Modeling the residential building stock in the Middle East for multi-hazard risk assessment

Abstract

This study presents an exposure model for the residential building stock in the Middle East, developed for the purpose of multi-hazard risk assessment. The exposure model provides the number of buildings, number of dwellings and population in 12 countries with their corresponding physical characteristics, geographical location and economic value. The main sources of data used to develop this model were housing and population census surveys, existing literature and the judgment of local experts. The study also includes an overview of the most common building types in different parts of the region. A simplified multi-hazard exposure taxonomy is introduced to identify relevant building features according to the type of natural hazard. The exposure model was disaggregated at a fine spatial resolution, using a combination of various remote-sensing datasets, and overlapped with hazard maps to identify population and buildings exposed to floods and earthquakes. The results from this study represent a significant step toward a better understanding of risk due to natural hazards in Jordan, Syria, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abu Hammad AA, Alhaj Ali SM, Sweis GJ, Bashir A (2008) Prediction model for construction cost and duration in Jordan. Jordan J Civ Eng 2(3):250–266

    Google Scholar 

  2. AECOM (2018) Middle east property & construction handbook. https://www.aecom.com/ae/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Construction-Handbook-2018_19.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2019

  3. Al Fahad J (2012) Reform of building codes, regulations, administration and enforcement in Kuwait: within the legal, administrative, technical & social framework. Loughborough University, Loughborough

  4. Al Shamsi GA (2013) Seismic risk assessment of buildings in Dubai. American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-masni MA (2012) Earthquake building risk assessment in Sana’a City, Yemen. https://www.adrc.asia/aboutus/vrdata/finalreport/2012A_YEM_fr.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  6. Al-Nimry HS (2013) Quasi-static testing of RC infilled frames and confined stone-concrete bearing walls. J Earthq Eng 18:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.835292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alrbdawi Q (2010) Population growth and urban development in the Sultanate of Oman. Damascus Univ J 26:555–587

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alshiha A (2008) Characteristics of housing and population trends in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: field study. Univ Sharjah J Humanit Soc Sci 5:245–279

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Taie E, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2014) The need to develop a building code for Iraq. Engineering 6:610–632. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2014.610062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1983) Seismicity of Yemen. Nature 303:321–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/303321a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arya AS, Srivastava LS, Gupta SP (1985) Survey of damages during the Dhamar earthquake of 13 December 1982 in the Yemen Arab Republic. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:597–610

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASCE (2005) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avci O, Al Nouss M (2018) Seismic assessment of existing lowrise and midrise reinforced concrete buildings using the 2014 Qatar construction specification. J Archit Eng 24:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bahammam A (2009) Housing reality and future in the City of Arriyadh. http://rda.gov.sa/idc/groups/public/documents/AR_ADA_Researches/004564.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2019

  15. Bird J, Bommer J (2004) Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Eng Geol 75:147–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blong RJ (1981) Some effects of Tephra Falls on buildings. Tephra Studies. Springer, Netherlands, pp 405–420

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borzi B, Pinho R, Crowley H (2008) Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 30:804–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2007.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bray JD, Stewart JP, Baturay MB, Durgunoglu T, Onalp A, Sancio RB, Stewart JP, Ural D et al (2000) Damage patterns and foundation performance in Adapazari. Earthq Spectra 16:163–189. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet J-P, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhaut M et al (2013) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. CRED (2018) EM-DAT: The emergency events database. www.emdat.be. Accessed 17 Jul 2018

  21. Dalrymple RA, Kriebel DL (2005) Lessons in engineering from the tsunami in Thailand. Bridge 35:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Danciu L, Kale Ö, Akkar S (2018) The 2014 earthquake model of the middle east: ground motion model and uncertainties. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3497–3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9989-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Bono A, Chatenoux B (2014) A Global exposure model for GAR 2015. https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/49763. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  24. de Moel H, van Alphen J, Aerts JCJH (2009) Flood maps in Europe: methods, availability and use. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:289–301. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Moel H, Jongman B, Kreibich H, Merz B, Penning-Rowsell E, Ward PJ (2015) Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:865–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam AL, Arnold M, Agwe J, Buys P, Kjekstad O, et al (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/621711468175150317/Natural-disaster-hotspots-A-global-risk-analysis. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  27. Dominey-Howes D, Papathoma M (2007) Validating a tsunami vulnerability assessment model (the PTVA Model) using field data from the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Nat Hazards 40:113–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0007-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. EC8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), EN 1998-1. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/showpage.php?id=13. Accessed 20 Sep 2004

  29. Ellingwood BR, Rosowsky DV, Li Y, Kim JH (2004) Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards. J Struct Eng 130:1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Erdik M, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu MB, Tüzün C, Giardini D, Mansouri B, Lodi S, Al-nimry H, et al (2012) Assessment of Seismic Hazard in the Middle East and Caucasus: EMME (Earthquake Model of Middle East) Project. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), Lisboa

  31. FEMA (2012) Hazaus MH 2.1 Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division, Washington, D.C., USA

  32. Fotopoulou SD, Pitilakis KD (2013) Vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to seismically triggered slow-moving earth slides. Landslides 10:563–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0345-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gamba P, Cavalca D, Jaiswal KS, Huyck C, Crowley H (2012) The GED4GEM project: development of a global exposure database for the global earthquake model initiative. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 1–13

  34. Ghobarah A, Saatcioglu M, Nistor I (2006) The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure. Eng Struct 28:312–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goda K, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM, Chiaro G, Katagiri T, Sharma K, Wilkinson S (2015) The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: insights from earthquake damage survey. Front Built Environ 1:8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2015.00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grigoratos I, Dabeek J, Faravelli M, Di Meo A, Cerchiello V, Borzi B, Monteiro R, Ceresa P (2016) Development of a fragility and exposure model for palestine—application to the City of Nablus. Procedia Eng 161:2023–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hancilar U, El-Hussain I, Sesetyan K, Deif A, Cakti E, Al-Rawas G, Safak E, Al-Jabri K (2018) Earthquake risk assessment for the building inventory of Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Nat Hazards 93:1419–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3357-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hassaballa AE, Adam FM, Ismaeil MA (2017) Seismic analysis of a ten-storey reinforced concrete building in Jazan Area, KSA. Open J Civ Eng 07:252–266. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2017.72016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. IBC (2012) International building code. International Code Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  40. Issa A, Mwafy A (2014) Fragility Assessment of pre-seismic code buildings and emergency facilities in the UAE. In: Second european conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Istanbul

  41. Jaiswal K, Wald D (2008) Creating a global building inventory for earthquake loss assessment and risk management: U.S. geological survey open-file report 2008-1160. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1160/. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  42. Jaiswal K, Wald D, Porter K (2010) A global building inventory for earthquake loss estimation and risk management. Earthq Spectra 26:731–748. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3450316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jaradat R, Fahjan Y, Nuseir O, Awawdeh M, Al-Qaryouti M, Diabat A, Abdulla A-R (2008) Earthquake risk assessment of Greater Amman Municipality. UNDP project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267927125_Earthquake_risk_assessment_of_Greater_Amman_Municipality_UNDP_project_2008_under_Atlas_no_51485_Jaradat_R_A_Awawdeh_M_M_Fahjan_Y_Al-Qaryouti_M_Y_Nusier_O_K_Diabat_A_A_and_Al-Rawabdeh_A_M. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  44. Jenkins SF, Phillips JC, Price R, Feloy K, Baxter PJ, Hadmoko DS, de Bélizal E (2015) Developing building-damage scales for lahars: application to Merapi volcano, Indonesia. Bull Volcanol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0961-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Khanduri AC, Morrow GC (2003) Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91:455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00408-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li Y, Ellingwood BR (2006) Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment. Eng Struct 28:1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Makhoul N, Navarro C, Lee J, Abi-youness A (2016) Assessment of seismic damage to buildings in resilient Byblos City. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 18:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. MARKAZ (2007) Lebanon : real estate overview. https://www.markaz.com/Asset-Managment/Real-Estate/MENA-Real-Estate. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  49. Marshall JD, Lang AF, Baldridge SM, Popp DR (2011) Recipe for disaster: construction methods, materials, and building performance in the january 2010 Haiti earthquake. Earthq Spectra 27:S323–S343. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3637031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martins L, Silva V (2018) A global database of vulnerability models for seismic risk assessment. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece

  51. Martins L, Silva V, Marques M, Crowley H, Delgado R (2016) Development and assessment of damage-to-loss models for moment-frame reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45:797–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Matsutomi H, Sakakiyama T, Nugroho S, Matsuyama M (2006) Aspects of inundated flow due to the 2004 indian ocean tsunami. Coast Eng J 48:167–195. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0578563406001350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mavrouli O, Fotopoulou S, Pitilakis K, Zuccaro G, Corominas J, Santo A, Cacace F, De Gregorio D et al (2014) Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:265–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, Schmidtke R (2004) Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:153–163. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Monteiro R, Ceresa P, Cerchiello V, Dabeek J, Di Meo A, Borzi B (2016) Towards integrated seismic risk assessment in Palestine—application to the city of Nablus. In: Proceedings of the VII European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016). Athens, pp 5987–5998

  56. Motamed H, Calderon A, Silva V, Costa C (2019) Development of a probabilistic earthquake loss model for Iran. Bull Earthq Eng 17:1795–1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0515-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mwafy AM (2012) Classification and idealization of the building stock in the UAE for earthquake loss estimation. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15 WCEE)

  58. Naseer A, Khan AN, Hussain Z, Ali Q (2010) Observed seismic behavior of buildings in Northern Pakistan during the 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Earthq Spectra 26:425–449. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3383119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nassif SI (2011) Evaluating the values of some factors and seismic requirements, given by the seismic Syrian code. http://www.geocities.ws/mazen_alhalabi/Naseef.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  60. Neubert M, Naumann T, Hennersdorf J, Nikolowski J (2016) The geographic information system-based flood damage simulation model HOWAD. J Flood Risk Manag 9:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nicholas J, Holt GD, Proverbs DG (2001) Towards standardising the assessment of flood damaged properties in the UK. Struct Surv 19:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800110406667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nienhuys S (1984) Dhamar aided self-help reconstruction project: post 1982 earthquake reconstruction: site selection. http://www.nienhuys.info/mediapool/49/493498/data/Dhamar_Site_Selection.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  63. PADCO (2006) Iraq housing market study main report. https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2013/05/4997_65700_IHMS_Main_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  64. Parisi MA, Chesi C (2014) Seismic vulnerability of traditional buildings: the effect of roof-masonry walls interaction. In: Tenth U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering frontiers of earthquake engineering. Anchorage, Alaska

  65. Pascucci V, Free MW, Lubkowski ZA (2008) Seismic hazard and seismic design requirements for the Arabian Peninsula region. In: The 14 world conference on earthquake engineering (14 WCEE). Beijing, China

  66. Pesaresi M, Freire S (2014) BUREF—producing a global reference layer of built-up by integrating population and remote sensing data. https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/49796. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  67. Pesaresi M, Freire S (2016) GHS Settlement Grid Following the REGIO Model 2014 in Application to GHSL Landsat and CIESIN GPW v4-Multitemporal (1975-1990-2000-2015). In: Eur. Comm. Jt. Res. Cent. (JRC), [Dataset]. http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-ghsl-ghs_smod_pop_globe_r2016a. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  68. Pesaresi M, Ehrilch D, Florczyk AJ, Freire S, Julea A, Kemper T, Soille P, Syrris V (2015) GHS built-up grid, derived from Landsat, multitemporal (1975, 1990, 2000, 2014). In: Eur. Comm. Jt. Res. Cent. (JRC), [Dataset]. http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-ghsl-ghs_built_ldsmt_globe_r2015b. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  69. Petrazzuoli SM, Zuccaro G (2004) Structural resistance of reinforced concrete buildings under pyroclastic flows: a study of the Vesuvian area. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 133:353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Petrovski J. (1983) Engineering measures for earthquake risk reduction in the Arab countries, in Assessment and Mitigation of Earthquake Risk in the Arab Region (Cidlinsky K., and B. M. Rouhban, eds.), Prepared by UNESCO for the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000080106. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  71. Reese S, Cousins WJ, Power WL, Palmer NG, Tejakusuma IG, Nugrahadi S (2007) Tsunami vulnerability of buildings and people in South Java - Field observations after the July 2006 Java tsunami. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:573–589. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-573-2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Román MO, Wang Z, Sun Q, Kalb V, Miller SD, Molthan A, Schultz L, Bell J et al (2018) NASA’s black marble nighttime lights product suite. Remote Sens Environ 210:113–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSE.2018.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25:1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rossetto T, Peiris N, Pomonis A, Wilkinson SM, Del Re D, Koo R, Gallocher S (2007) The Indian Ocean tsunami of december 26, 2004: observations in Sri Lanka and Thailand. Nat Hazards 42:105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9064-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sabri N (1998) Housing as an internal leading sector in the palestinian economy. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1097605. Accessed 18 Mar 2019

  76. Salameh C, Guillier B, Harb J, Cornou C, Bard P, Voisin C, Mariscal A (2016) Seismic response of Beirut (Lebanon) buildings: instrumental results from ambient vibrations. Bull Earthq Eng 14:2705–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9920-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sampson CC, Smith AM, Bates PD, Neal JC, Alfieri L, Freer JE (2015) A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Water Resour Res 51:7358–7381. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. SASPARM 2.0 (2014) Report on the structural typologies identified during the field investigation. http://www.sasparm2.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/DB1_Structural-typologies-identified.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  79. Schwarz J, Maiwald H (2008) Damage and loss prediction model based on the vulnerability of building types. 4th international symposium on flood defence. Canada, Toronto, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sill BL, Kozlowski RT (1997) Analysis of storm-damage factors for low-rise structures. J Perform Constr Facil 11:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1997)11:4(168)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Silva V, Crowley H, Varum H, Pinho R (2014) Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng 13:429–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9630-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Silva V, Crowley H, Bazzurro P (2016) Exploring risk-targeted hazard maps for Europe. Earthq Spectra 32:1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1193/112514EQS198M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Silva V, Yepes-Estrada C, Dabbeek J, Martins L, Brzev S (2018) GED4ALL - Global Exposure Database for Multi-Hazard Risk Analysis—Multi-Hazard Exposure Taxonomy. GEM Technical Report 2018-01. GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy

  84. Smith D (1994) Flood damage estimation—a review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. In: Water SA. pp 231–238

  85. Sokolov V, Zahran HM, Youssef SE-H, El-Hadidy M, Alraddadi WW (2017) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Saudi Arabia using spatially smoothed seismicity and analysis of hazard uncertainty. Bull Earthq Eng 15:2695–2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0075-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Spence R, Kelman I, Baxter P, Zuccaro G, Petrazzuoli S (2005) Residential building and occupant vulnerability to tephra fall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:477–494. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-477-2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Spence R, Kelman I, Brown A, Toyos G, Purser D, Baxter P (2007) Residential building and occupant vulnerability to pyroclastic density currents in explosive eruptions. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:219–230. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-219-2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sultan BM, Kajewski SL (2003) The Yemen construction industry: readying the industry for the successful implementation of sustainability. In: International conference on smart and sustainable built environment. Brisbane, Australia

  89. SYNER-G (2013) D8.8 - Guidelines for typology definition of European physical assets for earthquake risk assessment. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/guidelines-typology-definition-european-physical-assets-earthquake-risk-assessment. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  90. Taha B, Hasan S (2018) A comparative study of the seismic provisions between Iraqi Seismic codes 2014 and 1997 for Kurdistan Region/Iraq. In: 4th international engineering conference on developments in civil & computer engineering applications 2018. Erbil, Iraq

  91. Tamura Y (2009) Wind-induced damage to buildings and disaster risk reduction. In: The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering. Taipei, Taiwan

  92. Tsai KC, Hsiao CP, Bruneau M (2000) Overview of building damages in 921 Chi–Chi earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 2:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  93. UBC (1997) Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California

  94. UN (1993) Housing in the World-Graphical Presentation of Statistical Data, New York

  95. UN-Habitat (2012) The State of Arab Cities 2012: Challenges of Urban Transition. https://unhabitat.org/books/the-state-of-arab-cities-2012-challenges-of-urban-transition/. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  96. UN-Habitat (2016) Republic of Yemen National Report. Third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development - HABITAT III. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/Yemen-National-Report-September-2016.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  97. Valentine GA (1998) Damage to structures by pyroclastic flows and surges, inferred from nuclear weapons effects. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 87:117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00094-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Verderame GM, De Luca F, Ricci P, Manfredi G (2011) Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40:925–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Villar-Vega M, Silva V, Crowley H, Yepes C, Tarque N, Acevedo AB, Hube MA, Gustavo CD et al (2017) Development of a fragility model for the residential building stock in South America. Earthq Spectra 33:581–604. https://doi.org/10.1193/010716EQS005M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Waris MB, Al-jabri KS, El-hussain I (2017) Comparison Of Oman Seismic Code For Buildings with International Counterparts. In: World Conference on Earthquake (16WCEE). Santiago, Chile

  101. Weatherill GA, Silva V, Crowley H, Bazzurro P (2015) Exploring the impact of spatial correlations and uncertainties for portfolio analysis in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 13:957–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9730-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. WHE (2014) World Housing Encyclopedia. http://db.world-housing.net/. Accessed 27 Aug 2018

  103. World Bank (2014) Natural disasters in the Middle East and North Africa : A regional overview. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/19203331/natural-disasters-middle-east-north-africa-regional-overview. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  104. Yaseen AA, Begg D, Nanos N (2015) Seismic fragility assessment of low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Int J Struct Anal Des 2:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  105. Yepes-Estrada C, Silva V, Valcárcel J, Acevedo AB, Tarque N, Hube MA, Coronel G, María HS (2017) Modeling the Residential building inventory in South America for seismic risk assessment. Earthq Spectra 33:299–322. https://doi.org/10.1193/101915EQS155DP

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Zuccaro G, Cacace F, Spence RJS, Baxter PJ (2008) Impact of explosive eruption scenarios at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178:416–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to several local experts including Dr. Hala Hasan, Dr. Jalal Dabbeek, Dr. Ammar Shakir Bek and Eng. Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh for their feedback. The flood hazard data were kindly provided by Dr. Andrew Smith from Fathom.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamal Dabbeek.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dabbeek, J., Silva, V. Modeling the residential building stock in the Middle East for multi-hazard risk assessment. Nat Hazards 100, 781–810 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03842-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Exposure
  • Residential buildings
  • Middle East
  • Multi-hazard
  • Flood
  • Earthquake