the fault parameters, site amplification factors and average of the constrained attenuation parameters were used in simulation of the potential event (Mw7.3) and strong ground motion predicted for the entire northeast region (NER) at a grid interval of 0.5°. We used average values of constrained quality factor (Q) and Kappa parameter (ko) equivalent to 182f 0.95 and 0.038, respectively, in the simulation. It is apparent that the simulated PGA conditionally followed the attenuation curves of the region, and hence, we suggest developing an appropriate attenuation curve for the NER. The study reveals that the sites located up to 250 km distance away from the source zone may experience significant PGA ranging between 160 Gals and 360 Gals. The cities located within this zone, viz., Tezpur, Nagaon, Udalguri, Diphu and Bomdila, may witness strong to very strong ground shaking associated with substantial damage to buildings and other important structures in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K, Chouet B (1975) Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation, and scattering effects. J Geophys Res 80:3322–3342. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB080i023p03322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JG, Hough S (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectra of accelerograms at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc 74:1969–1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi DK, Shende VJ, Gupta ID (2010) Estimation of κ factor for two types of sites in northeast India. In: Indian geotechnical conference, pp 1–4

  • Bhattacharya PM, Mukhopadhyay S, Majumdar RKK, Kayal JRR (2008) 3-D seismic structure of the northeast India region and its implications for local and regional tectonics. J Asian Earth Sci 33:25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2002) Seismic zoning map of India. Bureau Indian Standard publication, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure appl Geophys 160:635–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bora N, Biswas R, Dobrynina AA (2018) Regional variation of coda Q in Kopili fault zone of northeast India and its implications. Tectonophysics 722:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSSC (2004) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450), Part 1: provisions, 2003 edn., 288 p. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). The Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Engdhal ER, delHilst R, Van Buland R (1998) Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull Seismol Soc 88:722–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SC, Kumar A (2002) Seismic wave attenuation characteristics of three Indian regions: a comparative study. Curr Sci 82:407–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J, Ottemöller L (2010) Routine data processing in earthquake seismology: with sample data, exercises and software. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika D, Baruah S, Gogoi NK (2009) Attenuation of coda waves in the Northeastern Region of India. J Seismol 13:141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-008-9132-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K (1984) Prediction of strong ground motions using observed seismograms from small events. In: Proceedings of 8th World conference on earthquake engineering, vol 2, pp 465–472

  • Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong acceleration motions using empirical green’s function. Seventh Jpn Earthq Eng, Symp, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K, Kagawa T, Sekiguchi H (1997) Revision of the empirical Green’s function method. Progr Abstr Seismol Soc Japan 2:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR (2008) Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics of South Asia, Springer publication. Kayal J. 2012:186–192

  • Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Baruah S, Tatevossian R, Gogoi N, Sanoujam M, Gautam JL, Hazarika D, Borah D (2010) The 2009 Bhutan and Assam felt earthquakes (Mw 6.3 and 5.1) at the Kopili fault in the northeast Himalaya region. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2010.486561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Baruah S, Hazarika D, Gogoi N, Gautam JL, Baruah S, Dorbath C, Tatevossian R (2012) Large and great earthquakes in the Shillong plateau-Assam valley area of Northeast India Region: pop-up and transverse tectonics. Tectonophysics 532–535:186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopoff L, Hudson JA (1964) Scattering of elastic waves by small inhomogeneities. J Acoust Soc Am 36:338–343. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mittal H, Kumar R, Ahluwalia RS (2017) Empirical attenuation relationship for peak ground horizontal acceleration for North-East Himalaya. Vietnam J Earth Sci 39(1):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal H, Kumar A, Ramhmachhuani R (2012) Indian National strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations. Int J Geosci 3:1151–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy DR (2001) Geodynamics of northeastern India and the adjoining region. ACB Publications

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2009) Seismic hazard assessment: a holistic microzonation approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1445–1459. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1445-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Raj A (2008) Earthquake hazard in Northeast India: a seismic microzonation approach with typical case studies from Sikkim Himalaya and Guwahati city. J Earth Syst Sci 117:809–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0070-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDMA (2011) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of india technical report. Natl Disaster Manag Auth 126

  • Padhy S, Subhadra N (2010) Attenuation of high-frequency seismic waves in northeast India. Geophys J Int 181:453–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04502.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth STG, Dash SK (2010) Deterministic seismic scenarios for North East India. J Seismol 14:143–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-009-9158-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghu Kanth STG, Somala SN (2009) Modeling of strong-motion data in Northeastern India: Q, stress drop, and site amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:705–725. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saragoni GR, Hart GC (1973) Simulation of artificial earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2(3):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML, Douglas J, Bungum H, Kotadia J (2009) Ground motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions. J Earthq Eng 13:1191–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Kolathayar Sreevalsa, James N (2015) Probabilistic assessment of surface level seismic hazard in India using topographic gradient as a proxy for site condition. Geosci Front 6(6):847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein S, Wysession M (2003) An Introduction to seismology earthquakes and earth structure. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutar AK, Verma M, Pandey Ajeet P, Bansal BK, Prasad PR, Rao PR (2017) Assessment of maximum earthquake potential of the Kopili fault source zone and strong ground motion simulation. J Asian Earth Sci 147:439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Bansal BK (2013) Seismic hazard assessment and mitigation in India: an overview. Int J Earth Sci 102:1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0882-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Singh RJ, Bansal BK (2014) Soft sediments and damage pattern: a few case studies from large Indian earthquakes vis-a-vis seismic risk evaluation. Nat Hazards 74:1829–1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1283-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, for all the supports and encouragement. The National Centre for Seismology (NCS), New Delhi, and Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, are highly acknowledged for providing strong motion data used in the present study. The online data from www.globalcmt.org (GCMT) and www.isc.ac.uk found very useful in completing the work, which are acknowledged. We sincerely thank the Reviewer for the constructive suggestions, which greatly helped improving the manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Borehole Geophysics Research Laboratory, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India

    Anup K. Sutar

  2. Geoscience/Seismology Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, India

    Mithila Verma & Brijesh K. Bansal

  3. National Centre for Seismology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, India

    Ajeet P. Pandey

Authors
  1. Anup K. Sutar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mithila Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brijesh K. Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ajeet P. Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anup K. Sutar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sutar, A.K., Verma, M., Bansal, B.K. et al. Simulation of strong ground motion for a potential Mw7.3 earthquake in Kopili fault zone, northeast India. Nat Hazards 104, 437–457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04176-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04176-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation