Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of dam disaster in India and equations for breach parameter

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been found that the less care is shown while constructing the water retention structures as compared to the amount of care shown in designing for it. This is more often in earthen embankments, where soil properties need to be controlled within the designed limits. The life and stability of embankments are entirely based on the extent to which the design assumptions are achieved in the field. History shows many failures were due to the lack of quality control during construction. In India every year many water storage structures fail, but very few were reported. Till date, only 37 dam failures in India are reported but not appropriately analyzed. This paper is focused on compiling the Indian dam failure list with relevant data which can be used for developing breach parameters equation. The data are collected from Government reports, articles news reports and magazines. This paper is also focused on developing new empirical equations for breach parameters and peak outflow from the dam failure which suits Indian condition. In developing the regression equation for breach depth, average breach width, peak discharge and failure time, different combinations of control variables is highlighted such as the dam height, reservoir capacity, average dam width, dam type, failure mode and dam erodibility. In this study, we incorporate the dam average thickness as another control variable for finding out the breach parameters and found suitable for breach depth calculation. New equations are proposed to compute the peak outflow rate. Further, these equations are compared with other developed regression equations for breach parameters and peak outflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bureau of Reclamation (1982) Guidelines for defining inundated areas downstream from Bureau of Reclamation dams. Reclamation Planning Instruction Rep. No. 82-11, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver

  • Bureau of Reclamation (1988) Downstream hazard classification guidelines. ACER Tech. Memorandum Rep. No. 11, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1987) Engineering guidelines for the evaluation of hydropower projects, FERC 0119-1, Office of Hydropower Licensing, July 1987, 9 p

  • Froehlich DC (1995a) Embankment dam breach parameters revisited. In: Proceedings of the water resources engineering, 1995 ASCE conference on water resources engineering. ASCE, NY, pp 887–891

  • Froehlich DC (1995b) Peak outflow from breached embankment dam. J Water Resour Plan Manage 121(1):90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich DC (1987) Embankment-dam breach parameters. In: Hydraulic Engineering, Proceedings of the 1987 ASCE National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, Williamsburg, Virginia, August 3–7, 1987, pp 570–575

  • Froehlich DC (2008) Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. J Hydraul Eng 134(12):1708–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FA, Illes P (1976) A classification of dam failures. In: International water power and dam construction, December 1976, pp 43–45

  • MacDonald TC, Langridge-Monopolis J (1984) Breaching characteristics of dam failures. J Hydraul Eng 110(5):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce MW, Thornton CI, Abt SR (2010) Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams. J Hydrol Eng 15(5):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Scarlatos CA (1985) Breach erosion of earthfill dams and flood routing: BEED model. Research Report. Battelle, Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C.

  • Singh VP, Scarlatos PD (1988) Analysis of gradual earth-dam failure. J Hydraul Eng 114(1):21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Snorrason A (1982) Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. SWS Contract Report 288, Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, University of Illinois

  • Singh KP, Snorrason A (1984) Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. J Hydrol 68:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Thun JL, Gillette DR (1990) Guidance on breach parameters. Internal Memorandum, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, 17

  • Wahl TL (1998) Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: a literature review and needs assessment. Dam Safety Rep. No. DSO-98-004, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver

  • Wahl TL (2004) Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters. J Hydraul Eng 130(5):389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl TL (2014) Evaluation of erodibility-based embankment dam breach equations. Hydraulic Laboratory Report HL-2014-02

  • Walder JS, O’Connor JE (1997) Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earth dams. Water Resour Res 33(10):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Zhang LM (2009) Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135:1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Dhiman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 Breach parameter equations by different authors

1.1 Variables

  • Bavg = Average breach width (m)

  • Bt = Breach top width (m)

  • g = Acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s2)

  • hb = Breach height (m)

  • hd = Dam height (m)

  • hr = Dam reference height = 15 m

  • hw = Height of water above breach bottom (m)

  • Qp = Peak outflow (m3/s)

  • tf = Failure time (h)

  • tr = Time reference = 1 h

  • Vw = Volume of water above breach bottom (m3)

  • Ver = Volume of embankment material eroded

  • Cb = Constant in Von Thun and Gillette breach width relation

  • V = Storage capacity of reservoir (m3)

  • W = A verage dam thickness

  • DC = Dam with core wall

  • FD = Concrete-faced dam

  • HD = Homogeneous dam

  • ZD = Zoned dam

  • O = Overtopping

  • S/P = Seepage erosion/piping

  • HE = High erodibility

  • ME = Medium erodibility

  • LE = Low erodibility

  • dovtop = Overtopping depth

\(V_{w}\) × 106

< 1.23

1.23–6.17

6.17–12.3

> 12.3

\(C_{b}\)

6.1

18.3

42.7

54.9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhiman, S., Patra, K.C. Studies of dam disaster in India and equations for breach parameter. Nat Hazards 98, 783–807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03731-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03731-z

Keywords

Navigation